Please tell your friends about federated social media site that speaks several fediverse protocols thus serving as a hub uniting them, hubzilla.eskimo.com, also check out friendica.eskimo.com, federated
macroblogging social media site, mastodon.eskimo.com a federated microblogging site, and yacy.eskimo.com an uncensored federated search engine. All Free!
D'un bout à l'autre, il s'agira de faire comme si le peuple palestinien, non seulement ne devait plus être, mais n'avait jamais été. Les conquérants étaient de ceux qui avaient subi eux-même le plus grand génocide de l'histoire. De ce génocide, les sionistes avaient fait un mal absolu. Mais transformer le plus grand génocide de l'histoire en mal absolu, c'est une vision religieuse et mystique, ce n'est pas une vision historique. Elle n'arrête pas le mal; au contraire, elle le propage, elle le fait retomber sur d'autres innocents, elle exige une réparation qui fait subir à ces autres une partie de ce que les juifs ont subi (l'expulsion, la mise en ghetto, la disparition comme peuple). Avec des moyens plus "froids" que le génocide, on veut aboutir au même résultat.
Les USA et l'Europe devaient réparation aux juifs. Et cette réparation, ils la firent payer par un peuple dont le moins qu'on puisse dire est qu'il n'y était pour rien, singulièrement innocent de tout holocauste et n'en ayant même pas entendu parler. C'est là que le grotesque commence, aussi bien que la violence. Le sionisme, puis l'État d'Israël exigeront que les Palestiniens les reconnaissent en droit. Mais lui, l'État d'Israël, il ne cessera de nier le fait même d'un peuple palestinien. On ne parlera jamais de Palestiniens, mais d'Arabes de Palestine, comme s'ils s'étaient trouvés là par hasard ou par erreur.
Et plus tard, on fera comme si les Palestiniens expulsés venaient du dehors, on ne parlera pas de la première guerre de résistance qu'ils ont menée tout seuls. On en fera les descendants d'Hitler, puisqu'ils ne reconnaissaient pas le droit d'Israël. Mais Israël se réserve le droit de nier leur existence de fait. C'est là que commence une fiction qui devait s'étendre de plus en plus, et peser sur tous ceux qui défendaient la cause palestinienne. Cette fiction, ce pari d'Israël, c'était de faire passer pour antisémites tous ceux qui contesteraient les conditions de fait et les actions de l'État sioniste. Cette opération trouve sa source dans la froide politique d'Israël à l'égard des Palestiniens.
Israël n'a jamais caché son but, dès le début : faire le vide dans le territoire palestinien. Et bien mieux, faire comme si le territoire palestinien était vide, destiné depuis toujours aux sionistes. Il s'agissait bien de colonisation, mais pas au sens européen du XIXe siècle : on n'exploiterait pas les habitants du pays, on les ferait partir. Ceux qui resteraient, on n'en ferait pas une main-d'œuvre dépendant du territoire, mais plutôt une main-d'œuvre volante et détachée, comme si c'étaient des immigrés mis en ghetto. Dès le début, c'est l'achat des terres sous la conditions qu'elle soit vides d'occupants, ou vidables. c'est un génocide, mais où l'extermination physique rester subordonnée à l'évacuation géographique : n'étant que des Arabes en général, les Palestiniens survivants doivent aller se fondre avec les autres Arabes. L'extermination physique, qu’il soit ou non confiée à des mercenaires, est parfaitement présente. Mais ce n'est pas un génocide, dit-on, puisqu'elle n'est pas le "but final" : en effet, c'est un moyen parmi d'autres.
La complicité des États-Unis avec Israël ne vient pas seulement de la puissance d'un lobby sioniste. Élias Sanbar a bien montré comment les États-Unis retrouvaient dans Israël un aspect de leur histoire : l'extermination des Indiens, qui, là aussi, ne fut qu'en partie directement physique. ll s'agissait de faire le vide, et comme s'il n'y avait jamais eu d'Indiens, sauf dans des ghettos qui en feraient autant d'immigrés du dedans. À beaucoup d'égards, les Palestiniens sont les nouveaux Indiens, les Indiens d'Israël.
L'analyse marxiste indique les deux mouvements complémentaires du capitalisme : s'imposer constamment des limites, à l'intérieur desquelles il aménage et exploite son propre système; repousser toujours plus loin ces limites, les dépasser pour recommencer en plus grand ou en plus intense sa propre fondation. Repousser les limites, c'était l'acte du capitalisme américain, du rêve américain, repris par Israël et le rêve du Grand Israël sur territoire arabe, sur le dos des Arabes.
