The more fraud that gets covered in MN, the more the Melissa Hortman murder looks like a hit, ordered by Tim Walz. The murderer was a Walz appointee, and Hortman had just voted to kill free healthcare for illegals.

The left tried associating Vance Boelter with being a Trump supporter, but after seeing how all this ICE stuff is playing out, he is the perfect guy for Walz to hire to bump her off.

#JustAskingQuestions

NEWS! Company insisting you can't 'work from home' also expects you to respond to work emails after you've 'gone home' newsthump.com/2026/01/26/compa…

ROJAVA. La Turquie creuse des tranchées le long de la frontière !
kurdistan-au-feminin.fr/2026/0…

"SYRIE / ROJAVA – Alors que les attaques des gangs djihadistes de HTS/SNA/ISIS contre le Rojava se poursuivent, l’État turc a commencé à creuser des tranchées entre les villes kurdes de Qamishlo et de Nusaybin séparant le Kurdistan « syrien » du Kurdistan « turc ». La semaine dernière, des dizaines de jeunes Kurdes de […]

As the coordination of the Environmental Social Association Initiative of Eressos with the collective Movement for Free Mountains in Lesvos, we call for a campaign of financial support for the legal expenses of our struggle against capital and the plundering of our lands. The new Hybrid Photovoltaic Park designed for "Profitis Elias" in Eressos and for "Skales" in Mandamado threatens our areas with environmental disasters, while the intentions of the investors and the state planning predetermine our island as an energy exporter. This project is currently under consultation and we are called to take a stand against it.

We call upon all Eressians, friends and lovers of Lesvos, as well as the people who have been watching, following, and supporting us all these years, to contribute to our collective effort to oppose the industrial model they want to impose on our island.

Embrace the financial support campaign!

Share - inform - spread!

Our crowdfunding link: whydonate.com/fundraising/lesv…

Initiative of Eressos - Environmental Social Association

Movement for Free Mountains in Lesvos

Fascist US ICE Agents Publicly Execute Man in Minneapolis for Filming Them
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/275…

"A man has been summarily executred by US federal immigration officers in Minneapolis during ongoing enforcement operations sparking protests and renewed calls from local leaders to end the federal deployment.…"


Fascist US ICE Agents Publicly Execute Man in Minneapolis for Filming Them


A man has been summarily executred by US federal immigration officers in Minneapolis during ongoing enforcement operations sparking protests and renewed calls from local leaders to end the federal deployment.

The incident occurred around 26th Street and Nicollet Avenue Saturday morning as federal agents, part of a broader immigration crackdown known as Operation Metro Surge, confronted a man on a snow-covered street. Video circulating on social media shows people wearing masks and tactical gear wrestling with the man before multiple gunshots are heard, and he falls to the ground.

The Minnesota Governor Tim Walz said the man was shot by a federal agent and later died at a hospital.

Nothing illegal, suspicious


Other videos showing the beginning of the confrontation demonstrate that the man was standing by, recording the ICE agents in the middle of what is presumed to be an arrest, and he did not appear to be doing anything unusual.

An ICE agent came up to the man and started shoving him before the remaining agents joined in and started brutally assaulting the man, kicking him as he fell on the ground, before at least two agents pulled out their handguns and fired over six shots at the victim.

Armed victim?


There were claims that the victim was armed, though there is no evidence that he pulled out his gun or pointed it toward any of the officers. There was a brawl in which the man was repeatedly pepper-sprayed, and even then, the squad, upwards of six agents, did not successfully subdue him, pointing to inefficient training.

The footage shared widely online and aired on cable TV shows agents grappling with the man in the snow before gunfire begins. Shortly after shots are heard, the individual falls to the ground. Another angle in a video obtained by Drop Site News shows that the man was instigated and illegally approached by the ICE agents before he was shot and killed.

In the videos, one agent says, “he’s got a gun,” but the footage shows that the gun was on the victim’s waistband and was not drawn. Only one agent saw the gun as the man was being assaulted, then the man was shot several times by several agents, even after he died.
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=…#execution #fascism #ICE #northAmerica #repression #us


Guter Artikel von Imre Stock darüber, wer die #ICE-Mascine antreibt. Sie erwähnt es nicht im Detail, aber ein Teil der Data Broker, die missionskritisch für ICE sind, stammen ursprünglich aus dem Wissenschaftsbereich wie #LexisNexis oder #ThomsonReuters. Wichtig ist die Rolle der erwähnten Scorings, aus denen die Listen der Zielgruppen abgeleitet werden. Solche Scoring kennen wir in der Wissenschaft auch, sie lassen sich aber auch ganz anders einsetzen wie gewohnt (1/2).

heise.de/hintergrund/USA-Die-A…

in reply to RenkeSiems

Aus der Masse an Daten, die fortlaufend über Forschende getrackt, gehandelt und z.B. von #LexisNexis weiterverbreitet werden, lässt sich eine Menge ableiten: Bewegungsmuster, Netzwerke, Informationsverhalten, behandelte Themen, Kooperationspartner und vieles mehr. Und letztlich könnte durch entsprechendes Scoring auch das Interesse autoritärer Regimes befriedigt werden, wer in ihrem Sinne gutdenkvoll ist - oder nicht. Irgendeine Datenbude wird es schon anbieten. (2/2)

melusinapress.lu/read/1981-583…

🔥 🔥 🔥 New Scoop: US-Handelskammer will der Schweiz verbieten, digital souverän zu werden!! 🔥 🔥 🔥

Meine Recherchen der letzten Wochen zeigen:

1. Ein Berater der amerikanischen Handelskammer macht Städten und Kantonen die Hölle heiss, die im Beirat des Netzwerks Digitale Souveränität sitze. Konkret meldete sich Alex Grossenbacher bei der Stadt Zürich und bei Kanton Basel-Stadt. Und verlangte den Austritt bzw einen Rüffel der Basler Datenschützerin. Digitale Souveränität sei ein politischer Kampfbegriff und das Netzwerk ein Lobbyverein.

2. For the record: Beides ist falsch. Das Netzwerk für digitale Souveränität ist ein fachliches Netzwerk für mehr digitale Unabhängigkeit und EBEN NICHT PARTEIISCH.

3. Die Stadt Zürich und der Kanton Basel-Stadt reagierten cool: No way. Und off the record antworteten mir alle: Sag mal, gehts noch?!!

4. Nicht nur Handelskammerberater Grossenbacher stört sich am Netzwerk. Auch die von der Kammer repräsentierten Big Tech-Konzerne haben immer mehr ein Problem mit den Souvereänitätbestrebungen der Schweiz. Und lobbyieren aktiv gegen den Initiator des Netzwerk, der auch Co-Geschäftsführer der ParlDigi ist: Matthias Stürmer.

5. Erfahren hat dies der IT-Verband digitalswitzerland. Dort sitzen Google und Meta in den verschiedenen Comitees (zum Beispiel Public Affairs). Nun haben verschiedene IT-Konzerne Druck auf digitalswitzerland gemacht, bei parlDigi auszutreten. Also bei der "Parlamen­tarischen Gruppe Digitale Nachhaltigkeit". Wegen Open Source-Turbo Matthias Stürmer. Denn: Stürmer tritt für Offenheit, Transparenz und digitale Autonomie ein bei der Wahl von Technologien. Das Gegenteil des Geschäftsmodells von Microsoft & CO.

6. Immer mehr Kantone wollen nicht mehr mit US-Firmen zusammenarbeiten. So etwa der Kanton Zürich, der ein neues KI-System für den Kanton aktuell beschafft. Und gemäss Ausschreibung explizit keinen IT-Lieferant möchte, der dem US Cloud Act untersteht. Es gibt auch zwei weitere Beispiele. Und die amerikanischen IT-Konzerne stören sich massiv daran.

7. Bei IT-Wirtschaftsverband Swico versuchen die Big Tech-Vertreter das milde KomPG (Plattformregulierug) noch plattzutreten, das aktuell in der Vernehmlassung ist. Der Verband ist eigentlich ein Verband für Schweizer IT-KMUs. Doch diese sind - vermutlich wegen weniger Ressourcen- nicht in der Arbeitsgruppe KomPG dabei. Aber der Verband scheint sich an der einseitigen Zusammensetzung nicht zu stören.

Fazit: USA macht Druck und Terror auf allen Ebenen. Die Schweiz soll eine digitale und unregulierte Digitalkolonie bleiben.

republik.ch/2026/01/26/die-usa…

Tolles GIF von Illustratorin Lisa Rock.

This entry was edited (1 hour ago)

"Viagra Culture"
-Revolting Cocks

youtube.com/watch?v=RvqocVlPx-…


(URL replace addon enabled for X, YouTube, Instagram and some news sites.)

in reply to 🔞Kinky-Biene💯

re: NSFW 🔞

Sensitive content

TURQUIE. Un jeune Kurde tué par un homme armé à Mersin
kurdistan-au-feminin.fr/2026/0…

"TURQUIE – Hier, dans la province méridionale de Mersin, un homme armé a ouvert le feu sur des manifestants pro-kurdes et a tué un jeune Kurde originaire de Kobanê qui se trouvait sur son balcon. Une personne est décédée hier dans la province méridionale de Mersin à la suite d’une manifestation contre l’offensive des forces […]
L’article

Υπάρχει κάποιο είδος φοβίας για την βροχή; Πχ μην λιώσεις γιατί είσαι από ζάχαρη που μας έλεγαν κάποτε;

Άνοιξαν οι ουρανοί και ρίχνεις καρέκλες και κεφτέδες μαζί και η συνάδελφος λέει «ιιιιιιι βρέχει».

Ναι βρέχει για να ξεπλυθούν οι αμαρτίες μας. Βέβαια η απάντηση που δεν είπα ήταν στα αρχίδια μου.

Ωραία βρέχει. Έτσι είναι η φύση εδώ και εκατομμύρια χρόνια. Έχει ζέστη κρύο αέρα χιόνι βροχή κατακλυσμό. Ποιο το θέμα; #ιστορίες_γραφείου

in reply to coninos ο γερομπισμπίκης

Ειλικρινά αυτή η κατακαημένη γη δεν μας έχει βαρεθεί όλους όσους κατοικούμε επάνω της τόσα δισεκατομμύρια χρόνια; Δεν έχει βαρεθεί να μας κουβαλάει; Δεν έχει σκεφτεί ποτέ «ρε γάμα τους θα τους καταπιώ όλους ή θα τους θάψω κάτω από λάβα.»

Απορία το έχω. #ιστορίες_γραφείου

Antonio García: ‘A National Agreement Is Required’
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/275…

"In the last week, Antonio García, first comandante of the ELN, gave interviews to journalists from the United Kingdom, France and the United States; Here we present a selection of…"


Antonio García: ‘A National Agreement Is Required’


In the last week, Antonio García, first comandante of the ELN, gave interviews to journalists from the United Kingdom, France and the United States; Here we present a selection of his responses, about the kidnapping of President Maduro, the resistance to imperialist aggression and the political solution to the conflict.

THE SUNDAY TIMES NEWSPAPER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM

[1] What impact does the arrest of Nicolás Maduro have on the political and military strategy of the National Liberation Army?

AG: The impact is not for the ELN, but for international legislation, since any president of any government, who does not share the policy of the United States, can be attacked and kidnapped by the American military forces. It also sets a precedent for the application of extraterritorial justice, destroying the sovereignty of the judicial systems of other countries, putting an end to the existence of Nation States.

For the ELN it is the reaffirmation of the existence of flesh and blood imperialism and that it does not distance itself from wars, to deal or understand with other States, legitimizing the right to defense and the fight of resistance.

[2] In the case of a direct military intervention by the United States in Venezuela, what would be the position and reaction of the ELN?

AG: The ELN at various times in its history has been linked to international solidarity, the José Antonio Galán National Pro-Liberation Brigade, which would give rise to the ELN, was created to link itself to fighting with the Cuban people, in the October crisis in 1962. We also had comrades supporting the struggle in Nicaragua, El Salvador and other processes.

We are an Organization linked to the struggle of the National Liberation Movements of the world and we listen when they call us, to support the struggle of the people, we are not interventionist, when they call us we support in solidarity and therefore we place ourselves under the orders of those people and processes. We do not direct anything where it does not belong to us.

FRENCH PRESS AGENCY (AFP)

[3] What changes for you as a structure that operates on the border, the fact that Nicolás Maduro is no longer the president of Venezuela? Is it true that you are or were in Venezuelan territory and began your return to Colombia?

