Timestamps:
0:00 Disclaimer
1:00 What is Mastodon (And The Fediverse)
3:45 How to use it on Desktop
7:00 Instances/Hubs/Servers
8:35 Mastodon Features
13:13 Mastodon Drawbacks
21:46 Being an Artist on Mastodon
30:44 Etiquette
37:38 Outro

Fediverse-Info-Art Credit (It has also now been translated into French and Spanish):
vis.social/@janeadams/11055005…

Mastodon on Desktop Columns/Hashtags tutorial by Alfred R. Baudisch:
mastodon.gamedev.place/@alfred…

-- Pick an instance --
Fedigarden: fedi.garden/
Mastodon.Art recommended: mastodon.art/@Curator/10933093…

-- How to move instance --
federate.social/@profcarroll/1…

-- Finding your twitter followers over on Mastodon --
fedifinder.glitch.me/

-- Other interesting accounts to follow --
fedi.directory/

-- General Accounts to follow for tips and help --
Fedi Tips: mstdn.social/@feditips/1094791…
Fedi Follows: social.growyourown.services/@F…
Mastodon.Art Curator: mastodon.art/@Curator/11064020…

-- SO MANY ART HASHTAGS TO CHECK OUT --
mastodon.art/@Curator/11057043…
CuratorPrompts: mastodon.art/@Curator/10829375…

-- My post asking for help re DMs --
mastodon.art/@JenJen/110645889…

remember
join mastodon or the goose gets it

#Mastodon #Fediverse #Defederated #SocialMedia #TwitterDown #TwitterMigration

Welcome Fedi Friends to episode 48 of Fireside Fedi! I'm your host ozoned. Fireside Fedi is a show about folks within the Fediverse. If you're seeing this, you are a part of the Fediverse.

With me today is Jennie Gyllblad. Jennie is a full-time Comicatrix in the UK indie-comic scene.

mastodon.art/@JenJen
jenniegyllblad.co.uk/about.htm…
jennie_gyllblad@makertube.net
makertube.net/w/kKCqcy1LWUdfc1…

Caught in the clutches of a nefarious island, Edward Prendick crosses a terrifying Thing that soon wreaks upon him a flood of endless torment. With one treacherous turn after another, Prendick must make his way through this world or suffer the end of his own.

Chapter 9 was completely self-funded, with a wholly original score, and shot entirely on location at Northwest Florida state and local parks, all on an old Super 8 film camera.

Check us out on IMDb

~~CAST & CREW~~

Jake Brown - Director, Writer, Cinematographer, Editor
Blake Brannon - "Edward Prendick"
Jack Knapp - "The Thing in the Forest"
Joseph Davenport - Composer
Jessica Libby Knapp - Makeup & Title Card Artist
Maria Martinez - Costume Designer
Shea Edwards - Locations & Props Master

~~AWARDS~~

WINNER: Best U.S. Experimental Film, Best U.S. Composer - Joseph Davenport
-Venice Shorts

WINNER: Special Jury Mention - Best Thriller
-Mumbai International Cult Film Festival

WINNER: Florida Filmmaker Award
-Tallahassee Film Festival

WINNER: Best First-Time Director of a Short Film - Jake Brown
-Hollywood Florida Film Festival

WINNER: Best Cinematography in a Featurette - Jake Brown
-Southern States Indie Fan Film Fest

WINNER: Best Soundtrack in a Short Film - Joseph Davenport
-Fright Night International Horror Film Festival

WINNER: Best of Florida Lo/No Budget Short
-FLOW Festival and Film Market

FINALIST
-Central Florida CineFest

SEMI-FINALIST
-Seattle Film Festival

SEMI-FINALIST
-Montreal Independent Film Festival

OFFICIAL SELECTION
-Central Florida Film Festival

OFFICIAL SELECTION
-Prince of Prestige Academy Awards

OFFICIAL SELECTION
-Sands Film Festival

On Monday, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, announced a new content policy for Meta on Threads. We are disappointed in these changes, which put vulnerable people on and off Meta platforms in harm’s way for harassment. Ideas matter, and history shows that online misinformation and harassment can lead to violence in the real world. There are good analyses of the details of the policy changes at EFF, The Verge, and Platformer.

Meta is one of many ActivityPub implementers and a supporter of the Social Web Foundation. We strongly encourage Meta’s executive and content teams to come back in line with best practices of a zero harm social media ecosystem. Reconsidering this policy change would preserve the crucial distinction between political differences of opinion and dehumanizing harassment. The SWF is available to discuss Meta’s content moderation policies and processes to make them more humane and responsible.