'Lemme guess, one of them was wearing thick glasses, one of them was extra stupid, and the third guy was holding a drink and wearing a sexy black t-shirt.'
Quelles sont les causes de la folie ? Personne ne peut répondre à une question aussi vaste et aussi complexe. Mais nous savons tous que certaines maladies — la syphilis, entre autres — détruisent les cellules du cerveau et amènent le déséquilibre mental.
📷 100,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge to protest against the genocide in Gaza. The crowd size exceeded expectations and demonstrated strong support by the people of Australia for a ceasefire in Gaza and an end to the genocide.
100,000 was NSW police estimate (a group who have opposed this march and have consistently messaged against the 80+ near-weekly previous marches as well; the police and/or NSW government have fought the organisers in court on three or four occasions and lost every time thus far).
Organisers say that after reviewing aerial footage, they estimate the number present today was between 200,000-300,000.
Police confirmed the following: as the front of the march arrived at Milsons Point station, there were still thousands of marchers yet to get past Wynyard station (south of where the march officially began). If it wasn't the biggest political single rally in Australian history, it was a close second (the biggest is widely acknowledged to be the 2003 Stop the War rally, at around 200k in Sydney).
I am disgusted with all the right wing politicians who think driving over a bridge is more important than a mass protest against a genocide. Wish I could be there. #SydneyHarbourBridge #HarbourBridge
L’histoire est pleine d’exemples amusants où l’on voit des personnages célèbres s’efforcer de montrer leur importance. George Washington, lui-même, exigeait qu’on l’appelât : « Sa Grandeur le Président des Etats-Unis. » Christophe Colomb réclamait le titre d’« Amiral de l’Océan et Vice-roi des Indes ». Catherine de Russie refusait d’ouvrir les lettres qui n’étaient pas adressées à «Sa Majesté Impériale ». Et, dans la Maison-Blanche, Mme Lincoln se tourna un jour comme une tigresse vers Mme Grant, criant: «Comment avez-vous l’audace de vous asseoir en ma présence avant que je ne vous y invite? »
Dites-moi comment vous comblez votre besoin d’importance, je vous dirai qui vous êtes. Cela détermine votre personnalité. C’est ce qui vous caractérise le mieux.
Our 26th Livestream ; this will be unscripted but will focus on the DPRK's rejection of talks with south Korea and the US , Marshal KIM JONG UN's visit to Si...
Listening - delayed - to Elaine Paige on Sunday and... Why? Why is she committing the awful sin of playing a song from the movie version of Les Miserablés (it's the only version that would have the audacity to be this awful) it's dreadful...
C’est ce besoin d’importance qui conduisit un pauvre petit commis sans instruction à étudier des livres de droit qu’il avait découverts au fond d’une caisse de bric-à-brac achetée dans une vente pour cinquante cents. Ce petit commis s’appelait Lincoln. C’est le désir d’être grand qui inspira à Dickens l’idée d
William James disait: «Le principe le plus pro fond de la nature humaine, c’est la soif d’être apprécié. » Il ne parle pas du souhait ou du désir, mais de la « soif)) d’être apprécié. C’est là une soif inextinguible et celui qui peut honnêtement étancher cette soif tient ses semblables entre ses mains.
Quels sont nos besoins? Peu de choses, mais ces choses, nous les réclamons avec une insistance inlassable. Les voici :
La santé et la conservation de la vie.
La nourriture.
Le sommeil.
L’argent et les biens qu’il procure.
La survivance future.
La satisfaction sexuelle.
Le bonheur de nos enfants.
Le sentiment de notre importance.
Presque tous ces besoins sont généralement satisfaits, mais il en est un qui est rarement contenté et, pourtant, il est aussi profond, aussi impérieux que la faim.
Harpal Brar, Chairman of the CPGB-ML, speaks at a conference hosted by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing, on October 14th 2015.A significant ...
Selon le philosophe John Dewey, le mobile le plus puissant de la nature humaine, c’est le « désir d’être important ». Rappelez-vous cette phrase : «Le désir d’être important. » Elle est lourde de sens
The age verification services used by social media platforms include a company funded by a Trump-supporting billionaire and a firm set up by former Israeli intelligence officers
2 Αυγ 2025, 12:39 - Μια σοκαριστική φωτογραφία, παρόμοια με τις υπόλοιπες εικόνες του λαού μας στη Γάζα, ενός Ισραηλινού αιχμάλωτου πριν και κατά τη διάρκεια της αιχμαλωσίας.