AG: The location of the ELN structures is defined by the strategic plan, Colombia’s land borders are 5 and two oceans. Due to its configuration, for each of them there is a definition in the plan, the same with the seas and rivers, no one ‘puts their eggs in one basket’. What happened in Venezuela affects the continent because the American troops kidnapped a President, who even made Petro change his speech.

The ELN is focused with priority on Colombia. The government and the military have always said that I spend my time abroad, that is not new, if I told them now that I was abroad, they would say that I was in Colombia. What I do specify is that there is no exodus in the ELN and it is attentive to threats.

[4] Alias ​​Iván Mordisco proposed a union of guerrillas to fight against the United States, will you accept?

AG: As soon as the demobilization dissident groups began to form, they were told that we agreed to talk when they were unified, so as not to talk to each faction, but they could not join and it became complex. If it is to defend the Homeland against the foreign aggressor, we will find ourselves in the fight.

MAX BEARAK FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES

[5] Has the ELN been increasing its military capabilities in anticipation of offensives by Colombian and US forces?

AG: The generation and creation of capabilities with the application of technology in our weapons is not new, that cannot be improvised, the State military has realized, it is no longer a secret, we have been developing that plan for more than 10 years in our military industry, in various types of weapons.

[6] Are you still open to dialogue with President Petro, or do you feel that he has abandoned the peace process with the ELN?

AG: The ELN speaks to the country, it presents its proposal for a National Agreement to all political and social forces, to all candidates for the next government; Of course, Petro is part of the political game in the composition of forces in the next elections. Now it is about going beyond a dialogue, to build a more in-depth route that allows overcoming both the country’s structural crisis and the social, political and armed conflict.

We have already seen that all governments have fallen short in their peace policies and a national agreement is required that makes this possible, a truly constituent process that has the strength to produce the changes that the regime and the political class block in parliament.

Source: eln-voces.net/2026/01/19/anton…
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=…#AntonioGarcía #colombia #eln #guerrilla #southAmerica #usImperialism #venezuela


Nikonoff & Pellizzari : quand l’État viole sa propre Constitution pour faire la guerre


  • Jacques Nikonoff, économiste et essayiste,
  • Général Paul Pellizzari (général de brigade à la retraite),
    débattent avec l’animateur Georges Kuzmanovic autour de la question de la légalité de l’engagement de la France dans le conflit ukrainien et du respect de la Constitution française.

Thèmes du débat :

Violation de la Constitution

Les deux invités partagent le constat que l’État aurait contourné les règles constitutionnelles lorsqu’il s’agit d’engager la France dans un conflit ou de livrer des armements à une puissance étrangère (ici l’Ukraine). Ils affirment que des décisions graves sont prises sans consultation réelle du Parlement et parfois contre les dispositions constitutionnelles.

Points clés évoqués :

  • Livraisons d’armes à l’Ukraine sans vote parlementaire explicite, en violation, selon eux, de l’article 35 de la Constitution, qui encadre l’engagement militaire.
  • Le général Pellizzari soutient que ces actions font de la France une partie prenante dans le conflit, même sans déclaration de guerre formelle.

Argumentaire du général Paul Pellizzari

Le général présente son parcours militaire (Liban, ex-Yougoslavie, Kosovo) pour asseoir sa crédibilité, avant de détailler son action juridique contre le gouvernement français.

  • Il a porté plainte (avril 2024) contre des responsables gouvernementaux pour « livraison illégale d’armes à une puissance étrangère », parce que le Parlement n’aurait pas autorisé ces livraisons.
  • Il critique aussi ce qu’il considère comme un discours officiel guerrier, qui masque un affaiblissement réel des capacités de l’armée française.
  • Selon Pellizzari, ces décisions contournent la souveraineté nationale et le cadre constitutionnel.

Analyse de Jacques Nikonoff

Il critique :

  • La marginalisation du Parlement dans les grandes décisions de politique étrangère et militaire.
  • La montée du pouvoir exécutif qui gouverne « par la peur et la communication » plutôt que dans le cadre strict de la loi.
  • Le rôle des contraintes européennes et de l’euro, selon lui limitant davantage la capacité de la France à décider souverainement de sa politique.

Réactions institutionnelles et conséquences pour Pellizzari

Le général raconte que sa prise de position lui a valu des sanctions administratives, notamment sa radiation des cadres de l’armée par décret présidentiel, qu’il interprète comme une tentative de répression contre ceux qui dénoncent ces violations.

Ce point est utilisé dans la vidéo pour illustrer ce qu’ils considèrent comme une pression exercée sur les voix dissidentes, même lorsqu’elles s’appuient sur des arguments constitutionnels.

Appel à un sursaut démocratique

Les deux intervenants concluent en appelant à :

  • Un débat démocratique plus large, au-delà des clivages partisans.
  • Un retour au respect strict des textes constitutionnels (notamment l’article 35).
    • Une mobilisation citoyenne pour défendre la paix, la souveraineté nationale et le contrôle parlementaire des décisions de guerre.


youtu.be/3q0vAQrVYgw

helloasso.com/associations/la-…


(URL replace addon enabled for X, YouTube, Instagram and some news sites.)

ROJAVA. Un enfant malade meurt de froid à Qamishlo
kurdistan-au-feminin.fr/2026/0…

"SYRIE / ROJAVA – Le froid et le siège militaire des zones kurdes assiégées par les gangs djihadistes de HTS/SNA/ISIS tuent les enfants et les nourrissons affamés et privés de toit. Après les cinq enfants morts de froid à Kobanê, un enfant malade est mort à Qamishlo assiégé également. D’autres crient famine mais la communauté […]
L’article ROJAVA.

World Mourns Michael Parenti, Marxist Voice Against Empire Dies at 92
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/275…

"The global left is mourning the death of Michael Parenti, the influential Marxist scholar, historian, and public intellectual whose work exposed the mechanics of capitalism, imperialism, and ideological power with…"


World Mourns Michael Parenti, Marxist Voice Against Empire Dies at 92


The global left is mourning the death of Michael Parenti, the influential Marxist scholar, historian, and public intellectual whose work exposed the mechanics of capitalism, imperialism, and ideological power with unmatched clarity. Parenti passed away on January 24 at the age of 92, leaving behind a body of work that shaped generations of scholars, organizers, and anti-imperialist movements across the world.

For decades, Parenti stood apart from mainstream academia and political life, refusing to dilute his analysis or bend his language to liberal respectability. He wrote not to impress institutions, but to arm people with understanding.

Working-class roots, uncompromising politics


Born in 1933 in New York City to a working-class Italian American family, Parenti often said that his political commitments were grounded not in abstraction, but in lived experience. Class was not something he discovered in theory; it was something he grew up inside.

He earned a PhD and taught political science and history, but his outspoken Marxism and anti-imperialism meant he was steadily pushed to the margins of elite academia. Rather than retreat or conform, Parenti chose independence: lecturing widely, writing prolifically, and speaking directly to union halls, community centers, activist spaces, and international audiences.

He lived modestly, avoided think-tank careers and corporate funding, and kept his private life largely out of the public eye. He was a husband and a father, including to journalist and political analyst Christian Parenti, but he never cultivated a public persona rooted in biography. What mattered to him was the work.

Exposing the class nature of “democracy”


Parenti’s most enduring academic contribution was his systematic critique of liberal democracy under capitalism. In his landmark book Democracy for the Few, first published in 1974, he argued that capitalist democracies are not neutral systems open equally to all, but class-structured states in which economic power overwhelmingly determines political outcomes.

He showed how elections, courts, media, and state institutions consistently serve the interests of capital, while popular demands are managed, diluted, or suppressed. Democracy, he argued, is tolerated only so long as it does not threaten property relations.

“Power is not evenly distributed in society,” Parenti wrote. “Those who own and control the productive wealth tend to dominate the political life of the nation.”

The book became a formative text for students and activists worldwide, prized for its clarity and refusal of liberal illusion.

Imperialism without disguise


Parenti was equally influential for his work on imperialism and US foreign policy. In books such as Against Empire and To Kill a Nation, he dismantled the idea that Western wars are motivated by humanitarian concern or democratic ideals.

Instead, he traced intervention, sanctions, and regime change to material interests: control over resources, labor, strategic territory, and global markets. He showed how human rights discourse is selectively deployed, how compliant client states are shielded from scrutiny, and how resistance is pathologized as extremism.

One of Parenti’s most quoted observations remains painfully current: “The essential function of imperialism is not to civilize or democratize, but to maintain a global system of inequality.”

His analysis helped anti-war and anti-imperialist movements reject moral distraction and focus on structure rather than spectacle.

Anti-anticommunism and historical honesty


In Blackshirts and Reds, Parenti confronted Cold War anticommunism as an ideology rather than an analysis. He did not deny repression or failure in socialist states, but he exposed how capitalist violence is normalized while socialist experiments are judged by impossible moral standards.

He insisted on historical comparison: asking why fascism is treated as an aberration while capitalism’s own mass violence, including colonialism, slavery, sanctions, structural deprivation, is rendered invisible or inevitable.

The book reopened serious discussion of socialism’s achievements in literacy, healthcare, women’s participation, and social welfare, at a time when such discussions were considered politically taboo.

Media, ideology, and manufactured consent


Long before “media literacy” became fashionable, Parenti laid bare the structural bias of corporate media. In Inventing Reality, he explained how ownership, advertising, sourcing, and elite consensus shape what is reported, how it is framed, and which voices are excluded.

He stressed that propaganda does not require overt censorship. It works through repetition, omission, ridicule, and selective outrage, teaching audiences what to ignore as much as what to believe.

This work made Parenti a cornerstone of critical media studies, especially among activists seeking to challenge war narratives and economic myths.

A scholar of struggle, not accommodation


What distinguished Parenti was not only what he argued, but how he lived. He never treated radical politics as a career ladder. He accepted marginalization rather than compromise and continued to speak plainly when euphemism was rewarded.

His lectures, many of which circulated widely online, are remembered for their warmth, humor, and devastating precision. He trusted ordinary people to grasp complex ideas without academic gatekeeping.

In doing so, Parenti helped bridge the divide between scholarship and struggle, restoring confidence in class analysis at a time when it was being hollowed out or replaced by moral abstraction.

An enduring legacy


Michael Parenti did not found a school or cultivate disciples. His influence traveled differently: through dog-eared books, shared lectures, study circles, movement spaces, and quiet moments of recognition when the world suddenly made sense.

At a time of renewed imperial violence, deepening inequality, and ideological confusion, his work remains unsettlingly relevant.

He once wrote: “The first step in the struggle for social justice is to understand the nature of the system we are up against.”

For generations of working-class intellectuals, organizers, and scholars across the world, Michael Parenti helped make that understanding possible.

His voice is gone. His clarity remains.

source: Al Mayadeen
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=…#communism #michaelParenti #northAmerica #rip #socialism


youtube.com/watch?v=2a2zKDEQ9X…
A #Paul-Fox 12" – #Simmer-Down
B Moonshine Horns– Cool & Settle

(URL replace addon enabled for X, YouTube, Instagram and some news sites.)

Emails and petitions aren't going to cut it any more.

goodlawproject.org/palantir-us…

#UKPolitics

La France malade de son extrême centre


Après un budget de la Sécurité sociale promulgué le 30 décembre 2025 qui n’est satisfaisant dans aucune des cinq branches de la Sécu (Santé-Assurance-maladie, Retraites, Famille, Accident du travail et maladies professionnelles et Autonomie), voilà le budget de l’État dont les seuls satisfaits sont les dirigeants du complexe militaro-industriel français. Pour le reste, économie en berne, continuation de la désindustrialisation française, insuffisance de plus en plus dramatique de la recherche fondamentale et de la recherche-développement, budget écologique en recul, services publics en recul, continuation d’un dualisme scolaire défavorisant les écoles publiques sur tous les plans (laïcité, indices de position sociale, évaluation PISA, recul de la formation du futur citoyen, développement du séparatisme social scolaire, etc.).

La nouvelle extrême centre (PS, macronistes, tendance majoritaire Wauquiez de LR) se pense suffisamment élargie pour éviter la censure. Les trois 49-3 ont donc été lancés. D’abord celui de la partie recettes avec les votes de censure du vendredi 23 janvier, qui sera suivi de celui de la partie dépenses et enfin de celui sur le budget total après retour du Sénat pour une promulgation prévue mi-février.