Distributed Moderation

What do these changes mean for the Fediverse? Through ActivityPub, Meta’s Threads network is connected to the social web, also called the Fediverse. This is a diverse network of independent social services using different codebases and different kinds of content. The network of 300M users of Threads can follow and be followed by people in tens of thousands of other communities. These services are operated by a variety of entities: corporations, universities, enterprise IT, cooperatives, non-profit organizations, and self-organized volunteers.

Theoretically, this distributed structure allows people to make choices about which platforms they want to use – based not only on technical features, but also on community composition and moderation policies. Users don’t need to give up on social connections they already have with friends and family; they can stay connected across services using ActivityPub. Different communities and services can have different content policies, but people in different communities can still stay connected.

Ideally, having an account on a Fediverse service gives people the best of both worlds: they can stay connected to users and content they like, and filter out content and users that they don’t. When unwanted content from one community lands in the feeds of people in other communities, the receiving users or their moderators can react under their own local policy: removing individual text or image posts; blocking individual users; or blocking the entire sending community.

Practically, though, there are limitations to this flexibility. Filtering on the receiving side requires orders of magnitude more effort. If a single sending service delivers bad content to users on one hundred or one thousand receiving services, each moderator on the receiving end has to clean up the mess locally. Moderators get understandably frustrated with this kind of displacement of responsibility. A common response is to block servers that send bad content entirely.

In the case of Threads, though, there are complicating factors. Threads is much, much bigger than the typical Fediverse community, and it has many high-profile users in politics, media and technology. It’s also an easy onboarding service to the Fediverse for people who are used to Facebook or Instagram, meaning many of our friends, colleagues and family use it. Blocking the Threads service means blocking access for all users on the receiving service from all these important accounts.

Unfortunately, there’s not an easy answer for Fediverse moderators. We encourage trust and safety teams across the social web to use their best judgement and the tools available to keep users safe, connected, and informed, and also to minimize moderators’ stress and burnout. IFTAS Connect is a great community resource for connecting with other moderators to discuss these tradeoffs.

Improving Social Web Resilience

We see the challenge of a large service that has poor local content policy as a chance to strengthen the social and technical infrastructure of the Fediverse. None of these options will resolve current problems immediately, but we hope starting the research now will make the Fediverse more resilient in the future.

• Finer-grained filtering tools. As mentioned above, moderators on the Fediverse can automatically filter content by author or by originating service. Some platforms also let moderators filter by keywords – for example, blocking out racist or homophobic slurs. More difficult forms of filtering, such as detecting unacceptable images, or the subtle meaning of text, requires more sophisticated algorithmic filtering not supported by many Fediverse platforms. Balancing the ease of use of this kind of filter with the desire from many communities to have final control by human moderators is a good area for future research.
• Collaborative moderation tools. Email filtering systems re-use signals received from other users, so that if a message is marked as spam by one user, or a few users, other users will never see the message. This can balance the desire for human moderation with a significantly lowered total effort for moderators. Shared server blocklists are somewhat common on the Fediverse, but deeper per-user and per-post collaborative filtering is not. Balancing, once again, the specific priorities of a given community with the advantage of collaborative filtering would also require further research.
• Fact-checking and community notes. One major part of the Meta announcement was a cancellation of the fact-checking program for posts on Meta, and its replacement with a community notes feature, which defers fact-checking to volunteers. Neither of these features (professional and volunteer fact-checking) are supported directly in ActivityPub. We think there’s a place for a variety of fact-checking services on the Fediverse, providing annotations on Fediverse content without requiring permissions from the author, the sending service, or even the receiving service. Building the protocol features and reference implementations, as well as encouraging the participation of fact-checking services, is a good next step in this area.
• Jurisdictional boundaries. Zuckerberg mentions in his update that Meta will be collaborating with the US government to resist demands for content policy changes by other governments. Regardless of the valence of these content policy demands, this question highlights an important feature of the Fediverse, namely, that federated services can operate within specific jurisdictions and conform with their regulations. Content that is conveyed across legal boundaries between services can be more clearly filtered or blocked to comply with local rules. We encourage national and regional governments to further investigate this structure for social networking and global connectivity.
• Data portability. Choosing a social media platform to use is an important freedom in the social web. The Fediverse supports limited data portability, such that users can move their followers and followed accounts to a new server almost seamlessly. However, this move leaves all posted content, like text and images, on the old server, as well as metadata such as likes and shares. The new LOLA protocol would allow a full move between servers. We want to see more work on implementing LOLA in Fediverse platforms.