Was glaubt man denn was passiert wenn in einem Land lebt, dessen Staat einen Genozid durchführt und dessen Bevölkerung zum großen Teil noch dahinter steht? Wer im Militäreinsatz war wird sich mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit daran beteiligt haben. Und durch die Gegend zu ziehen und "Tod allen Arabern" skandieren sollte natürlich auch nicht gut ankommen.
Die Art, wie die Netanyahu-Regierung im Gazastreifen Krieg führt, stößt international auf scharfe Kritik. Antisemiten nutzen die Situation nun aus. Viele Israelis sind deshalb alarmiert.
Wenn ich Urlaub machen möchte, dann will ich genauso wenig wie ich Neonazis am Nachbartisch haben will halt auch Leute am Nachbartisch haben die einen Genozid unterstützen. Kritische Fragen an und Skepsis gegenüber israelische Bürgern? Vor diesem Hintergrund verständlich.
Il n’est qu’un moyen au monde d’amener une personne à accomplir une certaine action. Y avez-vous jamais songé? Un seul moyen! C’est de susciter en elle le désir d’accomplir cette action. Retenez bien cela. Il n’existe pas d’autre manière.
"What was Israel supposed to do after October 7? Same thing they should have done before October 7: dismantle the apartheid state, give everyone equal rights, pay massive reparations, and right all the wrongs of the past. October 7 was a response to the tyranny and abuse of Israel; the correct thing to do when things finally came to a head with the Hamas attack would have been to remove all the tyranny and abuse which gave rise to it.
That’s what Israel should have done. Of course Israel was never going to do this, for the same reason they spent decade after decade murdering, displacing and oppressing Palestinians since Israel was created. Israel would never allow justice and equality after October 7 for the same reason Israel would never allow justice and equality before October 7: because Israel has always been a settler-colonialist project that can only be sustained by nonstop violence and tyranny and theft and abuse and lies and breathtaking immorality."
Speaking with a friends' son & his girlfriend (in their mid-20s) yesterday evening I was struck by how stridently they feel their future has been betrayed by older generations (of course, including his parents & me) & that the country is essentially a gerontocracy run for the benefit of the over 50s.
They both have signed up to the Corbyn/Sultana party & hope that this will change UK politics to reflect their views, interests & needs.
At the request of a viewer Dr Dermot Hudson Chairman of the British Group For the Study of the Juche , Chairman of KFA UK and owner of the SONGUN007 channel ...
Pourquoi l’enfant disparaît de l’espace public? Entretien avec Eric Alary, historien « Il y a d’abord la multiplication des voitures à partir des années 1970. On remarque que la signalétique n’est jamais à hauteur du regard des plus jeunes. » « L’électorat est plus âgé que jamais. On est dans une société gérontodictée. On ne fait pas la loi pour les enfants mais surtout pour ceux qui votent en masse, c’est-à-dire surtout les seniors. Ils prennent des décisions qui auront des conséquences qu’ils ne vivront pas. »
This was a fun jigsaw to complete. Going into it, I thought it would be a nightmare, but it was challenging without being tormenting.
Unlike the tiny (15cm x 10cm ish) jigsaw I did before it of a section of a faded fresco of blue grey birds and plants. That was so difficult it stopped being fun.
Folks, while everyone is losing their minds about age verification in the #OnlineSafetyAct, and while we here know all about the shuttering of community run sites, where are we at with the client-side-scanning provisions and the undermining of encryption?
Yes this hasn’t gone away. Ofcom consulted on this early in the year and you can read the replies ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/ill… including over 780 from individuals via @openrightsgroup
Look here's my plan: they're coming first for the immigrants and trans people, and if we say nothing, they'll surely go away and leave everyone else alone. Or at least us. Get a lot better at saying nothing is my point. Peace in our lifetime. Peace in our lifetime. RE: bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6jt7b…
I support a strong Global Plastics Treaty that cuts plastic production so that we can finally turn off the tap and end the age of plastic - for our communities, our country, and our planet. Join me
Imagine you have a friend. Let’s call him Rick Reasonable. Now imagine you have an enemy. Let’s call your enemy Bart B. Oilingwater. Bart is a real piece of crap. Whenever he sees you, he throws boiling water at you.www.the-reframe.com/boiling-water/
Usually you dodge it (you're always ready to dodge), but every once in a while he catches you. You have some bad scarring on one arm, and a few places on your face and neck. And you have to constantly be on the lookout for Bart, because if you let your guard down, it’s scalding water time!