Augmentation des défaillances d’entreprise

Les administrateurs et mandataires judiciaires viennent de publier les inquiétantes statistiques de 2025, qui corroborent les hécatombes des deux années précédentes : 68 057 défaillances d’entreprises ont été enregistrées l’an dernier (contre 65 683 en 2024 et 51 300 en 2019).

Gabriel Zucman nous invite à réfléchir sur les déclarations d’Eric Lombard, ancien ministre de l’Économie, dans Libération

L’ancien ministre d’extrême centre, Éric Lombard, a déclaré : « parmi les personnes les plus fortunées, des milliers ont un revenu fiscal de référence de zéro. Elles ne paient aucun impôt sur le revenu ! » Et « Elles se font rémunérer dans les holdings ». Cet aveu montre le caractère de classe des politiques de l’extrême centre et la responsabilité majeure de ce courant politique dans la perte de puissance de notre pays et donc dans la montée de l’extrême droite et de ses alliés potentiels.

Nous le savions à ReSPUBLICA depuis que nous avons lu les livres des historiens Johann Chapoutot Les irresponsables et de Pierre Serna L’extrême centre et le poison français. Si la vraie gauche (qui n’existe pas actuellement) ne se hisse pas à la hauteur des enjeux, tout recul global économique, politique et social de la France (ce qui est le cas aujourd’hui) entraîne l’extrême centre à créer les conditions d’une union de toutes les droites (RN compris).

Gabriel Zucman écrit :

  • Les dernières statistiques disponibles sont celles de l’Institut des Politiques Publiques : en 2016, les 75 foyers fiscaux les plus riches (grosso modo, les milliardaires) se sont acquittés de montants négligeables d’impôts personnels : l’équivalent de 2 % de leur revenu (lnkd.in/esp5izCb). Dix ans plus tard, on peut craindre que le phénomène se soit accentué et généralisé : l’ancien ministre Éric Lombard évoque des milliers de personnes, parmi les plus riches du pays, qui ne déclareraient aucun revenu imposable. Par ailleurs, il est clair que les masses en jeu sont encore plus fortes qu’il y a dix ans, compte tenu de l’explosion de la fortune des ultra riches : le patrimoine des 500 plus grandes fortunes est en effet passé de 200 milliards d’euros en 2010 à 1 200 milliards aujourd’hui.
  • Une multiplication par six en 15 ans ! Leur richesse atteint désormais l’équivalent de 42 % du PIB, contre 12 % du PIB en 2010. En outre, l’impôt sur les sociétés – qui venait en partie compenser la faible imposition personnelle des ultra riches en 2016 – a fortement baissé depuis, compte tenu de la baisse du taux d’IS de 33 % à 25 % et de la baisse de l’IS à l’étranger, principalement aux États-Unis.

Après Le grand détournement, voilà le nouveau livre à lire : Les politiques publiques par la défiscalisation

ReSPUBLICA vous a déjà suggéré le livre de deux journalistes du Nouvel observateur, Le grand détournement, qui montre que le montant des aides de l’État aux entreprises sans contreparties se montait à 270 milliards d’euros par an. Eh bien, le nouveau livre Les politiques publiques par la défiscalisation de Clément Carbonnier, Nathalie Morel, Bruno Palier et Michaël Zemmour montre la montée des niches fiscales, inefficaces pour l’économie française, mais excellente pour le « bien-être » de la grande bourgeoisie depuis 40 ans. Cela ne fait que se développer année après année. Ce livre de plus de 300 pages est d’une précision d’enfer et montre bien l’hypertrophie du ruissellement social du bas de la hiérarchie sociale vers le haut de cette dernière.

Nouvelle étude sur la fraude sociale du HCFiPS

Selon le Haut Conseil au financement de la protection sociale (HCFiPS), la fraude sociale se stabiliserait à 14 milliards d’euros. 52 % de cette somme provient du travail dissimulé et relève donc de la responsabilité du patronat, 36 % des assurés sociaux et 12 % des professionnels de santé(1). Mais la note de synthèse admet que « les activités partiellement dissimulées demeurent mal prises en compte dans l’évaluation ». Donc, il est probable que la responsabilité du patronat soit supérieure au pourcentage annoncé. Pour les assurés sociaux, une bonne partie provient des micro-entrepreneurs, statut rêvé par le grand patronat, ce qui montre que la responsabilité des salariés est faible. Pourtant, la communication des médias dominants ne fustige que les assurés sociaux et rarement les professionnels de santé, et surtout les employeurs.

L’extrême centre prépare le fascisme avec une atteinte au droit de grève

Dans la niche parlementaire des LR, le ministre des Transports, Philippe Tabarot, a souhaité engager ce jeudi 22 janvier l’extrême centre sur le chemin de la restriction du droit de grève pendant les jours fériés, les vacances scolaires, les élections et les périodes d’examens. Rien que cela ! Pour supprimer les restes du droit de grève dans un deuxième temps ?! En fait, la niche parlementaire d’une journée des LR ce jeudi 22 janvier 2026 a été largement occupée par une résolution, adoptée par 157 voix contre 101, demandant que l’Union européenne inscrive la confrérie des Frères musulmans sur la liste des organisations terroristes, et a été émaillée de plusieurs incidents, ce qui a annulé la proposition visant à restreindre le droit de grève, puisque les LR n’avaient que cette journée pour proposer des textes au vote de l’Assemblée.

L’ONPE nous renseigne sur l’explosion scandaleuse de la précarité énergétique

L’Observatoire national de la précarité énergétique (ONPE) nous informe(2) de la réalité suivante :

  • En 2023, près de 3,1 millions de ménages (soit 10,1 %) sont en situation de précarité énergétique, à savoir qu’ils dépensent plus de 8 % de leur revenu disponible pour l’énergie dans leur logement, tout en faisant partie des 30 % les plus pauvres… Cet indicateur ne permet toutefois pas, à lui seul, de rendre compte de l’ensemble des réalités vécues par les ménages. D’autres chiffres montrent une augmentation de la précarité énergétique ; le nombre d’impayés d’énergie a augmenté de 20 %, passant à 1,2 million. Dans une plus longue perspective, on constate que le nombre de ménages ayant eu froid dans l’hiver précédent a doublé entre 2018 et 2024, de 18 % à 35 %. Quant aux bénéficiaires du chèque énergie, 59 % déclarent avoir eu froid dans leur logement en 2024. L’édition 2025 met également en lumière la progression de la précarité énergétique d’été, liée aux épisodes de chaleur et à la mauvaise isolation des logements, renforçant les inégalités face au confort thermique.

La fin des mécanismes de soutien depuis 2023, sans autre compensation, alors qu’on enregistre + 18 % sur l’électricité et + 13 % pour le gaz sur la seule année 2025, risque bien de se traduire par une hausse de la précarité énergétique. Mais l’État a diminué le nombre de passoires thermiques par un simple changement de calcul pour les petites surfaces. Sur 700 000 travaux énergétiques prévus par an, seuls 90 000 ont été réalisés en 2024 ! Les gains en termes de santé de la lutte contre la précarité énergétique sont réels. La rénovation des passoires thermiques permettrait, selon France Stratégie, d’éviter 10 000 décès chaque année et d’économiser 800 millions d’euros sur le système de soins.

Que faire ?

Et si nous nous organisions tous ensemble, vous et nous, pour communiquer plus largement encore les réalités sociales et politiques que nous fait subir l’extrême centre macroniste ?

Notes de bas de page
↑1 HCFIPS – Fraude sociale copie.
↑2 La librairie ADEME – ONPE – Tableau de bord de la précarité énergétique – novembre 2025.

gaucherepublicaine.org/respubl…

Folks, our very own @gerrymcgovern has his new book, 99th Day: A Warning About Technology, coming out next Monday.

gerrymcgovern.com/books/99th-d…

“99th Day is essential reading for anyone who cares about our planet. Prepare to be disturbed, enlightened and inspired.” – Justine McCarthy, The Irish Times

And, if you’re in Ireland, Gerry has a book tour in February. If I’m in the country, I’ll be at the Dublin event on the 9th. Hope to see some of you there 😀

gerrymcgovern.com/tour/

💕

#99thDay #books #environment #climateChange #capitalism #technology #BigTech #technoSolutionism #fascism #ireland

Gerry McGovern reshared this.

Why Western Left Fails to Grasp the Link Between Imperialism, Zionism, and ‘Regime Change’ in Iran
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/275…

"When the Israeli spy agency Mossad called for riots in Iran on its Farsi-language social media on January 1, almost no one in the West took notice. Yet the very…"


Why Western Left Fails to Grasp the Link Between Imperialism, Zionism, and ‘Regime Change’ in Iran


When the Israeli spy agency Mossad called for riots in Iran on its Farsi-language social media on January 1, almost no one in the West took notice.

Yet the very next day, former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo made his famous intervention, openly calling for riots in Iranian cities and wishing a Happy New Year to “every Iranian in the streets – and “also to every Mossad agent walking beside them.”

After that, there was little justification for critics of Western foreign policy to ignore the role of foreign intelligence agencies and terrorist elements in the events that followed.

Nevertheless, a widespread reluctance persists to confront the involvement of Mossad – and indeed the CIA and MI6 – in the two days of riots between January 8 and 9.

The Western left has largely failed to understand the “regime-change” alliance linking Mossad, Pahlavist monarchists, the cult-like terrorist group Mujahedin-e Khalq, and a wide array of CIA-backed “opposition” groups – almost all based in the US, with a smaller presence in the UK and across Europe.

Few have grasped that Britain’s MI6 has also played a role in this sinister “regime-change” project targeting Iran. Instead, many on the Western left tend to interpret these attempts as a “freedom struggle,” viewing them as expressions of popular agency or even as a working-class or trade-union uprising. They are not.

What follows is an examination of the multifaceted errors, misunderstandings, and intellectual degradation displayed by far too many leftists – from the liberal and secular left to the revolutionary left, including those who claim to be anti-Zionist or supporters of the Palestinian liberation movement.

Before proceeding, however, it is necessary to briefly outline the correct framework for understanding the role of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

It is the world’s leading anti-imperialist state and the tip of the spear in the struggle for the liberation of Palestine. One need not take my word for this, nor even that of Sayyed Ali Khamenei or General Qasem Soleimani.

Instead, one should listen to the words of the leaders of the Palestinian Resistance themselves.

Here is the martyr Yahya Sinwar in 2019: “If not for Iran’s support for the resistance in Palestine, we would not have obtained these capabilities [rockets and the technical means to produce homegrown rockets]. Indeed, our [Arab] nation has deserted us in our difficult moments, while Iran has supported us with weapons, equipment and expertise.”

And here is the former Hamas chief, Martyr Ismail Haniyeh, on International Quds Day in 2020

“The essence of [our] strategy is the resistance project. Complete resistance, including the armed military resistance at the top. From here, I salute all the components of the nation that embrace and support the choice of resistance on the ground in Palestine… I am particularly specifying the Islamic Republic of Iran, which has not faltered in supporting and funding the resistance financially, militarily, and technically. This is an example of the Republic’s strategy that was established by Imam Khomeini, may God have mercy on his soul.”

Against the Islamic Republic (and the Palestinian Resistance) are, first and foremost, the Zionist colonists in Palestine and their main supporters, the US and the UK.

We also need to note the Iranian self-styled “opposition,” which takes the form of the monarchist supporters of the former Shah who want to install his son as the new king. Then there is the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MKO, aka People’s Mujahedin of Iran/National Council of Resistance of Iran)

The MKO is a designated terrorist group based in Albania, a NATO member state, where it maintains a troll farm alongside other operational infrastructure.

It was removed from the US list of terrorist organizations in 2012 following an extensive lobbying campaign supported by Zionist lobby networks.

In June 2023, Albanian police raided the group’s premises, seizing around 150 computer devices. The raid followed the China-brokered rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia, after which Riyadh, having long denied any connection to the MKO, was forced to withdraw its backing.

The Saudis had also denied funding the anti-Islamic Republic media outlet Iran International, but once the agreement mediated by China was signed, financial support was abruptly cut and the channel’s London office was closed.

Several months later, however, a new London office was opened after fresh funding was secured from the Zionist entity, which continues to bankroll the propaganda outlet to this day.

The case of Iran International highlights the broader ecosystem of external opposition groups targeting Iran. Many of these are financed through deniable intermediaries such as the National Endowment for Democracy and its network of affiliated agencies.

Journalist Alan MacLeod has recently documented several of these organizations in MintPress, including Human Rights Activists in Iran / Human Rights Activists News Agency, the Abdorrahman Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran, and the Center for Human Rights in Iran. There are, however, many more such entities operating within this parallel infrastructure.

