Checkin out the latest update on @JenJen's Kickstarter, an had to save an share the absolutely wonderfully amazin recreation of the sickos meme.

Anyways, go check out the kickstarter:

kickstarter.com/projects/jenni…

kevinmlevin.substack.com/p/sta…

#history #civilwar

Smokey Bear with a hand-held drip torch at the Siskiyou Smokejumper Base Museum in Oregon. Image credit Kurt Angersbach / Westernlabs. Learn more at npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/GetAsse… and smokeybear.com/en/smokeys-hist… and southernfireexchange.org/wp-co… and #smokeybear #forest #publiclands #photography #rxburn #prescribedfire #usfs #forestservice #smokey #smokejumper #museum #oregon #wildfire #history

Resumen: de la primera participación zapatista en el Encuentro de Resistencias y Rebeldías, día 4 de agosto del 2025
enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/20…

"Resumen: de la primera participación zapatista en el Encuentro de Resistencias y Rebeldías, día 4 de agosto del 2025: […]"

Multi Sizes Round Wood Maker / Dowel Maker
youtube.com/watch?v=AKCM8xzzXy…

Μαρδοχαιος Φριζής
Ένα σκουπίδι που απειλεί όσους δυσαρεστησαν τα σιωναζι που ήρθαν για βεγγερα και διάλειμμα από τις δολοφονίες των Παλαιστινίων
Διαβάζω ότι είναι ...

Είναι πρόεδρος του Ελληνικού παραρτήματος του κόμματος "Otzma Yehudit (Εβραϊκή δύναμη)" του Ιταμάρ Μπεν-Γκβιρ (Με τον οποίον είναι και προσωπικός φίλος και συνεργάτης) και ιδιοκτήτης του καναλιού "JewishIdea77" (Πρώην "Εβραϊκό Φως"), στο οποίο αναλύει τα θέματα του Ισραήλ και της Μέσης Ανατολής.

Why Democrats are down - UnHerd


#US #politics

Democrats have an image problem. According to a Wall Street Journal survey that has tracked the popularity of the two major parties for 35 years, a record-low 33% of Americans approve of the Democratic Party. CNN likewise reports an approval rating of 28%, the lowest in more than three decades of polling. Quinnipiac finds that only 19% of Americans approve of how congressional Democrats are handling the job — the lowest share in the 16 years the pollster has been asking that question. Aggregating the polls, the analysts G. Elliott Morris and Mary Radcliffe calculate a Democratic disadvantage of 10 points in net favorability — the worst figure the party has faced in more than two decades.

One might be tempted to conclude from this data that voters simply agree with Republicans more on the issues. The real story is more complicated. What Democrats are lacking isn’t so much the right policy package, but a demonstrated willingness to stand up to Donald Trump and his agenda in the second term. The issue, moreover, is less one of increasing Democratic unpopularity, than Republicans weathering a general decline in trust in institutions due to the unique connection Trump has with a significant minority of the country. Democrats cannot break this bond; they can only hope to mobilize the forces against it.

Consider polling about specific bills. Last month, Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill, the signature legislation of his second term thus far. On average, it had a net approval rating of -23, making it the second most unpopular major piece of legislation under consideration since 1990, only beating out the 2017 GOP health-care bill. In contrast, Biden’s infrastructure bill was at +39 when it was polled.

Put another way: When asked about specific pieces of legislation, voters prefer the Democratic approach of higher spending on infrastructure and social services to Republicans’ spending cuts that only partially offset tax cuts disproportionately favoring the wealthiest Americans.

