Please tell your friends about federated social media site that speaks several fediverse protocols thus serving as a hub uniting them, hubzilla.eskimo.com, also check out friendica.eskimo.com, federated
macroblogging social media site, mastodon.eskimo.com a federated microblogging site, and yacy.eskimo.com an uncensored federated search engine. All Free!
This chart is fascinating, although it's unfortunate that so many states don't have a specific category assigned to them. I just can't help but notice how many weeabo degenerates (I am part of said degenerates) must be living in Wisconsin, and Oregon being furry makes me wonder how many furries live there.
I don't like their company because they are also like the meta of porn in the sense that they bought up all their competitors and have made a monolith service
I made it to the final round of interviewing with them a couple years ago. I think it would have been interesting to work for them. They have PHP and even some Laravel in their stack.
Yeah I was a bit surprised too, they even told me how well I did during the interview and how I was getting stuff right that most of their candidates get wrong, and they made it seem like I should expect an offer from them. I think the dealbreaker was that I hadn't worked with message brokers before.
I really don't see what kind of percentage you were expecting. To me it looks almost exactly like the market share of android in the areas of the world where PH is used.
I think smartphones definitely win when it comes to convenience, accessibility, and ease of use. Even at home I use my phone a whole dang lot for general chill purposes, even though I have bigger and better screens to use.
I can't comment on porn because I genuinely never watch porn of any sort (yes, I'm serious), but I have watched and enjoyed YouTube and Netflix et al on my phone, even at home. I usually prefer a bigger screen but sometimes the portability wins out.
Anecdotally, I only visit PH on my phone and I use incognito mode sometimes, which I'm just guessing would count as a unique visit. Probably a lot of people are doing the same thing, and globally more people run Android than iOS.
I don't like YoY share percentage point delta. It's misleading and making it seem like a significant number of Mac users left, although they probably just stagnated while more Windows and Linux users came. I'd rarher see YoY absolute number delta.
I'm very confused about the significant drop in Apple users as well, but I'm not sure that it's purely caused by a userbase increase. E.g. in mobile, for or this big of a change to occur you would need the userbase to increase by 38% and for none of those new users to be iPhone users. I don't feel like that's a realistic YoY increase in users at this late stage.
Under video game consoles, it lists 0.1% for "Other (3DS/PS Vita)". Unless PornHub offers 3D porn that works on the 3DS (do they?!), I refuse to believe even 0.01% would use the 3DS browser in this capacity.
(On the other hand, that's 0.1% of video game consoles, and I can't imagine too many people use their consoles for porn in the first place... Basically I'd love to see absolute numbers for this)
Why? Did you get stuck in a washing machine yourself at some point?
On a more serious note, I remember reading an article once about this phenomenon. About how it's not some widespread latent sex fantasy to fuck step-siblings. Rather it's an odd reflection of how algorithms poison the content in this attention economy. The more unusual the content is (without being outright objectionable), then the more attention it gets for being so unusual. That starts a wave of new creations from content creators to jump on the bandwagon for the popularity of the content that seems to be getting traction. Then pretty soon anyone not catering to this "demand" is an outlier and loses out, so eventually this theme of content floods the entire ecosystem.
I hear ya. I really wish we could go back to the good old days of "who ordered the extra large sausage pizza" and " I'm here to check your plumbing, ma'am".
Yeah I mean if you’re going to make weird fetish stuff, do it I just hate that some videos that I might enjoy watching are kind of ruined for me just by the title.
Do they provide any source on how data is collected ? Does „only technically necessary cookies“ include in this data or is this an opt in only. Is there any method to filter out bot traffic? ( many downloader use an androidTV ID)
Windows has been getting continuously worse so it's not surprising that those with the income available are continuously willing to spend more to get out of it.
Based on the drop in Safari usage on mobile and desktop, and the increase in Firefox and Opera usage. I'm sort of assuming they swapped over to use the builtin VPN in opera or an extension in Firefox to bypass the blocks.
I'm sorry. There are people who go to an adult hardcore porn site and then type in "Suitable for work"??? Like do you think the site wouldn't get flagged at your work?
Idk, I saw a post on pornhub stats on I believe a map community that showed that cuddles were quite a popular tag. And if it's wholesome and comfy looking why not?
I'm somewhat proud my generation is actively seeking out parody porn. Those videos tend to be higher budget and more sex positive (less gonzo misogyny).
Edit: well, should caveat that by saying relatively less misogynist
As someone else said, they probably kept the original age bracket. I'd say it's at least 5-6 years out of whack. Early Ys are starting their forties, late ones their thirties.
Same here, but it also depends per country since well average life spans, average age to buy a house, average age to start a family etc all have an impact on when a new generation starts.
Vertical video is better for content focused on a single standing performer, because it allows as much of the screen resolution as possible to show the body. Horizontal is better for a performer lying down or any traditional horizontal sex acts, for the same reason.
I'm probably reading a little too far into this, but IMO Gen Z is much less interested in "simulations" of intercourse and is more interested in something "real", i.e someone doing a dance. Intercourse feels like a fantasy, like you're supposed to imagine that you're the one having intercourse, it's that fantasy which is appealing. Something like dancing or dirty talking is more honest about what it is, since a video of someone dancing or talking is essentially the same experience as if they were actually there in front of you. I believe that because Gen Z is more digitally native than older generations, they see digital content not as a substitute or fantasy for a real thing, but rather as a real thing in itself, and the nature of the content they consume reflects that. Another example of this is the shift from real-life streamers who fake personalities but pretend that they are presenting their real selves, to vtubers - who implicitly acknowledge that they are playing a fictional character for their stream as symbolized by their avatars. The human streamers are a fantasy substitute for a real human friend, but with a vtuber the content does not pretend to be different than what it actually is - a pretend character putting on a show for your enjoyment. By acknowledging its artificiality and integrating it into the content itself, it shifts from being something "fake" and "simulated" to being something "real". To me it's the exact same dynamic manifesting in a different area.
Now of course, I do understand that vertical content also simply means you don't need to rotate your phone, and that Gen Z is almost exclusively using the Internet on the phone vs. the desktop as older generations will. But this too is essentially a reflection of the feeling that digital content is not an artificial recreation confined to a specific display area (a TV or computer) but rather perpetually available (your phone), as would be appropriate for something which has taken on the status of being real rather than fake. The two forces reinforce each other, imo.