Leftist take on Iran

We should begin with those “leftists” who have historically held deeply flawed positions on “regime change” and the roles of the CIA, MI6, and Mossad.

Many are already familiar with the limitations of figures such as Bernie Sanders, who spoke of an “abhorrent regime” and praised the “incredible courage” of Mossad-directed “protesters”; or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, often scathingly referred to by critics as “AOCIA”; or Jeremy Corbyn, who stated that he was “appalled by the killing of protesters”; or Zarah Sultana, who declared, “The images of body bags leave no doubt about the brutality of Iran’s repression, and a communications blackout is indefensible.”

In the UK, Owen Jones, Michael Walker of Novara Media, and many others followed the same pattern. For those who remain unconvinced on these points, I suggest consulting the sources linked in the preceding statements.

The “Mullahs”, the “Ayatollahs” and the “Islamists”

Part of the problem is that Islamophobia runs deep within the left. Often disguised as morally upright secularism, a closer look reveals much more beneath the surface.

Back in 2017, I co-edited a book on Islamophobia, which proposed a theory identifying five pillars of Islamophobia. Alongside Western states, neoconservatives, the Zionist movement, and the far-right, we argued that a fifth pillar was found within certain elements of leftist, secular, and feminist movements.

In the book, we examined the so-called pro-war left, the New Atheists, feminist groups, and strands of secularism. Back then, we concluded that:

It is clear that while some within these groups did not initially set out to campaign against the oppressive conditions faced by Muslims in the West, many have ultimately ended up there.

In this sense, we describe these movements as “social movements from above,” whose trajectories have effectively aligned them with other Islamophobic currents – whether intentionally or not.

However, the problem on the Western left runs much deeper. It permeates the core of anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist movements and is evident across the so-called ‘revolutionary’ left.

Thus, beyond the “pro-war left,” when it comes to Iran, we must also critically examine the anti-war and pro-Palestine left.

Many on the left hold anti-theist and anti-Islamic views. Perhaps tentatively at first, they eventually adopt the racist language commonly used to describe Muslims and Muslim societies.

Terms like “Mullahs,” “Ayatollahs,” and “Islamists” – the latter, as I have argued elsewhere, being popularized by Zionist ideologues and curated by none other than Benjamin Netanyahu – come to be accepted as natural descriptors.

“Islamic fundamentalism”

Another key term in left-wing Islamophobia is “fundamentalism.” In the UK, a certain current of feminists formed a group called Women Against Fundamentalism in the late 1980s.

They did not adopt a nuanced or narrow definition of “fundamentalism” limited to a small subset within religious movements. Rather, they explicitly stated (1994, p. 7) that they were referring to movements that “use religion as a basis” for political strategies.

This description covers nearly all Muslim political movements, with the exception of a handful of Westernized secular groups—almost all of which are funded by state-related interests.

By their definition, Christian liberation theology and even the Quakers, a well-known liberal Christian group, would also qualify.

It is remarkable that this Islamophobic term was deemed appropriate for an organization claiming to be progressive, but there it is. One of the key activists was Julia Bard, a member of the Jewish Socialists’ Group, raising several questions about that organization.

Others involved included Nira Yuval-Davis, who describes herself as “an anti-Zionist diasporic Israeli Jew,” a phrase that appears to legitimize the false Zionist notion that Jews outside Israel constitute a diaspora and lends political legitimacy to the concept of “Israel.”

Perhaps the best-known figurehead of Women Against Fundamentalism was Gita Sahgal, infamous for labeling the civil rights group Cage as “Jihadi,” a subject I have explored in depth elsewhere. The term “Jihadi” is yet another Islamophobic label used to demonize Muslims engaged in political life.

Maryam Namazie and the secular/feminist/communist alliance with Mossad

Gita Sahgal has also been closely associated with the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB). For example, she appeared for “evening drinks” at a 2013 meeting alongside Maryam Namazie, the spokesperson for CEMB.

Founded in 2007, CEMB is an anti-Muslim organization. Namazie, who is Iranian, was prominent in the early October 2022 demonstrations against the Islamic Republic in Trafalgar Square on behalf of CEMB.

Images of her topless protest were subsequently removed by Instagram and Twitter.

That day, she joined forces with Islamophobic monarchists and other anti-government factions. Namazie is a former leading member of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran, though as of 2017 she still identified as a “communist.”

This has not prevented her from collaborating with far-right groups through her “anti-Shariah” campaign organization, One Law for All. Among its supporters from Islamophobic networks are prominent neoconservatives like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Caroline Fourest, as well as Zionists such as Alan Johnson, who works for the Israeli lobby group BICOM.

Additionally, various UK anti-Muslim civil society groups, including the Lawyers’ Secular Society, the National Secular Society, Women Against Fundamentalism (mentioned earlier), and British Muslims for Secular Democracy, have been involved.

One Law for All has also worked closely with far-right figure Baroness Cox, who is known for inviting Dutch Islamophobe Geert Wilders to the UK.

On January 16 of this year, Namazie published a piece on the website of the Islamophobic UK NGO, the National Secular Society, titled Iran: The Generation That Broke Faith with Theocracy.

The article echoed many of the main falsehoods circulated by Mossad and CIA-linked actors, including blaming deaths caused by foreign-backed terrorists on the police and Basij, claiming that families must pay for the bullets that killed their loved ones in order to reclaim their bodies, and more.

Left opposition and ‘workerism’

There is also a tendency to seize upon any criticism of governments in Western-designated enemy states. Liberal opposition suffices, but it’s often preferable if it can be framed as left-wing or ‘progressive’ criticism or revolt. Thus, Owen Jones has made himself appear misguided by citing Tudeh, the marginal, counter-revolutionary, and Islamophobic Iranian “Communist” party.

The naive “workerism” prevalent among large sections of the left is also noteworthy. Consequently, many leftists have circulated statements from unions in Tehran and elsewhere, attempting to leverage these as proof of genuine grassroots dissent, thereby obscuring the cover they provide to acts of terror.

One of the more sophisticated examples of this approach appeared in a piece published by Progressive International, the think tank funded in part by proceeds from the Sanders Institute, established by Bernie Sanders.

While the article offered an otherwise nuanced analysis of the forces arrayed against the Islamic Republic, it slipped into imagining that workers’ struggles in Iran might be free from foreign intervention. However, as British writer Phil Bevin demonstrates, the backing of such actions by the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MKO) terror cult seriously undermines these arguments.

It comes as no surprise that Progressive International, with its star-studded roster of intellectuals including Noam Chomsky, Jeremy Corbyn, and Yanis Varoufakis, is also a strong supporter of the recently collapsed CIA operation in northeast Syria, commonly known as Rojava.

Those involved in running Rojava are closely linked to the Sanders-Corbyn political current. Its director, David Adler, came from the Sanders Institute, and communications director James Schneider is the highly controversial former spin doctor for Corbyn. Their involvement in the “Justice for Kurds” campaign aligns seamlessly with their effective cover for CIA and Mossad-backed terror in Iran.

Anti-zionists against Islam

Here are some words from a self-proclaimed anti-Zionist and supporter of Palestinian liberation, spoken within the last fortnight.

To be clear, this is not someone who is a “watermelon” supporter of Palestinian “rights,” but a genuine supporter of the resistance and the liberation of Palestine, at least according to their public statements.

  • “Yes, Israel and the USA were involved in attacking the regime during the protests, but to miss the hatred of the Iranian people for the repressive, corrupt, theocratic rule of the Mullahs is racist and orientalist. The clerical regime of Iran is bated in the blood of their own people.”
  • “The clerical regime in Iran bears resemblance to fascism.”
  • “I happen to believe that when religion takes over the state, it inevitably means it is repressive.”

It is truly breathtaking to hear these racist beliefs spill from the mouths of self-proclaimed anti-racists and anti-Zionists. Every term from the Islamophobic bingo card is there: “regime,” “theocratic,” “mullahs,” “repressive,” and, of course, “fascism.”

This example is just one of many that reveal how deeply Islamophobic ideas run on the left—including within anti-Zionist circles, Jewish anti-Zionist groups included.

Revolutionary socialists for Mossad terror

Here is a ‘revolutionary socialist’ posting on Facebook, a post that received 172 likes from prominent British and international leftists, including many members of Trotskyist groups such as Counterfire and the Socialist Workers Party.

The author, John Clarke, a Canadian academic and socialist activist, opened his brief piece by stating that “the struggle in Iran should be supported but, at the same time, we must speak out against US and Israeli interference and intervention.”

There seems to be no recognition that this amounts to simultaneously supporting Mossad and condemning it. Clarke goes on to acknowledge that “there is no doubt that Western and Israeli intelligence agencies are seeking to influence the movement in Iran.

Doubtless, there are also reactionary and monarchist elements on the ground who are doing all they can to ensure the struggle serves US interests.”

In reality, the original demonstrations beginning December 28 were protests over economic grievances, not protests against the Islamic Republic itself. The left appears oblivious to the internal political dynamics at play. When Pahlavists and Mossad agents showed up, they were roundly condemned by the demonstrators.

Following the two nights of rioting and terror instigated by Mossad and its recruits, million-strong marches took place in Tehran and other cities across the country. Virtually no Western leftist has acknowledged this massive display of national unity.

Most strikingly, Clarke quotes Lenin on the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland, writing that Lenin “took on those who focused on the imperfect form of the struggle and stressed the way forward that it pointed to.” While true, it is utterly fanciful to compare an anti-colonial uprising in Ireland to a Mossad-orchestrated terror attack in Iran.

The latter signals the potential end of the Islamic Republic, the balkanization of Iran, and its elimination as a threat to the so-called “Greater Israel” project and the leading global supporter of Palestinian resistance.

Clarke claims socialists should offer “winning strategies,” but Mossad and CIA subversion of the Islamic Republic is a losing strategy, both for the prospects of socialist revolution and for human civilization.

It is also a surefire way to guarantee full Zionist triumph in Palestine, expansion into Greater Israel, and even further, towards a new Jewish empire.

The New Left for “nuanced” analysis

Then there is the tendency to produce “sophisticated” and “nuanced” academic-style writing that deliberately says very little. Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi, an Iranian lecturer at the University of St Andrews, writes on the New Left Review blog:

“Some cast the unrest as an imminent revolutionary rupture; others as exclusively the product of foreign destabilization; still others as the delayed reckoning of a society finally pushed beyond endurance. Each captures part of the picture, but none adequately explains the dynamics of the present conjuncture. What is unfolding is better understood as the convergence of accumulated social exhaustion, acute distributive shock and a crisis of governance which the Islamic Republic no longer possesses the ideological, bureaucratic or fiscal resources to manage.”

So far, so apparently nuanced. But there is a red flag in that phrase “present conjuncture,” which signals that this account ultimately carries water for Mossad-backed terror.

This term is a staple of poststructuralist and postmodern academic work, which often tries to maintain the appearance of a radical, even Marxist, spirit. It originates from Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci’s work, later adopted by French structuralist Marxist Louis Althusser, whose “glacial grip,” as Terry Eagleton put it, was passed on to British cultural studies scholar Stuart Hall and his followers.

The problem is that by the time Hall domesticated the concept in the 1980s, it had been stripped of any recognisable Marxist or anti-imperialist politics. Now, forty years later, the term is confined to academic debates and has no practical use whatsoever for actual movements seeking to defeat imperial power.

And so it is that only a few paragraphs later, we find this:

At the same time, there is video evidence of armed protesters confronting security forces with knives, machetes, and, in some cases, firearms, supposedly indicating how years of repression have radicalized segments of the opposition.

The evidence for this claim is, of course, nonexistent. These weapons did not arise from the radicalization of Iranian citizens but were supplied by foreign intelligence agencies.

Moreover, this narrative completely ignores the open boasting by Mossad and even Mike Pompeo’s January 2nd post on X, claiming Mossad agents were on the ground. Did Sadeghi-Boroujerdi overlook this crucial information in his research? In fact, the word “Mossad” does not appear once in his piece.

The most glaring failure of analysis is the suggestion that Mossad’s involvement only strengthened the Islamic Republic’s arguments.

“Acknowledging foreign interference does not mean endorsing the claim that the nationwide protests were purely foreign-engineered. A widespread uprising rooted in years of social and economic hardship cannot be reduced to external intelligence machinations—even if Israeli and US agencies sought to hijack it. What they chiefly achieved was to provide a convenient alibi for repression, reframing the protests as a continuation of the June war, thereby justifying a state of exception under the guise of national security.”