Nate Silver’s tracking of polls finds Trump’s approval rating to be underwater by double digits on inflation, trade, and the economy. Immigration is Trump’s strongest issue, but even here, net approval is currently at -3. To be sure, the Journal poll shows Republicans to be more trusted on issues like immigration and the economy. Meanwhile, YouGov in May found nine issues where Democrats had an advantage, and 10 where Republicans did. It’s difficult to know what to make of polls showing that voters agree more with Democratic tax-and-spending bills than those favored by Republicans, while at the same time Republicans are more trusted on the economy as an abstract issue. Another contradiction: while Americans dislike Trump’s tariffs, and one would think that Democrats represent a return to the status quo, they still trust Republicans equally as much as Democrats or more on the issue. This shouldn’t be logically possible, and probably again reflects voters not thinking too carefully about their political attitudes.

Issue polling is, in short, a mess. Although we can draw broad lessons about which party owns specific policy areas, I would be hesitant to use it in order to make inferences regarding recent changes in how Americans view Democrats and Republicans.

So if not policy, what does explain the sorry state of the Democrats? It would be one thing if they were cratering with Independents. That would suggest that they are simply out of step with the majority of Americans. In fact, the party leadership is reaching new lows because it faces discontent among its base. In the CNN poll cited above, only 58% of Democratic-aligned adults have a favorable view of their party, compared to 76% of Republicans. Morris and Radcliffe point to a Strength in Numbers/Verasite poll showing that Left-wing Democratic voters are disproportionately unhappy: about 20% of self-identified “very liberal” Democrats now have an unfavorable view of their own party, far higher than the equivalent disaffection among “very conservative” Republicans, who are at 8%. If you factor out this Left-flank discontent, Democratic approval would rise by a net of eight points. In the Strength in Numbers poll, Democrats actually do better with Independents.

The Republican advantage, then, seems mostly or completely driven by very liberal voters not liking the current Democratic Party. Does that mean that, in order to match Republicans in popularity, all Democrats would have to do is move Left? Unfortunately for them, surveys indicate that their voters would like them to do precisely the opposite.

According to a February poll from Gallup, as of early 2025, only 22% of Democrats were content with the party’s current ideological approach — everyone else wanted change. Crucially, 45% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning Independents said the party should become more moderate, while 29% wanted it to be more liberal or progressive. Among Republicans, in contrast, a healthy plurality of 43% was satisfied with the party and wanted it to stay the course.

What this means is that Democrats might need to think twice before simply trying to satisfy the most extreme voices among their base. Otherwise, they may lose moderate voters in the process, as more of their supporters want them to take a centrist path.

There is nothing all that mysterious about any of this. No matter where the Democrats are ideologically, voters could disapprove of the party from either side. A very liberal Democratic voter and a moderate one might both have gripes, which you would expect in a large, diverse country with only two major parties representing the entire political spectrum.

Perhaps it is a mistake, then, to focus on Democratic unpopularity. Maybe the question we should ask is why Republican approval remains so high among its base, in an era where trust in institutions is collapsing. The Trump-era GOP has taken radically unpopular positions on taxing and spending policy. Yet the Republican base seems to shrug everything off and remains malleable, seemingly due to Trump’s unique charisma. A KFF tracking poll shows that while only 61% of Republicans approved of the Big Beautiful Bill in June, that figure had risen to 78% in July.

Republican politicians now regularly justify their actions based on the idea that they follow the will of Trump. Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma was more explicit than most when he said that he fought against releasing Epstein documents in order to give Trump “cover,” arguing that Democrats would use any information that came out to target the president. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, when praising the recent trade deal with South Korea, urged his followers to “Trust in Trump”. A recent New York Times headline reads: “Texas Republicans Unveil Gerrymandered House Map, Trying to Please Trump,” showing that the president’s influence reaches down to what have traditionally been state and local issues.

The behavior of the current Congress has been downright cult-like. As the Associated Press reports, a raft of GOP proposals would allow Americans to “take the day off work for Donald Trump’s birthday,” receive “a $100 bill with Trump’s portrait on it,” and land at “Donald J. Trump International Airport near the nation’s capital,” among other similar measures.