Rick is a good friend; he tells you so himself. He thinks it is *really* bad that Bart throws boiling water on you. He tells you this, too. He’s written some letters to the newspaper about how bad Bart is for throwing boiling water on you. Sometimes he’ll even go out with you to watch your back.
Rick's got a popular TV show, and he’s gone on the record a few times that Bart is in the wrong for always trying to hit you in the face with boiling water. Then one day you turn on the TV at the end of the day, and you see Rick has Bart on as a guest.
Rick is arguing with Bart about whether or not it is good to douse you with boiling water. Rick is … parsing things a little more than you’d like. He wants to know if the water has to be *boiling,* if it can’t just be very hot. Bart says, no, no, it really does have to be boiling.
But does it have to be *water,* Rick asks. Could it be something a bit easier to dodge, like molasses or tar? Bart thinks about this, and decides he isn’t sure. He’ll have to get back to Rick on that one—but really, he prefers water. It's traditional.
Rick wants to know if there can’t be days Bart could promise to not throw boiling water at you. Bart doesn’t really want to set that sort of precedent. If you say this person or that person shouldn't be doused with boiling water, where does it end? Rick nods; obviously there should be limits.
Rick would like to know why it needs to be *you* every time. Bart is shocked that Rick would suggest such a thing. He insists he doesn’t have a throwing-boiling-water-on-you-specifically bone in his body. He just believes in throwing boiling water, and you happen to be the one that’s there.
Bart asks why, if you apparently hate being struck with boiling water, you insist on being in areas where you know he will be throwing it. He suggests that Rick is really the one singling him, Bart, out, by being so intolerant of his rich cultural heritage of throwing boiling water on people.
He hints that Rick’s constant scolding makes Bart want to seek you out specifically now, to throw boiling water on you, for daring to suppose such a thing of him.
Rick appears to have conceded that Bart absolutely does have a right to walk the streets carrying as much boiling water as he wants, in the long-standing tradition of our country. Bart appreciates Rick’s stance on the matter, and compliments him on his willingness to find common ground.
At the end of the segment, he and Bart agree to disagree on whether or not it is good to attempt to douse you with boiling water every day. Bart still thinks it is *very* good, even vitally necessary to freedom—though he insists it is not directed at you, but only spaces that you happen to inhabit.
Bart wonders, again, why you choose to inhabit those boiling-water spaces. Rick continues to insist that throwing at the space that you inhabit is tantamount to throwing it at you, and that it is quite rude indeed. They shake hands. Then there is a commercial for Pepsi.
The next day, you confront Rick about this and he shrugs. “Man, I hate that bastard Bart,” he says, “but you have to hear both sides.” Yes, you say. That Bart, he sure does suck, all right. But how are we feeling about Rick? www.the-reframe.com/boiling-water/
Here is a detailed explanation of how and why I use Mastodon, how to follow me and other thread posters by configuring your own filters, where to get my material on other services or in machine readable form, Etc. if you don't like threads, I encourage you to unfollow me and get my work in some other way. pluralistic.net/2023/04/16/how…
"Constructive feedback" isn't "I would prefer that you do things in a different way because that is my preference," however.
I'm fully aware that other people have preferences that are different from mine.
That's why I do 2-3/hours per day of unpaid administrative work to ensure that everything I post is available in other formats (including machine-readable ones) under the most permissive CC license.
If you don't like my feed, but you want to see the things in it that are not threads, why wouldn't you write a bot that ingests my feed, discards the threads, and republishes the rest? The feed is both labeled *and* licensed to permit this.
Surely this is as valid a response to "I have different preference from you" as "therefore you should work in a way I prefer, rather than the way you prefer."
@pluralistic I don't know that this will work for you, Jeff, but I additionally subscribed to @pluralistic.net which only has one post per thread and then added a filter for "Long thread" to my account preferences.
So, I get all of the pluralistic interactions and are unique to Mastodon (retoots, replies, etc.) and I also still get notified on his longer form content. Long thread from pluralistic are not seen due to the filter, but the bot posts a link and summary that is seen.