This is a truly awful way to describe an assault on the very foundations of the Islamic Revolution. Unsurprisingly, Sadeghi-Boroujerdi resorts to the racist label “Islamist” in his analysis of the Republic.

He closes his post by lamenting a “rapidly narrowing space for political agency.” Yet in this context, the idea of “agency” reeks of one of the key CIA talking points routinely deployed in regime change operations, an agenda tied closely to a specific intelligence agency.

In the end, there is no way around it: the international left is, at best, providing cover for and advancing Zionist efforts to destroy the Islamic Republic – and with it, the material defense of the Palestinians.

At worst, they are direct collaborators in the Zionist assault on Iran and, by clear extension, in the genocide in the Levant. And if they are Iranian, they are traitors to their own people.

David Miller
Source: Press TV
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=…#colonialism #imperialism #iran #palestine #repression #westAsia


The Dollar COLLAPSE Has Already Started | What Happens Next.
youtube.com/watch?v=XyXxAYFLPK…

(URL replace addon enabled for X, YouTube, Instagram and some news sites.)

BFM sur les USA : les grands médias français nous habituent déjà au pire
contre-attaque.net/2026/01/26/…

"BFM enchaîne les sujets sur l'exemple trumpiste afin de nous habituer au pire.
L’article BFM sur les USA : les grands médias français nous habituent déjà au pire est apparu en premier sur Contre Attaque."

someone asked whether I learned something from the winter training week and it's hard to explain, like, it's all body-level stuff. I was new to jigeiko, after doing jigeiko 1h per day every day my body started sinking in all sorts of little things that sound obvious when put into words but are hard to actually perform on spot.

but one thing I can say that I learned is, if you're in distant guard (too-no-ma) and they step in and you walk back defensively, to try and stay safe, you eat an ippon right away. if you start an attack and they block it and you stop halfway, you eat an ippon right away. when they offensively step into range, the only viable defence is to commit fully and resolutely to attacking first. or baiting then ōjiwaza, techniques I can't use well yet but—regardless of tactic, the strategy is resolutely going forward. once you attack the only safe place to be is to keep going, stay in the offensive. a half-hearted attack trying to protect yourself only leaves you more vulnerable.

this also applies to politics, I think.

#kendō

“Yet Another War of Extermination” – Letter by Anarchist Prisoner Luca ‘Stecco’ Dolce (Italy)
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/274…

"Now that the masses all over the world have expressed their solidarity with Gaza, I’d be curious to know how social scientist Elias Canetti(1) would describe his concept of the…"


“Yet Another War of Extermination” – Letter by Anarchist Prisoner Luca ‘Stecco’ Dolce (Italy)


Now that the masses all over the world have expressed their solidarity with Gaza, I’d be curious to know how social scientist Elias Canetti(1) would describe his concept of the “masses” in such a technological, warmongering and at the same time, exterminating age as ours. He says that mass society exists in the mind of human beings before it materially expresses itself. If ancient societies chose certain social and economic forms of mere subsistence, it was because they deliberately chose not to use bureaucratic or authoritarian methods: they foresaw their dangers. Our ancestors, therefore, were perfect political animals, aware and active observers of the community’s social life.

So what are these squares and streets full of people today, if in our daily lives we go back to the riverbed of a life organized and imposed by others?

Now that the “truce” in Gaza is divulged and imposed with the stamp of the army boot and the mediatic hype on the Flotilla, now that they are silencing and dampening the surge against the massacre, how to transform it into an action going beyond the manifestation and expression of opinions? Power uses human emotions as a can opener; often, the former gives its best in its “delayed reaction” empathic emotion and during “emergencies”, and it coagulates in peaks of scorn. A humanity which is nevertheless still alive despite all the efforts to atomize it. Its more progressive components are proving united in the face of the evidence of an extermination. Over the reaction timing, we should reason at length. Unfortunately, we haven’t yet understood in depth how deceitful and blackmailing the tactics of the enemies of life are, to what extent do commodities and quiet living manage to recuperate the movements, even sincere ones, at least here in Europe. In order to be more incisive and longsighted they have to doggedly overcome exactly the traps scattered over the ground of the struggle, which have the precise function of making everyone go back to the wishy-washy pen of the democratic morals, to issues such as the use of liberating violence or not, to inaction. Let’s move from emotions to self-organizing and direct action. If the roads of freedom are hindered, revolutionary movements of the past teach us opacity and going underground.

All the hypocrisy of the States and their various national authorities is before everyone’s eyes, there is no “truce” happening, there is no resolution of the conflict or peace talks. These lies told us are the same used in different historical periods, they are a support to the continuation of the Zionist, colonialist projects of Israel, of the West and of those States collaborating with them for mere geo-economical interests.

The colonial “reconstruction” market is huge and walks in parallel to the Ukraine issue. Egypt, for instance, has kept on selling food, cement, fertilizers and other raw materials to Israel throughout these years. The facade of solidarity put on by many countries is just the outcome of cynical calculations. Taiwan supports colonial settlements in the West Bank by building an hospital for them in Sha’ar – Binyamin.

In parallel, the deportations of Palestinians from Gaza, defined as “evacuations” by charter flights to South Africa, Malaysia, Indonesia, carry out another tactic of displacement, leaning on informal migratory processes now controlled by crime groups, rendering opaque the market of human beings; monetizing and brutalizing a practice used forever by humans, migration. Again, as many other times before, the push to leave is induced by an all-systemic violence.

The whole world knows the role played by the United Nations, an organization within which we note a few distinguished brave and impartial persons, who however cannot act from the inside against a mechanism created on purpose by the winners of WWII, which in decades has only showed its desire to maintain the status quo and the philanthropy of American and Western imperialism and that coming from emerging countries, also colonialist in their turn.

Another trick. Let’s remember the wars in Yugoslavia and Somalia. The policymakers dictating the military agenda on Gaza are the political grandchildren of those who, on November 2nd, 1917, concretely opened the road to the Zionist projects.

Speaking of Italy, its presence in Palestine is in the new base at Kiryat Gat, 20 kms. away from the Gaza Strip, where in a re-edition of the “coalition of the willing”, similar to that happening on the Ukraianian front, operates through the C.M.C.C. (Civil-Military Coordination Centre). Led by Gen. Sergio Cardea, commander of COVI, created in 2007 to manage crisis areas, and now – together with his cronies – is asking for some waste paper from the U.N. justifying this operation.

This institution has been created to implement the “Peace plan” by amerikan Trump. Here we find tech platforms such as Palantir, Maven, Datamiur, tasked to improve american air strikes in the Middle East. The creation of ISF (International Stabilization Force) with troops from different countries will impose terror as the life regime of the Palestinians.

This same technological system is used against migrants within 100 km radius from American borders. We now know that AI is used to create targets to hit in Gaza while at the same time operates on the deportation of undesirables from the U.S.

Whereas, on Nov. 20th., the Foreign Affairs Italian minister discussed whether the CoESPU (International policing school run by Italian military police) facility, set within the “Ederle” army base in Vicenza, could be the best location for the training of 3000 future Palestinian mercenary cops, controlled by this coalition and IDF.

Civil and military industry

These last few months, several newspapers competed against each other in denouncing the connivence between military and civil industry, about how they are making profits with the wars now happening. Almost daily new ties between vested interests are exposed in the entire technowar chain, its history, its political and civil affiliations, who the responsible are, in a few words, how the world network of contracts, collaborations, experiments, scientific breakthroughs is articulated, all of which are dual use, all of which are for control and social repression.

Gaza and Ukrainian front, the favelas in Rio, the climate crisis, the Sudanese uprising are all perfect places in which to experiment and advertise their sophisticated gadgets and experiments in a social panopticon architecture, for buying and selling amongst States and firms.

All of this almost nullifies the work carried out in the last decade by the antiwar movement. Even the official propaganda itself slaps our faces with the magnitude of the techno-industrial complex.

Questions to be asked are: where is the difference? In the quantity or the quality of information? Or else: what to do with it and towards which goals and perspectives should it be used?

Seeing that Elbit Systems is at the centre of the struggle of Palestine Action, it must be said that it is news of just a few days ago that Germany – after a 100 day break of weapon transactions to Israel – has started again sending supplies. The most important thing are the spare parts by Renk for the well-known Merkava tanks. The tank engines by MTU, based in Baden-Wurttemberg, never had a problem bypassing the embargo via USA.

With this new start, Elbit Systems will sell LMS ammunitions to Berlin for 700 million euros. Gundbert Scherf, company CEO, has promised that from 2026 on, the firm will manufacture between ten thousand and twenty thousand combat drones.

This German example is emblematic because it should shake all people who believed blindly that democratic States would have any real problem interrupting the conflict and sanctioning the Israeli state. We know that every war is profitable, both in its destructive phase as in that of reconstruction.

In between, the carnage fattens the wallet of industrialists and political class alike. The struggle against militarism must continue without a pause and with a continuous critical vision, carrying the praxis of denounce and agitation towards a non-stop campaign of action and subversive social upheavals of vast proportions.

Behind the class enemy’s lines

One of the often-forgotten main characters of the critique to militarism and its industry is the worker. That mass of human beings which, in all industrialized countries, create and forge the chains and gears useful to the ruling class to bite and massacre at will their subjects. Nationalist propaganda, racist culture, drive for conquest, fictional fear of foreigners, economic-territorial hegemony does the rest.

How to break the bond between this huge workforce blackmailed with a dish of lentils and the illusion of a quiet and pacific existence? How to reduce the moral gap that should move the conscience to desertion, even before that of the soldiers, of the workers manufacturing and setting up the war machine?

The ruling class knows very well how to break up the internationalist class solidarity. In Italy we have a clear example, happening in an inland colony such as the insular region of Sardinia, where the weight of the war is heavy in that economically deprived land. On one side, for example, we have the workers of Euroalllumina in Iglesiente, where the firm Rusal, owned by a Russian oligarch, is in dire straits due to the war sanctions imposed and 300 million euros of investments slated for the upgrading of the plant and the safety of the storage depot, blocked.

On the other side, a few kilometres away, in Domusnovas, the German firm RWM is asking Region Sardinia a permit to double up the area of the facility, since its main product are bombs sold for years to Saudi Arabia in its war against Yemen.

The markets these days are thriving due to European policies (and not only) for rearming and strengthening the military forces. Contradictions are emerging clearly and once again the trade unions are wavering between a rhetoric of job protection tout court and the critique towards the war industry that in the last few months has brought to strikes for Gaza, blocking harbours or general strikes of one day, which didn’t manage to spread and invite to radical desertion of the warmongering industry, of chemical ones, labs, etc. To do so would be “to take a step in the dark” which in turn would crack their facade of responsible protectors of wage work and of the national industrial and economic division.

Also in other Italian industries these contradictions emerge in an unmistakable way, seeing the strong war rhetoric in fashion now, banged from every drum.

A society such as ours today, strongly patriarchal and in its visions about the world, imposes on us the dichotomy cold war/hot war, in which “peace” is in reality simply the “absence of war”. This concept of society reveals itself in these “pauses” of war through treaties, “ceasefires”, memorandums etc.

If these talks can somehow interrupt a conflict, in reality they are only the demonstration of the power of some, using terms and arguments showing “weakness” in those “defeated” in the field or put with their back against the wall between the economic clamp and the miltary-strategic one.

Retreat, defeat, disarm and then again words such as trench, assault, are all terms that lead the war imaginary towards Heraclitus’ concept of war, that war is “father of all and king of all”.

Again in Germany and Italy, the automotive industry, in crisis due to international competition, will be reconverted to fit the new, giant European rearmament plan; meanwhile, from Poland to Sweden, from Croatia to France, the draft is re-instated, whether compulsory or voluntary; in Italian schools and universities militarism is ever more present. The institutional, reformist Left wavers between the façade of an anti-war position and the attempt to ride the wave of the movements against war and genocide in Gaza. The mass amnesia on what this ruling class said after the Russian attack and October 7th in Palestine, in reality should alert everybody about the double game played and the rhetoric of these gravediggers of every radical or revolutionary exuberance. For every act of liberating violence happening in society, the institutional, reformist Left immediately sides up with the moralizing choir against armed struggle, “terrorism”, “bad teachers”, against the outburst of those not caught up in the net of hypocritical moralization.