I wonder how much of this rise is caused by all of the recent state porn bans in the USA. Linux users are overall savvier and more likely able to circumvent the ban
My guess is the increase is due to two factors: Linux based vms scraping PH content to create tensor training models for nsfw AI image generators and individuals in the U.S. visiting behind a vpn that’s registering to the client as a Linux device. I’d visit the link but I’m not behind a vpn.
Or, and hear me out, what if they actually have good engineers and know how to sanitise their analytics? And at the risk of sounding crazy, what if the reason that the Linux share is rising is because it’s genuinely becoming more popular?
User agent logging is often done by running javascript locally on a machine, so the vpn would just pass the javascript to the local machine on which it would be run, so the data wouldn't be effected that way.
Sometimes TLS fingerprinting is done to try to identify bots and not sure if bots would be included. They probably would be included because if they were blocked, then the javascript catching user would never be run on their machine, although I'm unsure of whether such bots would run useragent fingerprinting javascriot yo try to blend in or block it to avoid unneeded processing.
So, Linux doesn't have a general icon and ChromeOS's icon isn't used, what could be an ideal icon/logo for the Linux Kernel, I wonder?
WhatsApp recently pulled support for some older iOS versions and devices, a lot of ppl threw them away and got Androids instead(as they should), I wonder if that's related to iOS's decrease.
Android devices dominate in a lot of countries, especially Asian countries, where our growth in those regions in the last few years has boosted Android’s user base.
As long as you don't use any of the windows and use the front door like my pet penguin, I won't mind. And there's a kernel of truth in there and by that I don't mean the kernel of an apple.
My apologies, this data is misleading. Most of the new traffic is actually just me mass downloading and data hoarding porn across thousands of VMs. Whenever I need to rub one out I ssh into one of them and watch it that way. Keeps it off my main machine and keeps my browser history clean.
I switched from Windows to Linux then went back to Windows cause of mutliplayer games and I'm not sure I'm a fan....like its kinda annoying having to udpate my programs individually.
Using something like PeerTube is potentially even worse because let's say you unknowingly open a video where someone in it looks of age but technically isn't. You as a user help propagate that content while you have it open. You're not just downloading illegal content at that point. You're actively sharing it to new people.
You as a user help propagate that content while you have it open.
I'm sure that's a legal grey area that hasn't been explored largely but I would think you would have to actually host the content or have it on your device locally.
In a sense, you are hosting the content. You're retaining a copy (so long as the window is open) and constantly attempting to spread it. It's literally built on bittorrent protocols if I remember correctly, and it's already very well established that you can be held responsible for seeding copyright infringing material, so I see no reason at all they'd give you a pass for CP instead. You may not intend to, but remember, my example was someone who looks of age but is not.
Legal yeah, but it doesn't stop ... thousands? tens of thousands? of random porn sites. There's no shortage of community driven porn at the moment. Federated solutions only seem to pop up when there's sufficient non-legal censorship of community-driven content.
I am very suspicious of the -26% Apple marketshare. It makes me feel like there's more to this than it seems at first. There's no way 26% of Apple users stopped using Apple devices within a year.
Edit: maybe it could be caused by a large user base increase that shifted the demographics, but this fast? And the PornHub bans across US states started only this year for the most part if I'm not mistaken, so it shouldn't affect this data?
2024 was the release of iOS 17.4, when Apple allowed third party browsers to use their own engine instead of WebKit/Safari as a layer beneath. So it could very well be that Firefox Mobile and Chrome Mobile on iOS don’t get registered as iOS Device in this survey due to their user agent.
Well, been * ahem * told that a friend of a friend didn't found any videos there were "Your friendly neighborhood geek goes into the house of a hot milf to upgrade her Windows 10 machine to Arch and she shows them how hot she found their Linux install skills and how thankful she is", so that seems unlikely.
« Mes amis Que l’on me donne 6 heures pour couper un arbre, j’en passerai 4 à préparer ma hache. » Cette citation d’Abraham Lincoln a été un déclic pour moi. Apprenez-la, notez-la, ne l’oubliez pas, elle vous aidera à intégrer la notion d’investissement dans la perte. »
"The latest UN report names hundreds of corporations, banks, technology firms, universities, pension funds & charities that profit from the Israeli occupation & genocide."
The report includes "a database of over 1,000 corporate entities that collaborate with Israel".
“Israel’s “forever-occuption” as “the ideal testing ground for arms manufacturers and Big Tech".
The latest United Nations report names hundreds of corporations, banks, technology firms, universities, pension funds and charities that profit from the Israeli occupation and genocide.
The White Resistance Movement is in the early meta-political stage of it's development, wherein it is extremely important for us to spread the word about how our political system really works. With almost 100 books on its digital shelves, the Colchester Collection's "Politics & Society" catalog is designed to help you learn the truth of our political situation so that you can help spread that word.
War Estimated Total Cost Estimated Deaths Approximate Cost per Death World War I $208 billion 15–22 million $9,450 – $13,850 World War II $4.1 trillion 70–85 million $48,235 – $58,571 Korean War $341 billion ~2.5 million ~$136,400 Vietnam War $1 trillion ~3 million ~$333,333 Iran-Iraq War $500 billion (est.) ~1 million ~$500,000 Iraq War $2 trillion 500,000–1 million $2 million – $4 million War in Afghanistan $2.3 trillion ~240,000 ~$9.6 million Global War on Terror $8 trillion+ ~900,000 ~$8.9 million In a world where global hunger persists, where families struggle to afford housing, healthcare, or education, the staggering cost of modern warfare reveals a haunting truth: we are spending millions—sometimes billions—per death to kill one another, when that same money could sustain countless lives. It no longer makes moral, ethical, or economic sense to wage war. The cost of killing one human being in war today could feed, house, and educate entire families for generations.