@BoydStephenSmithJr @pluralistic @pluralistic.net I subscribe to some arxiv summarizing bots, which have taken the annoyance I used to have of long threads. I don't know if I had to do something, but each post is hidden for me behind a content warning, so I only have to parse it if I decide I have the energy.
@jayalane @BoydStephenSmithJr @pluralistic.net if you click on any post in the thread, and then on the little eye icon, it should put all the posts in order and also unroll them
@pluralistic this is indeed a hilariously valid response. But also, I have come to really appreciate the CW labels you've added for your long threads. ❤️
@pluralistic I liked some of the suggestions to make the first post in the thread regular public and the rest of the thread “public quiet”, as well as mastodon clients that will collapse long threads automatically (or to your preference). I apologize for initiating the conversation in this semi-provocative way, but I assure you my goal, as always, is to improve the fediverse experience / open source software for everyone. I’m here to help, have fun, and find allies.
I only know "unlisted" which does nothing to decrease the likelihood that the subsequent posts will appear in TLs but DOES make those posts unsearchable, which sucks - it's all downside, no benefit... to anyone.
this is an excellent explanation but "Threading an essay requires the author to compose it in stanzas, each of which is a standalone, complete thought — and that means that readers can engage with each though separately, by replying to just that stanza." Why not post a brief summary of the blog entry with a hyperlink to the full blog post on Mastodon (this I 💯agree with and support) .. and let the users decide for themselves which parts of the blog post they want to reply to? Why duplicate every single sentence / paragraph of the blog post on mastodon? Surely your audience is smart and sophisticated enough to quote the bits they want to talk about in the replies?
I don't follow @pluralistic because I don't want the huge threads in my feed. But it feels like I'm missing out from seeing Cory's writing at all - as well as any interesting boosts, replies, or other posts. I always thought that a reasonable tradeoff would be to post the long threads to a separate Mastodon account, and boost the first post from the "main" account. That seems like a benefit for everyone.
@pluralistic do you have code or some kind of plugin which automates posting the threads? Can you share it with me? Depending on the complexity of the existing solution, I can probably pull something together if that would be a benefit for you and your readers. My suggestion would be moving the long threads to a different account, and then boosting the initial post of each thread on your existing account.
@pluralistic Example. Hey, everyone, I posted a blog entry here. blog.codinghorror.com/the-road… .. summary: "Should the obscenely wealthy in the second gilded age share their money with desperately poor people in rural areas, and generate scientific data on the results of GMI studies, that is, a manual redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poorest among us, in areas where money goes the furthest, to unlock their untapped potential?" reply with any questions or clarifications.
@pluralistic but if you truly believe I need to post my ENTIRE blog entry here on mastodon, line by line, if you truly believe that is the ONLY way to get people to engage and discuss a blog entry, I will do it. Reply to me here and let me know. I'll do as you say.
From this and other posts, it's becoming clear that you think that the way I use digital publishing tools is organized around maximizing engagement or selling books or some other idea.
You are laboring under a misapprehension.
I publish the feed, newsletter and blog I would like to read. I do it for free, to the tune of many hours, every day, under an open license, so that you can alter and republish it the way you would want to see it.
@pluralistic I read Cory's posts in a feed reader, and I have a related UX improvement suggestion. Could you wrap the long thread of footer info after each post in a block like this: <details open><summary>Hide footer</summary>[long thread of footer stuff]</details> so I can close it and read the next post without scrolling past it for ages? That would be nice.
@pluralistic I don't know how you do it in WP, that's a standard HTML way to make sections collapsible. Are your sections separate plugins? developer.mozilla.org/en-US/do…
The element. HTML element creates a disclosure widget in which information is visible only when the widget is toggled into an open state. A summary or label must be provided using the
@pluralistic ah, then you can edit the html to wrap the footer in <details> like I said above. You can nest them, or do one after each <hr> if you want to present the different sections. It's like collapsing an outline in an outliner, but as native HTML.
@KevinMarks Hrm, just tried this and I really don't like it. Makes it very hard to e.g. load an edition in browser and then search the full text (because sections are collapsed).
@pluralistic the 'open' part is important there - that defaults it to not collapsed, so it looks the same as now. I agree that find should search closed <details> and open them, but browsers disagree. Maybe I should file an issue for that.
I think there are very good arguments to be made for both "just link to the blog" and "post each separate thought as a separate threaded message". There's also the third option: "post the whole thing as a single, long post", which twitter and some Mastodons don't support, but Friendica and other Mastodons do, but let's leave that out.