Millions of workers and students, young and old, are pushed towards a mentality of warmongering fear. Selected experts on the public square explain the truth – of the ruling class: humans are aggressive by nature, the thirst for power is innate in human beings. Avoiding in this way a mobilization of the consciences against war, society is locked up in this grip.

Historians, anthropologists etc. such as Lawrence H. Keeley(2), introduced into the public discourse arguments to consolidate the idea that, since the dawn of mankind, humans have fought an “endless war”, strengthening the ever-present and “consolatory” Hobbesian philosophy. The interpretations of moats and walls, of some hunting weapons, of symbols of villages and cities of the Palaeolithic or Neolithic, seen as tools for defence only against external enemies, always ready to assault and prey. According to these explanations, therefore, everything can be linked to a fratricidal war.

Nothing could be more false.

Today we are surrounded and addicted to images, symbols, representations, objects, philosophies, communication campaigns inducing and bringing us all back to war.

Workers, scientists, technicians are immersed in a competitive, nationalist, terrorist rhetoric, in which “progress” is the son of productivism, of power and money.

This century-long nightmare is perhaps starting to slowly crack open: we must feed the dream, the re-enchantment of a new imagination of the world.

We can discuss at length about necropolitics, ecocide, totalitarianism, and write tomes about it all, keeping our hands supple and our limbs and muscles soft. It can prove useful in order to send a message against the suffocating dome of modernity and its crimes, but if we don’t make individual choices, potentially shared by others, bringing action to the forefront of thought, nothing will ever change. We will only count our bitter tears.

It’s a time of tense nerves and subversive smiles mocking the common enemy after the effort and the risk taken.

Internationalist struggle, anti-colonialism and revolution

The Palestinian resistance and the Sumud paradigm have created a deep gash in the world. In the heads of the powerful there is envy and hatred because those who live by the tenets of the “strong man” know full well how to recognize bravery and tenacity in the adversary; this is also one reason why their answer is so merciless and total. The challenge and the zeal abash the desire of power of an entire system. Those in power know that the Resistance won’t stop and that others will imitate it, with other formulas and perspectives, but they will draw inspiration from it. Then, the fearful master will use all historical and technological tactics to unhinge it, to annihilate it from the roots up.

But the echo is now worldwide, as happened in other decades with other resistances, announcing that resisting is possible and necessary. The answer from governments will be harsh and deep, we are already witnessing its disordered reactions. In USA the antifascist movement “Redneck Revolt” in North Carolina, active in the rural areas of the South struggling together with the workers for class liberation has been criminalized. Two anarchists in Texas have been arrested for an action against ICE under the provisions of the new law against “Antifa”.

In Europe we know well the repression that is acting against movements opposing the war.

But the subterranean river of struggle for freedom brings water along lines unknown by the enemy: as an underground river, it shows up and hides, remains quiet and then strikes with a roar.

In Morocco, the “Gen Z 212” movement against the government and the huge expenses slated for the construction of soccer arenas for 2030 World Cup, is claiming liberation of all detainees from the protests, also those of 2017 and are fighting poverty, environmental destruction etc.

In Tunisia the struggle against the chemical plant in Gabès producing phosphates that are carcinogenic, is mobilizing masses of youth ever angrier and more disillusioned by the ruling class.

In Madagascar, Nepal, Mongolia, mobilizations and political overthrows have happened by the strength of the struggle and its perseverance.

Europe is answering in different ways. In all of these struggles cited, the Palestinian resistance echoes strongly. In Serbia, the students against the corrupt Vucic government and Chinese multinationals destroying rivers and mountains are carrying Palestinian flags. In Poland, it is the same during demonstrations against the warmongering fascist wave.

In the European city streets youth is answering en masse.

The walls and colonial tactics, the historical-moral explanations by Zionists and capitalists are criticized in the metropolis of this old, decadent, imperial Europe; internationalist solidarity is expressing itself and reminding of past struggles.

But if all this is an indication of the current reality, if the virus of struggle is spreading in the streets, at the same time they haven’t yet managed to spill over the levees imposing their social peace, their rule of law, their prohibition on daring and dreaming something different and deeper than mere indignation.

Here then in the quiet of the anonymous night, restless hands without bonds act and strike. In France, anarchists sabotage power lines and storage facilities for raw materials in industrial areas and its war industry hotspots. In Germany, huge players such as Tesla lose millions of euros due to the electricity blackouts. On Sept.9th, 2025, an important sabotage against the military-industrial complex takes place in Berlin. In Canada, the railways have been systematically hit for years against the mining industry and its multinationals, necessary for the supply chain of raw materials needed to wage war and for the world producing and financing it.

In Greece, the comrades acting against the policies of a fascist government and mourning Kyriakos Xymitris, fallen along the road to freedom, have also relaunched the solidarity with Gaza.

Anarchists, and not only them, do not wait for a revolution to happen of its own volition, they live it ardently, studying and organizing themselves.

To sabotage and attack the system of domination certainly isn’t enough to prime a radical change, but it gets us closer to, and allows us to stare in the eyes of the life we desire, acting against an enemy that binds us to its system, from which we want to free ourselves. This free life is ever more withheld from us, we are uneducated in the capacity to choose, in pondering and activating a free will which dictates the guidelines and social rules that break the current, authoritarian ones, conscientiously choosing the routes and methods which avoid a system that is murderous, toxic, and unjust.

We need to destroy the moralistic idea of “democratic confrontation”: it moves us away from certain possibilities of struggle and I believe that the best example of insurrectionary fracture is coming in through the Indonesian riots of these last months. In response to the requests coming from the people, to their proposals for self-organization and anti-authoritarian communism, authority has manifested itself arrogant and violent. The subversive answer has been clear and precise, the democratic stunt broke down in the fires of the politicians’ houses. Their arrogance backfired on them and they became, for once, the material targets, the prey of a liberating fury.

In Europe, who keeps on producing, financing, justifying a murderous behaviour on the side of the Israeli and American State? Should an answer be given to this shamelessness and sense of omnipotence? Are the power relations within the social conflict still in their favour? And if the answer is yes, how do we turn them in our favour?

If their intent is to arm masses of youth for the future looming massacre, we know well that, historically, conscript soldiers have been the kingpin of a few revolutionary movements, at the time in which the work of rebels and subversives blended in with concrete proposals and the diffusion of revolutionary defeatism. Perhaps we won’t be able to stem the warmongering tide, but it is a duty of those fighting against the war to keep on supporting and stimulating action operating within the social fabric, with the most advanced ideas against any nationalist, racist, imperialistic mechanism.

The internal/home front must become the most alarming one for our common class enemies.

To carry forward the solidarity with Gaza and those suffering from the war of the States, we – european comrades – have the necessity to shake off some ballast.

The press campaign supporting Israel grafts itself onto a cultural hegemony of colonial and ruling forces; many of us know well the ideas of Edward Said(3) on the Orientalist thought. His articulated observation of the spiderweb limiting our view and directing it towards concepts created and stratified into historical processes of the last centuries, particularly those called “West” and “East”, advise us to tread upon uncomfortably hard paths. The role of the intellectuals, of new scientific disciplines, reinforces this historical and human division. The manacles that keep us from acting – often we don’t even feel them – separate those who, the world over, have the same need to free themselves from the common oppression, diversified as it may be, and operating differently according to the latitude in which is employed. The hybris of the scholars and that of Nations must be fought from every side.

In “The Holocaust and the Nakba”, Amos Goldberg and Bashir Bashir tell us that these two historical events are juxtaposed. In the West, though, just so we understand, a regime of memory has been built prohibiting comparisons and similitudes, which leads to think that a genocide, to be mentioned, must assume the radical form of the Holocaust. The authors suggest the way of the empathic perturbation, meaning confronting the trauma of the other to generate a new moral grammar.

The geopolitical engineering, the variable borders of which today analysts and experts, generals and racist opinion-makers are blabbing about in the news-media are numbing us using complex analysis that sometimes obscure the solidarity impetus. Freed from this ballast, what could we see?

If we observe microhistory, censored and forgotten on purpose, the events of which are almost unpronounceable, we know that the Zionist movement several times carried out tactics against subversive peasant Jews in Eastern Europe (especially Poland, Ukraine and Russia), using reactionary ideas and praxis. In Bialystok, organized anarchists, together with other supporters, defended the Jewish peasant and proletarian communities from the pogroms. After that, it was the Ukrainian Machnovist movement, between 1919 and 1921, defending the communities, and many comrades of Jewish background denounced and criticised Zionism which contains in its philosophical and cultural base also an anti-proletarian and anti-socialist reaction in the widest meaning of the term.

Today, Zionism attacks those in Israel who do not want to suffer the cultural brutalization and are forced to flee, creating a new sort of diaspora: 130,000 people already left the country between 2022 and 2024. An exodus marching in lockstep with a genocidal massacre. The reckless violence of the colonists is flooding the West Bank inside and out; Zionism works in many directions.

In Ukraine and Russia, the anonymous mass of deserters, wanted by the respective armies, is crossing paths with the partisans that are contributing to the hindering of the war machine on both fronts, carrying with them a gust of fresh air in this fratricidal war.

The anti-colonial struggle at the end of 19th century against the Spanish empire lead to the deportation of Filipino revolutionaries to the Montjuic prison of Barcelona, Spain. Spanish prisoners – many of whom jailed due to the long running struggle against bloody dictator Canovas – saw these men in the yard, covered with the light attire typical of their land. Within the prison solidarity mobilized immediately, because the groups acknowledged each other as comrades in the same struggle against an oppressive regime. From the windows of the cells heavy winter garment fell in the yard as a sign of closeness to the Filipino rebels, hit by one of the most ferocious and longstanding colonialist regimes.

The anti-colonialist struggles of the time, in Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Korea or China, crossed with the revolutionary movements and the anarchist and socialist ideas. European comrades would leave their countries to participate in insurrections around the world. In Egypt, Algeria and Argentina, in Japan, just about everywhere national liberation struggles were conspiring and conjugating with broader ideas of revolutionary and social emancipation.

These subversive experiments created hypothesis of communal living that put in practice “the world for which we struggle”, with genuine insurrectional plans, fruit of a conspiratory age.

Ideas circulated thanks to a brisk translation activity of books and pamphlets. This ferment joined the internationalist solidarity that led the anarchist Angiolillo to kill the dictator Canovas, torturer of Filipinos and Cubans abroad and of the revolutionaries at home. The anti-colonial struggles around the world and European insurrectional movements were talking to each other, there was no UN or Human Rights Charters to which appeal to in a macabre deceit and vain hopes. They were marching together to the conquest of a long-yearned freedom, suffocated by capitalism and by the government of the sanguinary motherland.

The ideology of the “endless war” insinuates minds and hearts with its barbed wire. The violence of subjugation, where life is worth nothing and there is no shame in shooting harmless women and men, where religious hate drenched in territorial promises and racist supremacies creates that soil that erases any human empathy and fans feuds and revenges that always hit towards the bottom, never towards the top of social hierarchy, can depress and create a sense of injustice reaching the point of being perceived as a physical pain.

Today we see women and men in Gaza planting olive trees amidst the rubble, showing the world the love for the land they were born in, men that keep on harvesting olives no matter what, children digging drainage to get a dry place to play in and study, young people still resisting. The Palestinian people show us every day what dignity, tenacity, infinite practical and moral ingenuity is, all of them trained during decades of life within an open air prison.

On Nov. 28th., Fadi and Jumaa’ Tamer Abu Asi have been shot to death by the IDF because they were busy collecting scrap wood to sell in the vicinity of the infamous “yellow line”. They were 8 and 10 years old. The land of Palestine is rife with stories such as this one and they are the kind that strikes the progressive public opinion, leading it to take the side of the weak ones, somehow palatable according to a colonial European view inasmuch victim and vulnerable.

Some newspapers are willing to show the eyes of suffering children. Then there is that openly racist side, rubberstamping even the vilest homicidal and repressive practice by the Israeli state.

Both sides, in the end, are parts of a social structure holding up because even if they differ in their appearance, in reality they defend the same privileges and interests.

Of course, it is important to denounce and be outraged, but this is all part of the show allowed by the masters, which works as a safety valve to blow indignation off and then go back to sleep. Never mind waking up from the slumber and understanding what makes a person go from indignation to action. Even worse if it organizes in a long-term perspective.

The Palestinian is ok if he misses a leg and has a starving body. If he dons a kefiah and totes an assault rifle, if he throws molotov cocktails or stones, the mirror of Western acceptability cracks, be it liberal or socio-democratic.

Generally, we are used to lazily accept something only if it shows weak and harmless to our eyes.

