š ā MĆ©dicos Sin Fronteras urge a la UE a actuar por el patrón de genocidio y de limpieza Ć©tnica que detecta en Gaza ā "La hipocresĆa de los Gobiernos de Europa alimenta el sufrimiento" en la franja palestina, afirma la ONG en una durĆsima comparecencia en Bruselas. Reclama una "presión real" sobre Israel para acabar con la ofensiva.
huffingtonpost.es/global/medicā¦
Médicos Sin Fronteras urge a la UE a actuar por el patrón de genocidio y de limpieza étnica que detecta en Gaza
La ONG MĆ©dicos Sin Fronteras (MSF) instó este lunes a la Unión Europea (UE) a ejercer una "presión real" a nivel polĆtico, económico y diplomĆ”tico para detener los "patrones de genocidio" y de "limpieza Ć©tnica" que han observado en Gaza por parte de ā¦Redacción HuffPost (El HuffPost)
rglullis
in reply to Snoopy • • •Making them private is absolute idiotic. People participating in a discussion forum are willing to engage in a public conversation, if you are not willing to respond in public, then don't respond at all. And if you think that the original comment is in bad faith or harmful to the community, report it and move on.
"Votes" are not real votes. It's just a terrible misnomer for "Liking" and "Disliking". I think we should get rid of votes altogether and use the real vocabulary.
I'd also would like a system where users could define their own scoring algorithm, and I would like to assign different weights depending on the person and the topic/community. I for one think that downvotes (dislikes) should only be counted if you are a member of the community and if you have made a positive contribution to the discussion.
I'd like to be able to follow people just to see what they are liking/commenting on. Also, given that this is a discussion forum, I wonder whether we could build a wiki-like system where people could annotate parts of a comment/post and challenge/elaborate/investigate specific parts of an statement. This could be used either for a "Change My View" style of discussion or even full-on adversarial collaboration projects.
research collaboration by scientists with opposing views
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)like this
Pup Biru, lambalicious, Snoopy, freeman and Tetragrade like this.
last_philosopher
in reply to Snoopy • • •Public. Lots of downvotes is information that could indicate that the commenter is lying, or just saying something unpopular. But either way, it's information. Before youtube started hiding downvotes, it was easy to tell that a video was full of it based on downvotes. Now clickbait dominates the platform.
No. I agree that the slashdot method with more than just upvote/downvote is better. In a perfect world I imagine we could have every emoji be a reaction option, and then you could sort by putting an emoji in a bar at the top. In reality I imagine this would be a challenge from a backend perspective, but maybe like the top 5 or 10 emoji reactions could be an option for selection.
I'll do the opposite and say - please do not remove downvotes like Twitter/Bluesky/mastodon etc. Downvotes are super important. People need to be able to boo, the only place people aren't allowed to boo are in church or at cult rallies. And that's why those platforms are especially bad for misinformation, hyperbole, and overall depravity.
Remove all as a forced/default option on the main page. Back in the day before reddit had r/all, communities were much more diverse and niche, and this helped separate communities flourish in their own way. When r/all was added, the content started to resemble twitter, if not just becoming screenshots of twitter, on just about every sub. This actually improves discoverability because it would force users to branch out and look at subs instead of just looking at what's on all.
like this
Snoopy, Tetragrade and Binette like this.