To prevent deer from being hit by cars Finland has tried using reflective paint. (smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/…)
File this under "solutions to modern problems that summon the old gods."
(It seems the image on the right is a rendering to show how this "would" work. Not a real photo. Updating again to correct image description to reflect, heh, this.)
To Avoid Deer Strikes, Finland Is Painting Deer Antlers With Reflective Paint
Attempts to keep motorists from hitting animals usually center around making cars and roads safer, but the Finns are heading straight to the sourceRose Eveleth (Smithsonian Magazine)
myrmepropagandist
Unknown parent • • •@lnlyisol
I'm so disgusted with the state of search these days. It's not just the AI it's the AI slop combined with the mushy "let us tell you what you really meant" search results.
Obscure band names, artists, concepts are "corrected" to more popular words. "ant" is swapped for "art" if I'm looking for anything cute or amusing ("cute art stickers" NO I want "cute ANT stickers")
It's like modern search is trying to make everyone hopelessly basic. Only popular things exist.
myrmepropagandist
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
Am I just getting old? One of the things that made me fall in love with the internet is how if you looked for something, no matter how obscure, no matter how unlikely if someone had gone to the trouble of making it you could find it.
That just isn't true in the same way anymore. It's more likely you will be redirected to a more "normal search query"
It "works better" for many people most of the time. But, that's at the expense of making everything strange hidden.
Jer 🚵🏼
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
I get that even with dictionary lookups on the mac. Highlight a slightly obscure word that “sounds like” something else and apple just says screw it, we'll use the more common word. There's not even a courtesy “we didn't find XYZ, did you mean ABC?” with a link to "no, I meant XYZ , figure it out”.
Space Catitude 🚀
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
FWIW, "ant stickers" worked for me on DDG:
duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=ant+s…
C Puffer
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •David G. Smith
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •.@futurebird @lnlyisol Have you tried this?
udm14.com/
&udm=14 | the disenshittification Konami code
udm14.comRyan Hyde (account moved)
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol Kagi has you covered.
@kagihq
RobertJackson
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
Yes ... this.
I have just looked for Arthur Arrowsmith, a local Wolverhampton artist only to be offered Aerosmith 🙁(
noplasticshower
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Alerta! Alerta!
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol OK. We've tried this "Search engine" stuff. Can we go back now to yellow pages?
Or newsgroups?
Sherri W (SyntaxSeed)
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •sahqon
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •ben
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Lena
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Marginalia Search Engine - Marginalia Search - reindeer reflective paint
marginalia-search.comStefan Thöni
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Arne Böttger
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Stevez
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •cute "ant" stickers
?
Works on #duckduckgo every time 😊
monkeyflower jelly bean
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •HumToTable
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Mark T. Tomczak
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol This is a known issue for Google, and as far as Google is concerned, it's working as intended. Typos are common so it biases in favor of most popular search results. If you search logged in, it does tend to learn your preferences eventually, but whether you're willing to search logged in with Google is an individual choice.
I don't know that other search engines are vulnerable to these effects or not. Google is definitely playing in a class of its own of too clever for its own good.
Bob Tregilus has moved...
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Thad
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •stiffelman
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •rufo
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •ScottMGS
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •"Popular" results gets Google their squeeze. And if we click through the pages of results to see if it's back there somewhere, well, they get a bigger squeeze. They aren't in it to find what *we* want. I hate it.
Rick O
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Hak Foo
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
Normal people should never have been given access to computers.
When the audience was technical people, they understood there was a sausage being made and could collaborate for the best sausage.
Now that the market is "everybody", there's a lot of selling "magic". "We'll fix your mistakes" and "here's a bunch of LLM garbage" both dazzle low-skill users, and steer towards profitable choices. It just comes at the expense of competent users whose queries get clobbered.
UnCoveredMyths
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
I find it interesting.
Years ago, before it was called Googling, I would search for something, not find it, and ask for help.
People would scream - Just search and find it yourself!
Which didn’t work, as I had obviously already done so.
However, they had already trained their search engines to display that information. I hadn’t, as I hadn’t found it.
Now, I find search easier, and they find search impossible.
Maybe I just used to niche of terms back then. Maybe the niche terms became mainstream.
And I often have autocomplete and autocorrect off.
I wish you luck!
Brian Grinter
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol @spacelizard I can appreciate not everyone can afford to pay for search, but @kagihq is really good, I wouldn’t go back to google
youtu.be/ijUfCMd2IL8
What Is Kagi Search?
YouTubeMy Actual Brain
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Artёm
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Hamish Buchanan
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •AI is a predictability machine. It is inherently conservative and populist.
@futurebird @lnlyisol
PS Jen
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Urban Hermit
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol agreed with this 100%.
Another effect, due to search trying to find you the most commonly accepted information, and publishers trying to meet that demand, the internet these days is a vast, shallow sea of entry level introductory information, repeated thousands of times over, with mid level and higher understandings frustratingly out of reach.
Like everything is the first month and a half of an introductory course. Sometimes YouTube can get you another month and a half.
S Bodzin, Real American 🇺🇸
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •stilescrisis
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Dan Piponi
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •KarlE
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •It's even worse in picture search, searching for some old equipment by name has become totally impossible.
myrmepropagandist
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
What I find hard to imagine is that there must have been people who were annoyed, frustrated that they typed "cute ant stickers" and obviously "ant" was a typo! who would want "ant stickers" gross, right?
The computer ought to "know" that no one would want to see that and show them what they meant.
The needs of that person are more important than whatever I'm trying to do.
But I also wonder if that person really exists. Are people happy this happens?
lenatrad
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Peter Bloem
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol In the early days, there was a lot to do about "the long tail". How the internet made it worthwhile to cater to niche subjects because you could cast such a wide net.
I felt this died when companies like Netflix became big. They started focusing on things with mass appeal. They could have broadened their catalog with lots of cheap, niche movies that a few people would like but they never bothered.
I think it would still make them money. It just doesn't generate prestige.
Luigi
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Krista @WHY2025 (4337)
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Steve Bannister
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •noplasticshower
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Dataless
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Richard Bairwell
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Searched on Kagi and just ~3 results all mentioning that model number and all going "guides don't work, haven't managed myself"
Asakiyume
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
I agree--I resent this and find it endlessly depressing :-\
Cat
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol well, except for the zone of stuff that was made before the web existed and was not yet historic or notable enough to rate a mention in someone's neighborhood memories blog/ get cataloged on discogs/ whatever
That zone shrank but never completely disappeared
bogosity
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •@lnlyisol
I feel the same way, finding weird stuff was something I used to do in the library back in the day, and I loved having it at my fingertips. Even mainstream items are getting hard to find now on the Internet, and my library skills have atrophied.
/Sad face
Urban Hermit
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •jon_wnc
Unknown parent • • •