A brief look at the historical ledger of war costs drives the point home. During **World War I**, the inflation-adjusted cost per death hovered around **\$10,000–\$14,000**. By **World War II**, this jumped to **\$50,000 per death**. In the **Vietnam War**, that number skyrocketed to over **\$330,000**, and in the **Iraq War**, it ballooned to a staggering **\$2–4 million per death**. These figures are not just economic abstractions—they reflect a moral chasm. Imagine what \$2 million could do in a struggling community: provide clean water, fund clinics, pay teachers, build homes. Instead, it is used to destroy lives and infrastructures, to traumatize survivors, and to deepen divisions that can last generations.
Even more troubling is that these costs are not borne equally. In 2024, each U.S. worker effectively contributed about **\$664** of their labor-derived taxes to fund wars in places like Ukraine, Israel, or Iraq—wars that many of them never voted on, never supported, and from which they derive no benefit. This forced contribution violates the principle of democratic accountability. Why should a worker in Detroit or a teacher in rural Montana finance a missile strike in Gaza or the occupation of foreign soil? Shouldn’t those who advocate for war bear its financial burden personally?
The human cost is not just lives lost. War displaces families, destroys livelihoods, and creates generational trauma. Civilian casualties often outnumber military ones. In conflicts like the **Iran-Iraq War** or the **Iraq War**, a large portion of the dead were not soldiers, but mothers, children, and the elderly. The euphemistic term "collateral damage" hides the reality of human suffering behind sterile accounting.
Beyond death tolls and taxpayer burdens lies an even deeper problem: war as policy is morally obsolete. In an era of nuclear weapons, drones, and artificial intelligence, war is less about soldiers on battlefields and more about devastating civilian populations from afar—remotely, impersonally, and with increasing detachment from ethical considerations.
Furthermore, war is inefficient. Economists and ethicists alike point out that for every dollar spent on war, a fraction of that amount spent on diplomacy, development, or humanitarian aid yields far greater and more lasting peace. For example, redirecting just a portion of the **\$107 billion** recently allocated to military efforts could completely fund programs to end homelessness in the United States or eradicate malaria globally.
War is not inevitable. It is a choice—one that politicians make with money taken from ordinary people. That choice is often sold to the public under the guise of national security, but more often it serves corporate interests, geopolitical dominance, or political posturing.
If war advocates truly believe in its necessity, let them finance it themselves. Let them forego their tax breaks, their corporate subsidies, their political donations, and instead fund their wars through voluntary contributions. Let them look into the eyes of those who must die for their policies and justify the cost—not just in dollars, but in blood and dignity.
**Conclusion**
To continue killing at the cost of millions per death, while families go hungry and the planet burns, is to commit an unforgivable betrayal of our shared humanity. The economic cost of war alone proves its insanity; the moral cost confirms its evil. In a time when we can no longer afford ignorance, we must demand better accounting—not just in budgets, but in conscience. It is time to stop funding death and start investing in life.
The cost figures are mostly U.S. expenditures where available, and casualties include both military and civilian deaths where possible.
| War | Total Cost (USD, Inflation Adjusted) | Estimated Deaths (Military + Civilian) | Approximate Cost per Death (USD) | Notes | |-------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-------| | **World War I** | ~$208 billion (in 2020 dollars) | 15–22 million | $9,450 – $13,850 | Total deaths ~40 million including wounded; U.S. cost ~$22 billion (nominal) | | **World War II** | ~$4.1 trillion (in 2020 dollars) | 70–85 million | $48,235 – $58,571 | Massive global conflict with highest casualties and costs | | **Korean War** | ~$341 billion (in 2020 dollars) | ~2.5 million | ~$136,400 | U.S. cost about $30 billion nominal | | **Vietnam War** | ~$1 trillion (in 2020 dollars) | ~3 million | ~$333,333 | Includes military and civilian deaths in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia | | **Iran-Iraq War** | ~$500 billion (estimated) | ~1 million | ~$500,000 | Exact cost estimates vary; long war with heavy casualties | | **Iraq War** | ~$2 trillion (including long-term costs) | ~500,000 – 1 million | $2 million – $4 million | Includes direct and indirect costs, casualties vary by source |
### Explanation and Sources:
- **World War I:** - Deaths: 15–22 million (military + civilian), with about 40 million total casualties including wounded[1][2][3]. - Cost: U.S. spent about $22 billion nominal, inflation adjusted to about $208 billion[6]. - Cost per death: ~$10,000–$14,000 range.
- **World War II:** - Deaths: 70–85 million total (military + civilian). - Cost: U.S. alone spent about $4.1 trillion inflation-adjusted[7]. - Cost per death: ~$50,000.
- **Korean War:** - Deaths: ~2.5 million (military + civilian). - Cost: U.S. spent about $30 billion nominal, ~$341 billion inflation adjusted. - Cost per death: ~$136,000.
- **Vietnam War:** - Deaths: ~3 million (including civilians in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia). - Cost: U.S. spent about $168 billion nominal, ~$1 trillion inflation adjusted. - Cost per death: ~$333,000.
- **Iran-Iraq War:** - Deaths: ~1 million estimated. - Cost: Estimated at around $500 billion total (hard to get exact). - Cost per death: ~$500,000.
- **Iraq War:** - Deaths: Estimates vary widely, 500,000 to 1 million total. - Cost: U.S. cost estimated at $2 trillion including long-term costs. - Cost per death: $2 million to $4 million.
### Summary
| War | Deaths (millions) | Cost (2020 USD, trillions) | Cost per Death (USD) | |-------------------|-------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------| | WWI | 15–22 | 0.208 | $9,450 – $13,850 | | WWII | 70–85 | 4.1 | $48,235 – $58,571 | | Korean War | 2.5 | 0.341 | ~$136,400 | | Vietnam War | 3 | 1.0 | ~$333,333 | | Iran-Iraq War | 1 | 0.5 (estimate) | ~$500,000 | | Iraq War | 0.5–1 | 2.0 | $2 million – $4 million |
### Notes:
- These figures are rough estimates based on available data and inflation adjustments. - Cost per death is a blunt measure and does not account for wounded, displaced, or long-term suffering. - Civilian casualties are included where data is available, but estimates vary widely. - The Iran-Iraq War and Iraq War costs are less precise due to varying sources and indirect costs.
If you want, I can help you with more detailed breakdowns or specific country costs and casualties.