I think the advantage of the thread is that you can keep the entire discussion here, and people can discuss each paragraph separately. With the blog, people have to go there to read it, and then come back here to discuss it. Or discuss it in the comments section of the blog platform (if it has that), which fractures the discussion.
So I think for discussion, Cory's approach might be superior. But Mastodon doesn't make it very readable, and it does require writing in separate thoughts, which isn't how most writers write.
Maybe we need a better platform to support open discussion of long articles.
Because that's how *I* prefer to read other people's posts.
Again, this is the feed, newsletter and blog I would like to read, and it's open licensed and machine readable, so you can transform it into the feed you would like to read.
I'm curious about why you're so invested in changing how I publish, rather than changing how you read? You could write a bot that publishes my work in the form you prefer in an hour. Why wouldn't you?
@pluralistic As my dad often said to me, "take my advice and do as you please". This is a short-form space, not a long form space. But it's also far from the end of the world, more of a minor party foul. We can push it over to the clients to suppress behind a click-to-expand after, say, 5 rapid-fire sequential threaded replies from anyone, and that's a net benefit for the whole ecosystem anyway. (Reddit already kinda does a form of this. It's a good design pattern to adopt for the safety of Everyday People.)
@pluralistic Just want to say that I consistently appreciate reading what both of you have to say On Here about topics du jour, or I had until you began this seemingly-interminable dialogue about how messages are formatted. 🥱
@pluralistic well, it's clearly a clone of the Twitter model, which was 140 then 280. You can, in theory, override and set it to ONE BAZILLION CHARACTERS but that's kind of a different thing. Give George Lucas an infinite number of characters to type and you end up with Jar Jar Binks. Ain't nobody want no Jar Jar Binks.
@pluralistic I mean, Omit Needless Words and all that. I think it's fine for individual sites to have higher limits to taste, but here on infosec it's some ridiculously large character limit of 11000 or something and you almost never see people post anything remotely close to that long. We did not come here to read your friggin' novella, buddy roe. (also, I supported twitter's move from 140 to 280 in the pre-hellsite days, though there was ENDLESS bitching about that, too, of COURSE, because, well, people.)
@pluralistic well, Activity Streams has Article as well as Note, but Mastodon skipped that part of the spec, so here we are. Use phanpy.social to get better thread handling.
@KevinMarks @pluralistic phanpy.social is amazing. I support Chee Aun (thanks for the fab phanpy) with a wee 😀 spot of cash monthly. Thanks Chee Aun! @davew 's wordland -> wordpress-> Activity Pub is amazing and basically supports everything AFAICT. Unlimited characters, links, bold text, the whole textcasting thing we lost from blogging!!!!!!! Thanks yet again to you too Dave! <-- All of you know this probably. Just letting the many folks who will read this thread know!
@pluralistic The only objective truth is that the tooling can be squished into any number of ways to get stuff done and people will go along with it or not.
Top posting or inline replies for email? Yes, people will have opinions. 😀
@pluralistic Just keep doing what you're doing in the way you're doing it!
I subscribe to your RSS feed, but also follow you here. I've got a filter in place to filter out your long threads, but am able to see the comments folks post here in response to your posts. Seeing the replies others post often piques my interest enough to open up my RSS feedreader and read your blog post in its entirety.
Thanks for your generosity in sharing your insights so freely in this way.
@pluralistic I have avoided following you because of the long threads but if there's one thing this conversation has shown me it's how to configure my filters to not have that problem.
Another thought although it may be more complicated: what if you have a second account that posts only the long thread blog posts in response to the header from your main account and gets boosted by the main account? Muting an account is a lot more discoverable and easy than configuring a filter
@gbargoud It's a nice idea for someone else to implement! I'm already doing a stupendous amount of administrative work just to post to all the platforms I keep up with. The point of publishing a machine-readable, open-licensed version of everything is to let other people do those remixes, to their taste.
We're at a place now where that isn't the case, and a different software could be used (like a truly federated forum!!) or at minimum just a server that sends more than 500 characters at a time.
@pluralistic @julian Thanks for (re-)sharing the explanation on why you're on that particular server; I wondered about that.
Though I primarily read your blog posts on @medium, I'm glad to follow you on Mastodon because unlike many popular writers, you frequently engage with people in your comments and share posts by others, even randos like myself.