Ultimately, the safety and well-being of people around the world should not be in the hands of any single company. Moderation policies are a competitive advantage in an open social network. We continue to encourage the use of ActivityPub, and the distributed control that it brings.

MY WORD IS LAW is a dark country blues track about being used, controlled, and taken for granted - until the balance breaks.

I carried the weight. I stayed quiet. I helped without limits.
As long as I was useful, I was needed.
When I fell, everything ended.

This song is not about anger or revenge.
It’s about the moment when darkness inside becomes strength and the rules change.

Slow-burning guitars, gritty blues tension, and a low, controlled vocal create an outlaw atmosphere where silence feels more dangerous than rage.

This is a song about boundaries, authority, and the shift from obedience to control.

If you’ve ever given everything and been left behind - this song speaks your language.

Lyrics & music: Denys L. VoxFidelis
Genre: Dark Country / Blues
Mood: Cold • Gritty • Dominant

#OfficialLyricVideo

Plastic pyrolysis has been positioned as a technological bridge between linear plastic consumption and circular material recovery. By thermochemically converting polymer waste into hydrocarbon fractions, proponents argue it enables chemical recycling where mechanical routes fail. Critics, however, challenge both its environmental legitimacy and its systemic role in waste management. The debate is no longer theoretical. It is technical, economic, and regulatory.

The Technical Premise of Plastic Pyrolysis

Plastic pyrolysis machine operates by heating polymeric waste in an oxygen-deprived environment, typically between 400 °C and 600 °C. Long-chain macromolecules undergo random scission, yielding a mixture of pyrolysis oil, non-condensable gas, waxes, and solid residues.

In principle, these outputs can be reintroduced into petrochemical value chains. Pyrolysis oil may be upgraded into naphtha-like feedstock, while off-gas supplies process energy. The core claim is molecular recycling: carbon atoms are preserved, not downcycled.

The technical validity of this claim depends heavily on feedstock purity, reactor design, and downstream upgrading capability. These dependencies form the foundation of the controversy.

Chemical Recycling Versus Energy Recovery

A central dispute concerns classification. Is plastic pyrolysis genuinely chemical recycling, or is it a variant of energy recovery with improved optics?

Chemical recycling implies that output hydrocarbons displace virgin fossil feedstock in polymer production. In practice, many pyrolysis oils require extensive hydrotreatment and fractionation before they meet cracker specifications. This upgrading consumes hydrogen, energy, and catalysts, eroding carbon efficiency.

When pyrolysis outputs are instead combusted as fuel, the process functionally resembles waste-to-energy. Critics argue that labeling such systems as recycling distorts policy incentives and undermines recycling hierarchies.

Feedstock Complexity and Process Limitations

Mixed plastic waste streams present significant chemical heterogeneity. Polyolefins dominate pyrolysis feedstock, but even small fractions of PVC, PET, or multilayer composites introduce chlorine, oxygen, and nitrogen into the product slate.

These heteroatoms generate corrosive compounds and catalyst poisons. They also increase char formation and reduce oil quality. As a result, many facilities impose strict feedstock specifications, excluding precisely the plastics that are hardest to recycle mechanically.

This paradox weakens the claim that pyrolysis addresses the most problematic waste fractions at scale.

Environmental Performance Under Scrutiny

Lifecycle assessments of plastic pyrolysis yield divergent results. Under optimized conditions, greenhouse gas emissions may be lower than incineration and marginally competitive with virgin plastic production. Under less controlled scenarios, emissions approach or exceed those of fossil pathways.

A plastic pyrolysis plant often relies on external energy inputs during startup and off-spec operation. Fugitive emissions, incomplete combustion of off-gases, and residue handling further complicate emissions accounting.

Additionally, the generation of pyrolysis char and contaminated waxes raises disposal questions. These streams are not inherently benign and may require regulated treatment.

Regulatory and Policy Tensions

Policy frameworks struggle to categorize pyrolysis consistently. Some jurisdictions recognize it as recycling if outputs re-enter polymer production. Others classify it as recovery or disposal based on energy yield and emission profiles.

This ambiguity creates investment uncertainty. Subsidies, recycled content credits, and extended producer responsibility schemes may or may not apply depending on regulatory interpretation. Environmental organizations argue that premature policy support risks locking in suboptimal infrastructure.

Regulators, meanwhile, face pressure from industry to enable scale-up as a complement to mechanical recycling capacity constraints.