[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wa… [2] ww1hull.com/the-cost-in-lives/ [3] britannica.com/event/World-War… [4] loc.gov/collections/world-war-… [5] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wa… [6] loc.gov/collections/world-war-… [7] khanlearning.weebly.com/upload… Russians and Palestinians, ethical concerns are heightened. In the context of 2024, where an estimated $664 per citizen went towards such actions, it is imperative to scrutinize the morality of such expenditures. At $664 per citizen, extracted from the hard-earned incomes of taxpayers, the allocation towards conflicts that may lead to harm against certain communities raises significant ethical questions. Firstly, it challenges the principles of justice and fairness. Should individuals who have no direct involvement in or support for these conflicts be compelled to finance actions that may result in harm to innocent civilians, particularly those in targeted populations? Moreover, there is a moral imperative to consider the consequences of war. Beyond the financial cost, war inflicts immeasurable human suffering, loss, and trauma. Allocating taxpayer funds to support military actions against specific groups perpetuates cycles of violence and undermines the principles of equality and human dignity. Additionally, the decision-making process regarding war expenditures raises issues of democratic accountability. When governments allocate taxpayer money for military purposes, they do so on behalf of the entire population. However, if the decision to engage in war is not subjected to rigorous public scrutiny and debate, it undermines the democratic principle of government by the people, for the people. In light of these ethical concerns, there is a compelling argument for those advocating for military action and war spending to bear the financial burden themselves. Rather than imposing the cost on all taxpayers indiscriminately, those who support and advocate for military interventions should be required to contribute directly to funding these endeavors. This approach aligns with the principles of individual responsibility and accountability. If individuals believe strongly in the necessity of military action, they should be willing to shoulder the financial cost themselves rather than imposing it on others. In conclusion, the allocation of taxpayer money for war, particularly when it involves targeting specific groups like Russians and Palestinians, raises significant ethical questions. It challenges principles of justice, fairness, human dignity, and democratic accountability. As we move forward, it is essential for policymakers to consider alternative mechanisms for funding military actions that respect these principles and ensure greater accountability and ethical responsibility in decision-making processes. To calculate the cost per person for the combined expenses of $93 billion plus $14 billion, given away for war, we first need to find the total amount spent on war. Adding these two figures gives us $107 billion. Next, to determine the cost per person, we divide the total amount spent on war by the number of workers. According to the information provided, there are 161 million workers. \[ \text{Cost per person} = \frac{\text{Total war expenditure}}{\text{Number of workers}} \] \[ \text{Cost per person} = \frac{\$107,000,000,000}{161,000,000} \] \[ \text{Cost per person} ≈ \$664.60 \] So, each person would have to pay approximately $664.60 for the combined expenses of $93 billion plus $14 billion given away for war. However, if we want to include the cost of other conflicts such as the ones mentioned (murdering Russians, Gaza, Ukraine, and general war expenses), we'd need more specific data on the costs associated with those conflicts. The figure provided only accounts for the expenses related to war generally, so it's challenging to calculate the precise cost per person without more detailed information.
World War I - Casualties, Armistice, Legacy: The casualties suffered by the military in World War I are estimated to be about 8,500,000 soldiers who died as a result of wounds and/or disease.
Since 2020, direct action group Palestine Action have documented their operations to dismantle the companies and infrastructure supplying weapons to the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
I said this before Microsoft announced they were firing another 9000 people to cover the cost of racking another warehouse full of nvidia gear.
It’s boring truism at this point that every large complex system that works started life as small, simple system that works, and then grew up. So why aren’t we seeing anything like that in this generative AI push? If this is going to work at all, why isn’t it working yet?
If all you have is an insanely expensive, rapidly depreciating hammer, everything had better be a nail or you'll never hit quarterly shareholder expectations.
AI's target audience is people who use search engines, the more, the better. That population, aside from shoppers, is often driven by curiosity. And as such, most don't want to turn to a resource prone to bullshit and wasting time having to mind it, check it, etc. So it's a loser push, like the assholes techbro nazis that run this crap show.
when I’m dancing at the studio and I feel like I am being watched in case my instructor goes over the paid time with my private lesson or we flirt with each other against rules on fraternization
NEW: The Supreme Court will decide next term whether states may lawfully prohibit transgender women and girls from participating in school sports on the women's team.
Alito—author of Dobbs, who promised to leave abortion to the democratic process—suggests that he thinks the Constitution may well forbid states from letting minors get an abortion without parental consent, because parents have a substantive due process right to force their kids to give birth ...
Especially if a family member or said parent is responsible for the pregnancy. This is some biblical hate and immorality here. One should be embarrassed to call themselves a Christian. Either that, or you need to go after your fanatic, rabid brothers in christ. You want to protest. Then, protest outside these churches, embarrass them when and wherever possible, and lastly, organize against them where they are. It's bad enough that they are passing immoral laws based on ignorance.
Such a double standard here. I have a 13 year old and I cannot talk to the doctors about his medical care without him present and agreeing to discuss the care, because it is private. All I can do without him present is pay his medical bills.
But they are saying that a parent can force a child to give birth.
If we have to ban trans women from sports because they have an unfair advantage over cis women, then we must ban cis men from sports because we have an unfair advantage over trans men.
The Instagram account of a well known anti-Zionist Jewish comedian was deleted after Meta's Public Policy Director for Israel and the Jewish Diaspora viewed one of his stories. This is just one example of the anti-Palestinian bias across Big Tech. mondoweiss.net/2025/07/metas-b…
The Instagram account of a well known anti-Zionist Jewish comedian was deleted after Meta’s Public Policy Director for Israel and the Jewish Diaspora viewed one of his stories. This is just one example of the anti-Palestinian bias across Big Tech.
« Mes amis Investir dans la perte, c’est accepter de « perdre du temps » à préparer et baliser le terrain, pour, en fin de compte, être plus efficient lorsque l’on se met au travail. Le temps « perdu » à s’organiser permet d’en gagner. »
"I don't think these pundits understand that the vast majority of us in this country, especially those of us under 40, simply don’t care. We truly do not care. This is not a system that works for us."
These people should be enjoying their lives, tinkering in a garden, taking up hobbies, making friends and hanging out in libraries keeping their minds stimulated, or volunteering when they feel like it; but instead they’re busting their humps doing work that is beyond their bodies comfort zone.