It’s easy to feel contempt for politicians here. But we can assume that they are simply following their voters, who really love this man. Trump’s approval remains sky high in a party that was famous for turning on its leaders in Congress throughout the Obama era. Since 2023, researchers at Vanderbilt University have been asking Republicans if they consider themselves more supporters of MAGA or the traditional GOP. The first time they posed the question, 37% of respondents reported that they feel MAGA first. Today, the MAGA-first group is at 52%.

This is particularly interesting because MAGA is notoriously flexible when it comes to ideology. Those who consider themselves more intellectual Trumpists have no shortage of complaints about the president, from his bombing of Iran to his Medicaid cuts. A popular meme shows Trump implementing tariffs and being praised for it by a cartoon supporter in a red hat, who then turns around and declares “art of the deal” every time he removes the levies.

The story of falling Democratic popularity relative to Republicans is therefore only partly a story about Democrats. We are in an era of declining trust, which afflicts nearly all institutions, from the media to Congress to the medical system. Of course, the two major political parties are likely to take a hit under those conditions. Yet Republicans are buoyed by a cult of personality that is largely impervious to the effects of bad news or unpopular policy positions.

According to the Wall Street Journal poll, Republicans are currently about where they were in 2010 in terms of net favorability. Meanwhile, Democrats have seen an almost continuous decline. Thus, the notion that Trump is a drag on the GOP likely gets things exactly backwards. While his overall popularity might be underwater, what distinguishes Trump from other politicians is his ability to hold a base of support among a substantial and unshakable minority of the American people. This rubs off on the rest of the GOP, as long as lesser Republicans are seen to be doing the bidding of their leader.

That doesn’t mean all hope is lost for Democrats. While the party is indeed divided on whether it should become more moderate or liberal, there is greater unity on standing up to Trump. In a March poll that asked Democrats how they would grade their party’s response to Trump, 70% gave them a C or lower, with 21% giving an F. Only 17% said that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was doing enough to fight Trump; 61% felt he wasn’t doing enough. Democratic voters overwhelmingly support efforts like trying to block Trump’s actions through the courts and engaging in mass protests.

“While the party is indeed divided on whether it should become more moderate or liberal, there is greater unity on standing up to Trump.”

It follows that Democratic elected officials can likely shore up their own base of support by standing together against Trump’s political priorities. Would that possibly hurt them with Independents? One can’t say for sure, but given that Trump’s overall approval rating is underwater, it isn’t as if they would be going against the tide of public opinion. And Republicans are already extremely polarized against Democrats, and likely to stay that way, given their increasingly propagandistic media-consumption habits.

Trump’s role in the national psyche is so overwhelming that nearly every major political story is, at heart, a story about Trump. Republicans believe what they believe largely based on what Trump says and does. The Democrats are now a party that is ideologically divided, but united in opposition to Trump.

Given the fact that Trump’s base can’t be moved, Democrats might as well show life and pull out all the stops to oppose his agenda. On policy and messaging, it probably makes sense to moderate, rather than move to the Left. On anti-Trump opposition, however, the party must be resolute. In other words, Democrats need a centrism that fights. As the Republican Party becomes more and more enthralled to one man and his personal agenda, there is little to be gained by hoping to appease the other side.

Oppositional centrism would shore up the Democrats’ own base, and likely has the best chance of winning over the small number of Americans who are still persuadable. MAGAs will find a reason to be angry regardless. In order to thrive in the face of an increasingly unified opposition, Democrats cannot keep living in fear of the backlash that might result from standing up to Trump.

Richard Hanania, an UnHerd columnist, is the president of the Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology and blogs at Substack.

unherd.com/2025/08/democrats-n…

Haris Doukas, mayor of #Athens, last sentence from his message to Israeli ambassador that mysteriously disappeared from most English speaking friends posts...

"I should also like to inform the ambassador that in the last year the number of Israelis to whom a Greek Golden Visa was granted rose over 90%.”