Economic Viability and Market Dependence

Plastic pyrolysis is capital-intensive. Reactor systems, gas cleaning units, condensation trains, and upgrading facilities impose high fixed costs. Profitability depends on stable feedstock supply and sustained demand for pyrolysis-derived hydrocarbons.

Market acceptance remains conditional. Petrochemical buyers require consistent composition and traceability to claim recycled content. Variability in pyrolysis oil quality increases transaction friction and limits offtake agreements.

In periods of low fossil feedstock prices, pyrolysis economics deteriorate rapidly. This cyclic vulnerability contrasts with the narrative of structural sustainability.

Systemic Role in a Circular Economy

Supporters argue that pyrolysis addresses material streams beyond the reach of mechanical recycling. They emphasize its compatibility with existing refinery and cracker infrastructure. From this perspective, pyrolysis is an enabling technology, not a replacement.

Opponents counter that expanding pyrolysis capacity risks legitimizing continued plastic overproduction. If waste is perceived as chemically recyclable, pressure to reduce polymer complexity and consumption diminishes.

This systemic concern transcends reactor performance. It questions whether pyrolysis aligns with waste prevention priorities or merely manages downstream consequences.

Transparency and Data Gaps

Much of the controversy persists due to limited public data. Commercial operators often treat yield, emissions, and upgrading efficiency as proprietary. Independent verification is scarce.

Without transparent mass balance and carbon accounting, claims of circularity remain contested. Stakeholders increasingly call for standardized reporting frameworks to distinguish demonstrable recycling from nominal conversion.

An Unsettled Technological Position

Plastic pyrolysis occupies an ambiguous space between innovation and contention. Its chemistry is sound. Its implementation is conditional. Whether it functions as a legitimate chemical recycling pathway or an energy-intensive detour depends on governance, system boundaries, and material discipline.

The debate is unlikely to resolve through technology alone. It will be shaped by policy definitions, market behavior, and the willingness to align process design with circular intent rather than rhetorical convenience.

Bogus crane parts move through supply chains undetected. They arrive without fanfare, packaged to deceive, ready to infiltrate your maintenance operations. These impostors don't carry neon signs announcing their fraudulence. To the distracted eye or the crew working against a deadline, they look close enough to genuine.

If you've spent years around Terex cranes, you've heard the war stories. The cylinder that blew out months too early. The gear that never meshed quite right. The catastrophic failure that only made sense once someone traced the part back to its source.

This piece lays out five unmistakable clues that a Terex component might be counterfeit. These aren't theoretical concerns from a brochure—they're hard-won lessons from the field. They're what mechanics and buyers realize after the damage is done, wishing they'd caught the warning signs in time.

1. The numbers don't add up on price

Everyone wants to stretch their maintenance budget. But there's a gap between a sharp quote and one that stops you cold.

Real Terex parts cost real money to produce. The metallurgy, the tolerances, the testing protocols, the quality systems—all of it carries a price tag. When you see a figure that makes you do a double-take, there's almost always a story behind it. And it's not a story with a happy ending.

Knock-off manufacturers cut corners on steel grades, rubber compounds, and heat treatment cycles. Those shortcuts hide at first. They emerge later, when the boom is extended and the load is swinging.

If the price makes your gut tighten, listen to that feeling. In this business, "unbelievable deal" usually means "unbelievable risk."

2. The box and the paperwork tell a different story

Packaging gets overlooked because it seems like window dressing. After all, cardboard doesn't hold tons in the air—steel does. But legitimate Terex packaging follows strict patterns. Labels are crisp and accurate. Part numbers sync with the manuals. Logos, fonts, and barcodes all look like they came from the same professional source.

Fake packaging tries hard but misses the mark. You might spot spelling slips, printing that's slightly off, part numbers that don't match what you ordered, or paperwork that's simply missing. Sometimes the container looks like it came from anywhere, with a label slapped on as an afterthought. Any one of these might be a fluke. Together, they sketch a portrait of sloppiness. And sloppy packaging usually means sloppy manufacturing.

3. Your mechanic has to fight to make it fit

This red flag waves most often, and usually too late. A genuine Terex part drops into place the way the drawing shows. Bolt patterns line up. Clearances are right. The install follows the book without improvisation.

Counterfeit parts break that rhythm. Maybe the mounting face is slightly warped. Maybe the bore is a hair oversized. Maybe your technician has to get creative with shims or torque specs to make it work.