Dozens of people were killed in airstrikes that pounded tents and a school sheltering displaced people in the Strip Wednesday night and Thursday morning.
She's Trying to CENSOR the Internet .. but she's LOSING 🤣 Billboard Chris vs Thought Police 💥. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner tried to censor Billboard C...
She's Trying to CENSOR the Internet .. but she's LOSING 🤣 Billboard Chris vs Thought Police 💥. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner tried to censor Billboard C...
right with ya. I do know lots of people who don't mind it, and some folks who celebrate it...so gonna encourage them to go outside and play taps this year. Loudly.
#StopKillingGames is about to reach its millionth signature as we speak, a month before the deadline. A tiny, but very necessary step in the right direction.
In diesem Statement des Lemkin-Institute geht's um unsere Bundesregierung, deren Unterstützung für einen völkerrechtswidrigen Angriffskrieges und die Verharmlosung dessen mit Gerede über die "#Drecksarbeit".
»The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security reminds that the expression "doing the dirty work" (die Drecksarbeit machen) relates to organized crime and is often used to describe contract killings or extrajudicial executions«
»The Lemkin Institute further reminds Chancellor Merz that the expression was also utilized by Nazi officials to justify their actions. For example, SS Chief Storm Leader August Häfner used the term when he was on trial for his role in the massacre of Babi Yar, where Nazi shooting squads and their collaborators murdered 33,771 Jews in less than two days.«
Ça mérite un post tout seul 😀 Par manque de connaissance du dossier (complexe et sinueux), je ne partage pas absolument toutes les certitudes de Candace #Owens quant au couple de dangereux escrocs élyséens, pour autant j'apprécie (et je crois en) sa sincérité et son intégrité. Et là elle révèle simplement, en bref, que Trump, qui recevait macron à la maison blanche, lui a téléphoné directement pour lui indiquer que #macron lui avait discrètement demandé de faire fermer sa bouche à #CandaceOwens, ainsi en échange macron pourrait œuvrer pour la paix en #Ukraine. Après les lettres envoyées par les avocats de bribri à candace, ça monte encore d'un cran, c'est juste ÉNORME. Ce dangereux couple est complètement cramé et encore et toujours protégé par le #médiavers français, ses #chiens-de-garde, ses truands et les journalopes officiels.... Et Trump la joue fine....en le sachant....ou pas:-) Pendant ce temps, les abrutis pipolitiques (qui ne sont pas comploplo eux, évidemment, enfin !! Aucune raison de douter de Brigitte, pas plus que de Pfizer, enfin !) font mumuse avec du secondaire ... On attend les réactions du #médiavers français aux ordres ....
Le 29 juin, un homme a été retrouvé mort après une terrible chute depuis sa fenêtre dans le 12ème arrondissement de Paris. Le bureau du médecin légiste a
En admettant que Brigitte est ou était un homme et n'assume pas... En quoi c'est une information importante? Ça me semble comme discuter du sexe des anges...
Ils ont mentis depuis le tout début, elle n'a jamais dit qu'elle était née femme, ils sont fake total, il est pervers, youngleader, vendu, corrupteur, menteur, cocaïnomane, tient des discours de tordu charmeur, ils ont trafiqué des papiers, ont fait faire des faux, ont éborgnés et enfermé les français, ont coulé la France, ils se gavent et vivent comme des pachas, on a pas de détails ni photos sur le passé d'un couple présidentiel, toi ça ne te déranges pas ? Il y a des gens que ça dérange, dont moi. On doit pas avoir les mêmes critères ou valeurs. Nous causons de politique, de gérer humainement des bases de la vie de 60 et quelques millions de personnes. Je ne veux pas de tocards pervers, dangereux, inconnus, menteurs, avec tout ce pouvoir à la tête d'un pays. Il est en plus majoritairement rejeté et ce serait le moyen le plus évident et logique de virer le manuléon qui se rêve chef de l'europe en guerre... mais le médiavers veille....
L'importance n'est pas le fait qu'elle soit un homme ou pas mais toute la magouille que le couple as fait, les mensonges et même quelques mortalités suspectes (probablement meurtres déguisés en suicide ou accident) et la réputation détruites de quelques témoins... Ça pue cette affaire!
je dis juste que le fait qu’elle soit un homme n’a aucune importance en regard de tout le reste.
Pourquoi insistes-tu la-dessus en le découplant de tout le reste ? Pour paraître "progressiste"? Ca s'imbrique dans tout le reste ! C'est hallucinant, ici plusieurs insistent sur ce point uniquement, alors que ça n'est pas la question du tout, c'est leur fausseté la question ! Arrêtez de pointer des détails qui sont juste à coté des points importants, c'est une technique d'enfumage.
Je veux bien être taxé de prétentieux, pas ambitieux 😀 J'ai aussi la prétention de connaître mes limites, ou de me les prendre dans la tronche de temps en temps.. En passant, l'inconscient, c'est justement pas lui qui va te dire : "ah si...j'ai exprimé ça pour ...blablabla" !
C'est quand même étrange, sur un sujet si grave, de parler d'un détail pour le découpler de tout le contexte qui est l'essence du message, qui pourrait envoyer les tordus en justice !
An archetypical "shoot and cry" genre piece for the ages.
You can't make this shit up. It is all, 100%, about their personal "suffering" and trauma. How the child corpses ruin their appetite. The smell, mind you, not anguish over who they killed. Don't get the wrong impression, they do express feelings of guilt: over the shooting of dogs, or loosing their temper and throwing a can of tuna at a fellow soldier, or endangering the hostages.
