Hairspray Effects With Geometry Nodes in Blender
Read the article at cloud.blender.org/blog/new-pro… and join Blender Cloud to get access to the full production lesson.
Sprite Fright is the new Blender Open Movie, now in production.
As Sprite Fright reaches its final stages, Shader Artist Simon Thommes provides a new production lesson focused on a unique effect: creating cartoony hairspray.


DefinitelyNotBirds
in reply to pineapple • • •thingsiplay
in reply to DefinitelyNotBirds • • •I sometimes prefer Flatpak over AUR, because I do not trust everyone on the AUR to run scripts with root rights on my system. At least Flatpaks are a bit sandboxed (even if the sandbox is an illusion) and the programs don't install and run with root rights. Sometimes the Flatpak is from the original developer and the script in AUR is not. Or the AUR script is not updated well and often enough, unlike day one Flatpak updates. But Flatpaks do not integrate well in your system and applications can look out of place too. There is a lot to consider, besides what you already mentioned.
I use both, prefer the AUR in optimal cases.
Maiq
in reply to pineapple • • •Look into the Chaotic AUR. It offers pre compiled AUR programs. Almost every app I really need has been there. If it's not in there and I really need it and will get used often I'll get it from the AUR.
I dont really like flatpaks much. I'll use it if it's easy and I dont plan on using the app much. Apps like Bottles. They are nice to have but rarely do I use it.
like this
potatoguy likes this.
Ada
in reply to pineapple • • •I don't like Flatpak, so that makes it an easy choice for me. Flatpak apps never quite integrate properly
I like having Flatpaks as a fallback option, but if something is available in the arch repos, aur or chaotic-aur, I'll always go there first
SolarPunker
in reply to pineapple • • •Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ
in reply to pineapple • • •If you install yay, it gives you pacman + AUR wiþout sudo. To be pedantic, þere is a sudo happening, but it's hidden. In any case, you don't ever type "sudo" and it is one command. I expect oþer yay-like tools are similar.
Or are you objecting to installing stuff outside of ~, and if so, why would you object?
Kangy
in reply to Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ • • •nothx [he/him]
in reply to pineapple • • •I just reinstalled arch last weekend and have both paru and yay installed. Only real difference between them is yay is Go and paru is Rust. Both work great and very similarly. I think the paru dev originally worked on yay.
I tend to choose the pacman and aur over flatpaks or snaps, something about the isolation layer never sat right with me.
thingsiplay
in reply to nothx [he/him] • • •paruANDyayinstalled at the same time? As someone who likes Rust, I maybe should have switched to paru too. But I just can't justify the change, because yay comes preinstalled and works just fine, and paru seems to not offer anything worthwhile the change.thingsiplay
in reply to pineapple • • •I use
yay, as it comes by default with EndeavourOS. It's basically an AUR helper that usespacmanand works quite the same.Flatpak is a different package manager and has nothing to do with your system packages. They are not exclusive, I use both. So what you basically asking isn't which package manager people use, but rather which package format.
v_krishna
in reply to thingsiplay • • •bad1080
in reply to pineapple • • •Ooops
in reply to pineapple • • •Paru, so Pacman & AUR...
With exactly one exception: Steam via flatpak because that's the single package left that would need 32bit libraries from multilib-repo since Wine finally left those dependencies behind.
nothx [he/him]
in reply to pineapple • • •Im running arch proper, nothing come pre-installed. But I originally used paru and then installed yay cuz I was troubleshooting something. Never removed it.
Fo what it’s worth, it doesn’t hurt anything to have multiple installed so you can see which you like. They shouldn’t interfere with eachother.
Kangy
in reply to pineapple • • •Shelly is another option, comes pre installed on CachyOS. It's aiming to modernise pacman. It's been pretty good for my usage.
It has a GUI that can handle native repos, the AUR, flatpaks and app images. It can also be used in your CLI as well
MonkderVierte
in reply to pineapple • • •Yay.
And btw, that question is covered already.
AUR helpers - ArchWiki
wiki.archlinux.orgthingsiplay
in reply to MonkderVierte • • •MonkderVierte
in reply to thingsiplay • • •Convenience. It asks the kernel if you're logged in and if you're allowed to escalate. So, secure enough for a single-user system.
github.com/illiliti/ssu
GitHub - illiliti/ssu: Extremely simple su utility
GitHubthingsiplay
in reply to MonkderVierte • • •I don't feel safe doing so. Would a script be able to run escalated rights without asking me a password? Is it somewhere displayed that such a process is started (notification in example or at least in the terminal a message?). And even for applications I am directly starting, I want it be explicit to require a password, that I am always aware its escalated root rights the app has now.
I can understand your view of convenience and I am "guilty" of some convenience stuff too. But this goes a bit too far for my taste.
MonkderVierte
in reply to thingsiplay • • •thingsiplay
in reply to MonkderVierte • • •