All that would happen would your entire meniscus getting cut up then, as why would a LLM know how to do surgery, considering it doesn't even have intelligence?

Surgery is known for sometimes making a problem worse even if a competent surgeon does it - thus surgery should be a last resort.

@Suiseiseki i didn't say LLM. you would need a multi-modal model for that not purely a language model.

"AI can't do anything" is a surprising take for someone i suspect is probably an AI himself

It would be complete insanity to put such kind of unpredictable proprietary technology in control of a scalpel.

But of course it will be done, no matter the consequences.

Functionally, at most real AI could be used to suggest optimal cuts, but such recommendation would have to be checked to see if the cuts are correct.

@Suiseiseki why would it have to be proprietary?

AI is already expert level at reading x-rays, such as identifying pneumonia in lungs. trust me lad AI will be doing surgery within a decade, and with a much lower rate of screw ups than human doctors

Unfortunately the output of neural networks is proprietary, as that's clearly lacks source code and is an act of reverse engineering to understand it.

Neural networks are nowhere near experts at reading x-rays - they just are extremely fast at comparing every single x-ray on record that contained pneumonia with the current image and notifying the expert if pneumonia is suspected, working around some human error where a condition is simply missed.

Such scheme actually needs a expert to check and determine if there's a false positive or not.

I don't see how you could go from a neural net that is good at giving suggestions as to what condition a scan contains, with some false positives and some false negatives, to the much harder task of actually performing a surgery and not screwing it up within a decade.

Even though they're now road legal, Telsa's proprietary control software that uses only cameras is just as dangerous now than it has ever been.

It doesn't seem to have gotten much better in many years either.

@Suiseiseki i certainly wouldn't take my hands off the wheel of a tesla, at this point.

your problem is you lack the ability to extrapolate how this is going to progress within the next few years, and to think in exponential time frames

@jazzilla He thinks Mohammed is in the Bible.

He thinks there is no historical evidence to corroborate the Biblical account of anything.
He either has done zero research, or he is lying.

@rw @jazzilla
Who said anything about atheism? I'm not an atheist. I just don't need an outside source for morality.

I don't know who you should look to. Maybe just one source? Any at all? The point made in the clip is there are multiple sources of people who existed throughout history, just no other sources for people in the bible.

I'm not the expert but every bible scholar will tell you there are things in the bible that are simply not true. That's my point. You're dealing in half truths.

@jazzilla you missed my point. The biblical explanation is miraculous and not explained by atheist science.

But to your point, which writers should we look to that were in the area Abraham lived, wrote about the relevant topic, and their works were preserved for 4000+ years?

There is plenty of evidence for the biblical account, but you require writings about specific characters, or else they never existed. An argument from silence.

Poorly written article:
medium.com/the-search/moses-ou…

Moses Outside of the Bible - The Search - Medium

Have you ever noticed that our perceptions of “ancient” history is nearly 100% created by the Judeo-Christian Bible, so much so that it feels as if history did not happen unless it was in the Bible…

^{Carson Corduroy (The Search)}

@rw @jazzilla
He's not talking about cities. He's talking about people. He's saying the only evidence of the people written about in the bible...are in the bible and no other texts from that period.

Sure there is evidence of places written about in the bible...it's called telling a half truth and it's designed to manipulate and deceive people. Try again.

those who won't seek the truth will be given over to strong delusions.

Here is archeological proof that a Biblically recorded event in Abraham's time actually happened, for which atheist scientists have no reasonable explanation.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=QjPcSQUY…

@jazzilla

Sodom burned—Zoar did NOT: The full story of the discovery of the Cities of the Plain!

Join Joel as he tells the exciting story of how the Cities of the Plain were discovered, including Lot's Cave, and why it matters that the city of Zoar did N...

^YouTube