And if you needed any proof that there is no repressed deep underlying shame vis-à-vis the tens of thousands of murdered Palestinian children, that the mind-boggling myopia where only Israelis even exist for real is totally authentic, there's the chef's kiss at the end:
❞When will you understand that it's time to end this? When there are 900 dead? A thousand? Please – stop. Speak out. Protest. Don't let all this death keep going.❝
Sent into Gaza straight from high school, five young Israeli conscripts describe the brutal, exhausting reality of the war with Hamas – a world of despair, rage and crippling fear, with no end in sight
06:20 Palestinian sources: Over 70 killed and dozens injured in Israeli massacres in Gaza since dawn, including 11 waiting for aid english.masirahtv.net/news/362…
« Mes amis Quiconque respecte une deadline, notamment en entreprise et auprès de ses collaborateurs, dégage une bonne image de lui-même. Avec soi-même, cela est aussi vrai : quand on se tient aux échéances que l’on s’est fixées, on est fier de soi. Notre estime de soi est nourrie. »
« Mes amis En définissant un temps d’action, nous aidons notre cerveau à être concentré et productif. Le cerveau aime les dates butoir : parce qu’il sait qu’il faut avancer, il mobilise ses ressources. Nous pouvons donc établir des échéances pour chacun de nos projets »
The BUB has passed the Senate, putting nursing homes, rural hospitals, and emergency care on the chopping block, while making it easier to buy silencers and deadly firearms! Make sure your representative knows that you want them to vote NO. Go to democratsabroad.org/fight_back…
Democrats Abroad strives to provide Americans abroad a Democratic voice in our government and elect Democratic candidates by mobilizing the overseas vote.
Antarctic sea ice extent has fallen dramatically in recent years – the effects include accelerated ocean warming, faster loss of inland ice sheets and severe impacts on wildlife
Job Creators Network CEO Alfredo Ortiz: "Hats off to President Trump because this three-legged stool of his has really been powerful: The trade, taxes, and regulations together. It's all about Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!"
TEHRAN, Jul. 03 (MNA) – Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has dismissed the European Union’s recent push to initiate talks aimed at halting Iran’s nuclear program.
« Mes amis Les tâches urgentes et importantes ne doivent pas représenter plus de 20 % des tâches à exécuter dans une journée, pour éviter le stress. On parvient à ce ratio si on anticipe. »
«Mes amis La réalisation d’une to-do list et d’un planning est parfois considérée comme une perte de temps. Or prendre le temps de les établir nous en fait gagner ensuite : on est plus efficace, on sait où on va, on ne procrastine plus… Cela revient à investir dans la perte
stinkyFollow Me: https://www.instagram.com/hunterwiilliams/Drayton: https://www.instagram.com/draytonrw/ (@draytonwilliamsYT )Where I Get Music: https://fm....
This article was first published in Arabic on 7iber by Reem Almasri - April 21, 2025.
Since opening its offices in Israel in 2013, Google has shown ongoing admiration for the state's role in the global tech scene.
« Mes amis Identifiez dès maintenant un temps de votre journée qui risque d’être perdu, et prenez la décision de le remplacer par une activité qui vous rend fier.
Et si, plutôt que de passer trente minutes sur Instagram avant de dormir, vous ouvriez un livre ?
Et si, plutôt que d’attraper la télécommande dans le but de lancer un programme télé, vous écoutiez un podcast en lien avec vos préoccupations ou désirs du moment ?Pour vous motiver, pensez à la satisfaction que vous en tirerez ensuite. »
« Parfois, le temps personnel (loisirs, détente…) devient du temps perdu, notamment quand il se répète et se répète encore, sans que l’on parvienne à le remplacer par un temps plus fructueux. Si je fais du shopping tous les jours, je ne suis peut-être plus en train de profiter de la vie mais de m’éviter, ou d’éviter de me mettre à mon projet. On parle alors de procrastination »
The Labour Party’s return to government should mark the beginning of a transformative era for Britain. Instead, under Sir Keir Starmer, it feels like little more than a polite changing of the guard.
Thinking about how depression (in the face of all of your rights being stripped away and being forced to live without healthcare or sustainable wages) is a mental illness but believing that Donald Trump was handpicked by a man in the sky is not.
phantomwise
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Troz
in reply to phantomwise • • •like this
phantomwise likes this.
Novaling
in reply to phantomwise • • •like this
phantomwise likes this.
NessD
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •eatCasserole
in reply to NessD • • •qaz
in reply to NessD • • •gon [he]
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •internet meme
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)maniacalmanicmania
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •renegadespork
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Pornhub is lowkey a very skilled tech company. Delivering a quality video platform on the scale they do is incredibly difficult.
Also obligatory: Year of the Linux Desktop! 🎉
eldavi
in reply to renegadespork • • •cmgvd3lw
in reply to renegadespork • • •candyman337
in reply to renegadespork • • •like this
gonzo-rand19 likes this.
ipkpjersi
in reply to renegadespork • • •/home/pineapplelover
in reply to ipkpjersi • • •ipkpjersi
in reply to /home/pineapplelover • • •/home/pineapplelover
in reply to ipkpjersi • • •ipkpjersi
in reply to /home/pineapplelover • • •ohulancutash
in reply to renegadespork • • •MynameisAllen
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •NeatNit
in reply to MynameisAllen • • •MynameisAllen
in reply to NeatNit • • •NeatNit
in reply to MynameisAllen • • •Cyberwolf
in reply to NeatNit • • •NeatNit
in reply to Cyberwolf • • •Cyberwolf
in reply to NeatNit • • •Lmao in hindsight I probably didn't read the graph correctly. Apparently more people want on desktop. I was looking at the dovosoon by country.
Still, are people watching porn in cafes? Or worse, are they masturbating in public? Hmm...
NeatNit
in reply to Cyberwolf • • •I think smartphones definitely win when it comes to convenience, accessibility, and ease of use. Even at home I use my phone a whole dang lot for general chill purposes, even though I have bigger and better screens to use.
I can't comment on porn because I genuinely never watch porn of any sort (yes, I'm serious), but I have watched and enjoyed YouTube and Netflix et al on my phone, even at home. I usually prefer a bigger screen but sometimes the portability wins out.
NewOldGuard [he/him, they/them]
in reply to MynameisAllen • • •Eugenia
in reply to MynameisAllen • • •jawa22
in reply to Eugenia • • •gonzo-rand19
in reply to MynameisAllen • • •hellinkilla [comrade/them]
in reply to MynameisAllen • • •Diplomjodler
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Mwa
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •ChaoticNeutralCzech
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Redex
in reply to ChaoticNeutralCzech • • •NeatNit
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Under video game consoles, it lists 0.1% for "Other (3DS/PS Vita)". Unless PornHub offers 3D porn that works on the 3DS (do they?!), I refuse to believe even 0.01% would use the 3DS browser in this capacity.