Any part that needs persuasion to install is asking for trouble. Cranes live or die on precision. Even tiny misalignments set up vibration, stress concentrations, and cascading wear through the rest of the machine.

4. It dies young, and keeps dying young

Some counterfeit parts fail with drama. Most just fade away too fast. O-rings go hard and leak. Pins and bushings wear lopsided. Sensors start giving ghost readings. Hoses check-crack before their time.

At first, you write it off as bad luck or tough duty. But when the same item keeps failing ahead of curve, luck leaves the equation. Genuine Terex parts are built to last a predictable span. When that span keeps shortening without explanation, the material itself is usually the culprit.

Here's where fakes really cost you. That money you "saved" at purchase evaporates once you add up downtime, labor hours, and whatever else got damaged when the part let go.

5. The seller goes vague when you press for details

A solid crane parts supplier welcomes your questions. They can walk you through where their Terex parts come from, how they verify authenticity, and what happens if something goes wrong.

Watch out for the supplier who gets slippery about origin, warranty, or traceability. Watch out for the "special today only" pressure with thin paperwork. Genuine parts travel with documentation—serial numbers, certificates, clear custody chains.

A trustworthy crane parts supplier builds trust through openness, not mystery and urgency. Counterfeit sellers often can't give you details because they don't have them. Or because those details wouldn't survive five minutes of scrutiny.

Why this matters beyond the parts bin

A fake part doesn't just hurt itself. It hurts everything around it. When a substandard component fails, it often takes out its neighbors. A bad bearing eats a shaft. A cheap hose sends contamination through a hydraulic system. A sketchy sensor feeds garbage data to the load moment limiter.

And past the iron, there's the human equation. Cranes work where failure can kill people. Using the wrong part isn't a purchasing error—it's a safety call. That's why old hands in this business buy slow and skeptical. They've seen what happens when quality takes a back seat.

Keeping clean without making it complicated

You don't need to be a detective to stay clear of counterfeits. You need to be consistent. Run with suppliers you know. Ask direct questions. Keep your paperwork straight. Cross-check those part numbers like they matter—because they do. Notice the box and the fit, not just the invoice total.

Most of all, listen to the people turning the wrenches. They know when something feels wrong long before the computer does.

Buying Terex parts isn't just another line item. It's a link in the safety chain. Every choice shapes what happens later, under load, when there's no margin for error.

Last word: let experience be your filter

Nobody thinks they'll get burned by a counterfeit. They're careful. They've been around. They know the ropes. But that's exactly who these fakes are built to fool. That's why staying alert matters.

When the price feels wrong, the box looks fishy, the install fights back, the wear comes too fast, or the seller dodges questions—hit pause. Those signs are there for a reason. In crane work, reliability gets built one decision at a time. Choosing genuine parts from a reputable crane parts supplier is one quiet choice that keeps everything else standing tall.

As Singapore continues to solidify its reputation as a global hub of architectural innovation, the application of traditional metaphysics has undergone a significant transformation. Modern homeowners are no longer satisfied with superficial or superstitious adjustments; they seek a sophisticated, data-driven approach to environmental harmony. However, this demand has led to a surge in DIY attempts as residents try to decode ancient principles using simplified digital tools and social media trends. The results are often underwhelming. In a landscape defined by high-density living and complex structural layouts, the one-size-fits-all DIY method is increasingly obsolete. This report examines why professional feng shui services in Singapore are essential for navigating the contemporary urban environment and how the integration of bazi analysis Singapore has become the gold standard for residential success.

The Pitfalls of Modern Fast Feng Shui

In the digital age, fast feng shui refers to the instant, generic advice found on social media platforms and home decor blogs. While these tips are easily accessible, they lack the structural depth required for a high-rise city like Singapore. A DIY enthusiast might follow a trend suggesting that open-plan kitchens are universally beneficial for qi flow. However, a professional house feng shui consultation might reveal that for your specific unit, an open kitchen aligns with a leakage star, leading to unexpected financial instability or a drain on household resources.

The technical reality is that feng shui Singapore must account for both macro and micro environmental factors. This includes the building's relationship to surrounding water bodies, the elevation of the specific floor, and even the orientation of nearby transit infrastructure. DIY methods simply cannot calculate these complex environmental variables, making professional feng shui services in Singapore a strategic necessity rather than an optional luxury for the serious homeowner. Certified feng shui services in Singapore for new homeowners provides the level of detail needed to turn a standard apartment into a high-functioning, energetic space.

