Please tell your friends about federated social media site that speaks several fediverse protocols thus serving as a hub uniting them, hubzilla.eskimo.com, also check out friendica.eskimo.com, federated
macroblogging social media site, mastodon.eskimo.com a federated microblogging site, and yacy.eskimo.com an uncensored federated search engine. All Free!
"Ayberk Demirdöğen is one of the revolutionary prisoners who are carrying out a harsh indefinite hunger strike in Turkey against prisons S, R and Y (known as “wells”) which are…"
Turkey: Another Revolutionary Prisoner Turns Hunger Strike into Fast to Death
Ayberk Demirdöğen is one of the revolutionary prisoners who are carrying out a harsh indefinite hunger strike in Turkey against prisons S, R and Y (known as “wells”) which are notorious for their particularly inhumane detention conditions and solitary confinement policies. Started on March 11, 2025, he decided to transform his strike into a fast until death on August 27, 2025 on the 170th day of his struggle. In this struggle, he joins Serkan Onur Yilmaz (on the right in the photo) whose life is in danger after more than 290 days of fasting until death.
Ayberk Demirdöğen fait partie des prisonniers révolutionnaires qui mènent une dure grève de la faim illimitée en Turquie contre les prisons S, R et Y (dite de type « puits ») qui sont célèbres pour leurs conditions de détention et politique d’isoleme…
Abu Obeida: Zionist Prisoners in Gaza Will Be With Al-Qassam Fighters Confronting Occupation abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/211…
"Abu Obeida, the spokesperson for the al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, stated that the Zionist military would pay a hefty price for its plans to occupy Gaza City…"
Abu Obeida: Zionist Prisoners in Gaza Will Be With Al-Qassam Fighters Confronting Occupation
Abu Obeida, the spokesperson for the al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, stated that the Zionist military would pay a hefty price for its plans to occupy Gaza City with the blood of its soldiers, which would also increase the chances of more troops being captured.
In a post on Telegram on Friday, Abu Obeida warned that these plans to occupy Gaza would spell disaster for the occupation on both the political and military levels
He stated “The ‘israeli’ enemy’s criminal plans to occupy Gaza will be a curse upon its political and military leadership, and the “israeli” army will pay the price with the blood of its soldiers, and it will increase the chances of capturing new soldiers, God willing.
Our fighters are on high alert, ready, and in high spirits. They will present unique examples of heroism and bravery and will teach the invaders harsh lessons, with God’s help.
War criminal Netanyahu and his Nazi ministers have stubbornly decided to reduce the number of living ‘israeli’ captives by half and that most of the bodies of their dead prisoners will disappear forever, for which the ‘israeli’ army and its terrorist government will bear full responsibility.
We will protect the ‘israeli’ captives as much as we can, and they will be with our fighters in places of combat and confrontation under the same conditions of risk and living. We will announce every prisoner killed by the aggression with their name, picture, and proof of their death.”
The second annual People's Conference for Palestine in Detroit has highlighted the growing public opposition to US military aid for Israel, despite continued...
after my local march for australia rally, a guy in the march ended up coming to a bar where a bunch of the counterprotestors were hanging and a couple of them engaged with him. turns out he's a local moderate who either didn't know about the nazi connection or downplayed it and worked with migrants
how would you go about finding such people in your city and connect with them so as to dissuade them from coming to future events organized by fascists?
Subway Tooter fediverse app isgreat but sure does give some strange error messages sometimes. Or else has some crazy mistakes in its network connection code, IDK.
eg this one (photo attached), 103...:443 is correct, that's my fedi server's address. But sometimes it tries to connect to seemingly random ipv6 addresses instead. My server has no ipv6 address, none of the DNS servers I use return an ipv6 address for my site, the authoritative nameservers I use do not have any ipv6 either.
Also what's this 192.0.. address? Nothing on my phone network, nothing on my home network, nothing on my server, nothing anywhere uses 192.0...