(On the other hand, that's 0.1% of video game consoles, and I can't imagine too many people use their consoles for porn in the first place... Basically I'd love to see absolute numbers for this)
Takapapatapaka
in reply to NeatNit • • •frañzcoz
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •theshatterstone54
in reply to frañzcoz • • •Evil_Shrubbery
in reply to frañzcoz • • •frañzcoz
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •Tenderizer78
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Guys, we're losing big to mobile devices. Although I'm glad Australia is still going strong at 12% desktop computer.
CrumblyLiquid
in reply to Tenderizer78 • • •eatCasserole
in reply to Tenderizer78 • • •jim3692
in reply to eatCasserole • • •postmarketOS // real Linux distribution for phones
postmarketOSeatCasserole
in reply to jim3692 • • •Ulrich
in reply to eatCasserole • • •Ulrich
in reply to Tenderizer78 • • •EnsignWashout
in reply to Tenderizer78 • • •Tablet pornography must be nice.
That seems like someone who made a plan, and then lived out their best evening.
I imagine those tablet Pornhub users probably prepared themselves a nice mixed drink, set out some snacks, and got all cozy in a bathrobe first.
Tablet pornhub sounds like some kind of intentional self care.
Hadriscus
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Samsy
in reply to Hadriscus • • •cRazi_man
in reply to Hadriscus • • •Bash:
yay -Ss stepsister-stuck
Thebigguy
in reply to cRazi_man • • •cRazi_man
in reply to Thebigguy • • •Why? Did you get stuck in a washing machine yourself at some point?
On a more serious note, I remember reading an article once about this phenomenon. About how it's not some widespread latent sex fantasy to fuck step-siblings. Rather it's an odd reflection of how algorithms poison the content in this attention economy. The more unusual the content is (without being outright objectionable), then the more attention it gets for being so unusual. That starts a wave of new creations from content creators to jump on the bandwagon for the popularity of the content that seems to be getting traction. Then pretty soon anyone not catering to this "demand" is an outlier and loses out, so eventually this theme of content floods the entire ecosystem.
Thebigguy
in reply to cRazi_man • • •cRazi_man
in reply to Thebigguy • • •Thebigguy
in reply to cRazi_man • • •/home/pineapplelover
in reply to Hadriscus • • •steeznson
in reply to /home/pineapplelover • • •Ulrich
in reply to steeznson • • •Hadriscus
in reply to /home/pineapplelover • • •rottenmummy
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •naom3 [she/her]
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •kylian0087
in reply to naom3 [she/her] • • •Evil_Shrubbery
in reply to kylian0087 • • •istdaslol
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •hmmm
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •(des)mosthenes
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •verdigris
in reply to (des)mosthenes • • •(des)mosthenes
in reply to verdigris • • •Ulrich
in reply to (des)mosthenes • • •(des)mosthenes
in reply to Ulrich • • •Raltoid
in reply to verdigris • • •w3dd1e
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Is it finally the year of Linux?
(ง’̀-‘́)ง
Ulrich
in reply to w3dd1e • • •Evil_Shrubbery
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •\
Y'all need a spanking.
WIIHAPPYFEW [he/him, they/them]
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •JustEnoughDucks
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •huppakee
in reply to JustEnoughDucks • • •Evil_Shrubbery
in reply to JustEnoughDucks • • •ILikeTraaaains
in reply to JustEnoughDucks • • •HR: IT detected that you watch porn at work.
Employee: I’m not, it’s all SFW videos
HR: OK, no problem then.
Ziglin (it/they)
in reply to JustEnoughDucks • • •steeznson
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •I'm somewhat proud my generation is actively seeking out parody porn. Those videos tend to be higher budget and more sex positive (less gonzo misogyny).
Edit: well, should caveat that by saying relatively less misogynist
SupremeDonut
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •Evil_Shrubbery
in reply to SupremeDonut • • •... is it possible that these uneducated plebeians just put "fetish" in the search?
(jk)
Chocobofangirl
in reply to SupremeDonut • • •billwashere
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •dzsimbo
in reply to billwashere • • •Vinstaal0
in reply to billwashere • • •amda
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •BlackPenguins
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •Is that supposed to be they watch videos in vertical...or they get off on watching vertical videos?
"Oh yeah, tilt that camera. Tilt it harder. There we go. Oh yeah! It's standing straight up."
mfed1122
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •Vertical video is better for content focused on a single standing performer, because it allows as much of the screen resolution as possible to show the body. Horizontal is better for a performer lying down or any traditional horizontal sex acts, for the same reason.
I'm probably reading a little too far into this, but IMO Gen Z is much less interested in "simulations" of intercourse and is more interested in something "real", i.e someone doing a dance. Intercourse feels like a fantasy, like you're supposed to imagine that you're the one having intercourse, it's that fantasy which is appealing. Something like dancing or dirty talking is more honest about what it is, since a video of someone dancing or talking is essentially the same experience as if they were actually there in front of you. I believe that because Gen Z is more digitally native than older generations, they see digital content not as a substitute or fantasy for a real thing, but rather as a real thing in itself, and the nature of the content they consume reflects that. Another example of this is the shift from real-life streamers who fake personalities but pretend that they are presenting their real selves, to vtubers - who implicitly acknowledge that they are playing a fictional character for their stream as symbolized by their avatars. The human streamers are a fantasy substitute for a real human friend, but with a vtuber the content does not pretend to be different than what it actually is - a pretend character putting on a show for your enjoyment. By acknowledging its artificiality and integrating it into the content itself, it shifts from being something "fake" and "simulated" to being something "real". To me it's the exact same dynamic manifesting in a different area.
Now of course, I do understand that vertical content also simply means you don't need to rotate your phone, and that Gen Z is almost exclusively using the Internet on the phone vs. the desktop as older generations will. But this too is essentially a reflection of the feeling that digital content is not an artificial recreation confined to a specific display area (a TV or computer) but rather perpetually available (your phone), as would be appropriate for something which has taken on the status of being real rather than fake. The two forces reinforce each other, imo.
...m...