Doukas was and still is facilitating all Israeli real estate companies confiscate peoples homes in Athens including in #Exarxeia where he still tries to enforce gentrification and the metro subway system.

Texas Law Requiring Voter ID for Mail-In Ballots Wins After Biden Admin Lawsuit

breitbart.com/politics/2025/08…

#Zap to support, DM to suggest new feeds.

TIL that You can spot base64 encoded JSON, certificates, and private keys

Link: ergaster.org/til/base64-encode…
Discussion: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4…

Acharya’s The Once and Future World Order is highly commended for its accessibility, anti-colonial challenge to Western hegemony, rejection of Eurocentric narratives, and emphasis on non-Western agency.

#Africa #Asia #LatinAmerica #colonialism #imperialism #capitalism #racism #liberalism #democracy #NeoLiberalism #GlobalSouth #GlobalNorth #west #WesternHegemony #AmericanHegemony #history #civilisation #civilization #CivilizationCollapse #Egypt #India #Greece #China #Rome

This entry was edited (1 week ago)

Yesterday, the Rome Tribunal of Ministers dropped an investigation against Prime Minister Meloni relating to her involvement in returning a warlord to Libya.

Osama Almasri Najim, a senior official of Libya’s judicial police, was arrested in Italy in January before being quietly released and sent back to Libya two days later via a State-operated flight. Almasri is wanted by the ICC for allegedly murdering, torturing and raping migrants, including children, since 2015.

The Court in Rome states Meloni was “certainly informed” but that there is no clear evidence of how involved she was in the decision. The Court will request authorization to proceed with the case against three members of her government: Interior Minister Piantedosi, Justice Minister Nordio, and Undersecretary Mantovano.

Meloni claims on X that it’s an “absurd argument” to say her ministers acted without her being part of the decision-making process and “with the sole compass being the protection of Italians’ security”. What’s truly absurd, is boasting about being part of a decision that set a torturer free, instead of bringing him to justice.

What security are Meloni, Piantedosi, Nordio and Mantovano building by defying the ICC and letting war criminals walk free?

Belarus, Serbia seek ways to strengthen cooperation amid challenging external conditions eng.belta.by/politics/view/bel…

Ισχυει οτι Ισραηλινος επιτεθηκε σε μσγαζι στον Αγ. Νικολαο που ειχε πανο Zionist killers go home, peaceful Jews welcome?

Κι αν ναι, που ειναι οι Κρητικαροι να τον πεταξουν στη θαλασσα;

Α ρε ξεφτιλες Κρητικοι, τα λογια πανω απ το μποι σας απο παντα

in reply to Proletarian Rage

@prolrage μια μικρη μειοψηφια πολιτικοποιημενων, οχι η πλειοψηφια. Ας μη γελιομαστε τωρα 600.000 κατοικους εχει η Κρητη κ μαζευτηκαν μερικες εκατονταδες

Δεν συγκινουνται οι κρητικοι, ουτε απο γενοκτονιες ουτε απο προσφυγες κ μεταναστες. Ειναι γνωστοι τοπικιστες παρτακηδες, σωβινιστες θα ελεγα. Και απατεωνες διαχρονικα (βλεπε ΟΠΕΚΕΠΕ και οχι μονο).
Και η "δημοκρατικη τους παραδοση κ συνειδηση" ειναι μια μουφα. Πελατεικο εθνικο δεξιο κρατος. Αυτοι το εστησαν, τα φιντανια τους

This is an essential, but depressing, read if you are concerned about trends in scientific publishing and research fraud.

pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2420…

We are fortunate in astrophysics not to have (as far as I know) as big a problem as some of the life sciences, but the perverse incentives operate here also.

There's also a good blog by the first author

reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/0…

#OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity

in reply to Luke Drury

I think the writing is on the wall, and governments need to just stop paying for papers. 20 years ago it was a festering issue, now with ChatGPT able to just generate papers it's turning into a full blown catastrophe.

