Huntress, Queen of Jerusalem
I'm primarily an American princess, with colonial heritage. But my corrupt government has chosen to finance the jew war on the Levant, so that activates the divine lineage I have from Maria Komnene. It makes no sense religiously or politically for Americans to turn over that land to jews. If we're going to pay for it, we should rule it. I'm not the only American with descent from Maria Komnene, just one who has established it genealogically, and the first to claim that divine right. So I should be queen.
European Christians established a divine right of royal families to rule, and Maria had that right in spades over Jerusalem.
My lineage back to her is through The White Queen, Elizabeth of York. As an English queen. It's fitting that her descendant should rule Jerusalem, because it was the English who took the land back from the Ottomans in WWI. Her mother was a descendant of Maria.
Maria was a Byzantine princess, her right of rule over Jerusalem established by the Romans in 70 AD, as a Byzantine.
She was also a descendant of Armenian kings, who descended from the Seleucids, the Ptolemies, Philip of Macedon, Cyrus the Great of Persia, and the Chaldean dynasty of Babylon. That means she was a descendant of every non-jewish (and non-Muslim) royal family that had ruled Jerusalem since the first destruction of the Jerusalem temple in 587 BC.
Also, Muslims claim (with a very questionable genealogy) that the English royal family has lineage back to Mohamed. I have that lineage as well. I don't claim it, but if Muslims believe it, who am I to argue?
According to their own prophets, jews angered God so much that he condemned them. Malachi said God's favor turned from the jews to Gentiles. That means the people chosen by God to rule Jerusalem were and are Gentiles, even according to jewish books.
James Clarke 1636 to1737
in reply to HUN7R35 • • •HUN7R35 reshared this.
HUN7R35
in reply to James Clarke 1636 to1737 • • •phlfie
in reply to HUN7R35 • • •James Clarke 1636 to1737
in reply to HUN7R35 • • •HUN7R35 reshared this.
James Clarke 1636 to1737
in reply to HUN7R35 • • •James Clarke 1636 to1737
in reply to HUN7R35 • • •The Princes in the Tower - The New Evidence | Historical Enigma
YouTubeHUN7R35 reshared this.