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •Evil_Shrubbery
in reply to ...m... • • •folaht
in reply to Evil_Shrubbery • • •Boomers = 1950-1964
Gen X = 1965-1979
Gen Y = 1980-1994
Gen Z = 1995-2009
Gen α = 2010-2025
So ages
18-29
30-44
45-59
60+
Gorillatactics [none/use name]
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •DelgadoSlims [he/him]
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •scott
in reply to DelgadoSlims [he/him] • • •Cenotaph
in reply to scott • • •expatriado
Unknown parent • • •handsoffmydata
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •iopq
in reply to handsoffmydata • • •voodooattack
in reply to handsoffmydata • • •Or, and hear me out, what if they actually have good engineers and know how to sanitise their analytics? And at the risk of sounding crazy, what if the reason that the Linux share is rising is because it’s genuinely becoming more popular?
Crazy talk, right?
secretlyaddictedtolinux2
in reply to handsoffmydata • • •User agent logging is often done by running javascript locally on a machine, so the vpn would just pass the javascript to the local machine on which it would be run, so the data wouldn't be effected that way.
Sometimes TLS fingerprinting is done to try to identify bots and not sure if bots would be included. They probably would be included because if they were blocked, then the javascript catching user would never be run on their machine, although I'm unsure of whether such bots would run useragent fingerprinting javascriot yo try to blend in or block it to avoid unneeded processing.
steeznson
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Jankatarch
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Majestic
in reply to Jankatarch • • •AnarchoCummunist [he/him]
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Gen Z, Vertical Video.
They're nothing, if not, efficient. Bravo.
a Kendrick fan
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •So, Linux doesn't have a general icon and ChromeOS's icon isn't used, what could be an ideal icon/logo for the Linux Kernel, I wonder?
WhatsApp recently pulled support for some older iOS versions and devices, a lot of ppl threw them away and got Androids instead(as they should), I wonder if that's related to iOS's decrease.
Tattorack
in reply to a Kendrick fan • • •Spice Hoarder
in reply to a Kendrick fan • • •Underwire
in reply to a Kendrick fan • • •I think the decrease is mostly due to this.
Evil_Shrubbery
Unknown parent • • •not quite01(they/them)
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •the age of linux is cumming upon os.
ok this is really bad , ill see myself out....
witness_me
in reply to not quite01(they/them) • • •herseycokguzelolacak
in reply to not quite01(they/them) • • •folaht
in reply to not quite01(they/them) • • •And there's a kernel of truth in there and by that I don't mean the kernel of an apple.
billwashere
Unknown parent • • •Nyadia (she/they)
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •renrenPDX
in reply to Nyadia (she/they) • • •Routhinator
in reply to renrenPDX • • •prole
in reply to renrenPDX • • •gndagreborn
in reply to Nyadia (she/they) • • •Spice Hoarder
in reply to gndagreborn • • •Bluewing
in reply to Spice Hoarder • • •sudo_halt
in reply to Nyadia (she/they) • • •Matt
in reply to Nyadia (she/they) • • •folaht
in reply to Nyadia (she/they) • • •Mamdani_Da_Savior
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Hansae
in reply to Mamdani_Da_Savior • • •?
Sudo apt update
Sudo apt upgrade
Voilà
SayCyberOnceMore
in reply to Hansae • • •Hansae
in reply to SayCyberOnceMore • • •IEatDaFeesh
in reply to Hansae • • •Drunk & Root
in reply to Mamdani_Da_Savior • • •Aquilae [he/him, they/them]
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •secretlyaddictedtolinux2
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •pH3ra
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •like this
BubblyRomeo likes this.
cyan_mess
in reply to pH3ra • • •like this
BubblyRomeo likes this.
AHemlocksLie
in reply to cyan_mess • • •Ulrich
in reply to AHemlocksLie • • •I'm sure that's a legal grey area that hasn't been explored largely but I would think you would have to actually host the content or have it on your device locally.
AHemlocksLie
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to AHemlocksLie • • •literally webtorrents*
Right, because you're hosting it and distributing it. PeerTube is just like a window to non-local content (except for the local content, obvi).
FireIced
in reply to pH3ra • • •huppakee
in reply to pH3ra • • •NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
in reply to pH3ra • • •rumba
in reply to NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ • • •Ulrich
in reply to pH3ra • • •BubblyRomeo
in reply to Ulrich • • •BubblyRomeo likes this.
Redex
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •I am very suspicious of the -26% Apple marketshare. It makes me feel like there's more to this than it seems at first. There's no way 26% of Apple users stopped using Apple devices within a year.
Edit: maybe it could be caused by a large user base increase that shifted the demographics, but this fast? And the PornHub bans across US states started only this year for the most part if I'm not mistaken, so it shouldn't affect this data?
Spezi
in reply to Redex • • •Scrollone
in reply to Spezi • • •Vincent
in reply to Spezi • • •buttnugget
in reply to Vincent • • •huppakee
in reply to Spezi • • •RadioFreeArabia
in reply to Spezi • • •Spezi
in reply to RadioFreeArabia • • •Agosagror
in reply to Redex • • •Aceticon
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •pulpier
in reply to Aceticon • • •Aceticon
in reply to pulpier • • •EnsignWashout
in reply to Aceticon • • •Haha!
But uh...I would watch that. That sounds pretty hot.
rumba
in reply to EnsignWashout • • •Melatonin
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Lifter
in reply to Melatonin • • •Valmond
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •dogs0n
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •HaraldvonBlauzahn
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Which data source would be more repräsentative and reliable ?
HouseWolf
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •fnrir
in reply to HouseWolf • • •peaceful_world_view
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •PrettyFlyForAFatGuy
Unknown parent • • •prole
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •sunbytes
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •If they're anything like me, it's the old laptop that you'd install Linux on as an experiment.
And maybe that laptop was only ah... Semi-retired at the time.
geneva_convenience
Unknown parent • • •procapra
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Ulrich
Unknown parent • • •josefo
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •highball
in reply to josefo • • •BubblyRomeo likes this.
rumba
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •fnrir
Unknown parent • • •RadioFreeArabia
Unknown parent • • •FireIced
Unknown parent • • •FireIced
Unknown parent • • •