That's not to say we should chuck researchers into the workforce and make them do 9-5 jobs while thinking on the side, rather, we need to figure out why 100 years ago you had bicycle mechanics not only putting food on the table, but having enough free time to invent the airplane. These days everyone's working as hard as they can just to pay rent, that's the part that's broken...

Political blocs in the European Parliament have called on the #EU to halt the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, warning that there is growing evidence of genocide which the world can no longer ignore.

They also urged the suspension of the EU-#Israel partnership agreement due to Israel’s repeated violations of human rights and international law.

Meanwhile, Israel Hayom reports that Israeli embassy staff have been evacuated from #Athens following widespread public protests against Israelis in #Greece.
t.me/QudsNen/179453

This entry was edited (1 week ago)

reshared this

À Nantes : de la prison ferme pour un vol de Yop à moins de 2€
contre-attaque.net/2025/08/05/…

"Fort avec les faibles, faible avec les forts : comment la justice broie les pauvres et préserve la caste des dominants
L’article À Nantes : de la prison ferme pour un vol de Yop à moins de 2€ est apparu en premier sur Contre Attaque."

B’Tselem’s report on the Gaza genocide missed an opportunity to advance a clear and unequivocal legal argument that Israel’s actions constitute a textbook case of genocide.

mondoweiss.net/2025/08/btselem…

#Palestine #Israel #Gaza
@palestine @israel

reshared this

BREAKING: In A First, The DOJ Has Sent Criminal Charges To A Federal Grand Jury With The Goal Of Indicting The Obama Russia Hoax Coup Plotters!

infowars.com/posts/breaking-in…

#Zap to support, DM to suggest new feeds.

lesson of the day is coming from the move = war of the worlds, year 2025 (note I saw this movie for free just like how it is in the theater on the free movie app's...

1) quote = The truth shall set you free.
2) quote = data is the most important resource.
3) quote = DNA is like a computer code or line of code for tech.
4) show why sometimes an illegal act thing is a good thing due to the government is fucking us over...
5) How the government will kill anyone and everyone who gets in there way.
6) How you cant trust anyone who depends on tech in the government and drones with using them properly.

Can you please support us in our endeavor of trying to build a business up from stretch from an old business ... You can support us at www.givesendgo.com/advancingmediabusiness, if you would like to help us out.

=these comments are protected by freedom of speech and freedom of opinion.
= we have say please do not do illegal things unless you are willing to fight the government legal system. we can not endorse doing illegal things

Survivors of Aid Massacres: Israel Is Eroding Gaza’s Social Fabric orinocotribune.com/survivors-o…

Israel’s war in Gaza combines a staggeringly high death rate, shocking violence toward children, unparalleled physical destruction, and now a world-historical famine. The world has, by objective measure, never seen anything like this

jacobin.com/2025/08/israel-gaz…

Since the Sidney Sweeny op persists:

Sydney Sweeney is the face of the American Eagle “jeans” fiasco.

Jay Schottenstein is the Chairman and CEO of American Eagle as well as the owner. American Eagle is the parent company of aerie.

The Creative Director for American Eagle was also the Creative Director responsible for the woke AerieReal Campaign

The people behind the woke campaigns that changed America are the same people responsible for the ‘Pro-American’ campaigns
x.com/RabbitHoleRick/status/19…

in reply to Consider The Raven

@Jagahati Advertisers are evil for the most part. Simply because their job is to use psychological tricks to drive sales.

They're the golem to drive the cultural change their owners want to be the current FOTM & profit at the behest of the people they seek to manipulate & deracinate, Whites.

In this case it's a the same group that's making themselves a pariah by their own actions, Jews.

Pointing at this not so obvious subtext to the group that falls for the Sweeny Op is part of the solution.

Kemalizm solun düşmanı

Türkiye devletinin kurucu ideolojisi olan Kemalizm, AKP’ye karşı muhalefet içerisinde solun bir değeri veya destekçisiymiş gibi gösterildiği ölçüde hem solun hem de daha geniş muhalefetin milliyetçiliğe kaymasına yol açıyor.