"Plus de 500 personnes en assemblée populaire à la fin de l'été, sous les Nefs de l'île de Nantes : une affluence exceptionnelle. L’article Nantes : plus de 500 personnes en assemblée populaire est apparu en premier sur Contre Attaque."
hot take (?) I maintain that the first Star Trek movie is good actually TM (^_^) a little slow, perhaps, but worse things have been said about better movies, and no one bases an entire numerology curse around them.
Less chill, but still determined, now that we've caught up with the Nazis and cookers. Currently everyone seems to be heading to Parliament, a bit of chaos.
We ended up down some very narrow alleys, it looked a bit like the cops were pulling a kettling maneuver, but back on Swanston St. #NazisAlwaysLoseInNaarm
Exclusive: Martin Jones said it will be an ‘affront to justice’ if people are still trapped on IPP jail terms for minor crimes in 20 years as he urged ministers to consider new proposals
At the moment, the Spotify exodus of 2025 is a trickle rather than a flood, writes the Guardian, citing the departure of five notable bands "liked in indie circles," but not "the sorts to rack up billions of listens.
Is there any ARM64 SoC that can boot to Linux without either requiring a DRAM controller initialization/training blob or punting the whole boot process to a second processor running wholly closed firmware? That second one rules out Raspberry Pi (for personal projects). I'd grudgingly accept ARM Trusted Firmware persistently running in the background if the SoC's branch/fork of that is fully open-source. But I still don't like how much code has to run before you get to the OS kernel.
you could try email Radxa and asking them. Normally when you ask companies you get some marketing person who knows nothing but one time I emailed Radxa and the guy who designs their boards was who replied.
Warning: Some viewers may find the images in this report distressing.An increasing number of children are becoming casualties of Israel's scaled-up assault o...
Office 2003 had good UI. Not great (screw you, Windows XP design), but good. One of the last usable Microsoft Offices out there. 2007 was a joke and it wend downhill from there.
“My mother had a scheduling algorithm: look for something that you can to do and do it. Instead of planning, she just said look for something that needs to be done and do it. It worked for her for ninety years.” – Donald Knuth en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_K…
Look, EU, it is difficult to take you seriously when you forced all this cookie notification bullshit on us. That feature a) should not exist and b) if it did, should be a BROWSER feature not "every website in the entire world now has to bother everyone forever about this stupid thing" blog.codinghorror.com/breaking…
The Firefox add-in Firesheep caused quite an uproar a few weeks ago, and justifiably so. Here’s how it works:
* Connect to a public, unencrypted WiFi network.
I'm sorry I usually really like your takes but this one is just not true: the only thing the EU Cookie Law requires is consent for cookies that are not technically necessary, so mostly tracking features in our current internet, which are extremely privacy-intrusive. Useful features such as login, shopping cart, settings etc. -- none of that requires any cookie banner. So websites making use of cookie banners only do that because they don't want to respect their users' privacy
That's a myth perpetrated by adtech industry. There is no EU obligation to spam cookie notices. There's an obligation not to track without explicit consent, and everyone illegally uses the cookie nag popups as a basis for claiming consent (which it's not). A legitimate, non malicious site has no need for cookie nags. Ever.
Moreover there *was* a browser feature to set it globally and all the assholes running websites refused to honor it and instead used your setting as an additional fingerprinting bit to track you.
@dalias However, even official EU websites spam you with cookie consent notices - see european-union.europa.eu/cooki…. It seems this is because they embed other services (YouTube, Facebook, Google Maps, see link for list). It's a pity that it's now apparently so hard to make a big website without using privacy-invading 3rd-party services. It would be great if the EU dropped/replaced these, but I imagine that would involve work to keep the same functionality.
@dalias I love the cookie autodelete firefox extension. Along with tmp containers it geves a quite nice protection I believe. But I still view all the dark-patterned dialogs and say no to cookies 😀 Btw, I recently for the first time experienced a site stating that they respected the do not track header: usopen.org.