@pluralistic @jorgecandeias I really don't get his problem. I almost *never* read blogs anymore but I love coming across one of your threads and then choosing to read it or skip it. Actually, I dont think I've ever gone to the long-form link you provide, and just stick to my phones mastodon client.
And... "considered blogging?" Is he that clueless?
@pluralistic @jorgecandeias actually that might be a key point. Gen-Z is heavily phone-centric, and let's not even with Gen-alpha... My 20-something's laptop goes almost complelty untouched in favor of his phone.
People who don't account for changes in information consumption are just dinosaurs
@pluralistic @joncruz @jorgecandeias *** RED ALERT*** Cory Doctorow, Jeff Atwood and Randall Monroe in one thread - we're dangerously close to the critical mass of cool!
Luckily my appearance in the thread should act like cool-absorbing control rods.
@pluralistic @jorgecandeias yeah, thats what i did. Im really pleased when someone boosts part of your threads, and i click through and read the long post 😀 but when i came in to dip my spoon and have a sip of fedi, and my 20 post allowance was almost all the one post in many parts from you… that made me sad. Much better like this! But please do continue writing - you are fighting the good fight!
@leadegroot @pluralistic @jorgecandeias Always continue writing! Just don't SEO us (I will post my entire blog entry here, line by line) into oblivion please.
@leadegroot @jorgecandeias Again, you're laboring under the severe, total, complete misapprehension that I care about - much less gather - quantifiable and measured engagement.
I.
Do.
Not.
I believe that doing so is a kind of sickness that reduces the quality and authenticity of one's work, and leads to audience capture and other horrors.
@cavyherd @pluralistic @joncruz @jorgecandeias no, it was an XKCD joke first, then the EFF made it real at etech 2007 This thread was fun at the time xkcd.com/341/ and even funnier when Randall came to Google and Knuth asked him for the O(n log ( log n) ) proof
Oh yes! Okay! I dimly remember seeing those comics on the first round, & having vague awareness of Doctorow's part in it. But that was a •very• long time ago, & I didn't yet have a full appreciation of the personalities involved.
@pluralistic @joncruz @jorgecandeias I actually dressed up this way for Halloween that year and tied a helium balloon to my belt as part of the costume. When I arrived at the party, dozens of people looked at me in confusion and then one guy at the back of the room shouted, "Hah! You're Cory Doctorow!" We became the best of friends instantly. #TrueStory
I remember a Hugo award (or Nebula?) ceremony some years ago where Doctorow was tasked with accepting an award on behalf of an author who couldn't be there—& was asked to do so "in uniform." Which he cheerfully obliged 😂 👍
@KevinMarks @cavyherd @pluralistic @joncruz @jorgecandeias Munroe and the EFF issued a special donation tier reward t-shirt with a custom comic strip that year as well. It's in the back of my closet somewhere.
On August 17, 2014, "Time" won the 2014 Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story at the 72nd World Science Fiction Convention (WorldCon) in London. More information about the Hugo Awards is available on the official website.
Veteran CBC journalist ‘succeeds’ in not mentioning what is causing this heat and prolonged drought.
‘
"That's why we've seen this drop of half a million head of cattle over the last five years, is because this has been a fairly prolonged drought in one of the regions that has the highest number of livestock," he said.
11,000-year-old settlement in Canada could rewrite history of Indigenous civilizations in North America
"The newly uncovered village site of Âsowanânihk, which means "a place to cross" in the Cree language, is one of the oldest archaeological sites found on the continent and suggests that an organized society existed in central Canada far earlier than experts previously thought."
"This discovery is a powerful reminder that our ancestors were here, building, thriving, and shaping the land long before history books acknowledged us," said Chief Christine Longjohn. "For too long, our voices have been silenced, but this site speaks for us, proving that our roots run deep and unbroken. It carries the footsteps of our ancestors, their struggles, their triumphs, and their wisdom. Every stone, every artifact is a testament to their strength. We are not just reclaiming history—we are reclaiming our rightful place in it."
Archaeologists including Dr. Glenn Stuart (PhD) of the USask Department of Anthropology worked with the community to study one of the oldest known Indigenous sites on the continent
A shadowy Russian political elite hires three American consultants to help with President Yeltsin's reelection campaign when his approval rating drops to sin...
Kat
in reply to UptownGirl • • •UptownGirl reshared this.
UptownGirl
in reply to Kat • • •