Kemalizm, dağılmış bir feodal devlet olan Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun kalıntıları üzerinden, Batı’da burjuva devrimleri sonucu kurulmuş ulus devletlere benzer bir yapı inşa etmeye çalışanların ideolojisidir. Yani 20. yüzyılın başında Anadolu’nun hâkim sınıflarının; yükselmeye başlayan Müslüman Türk ticaret burjuvazisinin ve “Millî Mücadele” adıyla anılan dönemde öne çıkan askeri bürokrasinin, Batı’daki modernleşmeyi tepeden aşağı dayatma ve aynı zamanda yeni Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Türklük kimliğini diğer tüm halklara dayatma projesinin adıdır. Bu anlamıyla Kemalizm baskıcı ve otoriterdir, milliyetçi ve hatta ırkçıdır, dini de “laiklik savunusu” adı altında tamamen devletin kontrolüne almaya çalışır, yoksullara ve tüm ezilenlere karşı elitizmi ve egemenleri savunur.

Kemalist gelenek

Dolayısıyla Kemalizm, Türkiye devletinin kurucu ideolojisi olarak, belli başlı birkaç görev ve özelliğe sahiptir:

1) 20. yüzyılın başında başta Ermeniler ve Rumlar olmak üzere Anadolu’daki gayrimüslim halklara karşı uygulanan imha politikalarının, ayrıca onların mülklerinin gaspıyla servet transferi yapılmasının teorize edilmesi ve ölümüne savunulması

2) Kürt halkının varlığının ve kimliğinin inkârı, bu becerilemediği zaman onlarla çatışmanın devamlılığının sağlanması

3) Türkiye toplumunun çoğunluğunun dindarlığının modern burjuva ulus devlete karşı bir tehdit olarak görülmesi ve buna karşı dinin devletin kontrolü altına alınması

4) Ordunun egemen sınıfın bir parçası olan, sermaye sahibi bir yapı olarak siyasetin göbeğinde konumlandırılması

Kemalizm, Türkiye tarihi boyunca seçim sandıklarından çıkan sonuç ne olursa olsun, bu değerler etrafında devleti korumaya ve toplumu şekillendirmeye çalışan bir siyasi çizgi olarak varlığını sürdürdü. Ve görüldüğü gibi bunların solla, sosyalizmle, devrimcilikle hiçbir ilgisi yok. Zaten Kemalizm, kimi zaman iddia edildiği gibi “bir burjuva devriminin” ideolojisi değil; aksine, 1908’de patlak veren kitle hareketlerinin sonucu olarak gerçekleşen burjuva devrimini yukarıdan bastıranların ideolojisidir.

Sol ve Kemalizm

Tüm bunlara rağmen, Türkiye’de solda Kemalizm hep tartışılan bir kavram olmuştur. Solun bir rengi, savunması gereken bir tarihsel dönem veya güncel müttefiki olarak görülmüştür. Bunlara neden olan iki temel yanılgı var.