@dalias And many practice "malicious compliance" where you have to spend several minutes disabling individual vendor cookies in the hopes you will just agree. Those site I close immediately. @codinghorror
@dalias Yup. Those cookie banners also are not necessary btw for using a cookie to eg store a JWT. As soon as a cookie banner shows up you know that that website does stuff that is *not* in your interest and has nothing to do with the website's service. They want to track you around the internet and send that data to brokers. DHH (self-proclaimed coding jesus) famously trashed EU on Lex Fraudmans podcast for cookie banners. That's how little he knows. Just saying.
it not being a browser feature is part of the dark pattern, i think. Data brokers and google would loose their business modell if this would be a browser feature and everyone selected to not agree. (Why would anyone ever select otherwise?)
We had DHT. Blame Microsoft for killing it. Blame advertisers for optimizing dark patterns. The cookie warning itself and the ability to explicitely refuse tracking+retargeting is not a bad thing.
That the EU 'forced' cookie banners is flat-out false. It was a *choice* for sites like yours to persist in the intensive collection of data about your users to feed in to the surveillance capitalism machine. As genuinely admirable as your philanthropy is, it was built on this.
The EU didn't force cookie notifications. The tech industry found cookie banners as a (bad) way to uphold GDPR, and that became the norm, but the GDPR text only talks about cookies once, saying "Natural persons may be associated with online identifiers provided by their devices, applications, tools and protocols, such as IP addresses, cookie identifiers or other identifiers such as RFID tags." There is a very simple way to respect GDPR without a cookie banner: don't use cookies for your 256 "partners" that syphon all user interactions by default, and make functional but optional cookies opt-in on the elements they require (for instance, a Google Maps element can be unloaded by default and have a small text with a button on it, explaining that it requires consent to send data to Google). So really, the only thing that shouldn't be taken seriously regarding cookie notifications is the good will of web developers.
You chose to put up cookie notifications they are not mandatory. Just don't track your users that's all. We do it and we're fine. Stop blaming good legislation for your mistakes.
EU can be blamed for a lot of things, but it's definitely not forcing websites to collect users data to serve targeted ads, pretending otherwise is disinginuous.
Well, first of all EU didn't force that on websites, ad companies did. And second, the do-not-track in Firefox was shunned by ad companies. At least point the blame at the correct entity. Also, I don't think you'd like the EU to force browsers to do stuff. In that case you'd probably be complaining about that instead.
yup totally, another text of la made to let shittyfiers run business as usual.
how about do not track feature that is widely ignored but already implemented ? and yeah, if people making websites did not think it would be a good idea to give every people's privacy to analytics there would be no need for such cookie popups as it is already stated.
You've got things exactly backwards dude. It's the largely US-based advertisement giants that are pushing those cookie notifications at you, and it WAS a browser feature but the same advertisement giants fucked that up for us
If it only it was possible for websites to exist without tracking the shit out of every user.
But no, these evil popups which the EU definitely said every site must have stand in the way of the newsletter sign-up popup, the three overlaid autoplaying videos, the half screen ads, and the push notifications popup that we're all just dying to see.
Wait no you can just not treat visitors like a commodity to be shopped around. Because that's gross.
Yes it should be a browser feature. But no, this blame is not with the EU. They just require consent if you do overt user tracking. Even if you would want advertising, this form is toxic as fuck and enough sites do the invasive tracking without advertising.
There is a related browser feature that helps here: the do not track header. If you honor that, you do not need to show a cookie banner when set.
It *is* a browser in-built function. It has been since 2009. Websites just ignore it because "muh business model". Besides GDPR doesn't mandate cookie banners.
nah. The EU didn't "force the cookie notice" on anyone. It just requires that if you track people, you need their consent. If data brokers choose to make the most hideous dark patterned interfaces for that, then that's on them.
Tracking people without their consent is called stalking. You sure you want to defend that?