The prisoner studying their escape plan for months and then sawing off the bars one night and splitting, upsets the hypocrite, bourgeois society. The “madman” that “point blank” explodes in “unusual” acts, smashes and drools “senselessly”, shocks for his unpredictability. The child playing and screaming “inconsiderately”, creating embarrassment, nowadays risks to be filed under “hyperactive”. The Palestinian hating those that murdered his or her family and force-fed with fear and dust, are already moralized and branded by the Western white man. The caged animal that “out of the blue” bites and wounds must be killed.

Now that the media spotlight – at least here in Italy – is fading, it is time to act with greater energy, and somehow shake up that part of society which, in various ways, has already taken a stand, but has not gone too far, has not crossed the moral boundaries imposed by the laws of the state and Christianity, and has not transformed its daily life, turning it into a battleground that is unrecoverable by the state.

We know the Italian colonialist goals in Gaza. ENI (major Italian energy company) wants the natural gas off the coast of Gaza, while the Meloni government carries on its “Mattei Plan”, which is the continuation of Italian colonialism. We know that if we begin to place a stick in ENI’s wheel, we’d have to deal with the Secret Service. If in Italy we start listening to the echo from Gaza and decide to throw the yankees overboard, imposing their economic and political hegemony in Italy since the Sicily landing in 1944, we also know that times of waterboarding, political destabilization, bombs might easily come back as in decades ago. We must be aware: you don’t play with such powers. Now that we are nearing the start of phase 2, we can already say that the people in Gaza and the West Bank will only and exclusively get policies of terror and elimination.

As I am finishing these notes, on Dec. 8th, the news is out that Belgian justice has issued an international arrest warrant against an Italian consultant acting on behalf of Elbit Systems, for some contracts stipulated with a NATO agency. Magistrates and police officers of other countries are also indicted in the proceeding.

That the activity of this or other similar companies is “clean” or “dirty” matters little. Their work remains criminal and must be stopped. This struggle must not be pursued in an emergency logic, but in that of a long running and wide campaign: we need to confront and organize. In doing so we could – in several ways – aspire to an integral liberation from the state and techno-industrial system.

Stecco – Luca

Write to Stecco:

Luca Dolce
c/o Casa Circondariale Sanremo
Strada Armea, 144
18038, Sanremo (IM)
Italia

Transliterator’s notes:

1. Elias Canetti, Bulgarian, 25 July 1905 – Died in Switzerland, 14 August 1994; author of Crowds and Power. and other titles.

2. Lawrence H. Keeley, USA, 24 August 1948 – 11 October 2017) ; author of War Before Civilization – The Myth of the Peaceful Savage.

3. Edward Said, Palestinian-American, Born in Jerusalem, 1 November 1935 – Died in New York, 24 September, USA, 2003. Professor, author of Orientalism.

souce: Dark Nights

abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=…#anarchism #europe #insurrection #italy #lucaDolce #repression


in reply to Spytfyre🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇪🇺🇬🇱

Politics

Sensitive content

in reply to Nemo

Tiens, j'allais poster ça en standalone mais je le mets en réponse à ton (joli) dessin : youtube.com/watch?v=NtsJ5m6C7d… C'est bête à dire mais je suis resté 30 minutes à admirer, silencieux, ces petites graines déterminées à pousser. Elles m'ont fait oublier l'état du monde et sourire d'émerveillement ! 🙂

(URL replace addon enabled for X, YouTube, Instagram and some news sites.)

Batam begins returning hazardous e-waste to US Four containers of electronic waste have finally been re-exported from Batu Amprt Port in Batam, Riau Islands, to their country of origin, the United States.

The Global North dumps its e-waste in the Global South.

thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2….

Yet even in the best of cases, the need to be on call, to spend at least a certain amount of energy looking over one's shoulder, maintaining a false front, never looking too obviously engrossed, the inability to fully collaborate with others —all this lends itself much more to a culture of computer games, YouTube rants, memes, and Twitter controversies than to, say, the rock 'n' roll bands, drug poetry, and experimental theater created under the midcentury welfare state.

David Graeber

Residents raise red flags over 'hazardous' crisis spreading across US region: 'The consequences ... terrify and infuriate me'

"The people who produce this stuff, it is their responsibility," said Matt Naimi, co-founder of a Detroit-based recycling center, per the Detroit Metro Times. "They're producing the garbage. E-waste is a big problem but no one ever thinks about it."

yahoo.com/news/articles/reside…

La National Defense Strategy 2026 des USA


Veille Stratégique

Le 24 janvier, le Pentagone a publié sa Stratégie de Défense Nationale pour 2026. Ce document de 34 pages, signé par le secrétaire à la Guerre Pete Hegseth, marque un virage radical dans la politique militaire américaine. Loin des interventions interminables et des engagements idéologiques des administrations précédentes, il prône un "America First" pragmatique, axé sur la paix par la force, la protection des intérêts concrets des Américains et une refonte des alliances internationales.

Comme un écho aux discours enflammés de Donald Trump, cette stratégie dépeint un monde dangereux, hérité d'années de négligence, mais que l'Amérique, sous sa houlette, est en train de redresser avec une armée "la plus puissante que le monde ait jamais vue". Dès l'introduction, le ton est donné : Trump a hérité en 2025 d'un chaos sécuritaire. Les frontières étaient poreuses, envahies par des migrants illégaux et des narcotrafiquants tandis que l'Europe, dépendante de l'OTAN, peinait face à la Russie en Ukraine. Parallèlement, le Moyen-Orient était instable malgré la résilience d'Israël face aux attaques du 7 octobre. Enfin, la Chine dominait l'Indo-Pacifique, menaçant la prospérité américaine. Les auteurs accusent les élites post-Guerre froide d'avoir dilapidé les avantages des États-Unis en poursuites chimériques comme la construction de nations (Nation Building) à ou la défense d'un "ordre international fondé sur des règles".

L'état des lieux

Au lieu de cela, Trump réoriente tout vers une "réalisme flexible et pratique", priorisant la défense du territoire national et la dissuasion sans confrontation inutile. Le chapitre sur l'environnement sécuritaire dresse un tableau sombre mais hiérarchisé des menaces. Au premier plan, la patrie et l'hémisphère occidental. Les frontières américaines sont décrites comme assiégées par des "narco-terroristes" comme Nicolás Maduro, neutralisé par l'opération Absolute Resolve. Des menaces aériennes, cybernétiques et nucléaires émergent, tandis que des acteurs comme l'État islamique persistent. La stratégie invoque le "Corollaire Trump à la Doctrine Monroe", affirmant la domination militaire américaine dans l'hémisphère pour sécuriser des points clés comme le canal de Panama, le golfe du Mexique et le Groenland, face à l'influence croissante d'adversaires.

La Chine émerge comme la menace la plus importante. Deuxième puissance mondiale, Pékin a investi massivement dans son armée de Libération populaire (PLA), capable d'opérations dans le Pacifique occidental et au-delà. L'Indo-Pacifique, représentant bientôt la moitié de l'économie globale, est vital pour la liberté commerciale américaine. Sans viser à dominer ou humilier la Chine, la stratégie cherche un équilibre de pouvoir pour une "paix décente", via des communications militaires accrues et une défense de déni le long de la Première Chaîne d'Îles. La Russie reste une menace persistante mais gérable pour l'Europe de l'Est, avec son arsenal nucléaire massif et sa résilience en Ukraine. L'Iran, affaibli par l'opération Midnight Hammer qui a oblitéré son programme nucléaire, et ses proxies comme le Hezbollah ou les Houthis, dégradés par des actions israéliennes et américaines, demeure instable. La Corée du Nord menace directement les alliés comme la Corée du Sud et le Japon, avec des forces nucléaires croissantes visant même le sol américain. Enfin, le "problème de simultanéité" – des conflits multiples – est abordé : les alliés doivent assumer plus de responsabilités, car les États-Unis ne peuvent plus subsidier leur défense.

Les axes stratégiques

La partie stratégique articule quatre lignes d'effort pour traduire cette vision en actions.D'abord, défendre la patrie : sécuriser les frontières en coordination avec la Sécurité Intérieure, contrer les narco-terroristes via des partenariats ou des actions unilatérales, et protéger les cieux avec le "Golden Dome" de Trump contre missiles et drones. Moderniser l'arsenal nucléaire, renforcer les cyberdéfenses et traquer les terroristes islamistes complètent ce pilier.

Deuxièmement, dissuader la Chine par la force sans confrontation. Engager le PLA pour la stabilité, tout en érigeant une défense robuste le long de la Première Chaîne d'Îles, en incitant les alliés régionaux à contribuer plus. L'objectif : négocier depuis une position de force pour un équilibre pacifique.

Troisièmement, il faut accroître le partage du fardeau avec les alliés. Fini les "dépendants", place aux partenaires responsables. Trump a imposé un nouveau standard à l'OTAN : 5 % du PIB pour la défense, dont 3,5 % pour les capacités militaires. En Europe, les alliés mèneront la défense conventionnelle contre la Russie, soutenant l'Ukraine. Au Moyen-Orient, Israël et les partenaires du Golfe prendront le relais contre l'Iran, bâtissant sur les Accords d'Abraham. En Afrique, l'attention se concentre sur les terroristes menaçant directement les États-Unis. Sur la péninsule coréenne, Séoul assumera plus face à Pyongyang. Des incitations comme des ventes d'armes et des collaborations industrielles récompenseront les "alliés modèles".

Quatrièmement, il faut remobiliser la base industrielle de défense américaine. Trump mène une renaissance industrielle, réinvestissant dans la production pour armer les forces américaines et alliées. Mobiliser innovateurs, adopter l'IA, lever les obstacles réglementaires, et intégrer les productions alliées pour produire à échelle massive. C'est une "mobilisation nationale" comparable à celle des guerres mondiales, pour assurer la préparation et léthalité des forces armées américaines.

En conclusion, cette stratégie incarne la renaissance trumpienne : de la stratégie de la corde raide mondiale à une paix durable par la force. Elle restaure l'éthos guerrier, priorise les intérêts américains et refond les alliances sur l'équité. Comme l'affirme le document, "nous serons l'épée et le bouclier de la nation", prêts à la guerre si nécessaire, mais visant une paix noble. Avec des opérations comme Midnight Hammer ou Southern Spear, Trump démontre déjà sa résolution. Ce virage, audacieux et controversé, pourrait redéfinir la géopolitique pour des décennies, plaçant l'Amérique en position de force face à un monde multipolaire.

Veille Stratégique

Lien vers le document : media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/…

Pour aller plus loin sur l'état des forces armées américaines, commandez le livre de Sylvain Ferreira "La fin de la domination militaire américaine ?" : thebookedition.com/fr/la-fin-d…

patreon.com/posts/la-national-…

Kataib Hezbollah Leader Calls for Preparedness for Comprehensive, Worldwide War
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/275…

"The secretary-general of Kataib Hezbollah called on fighters across the world to prepare for what he described as a “comprehensive war” in support of the Islamic Republic of Iran and…"


Kataib Hezbollah Leader Calls for Preparedness for Comprehensive, Worldwide War


The secretary-general of Kataib Hezbollah called on fighters across the world to prepare for what he described as a “comprehensive war” in support of the Islamic Republic of Iran and in response to an unprecedented aggression by US and Zionist forces, according to a statement released on Sunday.

Addressing what he described as “mujahideen in the east and west,” the Kataib Hezbollah leader urged readiness to support Iran, portraying it as a central pillar for Resistance in the region and stressing that it has stood for decades alongside oppressed peoples regardless of sect, ethnicity, or race.

He said, “Zionists and their allies” were now mobilizing to confront Iran, warning that any war against the Islamic Republic would not be easy. The statement asserted that such a conflict would extend across the region and carry severe consequences for Iran’s adversaries.

The secretary-general also called on fighters to prepare operationally and psychologically, urging them to brace for what he described as all possible outcomes should religious authorities declare jihad in support of Iran. He said this could include expanded forms of armed action in defense of what he termed Islamic causes.

The statement further said if a comprehensive war is declared “brothers in the eastern and western parts of the earth” must prepare. If this declaration is announced it may even call for “martyrdom operations” against the colonial forces of arrogance. Media in West Asia declared that the statement is unprecedented and marks a huge departure from the norm.

The head of the Iranian Journalists’ Association and member of the Government Media Council, Masha’Allah Shams al-Wa’izin, warned on Friday that US President Donald Trump is “walking on the edge of the abyss,” amid escalating tensions in the region.