Birincisi, Kemalizmin antiemperyalist bir kurtuluş savaşı verdiği ve bu yüzden küresel düzenin hakimlerine karşı başarı kazandığı inancı. Burada varılan sonuç, Birinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası Anadolu’da yaşananların tamamen resmi tarih anlayışına dayanan bir perspektiften okunmasından kaynaklanıyor. Kurtuluş Savaşı veya Millî Mücadele denilen çatışmaların çapı, Osmanlı’nın Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda içinde bulunduklarının neredeyse onda biri kadar. Burada, emperyalistlere karşı verilen bir mücadeleden çok, Anadolu’da kalan son gayrimüslim unsurların da temizlenmesi ve mallarına el konulan Ermenilerin, Rumların dönme ve bunların peşine düşme ihtimaline karşı kurulan askeri ve siyasi yapıları görüyoruz. Örneğin Fransız işgaline ilk yıllarda pek itiraz etmeyen şehirler, bir anda Ermenilerin geri dönme ihtimaline karşı “ayaklanıp” bugün bildiğimiz “şanlı”, “kahraman” gibi sıfatları edinirler. Kısacası, Kemalizm anti-emperyalist bir kurtuluş mücadelesi değil; elbette yabancı güçlerle bazı askeri çatışmalara da girdiği için milliyetçi, ancak özünde küresel kapitalist sistemde yeni bir devletle var olmak isteyen egemen sınıfın ve dolayısıyla emperyalistlerle bir uzlaşmanın üzerine kurulan devletin ideolojisidir. Anti-emperyalizmi milliyetçilikle, yabancı düşmanlığıyla sınırlı bir ufka sahiptir.

Solu etkileyen ikinci unsur ise halkın ve işçi sınıfının çoğunluğunun dindar, gerici, fikirleri değişmeyen sabit kafalı ve sağcı insanlar olarak görülmesi; buna karşı Kemalizmin bir tür aydınlanmacı, modernleşmeci ideoloji olarak ilerlemeyi temsil ettiği iddiası. Burada birden fazla sorun var. Öncelikle, sol ve sosyalistler, dünyayı akıllı ve modernleşmiş insanlarla geri kafalı barbarlar arasında gören “medeniyetler çatışması” tezlerinin savunucuları değillerdir. Bu bakış sömürgeciliğin, büyük güçlerin dünyanın geri kalanını “medenileştirme” projelerinin, dolayısıyla günümüzde Batı emperyalizminin bakışıdır. Biz ise “cahil” veya “barbar” diye aşağılanan geniş kitlelerin, işçi sınıfının kolektif mücadelesiyle dünyanın daha özgür ve eşit bir yere dönüştürülebileceğine inanıyoruz. Yani bu “aşağılananlar” aslında bizleriz ve tarih boyunca böyle olduk.

Bu yüzden Birinci Enternasyonal’e katılan Fransız işçiler şöyle diyordu:

“Biz bütün ülkelerin işçileri, insanlığı iki sınıfa, cahil sıradan halk ile bolluk içinde yüzen şiş göbekli mandarinler sınıfına ayıran bu ölümcül sistemin barikatlarına karşı birleşmeliyiz. Kendi kurtuluşumuzu dayanışmayla kendimiz yaratalım!”

Veya Lenin 1918’de benzer şekilde devrimi ve kitleleri aşağılayanlara karşı şunları söylüyordu:

“Ahlaksız burjuva basını varsın bizim devrimimizin yaptığı her yanlışı dünyaya haykırsın. Hatalarımız cesaretimizi kırmıyor. Devrim başladı diye insanlar azizlere dönüşmedi. Yüzyıllardır ezilmiş, korkutulmuş, sefalet ve cehalet içinde tutulmuş, vahşileştirilmiş emekçi sınıflar, devrimi, hatalar da yapmadan gerçekleştiremezler.”

Ayrıca, Kemalizmin “laiklik” yorumu, Avrupa’da kilisenin egemenliğine karşı aşağıdan gelişen hareketlerin yarattığı toplumsal durumun aksine; baskıcı, dini devlet tekeline alan, Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı gibi yapılar kuran, farklı dini mezhepler arasında ayrım gözeten, dindarların dinini özgürce yaşama hakkını da çoğu yerde elinden alan bir devlet formasyonu. Başörtülü kadınları sosyal hayattan dışlamaya çalışan bir laikliğin solla, sosyalizmle hiçbir ilgisi yoktur. Din derslerinin zorunlu olmadığı, devletin veya anayasanın toplum adına bir dini kimliği seçip dayatmadığı, Diyanet’in kapatıldığı, tüm inançların ve cemaatlerin kendi din görevlilerini seçmekte ve ibadethanelerini fonlamakta özgür olduğu, tüm inançlar üzerindeki baskıların kalktığı bir laikliği biz de savunuyoruz. Ancak Kemalizmin önerdiği bu değil.