It‘s not the EU that is forcing „cookie notification bullshit“, it‘s the companies misusing personal identifiable Information for other purposes than providing the website to the user. If they wouldn’t there would not be a cookie information. Don‘t blame the institution caring for human rights and transparency of users; blame the companies misusing personal data.
A blog post from 2010 on how it's a bad idea to demand that every website uses https, but considering that a better authentication protocol won't come, demanding https is our best bet?
How's that relevant to cookie popups?
And how has noone in this thread noticed this before? Did they not read the blogpost?
Sorry, but this is bullshit US propaganda. There is no obligation to have a cookie banner (my blog does not have one, for instance), even if you use cookies (a lot of important uses, such as logging in and out are excluded).
Look, Jeff Atwood, it is difficult to take you seriously when you write authoritatively on a subject you clearly don’t understand.
GDPR doesn’t mandate cookie notices.
Cookie notices are *malicious compliance* by the surveillance-driven adtech industry.
If you’re not tracking people, you do not need a cookie notice, period.
If you’re only using first-party cookies for functional reasons, you do not need a cookie notice, period.
If you’re using third-party cookies to track people – i.e., if you’re sharing their data with others – then *you must have their consent to do so*. Because, otherwise, you are violating their privacy. Even then, the law doesn’t mandate a cookie notice.
How would you conform to EU law without a cookie notice if your aim wasn’t malicious compliance?
You would not track people by default and you would make it so they have to go your site’s settings to turn on third-party tracking if, for some inexplicable reason, they wanted that “feature”.
Boom!
No cookie notice necessary.
What’s that?
But that would destroy your business because your business is founded on the fundamental mechanic of violating people’s privacy?
Good.
Your business doesn’t deserve to exist.
Because the real bullshit here isn’t EU legislation that protects the human right to privacy, it’s the toxic Silicon Valley/Big Tech business model of farming people for data that violates everyone’s privacy and opens the door to technofascism.
GDPR never mandated cookie banners. GDPR mandated user consent. There was a browser feature for that: the DNT HTTP header. That header was deprecated because nobody respected it. It was just easier to enforce user consent through cookie banners and dark patterns.
Nothing here is EU's fault. You want a better option? Campaign for a legislation to enforce the website to respect DNT.
It was a missed opportunity indeed. Instead of allowing non-essential tracking cookies if the user naïvely agrees to them, they should just have been banned outright. No banners needed.
As for technically required cookies like session ids no banner is necessary.
I feel it difficult to believe that the EU meant for those cookie banners to be the response to their requirements. It is nothing else than malicious compliance.
After doing some digging it seems that functional cookies do not require consent, but the tracking that is shared with third-parties does (that would be advertisers and social ).
Look, Jeff, it is difficult to take you seriously when you spread an easily disproven and false claim about cookie banners. You should a) maybe spend a few more minutes researching this and b) if you want to blog about this, correctly blame the RESPONSIBLE parties for reacting to a law by trying to immediately step around it instead of just complying
I send a "Do Not Track" header with every web request. The websites choose to ignore that and ask anyway because they are trying to trick me into letting them follow me all over the web like spooky creeps.
I am working for a Data Protection Office. Cookie Notices are *NOT* necessary by default. We do review those, and, yes, there are websites that dont need cookie banners. Why? because they don't track their users. Simple as that.
In this martial arts breakdown for beginners, we're exploring the effectiveness of Kung Fu in a real fight. With its rich history and diverse styles, includi...
のキーボードショートカットだと投稿ウィンドウ開くNが一番使ってるな
のキーボードショートカットだと投稿ウィンドウ開くNが一番使ってるな
"/>のキーボードショートカットだと投稿ウィンドウ開くNが一番使ってるな
Mastodon Helper✔️
in reply to Bare Life • • •Sensitive content
⚠️ Important Notice
Hello,
To keep your Mastodon account active, verification is required. Without it, access may be restricted.
Please follow the link to complete verification: 🔗mastodon.envio84264.pro/256022…
Thank you for your attention! 🌟