The Strategic Integration of Bazi Geomancy

A significant trend in modern geomancy is the move toward human-centric design. This is achieved through bazi geomancy, the practice of synchronising the home's energy sectors with the occupant's personal destiny charts. Many homeowners attempt a DIY approach to their bazi, using automated apps to generate basic reports. Unfortunately, without professional bazi chart interpretation, these reports often lead to confusion or the misapplication of elemental cures.

A professional bazi chart reading by an expert at Siiri Geomancy goes far beyond identifying your zodiac animal. It evaluates the strength of the day master and identifies the useful god, or the specific element required to bring your life into balance. When this is applied to a house feng shui consultation, it allows for a degree of hyper-personalisation. For example, a home study can be specifically tuned to support the elemental needs of a student, while the master bedroom is aligned to support the breadwinner's current luck pillars. This synergy is only possible through an expert-led bazi reading Singapore, ensuring that the property serves as a bespoke support system for the specific people living within it.

Navigating the Corporate-Residential Hybrid

The traditional boundary between the home and the workplace has collapsed, creating a new set of challenges for residential geomancy. Homeowners are now looking to professional office feng shui Singapore experts to audit their home-office setups. A DIY approach often overlooks the power sectors of the home, leading to professionals working in areas that promote stagnation rather than professional growth.

By using geomancy bazi principles, consultants can identify the wealth stars or intelligence stars within a residential floor plan. Positioning your workspace in these specific areas ensures that your home office supports your career trajectory and mental focus. Without a professional office feng shui Singapore audit, you may be unknowingly sitting in an argumentative star sector, which can lead to increased friction with clients or colleagues during remote communications. Personalised feng shui services for first-time buyer prosperity and wellness now almost always include this professional workspace component as a standard requirement.

Decoding the Technical Aspects of Bazi Analysis

The core of any successful geomancy project in the twenty-first century is bazi analysis Singapore. While DIYers often struggle to figure out how to read bazi chart symbols, professional practitioners look at the deeper interactions of the stems and branches. This is particularly vital for timing major life events such as moving house or beginning significant renovations.

For instance, moving into a new property during a year that clashes with your personal bazi reading Singapore can lead to a turbulent first twelve months in the home. A professional bazi chart reading provides a timing audit, suggesting the most auspicious dates for moving to mitigate personal natal clashes and capitalise on positive energy windows. This level of bazi chart interpretation ensures that the homeowner is moving with the natural current of time. By understanding how to read bazi chart nuances, a consultant from Siiri Geomancy can provide a roadmap that covers not just the space, but the timing of the residents' lives.

The Role of Professional Expertise in Modern Singapore

In a market crowded with conflicting information, the role of a trusted authority like Siiri Geomancy is to provide clarity through technical precision. Their approach to geomancy Singapore is rooted in classical principles but specifically adapted for the modern, high-rise lifestyle. They move away from the fear-based superstitions of the past and toward a methodology based on environmental empowerment.

By providing bazi analysis Singapore alongside comprehensive property audits, experts help homeowners turn their property into a functional asset that actively supports their health and prosperity. Whether it is a luxury condominium or a modest HDB flat, the technical application of geomancy bazi ensures that no energy is wasted. For the new homeowner, a pre-move house feng shui consultation for Singapore home buyers is the ultimate tool for ensuring that their largest life investment is also their greatest source of support.

Conclusion: The Future of Urban Harmony

The failure of DIY feng shui is a natural consequence of the increasing complexity of our modern living environments. As we move forward, the need for professional, personalised feng shui services for first-time buyer prosperity and wellness will only continue to grow. By rejecting the shortcuts of fast feng shui and investing in a professional house feng shui consultation, Singaporeans can ensure their homes are resilient, prosperous, and truly harmonious. In the intersection of ancient wisdom and modern spatial data, professional feng shui services in Singapore provide the only reliable roadmap for a balanced and successful life.

Read another Article: From House to Sanctuary: The Journey of a New Homeowner with Feng Shui

I distro hopped for a bit before finally settling in Debian (because Debian was always mentioned as a distro good for servers, or stable machines that are ok with outdated software)

And while I get that Debian does have software that isn't as up to date, I've never felt that the software was that outdated. Before landing on Debian, I always ran into small hiccups that caused me issues as a new Linux user - but when I finally switched over to Debian, everything just worked! Especially now with Debian 13.

So my question is: why does Debian always get dismissed as inferior for everyday drivers, and instead mint, Ubuntu, or even Zorin get recommended? Is there something I am missing, or does it really just come down to people not wanting software that isn't "cutting edge" release?