Le "Gobi Wall", ce mur médiéval méconnu qui éclaire l'histoire des frontières en Asie
Ni tout à fait une muraille, ni simplement une frontière, le "Gobi Wall" révèle une stratégie de contrôle du territoire étonnamment sophistiquée, conçue par un empire nomade longtemps marginalisé.
geo.fr/histoire/le-gobi-wall-c…
like this
Emmanuel Florac reshared this.
airikr
in reply to elements • • •XXIC3CXSTL3Z
in reply to airikr • • •airikr
in reply to XXIC3CXSTL3Z • • •glowie - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
WiktionaryXXIC3CXSTL3Z
in reply to airikr • • •airikr
in reply to XXIC3CXSTL3Z • • •solardirus
in reply to elements • • •I really have no idea why everyone is bashing Signal so much here. None of the concerns listed seem even slightly technical.
The only problem I have with signal is that it is:
A. Centralized (which isn't explicitly a privacy concern, but a control concern in-line with linux and foss)
B. Requires a phone number to register.
It is quite private in spite of that, and goes to great lengths to achieve that privacy. It is what I see people in the security community consistently suggest.
However, if this is a public group, are we to really be that concerned about many of the considerations Signal tries to tackle? Worst case scenario a bad actor simply enters the chat and backs everything up.
It seems like our threat model is moreso in the way of general surveillance economy concerns (and perhaps to have a slightly less public entry).
In this case, point A and B become even more glaring! Why not something like an E2E encrypted Matrix chat?
kurumin
in reply to elements • • •XXIC3CXSTL3Z
in reply to kurumin • • •