@relentless_eduardo

Talking to a lot of them they basically have planned Parenthood and Democratic Party goals with some exceptions they believe the world is over populated and they are like the Church of Euthanasia

@relentless_eduardo

They also tend to be hedonists and support the idea of having pleasure now even if there are bad consequences in the future

@relentless_eduardo

Homosexual goals line up with kike goals because the kikes have brainwashed them

Reduce White Population

Sanhedrin 54b search for "nine" or "9" to find another one of their goals

Right to force other people to become homosexuals

Forced celebration of homosexuality and transgenderism

Outlaw celibacy and chastity

Free stuff at other people's expense

Outlaw criticism of all religions except Christianity

Outlaw Christianity

Promote feminism

- Not all homosexuals goals

@relentless_eduardo Do you actually think that or are you being facetious?

If that was the case, they wouldn't have demanded gay marriage.
Gays don't need society's permission to have sex with each other, especially if they keep it private, like they used to (and should).

Marriage is about children, men and women get married for the child's sake, that's the whole point.
What gays wanted was adoption, because homosexuality is usually linked to other sick attractions/mental issues.

@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
A large number of them have a complex set of goals that relate to a simple philosophy of hedonism and the belief that if it gives them gratification in the short run then they have a Right to do it

There are exceptions of some homosexuals that do not have the complex set of goals

But most people are turned into homosexuals through propaganda and would not naturally be homosexuals if they were willing to avoid doing what feels good in order for long term gains

@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus

Once they cross over to the philosophy that it is ok for men to have physical relations with men because it provides short term gratification that comes with a bunch of other things encouraged that harm society but provide short term gratification

The men who are attracted to men but choose not to act on it because it harms society have a philosophy of helping society in the long run even if it is not as gratifying in the short run

@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus

You see there are plenty of men who are attracted to men but do not believe they have a right to have physical relations with men and do not choose to do so because they know it is harmful to society by raising the rates of STDs at the cost of no benefit since they can not reproduce that way

If they are going to do that they could minimize harm by having less partners but they have massive amounts of partners typically

@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus

Because a large amount of the propaganda that turns people into homosexuals in the current year is from Kikes. A large number of homosexuals share the kike goals like the goals of the United Nations, The European Union, the world Economic Forum and the Democratic Party in the U.S.A.

There are exceptions like the log cabin Republicans that do not overlap with those goals as much but those exceptions are rare and even the log cabin Republicans are subverted

@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus

Also I do not endorse encouraging men who had physical relations with men into converting to have physical relations with women because then they will just have increased likelihood of spreading STDs into the heterosexual community

And having physical relations with women does not mean someone is not homosexual because there are bisexuals

Bisexuals who have already had physical relations with men would help society better becoming celibate usually

@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus

1 They lifted the entry ban of HIV AIDS that George Bush tried but failed to Remove under Barack Hussein Obama

2 If you accept that men have a right to have physical relations with men because it feels good it opens up desire for the whole LGBTQP+ ideology because it feels good. 1 / 2 of statutory r*** cases are involving two people of the same gender but less than 1 / 2 of people are homosexual or bisexual

3 Low or No impulse control in decision making

@KuteboiCoder @Humpleupagus @relentless_eduardo

Look if the person became rich through honest and ethical means then whether or not they think they are doing what is good for society by reproducing with ethical businessmen Trophy wives are making the world a better place, but they make it a worse place if they divorce them for their money

However the trophy wives who marry the rich men with unethical business practices and reproduce with them make the world a worse place

@KuteboiCoder @Humpleupagus @relentless_eduardo

I did not know what that word meant here is what the Kike Anti Defamation League defines it as

And I am going to log out of here and do other stuff now if I do not reply to comments right away

extremismterms.adl.org/glossar…

Foid is a derogatory incel term for woman. The phrase is an abbreviation of "femoid" which combines the words "female" and "humanoid" or "female" and "android."

Foid

^{Foid (Foid | Center on Extremism)}

@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus

7 Many people who choose to practice a homosexual lifestyle often claim they are making the world a better place by reducing the population and often adopt the goals of the Church of Euthanasia and Planned Parenthood

Ich stelle mich vollkommen gegen das Assad-Regime, seitdem Ich 13 war und in der Schule Waffeln gebacken habe um über Peace Counts einer Menschenrechts- und Friedensorganisation in Aleppo eine Spende zu überreichen, wurde Ich über den Terror dieser „Regierung” aufgeklärt.

Dennoch stehe Ich nicht an der Seite der Islamisten, welche gerade das Land übernehmen. Mit einem neuem Justizminister, dessen erster Akt es war jeder Frau von nun an zu verbieten Recht und Gesetz zu praktizieren und auszuüben, oder dem jetzigen Premierminister der sowohl dem IS, al-Qaida, und jetzt dem HTS angehört, gibt es weder Frieden noch Stabilität.

Das die USA signalisieren die neue Regierung anzuerkennen, lediglich weil diese Terroristen lernten für Legitimät U.S. Interessen vertreten zu müssen, ändert nichts daran was sie sind. Es ist der letzte Nagel im Sarg des „Kampf gegen Terror” Euphemismus.

Es war nie ein Krieg gegen Terrorismus, es war immer ein Kampf für die eigenen Staatsinteressen. Anders als das U.S. Department of State Gestern Abend bekanntgab, ist es nicht das „syrische Volk”, welches die Zukunft des Landes entscheidet, sondern eine Handvoll Milizen.

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass in manchen Medien am Anfang von 'Dschihadisten' und 'Islamisten' gesprochen wurde:

tagesschau.de/ausland/asien/sy…

zeit.de/politik/ausland/2024-1…

Und daraus dann später plötzlich 'Rebellen' und 'Aufständische' wurden.

tagesschau.de/ausland/asien/sy…

tagesspiegel.de/internationale…

Es kann natürlich sein, dass ich nur zufällig diese Meldungen im Gedächtnis behalten habe. Wäre interessant, da eine Statistik zu machen, wann und wie oft häufig die verschiedenen Begriffe benutzt wurden.

Krieg in Syrien: Islamisten rücken laut Aktivisten in Aleppo ein

Am Stadtrand von Aleppo sollen sich islamistische Rebellen Gefechte mit dem syrischen Militär liefern. Bewohner berichten von Kämpfern auf der Straße und Panik.

^{Anja Keinath (ZEIT ONLINE)}