ENCORE UNE LOI DE MERDE - Vérification d'âge
Pour en savoir plus :
Sur la vérification d'âge en général et la proposition de loi en cours de discussion : laquadrature.net/2026/05/21/de…
L'analyse de La Quadrature et Act Up-Paris de 2023 sur la vérification d'âge pour les sites pornographiques : laquadrature.net/2023/09/19/pr…
Le rapport d'AI Forensics sur AgeGo : aiforensics.org/work/agego-por…
Le rapport du Défenseur des droits de 2021 sur la santé mentale des plus jeunes : defenseurdesdroits.fr/rapport-…
Dossier législatif de la proposition de loi « visant à protéger les mineurs des risques auxquels les expose l'utilisation des réseaux sociaux » : senat.fr/dossier-legislatif/pp…
La Commission européenne étrille la proposition de loi française d'interdiction des réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans : lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2026…
Et pour nous faire un don : laquadrature.net/donner



viertesauge
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •2 times:
Recently an update broke something in flatpak and in consequence freecad would refuse to load completly. There was no way for me to know what actually happened and all the time i thought freecad was at fault.
The infamous gma500 driversupport condeming so many netbooks to become ewaste instead of having a second life with linux.
infinitevalence
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •I am disappointed at professional application support, but not with Linux specifically. In my professional life I have needed to use products like Visio, Adobe Suite, Autodesk software, and others.
I am often forced to use Windows for my work computer because of these limitations, and while I realize its not the fault of Linux, the lack of install base demanding professional applications run on Linux is a community issue. While I always prefer FOSS over PROP software, sometimes I really do need to run PROP software on linux, and that means convincing enough people to demand that support from the developer.
baronvonj
in reply to infinitevalence • • •I think it means convincing people to drop the proprietary platform and telling the sales rep that both lack of Linux support is why you're dropping them and what application you're switching to. As long as you're still a revenue stream for them they're not incentivized to change. I do recognize, though, that this isn't always professionally possible as the end user.
comrade_twisty
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •I am disappointed we still don't have a solid FOSS smartphone OS that can compete with the 2 monopolies who have cornered the market.
I don"t want ro sell my soul to Google or Apple just to use my bank (even on my computer thanks to mandatory 2fa apps) or to renew my government issued ID or to buy a train ticket on European public transport.
pixeldaemon
in reply to comrade_twisty • • •postmarketOS, LineageOS, GrapheneOS?
I know they have limited hardware support but that's only a matter of involvement at the end of the day
gnunikky
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •Throbbing_banjo
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •Before Proton, I wasn't able to consider Linux as a viable solution for home computing at all. I could set up and manage a pihole, and salvage an old laptop to use for word processing and email, but couldn't run anything my family or non-techie friends were familiar with.
Sure Wine was a thing, but I think for most casual users it wasn't worth the hassle.
My first attempt with Ubuntu 15ish years ago was horrible; almost nothing worked, GPU support was trash, it was just an all around miserable experience.
With proton, stuff just works. It's like a whole new ecosystem now.
printf("%s", name);
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •1. RTFM
2. Reading logs
3. Keeping/reusing old hardware
Samsy
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •novafunc
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •Yes, the packaging mess that Atomic distros cause.
I want a couple of functional things:
- To be able to safely upgrade my system silently, without interruptions, and rollback of necessary
- To know my system is not drifting away from upstream defaults and to restore it to a “factory” state
- To sandbox applications
I’d like to be able to do all that efficiently and cleanly too. Atomic systems generally fulfill those first two while traditional distros struggle, which is why I stick to Atomic distros.
But whereas you can use a single package manager on Arch and get everything (albeit without easy sandboxing), Atomics keep adding more and more. Here’s your rpm-ostree, flatpak, toolbox, homebrew, sysexts, etc.
I find sysexts particularly insulting because they regress so much on traditional packages for so little upside. Doesn’t even have dependency management.
I would wish we would stop creating so many package managers and just focus on improving existing ones.
In a more ideal world we would have something like
- Distro based on Freedesktop runtimes
- Flatpak that officially supports both GUI applications, CLI applications, and even daemons/services
- Flatpak would also be able to reuse the Freedesktop runtimes of the host system
pinball_wizard
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •Oh sure, all the time.
A computer running public auditable software refined by some of history's top computer scientists...is still just a computer.
We taught spicy electrified rocks how to help us fill out tax forms.
It's going to fall short every so often.
SocialistVibes01
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •pixeldaemon
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •SocialistVibes01
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •It's more what he's not doing: blocking MIT licensed drivers in the kernel.
Also there was that thing with banning Russia from the LKML. He stressed over he was a Finn at that opportunity. Don't ask what the Finns were doing at the WWII. And he's a pro status quo kind of guy.
mnemonicmonkeys
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •712
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •The moments I have been disappointed by Linux were the moments I learned most about hardware and software.
Linux made me switch the WiFi card of my computer, which is something I’ve never done before and would have deemed “impossible”.
Linux is like a teacher that sometimes slaps you on the hands, but who is always helping you to expand your knowledge.
Dariusmiles2123
in reply to pixeldaemon • • •Yes because Linux encourages you to make it your OS by customizing it, but it’s not easy as it should to create a backup of all that work so that you can easily deploy it on another computer.
I know that Clonezilla works in some situations or that NixOS coulb be a solution, but it’s not should be easier.