Shams al-Wa’izin said that Washington has communicated through a third party that Iran’s facilities could face attacks and that Tehran is expected to endure any such strikes “without a severe response.”

He emphasized, however, that for Iran, any limited strike would be considered a full-scale war, significantly raising the cost for any potential aggressor. Shams al-Wa’izin further asserted that the United States and the Zionist regime had planned recent events involving armed riots in the country, following the failure of the 12-day war on Iran. He dismissed conflated and false reports spread by opposition forces on alleged developments in Iran as “originating from the armed opposition based in Tel Aviv [and] Paris.”

“The United States wants Iran to surrender,” Shams al-Wa’izin said, stressing that no self-respecting nation could accept such threats. He noted that American military mobilizations in the region are political signaling by Trump to the Iranian leadership, but stressed that Tehran possesses multiple power cards to respond to any pressure.

Shams al-Wa’izin’s remarks on US messaging to Tehran follow statements made by a senior Iranian official who spoke to Reuters.

The senior official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that any attack would be regarded “as an all-out war against us.”

“This military buildup, we hope it is not intended for real confrontation, but our military is ready for the worst-case scenario,” the official said in regard to the US military buildup in the region, including the repositioning of two aircraft carriers.

The official stressed that this time around, Iran would treat limited, unlimited, surgical, and kinetic American attacks as “an all-out war”.

“We will respond in the hardest way possible to settle this,” the official said.
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=…#alAqsaFlood #colonialism #imperialism #iran #iraq #lebanon #palestine #westAsia


"The Philippine National Police on Jan. 23 dismantled an anti-mining barricade in Dupax del Norte, Nueva Vizcaya, arresting seven residents and clearing the way for mining exploration. The move prompted condemnation and calls for accountability from church leaders, environmental groups, human rights advocates, and indigenous peoples’ organizations."

altermidya.net/arrests-of-anti…

Residents’ immediate goal was to ensure the City Council approved a 45-day moratorium on data center development, an item added to the agenda after weeks of mounting public pressure. What they got, in a meeting that stretched past midnight, was the council’s commitment to draft an outright ban during the 45-day period for a later vote. “That is more than I ever could have hoped for from this meeting,” resident Steven Kung said. “I am shocked and a little bit overjoyed.”

laist.com/news/politics/how-mo…

"Climate change is exacerbating the situation by reducing precipitation in many areas of the world. Warming increases the water demand of crops and the need for electricity to pump more water. It also melts glaciers that store fresh water. Despite these problems, nations continue to increase water withdrawals to support the expansion of cities, farmland, industries and now data centers."

ketk.com/news/the-world-is-in-…

Anti-Fascism Has Been Banned in Hungary
abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/275…

"We note the recent proscription of the so-called ‘Antifa Ost’ at an international level by the Trump Administration and the increased repression taking place worldwide against the radical left, anarchist…"


Anti-Fascism Has Been Banned in Hungary


We note the recent proscription of the so-called ‘Antifa Ost’ at an international level by the Trump Administration and the increased repression taking place worldwide against the radical left, anarchist and anti-fascist movements.

The Hungarian government made antifascism officialy illegal through legislative means. Antifascist activists are under surveillance, demomstrations are banned. The new legislation makes room for limitless repression.

At the 14th of February, there is going to be an international nazi meeting in Budapest. Nazi rock festival, nazi grand meeting, nazi tour, with several thousands of attendees. The antifascist counter demonstration is banned. Several hundred policeman are going to protect the nazi events and in the meantime, hunt for antifascists.

We ask all antifascists, to protest the Hungarian fascist regime at the 14th of February! Show international solidarity before embassys, consulates or any other sorts of Hungarian state-sponsored facilities!

Down with Orbán’s fascist system!

In September 2025, a Hungarian government decree declared “anti-fascist gathering together” (sic!) to be “terrorist organization.” This means that anti-fascist activity is now prohibited in Hungary. They are not persecuting a specific organization or taking action against specific acts, but rather ordering the persecution of anti-fascism itself.

For now, the decree has resulted in the police banning half a dozen anti-fascist demonstrations. (police.hu assembly decisions.) On January 15, the MEASZ (Hungarian Organization of Resistance Fighters and Anti-Fascists) and the FIR (Fédération Internationale des Résistants) were also banned from holding a Holocaust memorial event, at which a Holocaust survivor, among others, would have given a speech.

The justification refers to “public order,” which they claim is threatened by “supporters of the antifa ideology.” The message is clear: anyone who does not want fascist rule is a threat to public order.

In February 2023, several nazis, mainly foreigners who had come to Budapest for international nazi events, were attacked. The case against those suspected of the attacks was turned into a political trial aimed at criminalizing anti-fascism. A show trial is currently taking place in Budapest. The defendant, Maja T., has been held in solitary confinement for a year and a half and tortured with psychological methods. The presiding judge and the police consider the participation of Maja’s friends and relatives in the trial to be an aggravating circumstance.

Since December, solidarity demonstrations in front of the court have been banned, but fascists are free to demonstrate in the same place. This clearly shows who benefits from the anti-fascism decree: the fascists.

Neo-nazi organizations have been operating openly in hungary since the transition. Although some of their demonstrations are occasionally banned, they still hold dozens of public events every year. Street demonstrations, memorial tours, protests, nazi concerts, martial arts galas…

And accompanying this: there have already been several fatalities as a result of nazi attacks, and the number of people attacked and injured by nazis can be estimated at several hundred or even several thousand.

One of the police prohibitions cites as a negative example that the anti-fascist demonstration against the international nazi meetings in February became the largest event of its kind. The so-called “day of honour” nazi event has been held for almost three decades. It was banned several times in the past, which is why they started organizing a “memorial tour,” which has now become the “sortie tour,” attracting thousands of people. The tour pays tribute to nazi “heroes” and attracts a significant number of foreign participants. All hungarian nazi groups are represented on the tour. The international nazi demonstration in February has been officially banned since 2022, mainly because of the anti-fascist counter-demonstration, which has now been condemned by the police, but it always takes place. They hold a “press conference,” demonstrate at Normafa, stage a flash mob at Heroes’ Square, and in 2025, they organized a nazi rally at the headquarters of the World Federation of Hungarians.

The police is simply carrying out what the government expects of them.

What is the government’s goal? What could be the purpose of a decree banning anti-fascism? To support fascism. The authoritarian regime employs countless elements of fascism. In addition to dismantling the rule of law, suppressing political opposition, controlling the media, and bringing institutions into line, state propaganda also contains explicitly nazi elements. Inciting hatred—against refugees, opponents, and minorities—is the government’s main message. There are more than a few nazi sympathizers among those shaping memory politics. The official position denies the hungarian state’s role in the Holocaust. Poverty is ethnicized and treated as a “gypsy problem.” Social darwinism – “everyone is worth what they have” – is the social policy of fascism. Government officials and leading politicians openly pose with well-known nazis. They have built loyal nazi satellite parties.

The government’s anti-anti-fascism stems from the general political climate. This is how Orbán is trying to score points with trump and set an example for European governments. At the same time, the anti-anti-fascist, i.e., fascist decree also shows that his regime is becoming increasingly uninhibited, especially because he feels his power slipping away as the April elections approach.

In fact, it is irrelevant what motivates the regime. What matters is that the government is attacking anti-fascism and thus strengthening fascism.

“If you want to know what you would have done in the 1930s, during the nazi era, then look at what you are doing now.”

Anti-Fascists in Hungary

source: Dark Nights

abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=…#antifa #antifascism #europe #hungary #repression


1. Let go of toxic people in your life
2. Let go of regretting past mistakes
3. Let go of the need to be right
4. Let go of feeling sorry for yourself
5. Let go of the need to impress others
6. Let go of loyalty to those who don’t deserve it
7. Let go of holding yourself back
8. Let go of the need to please everyone
9. Let go of the need to control others
10. Let go of a job you hate

Richie Norton

#quote #quotes

Violences policières : des comités vérités et justice pour en finir avec l’impunité
revueladeferlante.fr/violences…

"Début janvier 2012, Wissam El Yamni, un jeune homme de 30 ans, meurt à l’hôpital de Clermont-Ferrand. Quelques jours auparavant, pendant la nuit du réveillon du Nouvel An, il a été […]"

ICE agents murder another legal observer (USA)
darknights.noblogs.org/post/20…

"kolektiva.social/system/media_… Reports indicate ICE agents shot 37 year old comrade Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse, on the street, who was filming their repression in Minneapolis, USA. This occurs in the context of widespread protests and an ongoing general strike. The USA has

"The ecological disaster in Sumatra (not a natural disaster that only includes earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and tsunamis) in December 2025 is a tangible proof of the failure of the capitalist developmentalist ideology with the primary target of high economic growth. For several decades, some countries around the world have been hypnotized by the myth of high growth to address various social problems in order to ensure the welfare of humanity."

kompas.id/artikel/en-bencana-e…

All down to the collapse of the centre and decades of neoliberalism. euobserver.com/eu-political/ar…

Google has been doing it for years…
straitstimes.com/world/united-…

Microsoft has been doing it since forever…
neowin.net/news/microsoft-bans…

Amazon is, of course, doing it…
seuros.com/blog/aws-deleted-my…

Yet every single time it happens, people are surprised, outraged and—most of all—helpless. It keeps happening because we allow it to happen, over and over again.

in reply to Flaki

Oh yes, Apple is, of course, doing it, too.

hey.paris/posts/appleid/

in reply to Flaki

…and when Apple doesn't do it, it allows your corpo overlords do it instead:
oldbytes.space/@feoh/115215401…

Cyberpunk is not pretty neon lights and flying cars. Cyberpunk is is corporations owning the air you breath and the synthetic blood in your veins, then renting it back to you, a wage slave (h/t Neofeud @silverspookgames ). Cyberpunk is resisting. Cyberpunk is reclaiming your digital sovereignty, by seizing the means of computation (h/t @pluralistic, and particularly Unauthorized Bread)


This is a Dystopian timeline: My wife was let go after 25 years working for the same bank this morning. In an apparent oops, the bank's IT department hard wiped ALL her IOS devices remotely, while she was on the road driving, relying on the GPS function.

The screw you cherry on top? Our apartment building in its infinite wisdom a couple years back switched all building locks to the Latch app.

So she was LOCKED OUT OF OUR HOUSE.

Oh, and the Latch maintained intercom at our front door is out of order.

Thanks for that. Sheesh.


in reply to Flaki

Good god can we please just yeet all centralized billionaire-owned platforms into the sun finally? It is time. Way past time, in fact.

socel.net/@robotwig/1159607557…

in reply to Flaki

Knowing how much big companies are coming hard on gift card scam, I'm truly amazed to see when people with extensive digital only XBox game libraries buy XBox live and other gift cards from sketchy eBay sellers all the time. I've seen so many similar cases like this Apple one on Reddit's r/xbox where a person's basically free time digital life just disappears. Sometimes it's not even their doing, when aunt Nana has bought them the gift card.

New Zine “Words Mean Things – A Compilation of Anathema Arrticles” (USA)
darknights.noblogs.org/post/20…

"This compilation is coming together in a moment when it feels that many anarchist ideas are losing their meanings. Dragged out of anarchy into leftism or activism, drained of their radical content. Mutual aid isgiving away supplies, direct action is a more aggressive form of begging, anti-fascism is

Me ha dicho @taxorubio que me presente así que a eso voy #presentación

Como se puede intuir me llamo Pablo, he/they (creo?) y vivo en Granada. Me gustan los videojuegos, el rol, el gamedev y huir de los algoritmos de recomendación

En cuanto a juegos le doy a casi todo que no sea online, pero me gusta especialmente Nintendo y los JRPGs. En mi backloggd podéis haceros una idea de mis gustos: backloggd.com/u/pavro/. Y me gusta mucho la Wii U, tengo 2 y quiero más :redPikmin:

Desde hace unos años juego rol, normalmente dirigiendo, y me encanta investigar y charlar sobre formas de dirigir. Me gustan las partidas rollo JRPG o shonen, con poderes locos, drama intenso, villanos muy presentes y theatre-of-the-mind. Me gustan los juegos con reglas ligeras y que den espacio a la narración, mi favorito ahora mismo es Fabula Ultima

Y por último a veces hago juegos y participo en game jams y los subo aquí pavro-o.itch.io/

Asín que nada, ojalá conocer gente maja por aqui pa charlar de lo que sea

This entry was edited (23 hours ago)

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.