Solu ezen bir güç

Kemalizm ayrıca, Kürtlerin, Ermenilerin, yoksul dindar işçilerin yanı sıra demokrasiye, serbest seçimlere ve sosyalist solun kendisine de düşman. Bu yüzden tek parti döneminde hiçbir özgür seçim yapılamıyor, Mustafa Kemal eliyle kurdurulan muhalefet partileri kısa süre içerisinde popülerleştikleri için kapatılıyor, baskı altına alınıyorlardı. Bu dönemde Mustafa Suphi önderliğindeki komünistler öldürüldü, hatta devlet eliyle sahte bir komünist parti dahi kurduruldu.

1950’lerden itibaren ise Kemalist geleneği temsil eden partiler, 1970’lerin ortasındaki kısa bir dönem dışında, girdikleri seçimleri hep kaybettiler. Demokrat Parti’den Ak Parti’ye merkez sağın ve muhafazakâr partilerin güçlenmesinde başat rol Kemalizmindi.

Kemalist siyasi gelenek aynı zamanda solu da ezen temel güçtü. Komünistler “devleti bölmek isteyen” anarşistler olarak tanımlandı. Cezaevlerinde, işkencehanelerde devrimcilere Türk milliyetçiliğinin öğeleri, Kemalist devletin normları ile eziyet edildi.

Kemalizmin milliyetçiliğinden gidilen yol

Kemalizm, Türkiye’nin kalkınmasını ve diğer devletlerden üstün olmasını savunan milliyetçiliğinin yanı sıra, çoğu zaman bu milliyetçiliğin ötesine geçmiştir. Güneş Dil Teorisi’ne göre tüm dillerin atası Türkçedir. Türkiye’de yaşayanların ırksal birliğini ispatlamak için on binlerce kişinin kafatası ölçülmüştür.

Kemalizm, Kürtlerin “dağlarda yaşayan Türkler” olduğunu iddia etmiş, Türk olmayı aşırı milliyetçi bir ant vasıtasıyla ilkokula giden herkese dayatmış, “Vatandaş Türkçe konuş” kampanyaları düzenleyerek insanların dillerini inkâr etmiştir. Bugün aynı gelenek kemalistlerin zehirli göçmen düşmanlığında devam etmektedir.

Günümüzde Kemalizm

AKP’nin son yıllarda gerçekleştirdiği makas değişikliği, eski derin devletin artıklarıyla ve MHP ile kurduğu ittifak, Kemalizmin tekrar devlet mertebesinde kabul görmeye başlamasına yol açtı. Muhafazakâr sağ gelenekten gelen AKP, Atatürk resimlerinin yanına Tayyip Erdoğan’ı koydu ve Kemalizmin biraz muhafazakâr soslu bir yorumuna; Türkiye’yi kuran liderden 100 yıl sonra onu çok ilerilere taşıyan bir başka lider anlatısıyla ikna oldu. Kemalizmin son 25 yıldaki en fanatik temsilcilerinden Doğu Perinçek’in bugün AKP’nin baş destekçilerinden biri hâline geldiğini düşündüğümüzde, bu durum daha berrakça ortaya çıkıyor.

Kemalizmin bir devlet ideolojisi olarak AKP-MHP ittifakında kendini bulmasında ve yenilenmesinde şaşılacak bir şey yok. Bizi daha çok ilgilendiren ise muhalefette, anti-AKP’ciliğin içinde Kemalizmin tuttuğu yer.

Sol Kemalizm

2005 yılından 2015 yılına kadar süren mücadelelerde, Kemalizmi, onun katı milliyetçilik ve din yorumlarının yarattığı tahribatları gidermeyi, geriletmeyi bir ölçüde başarmıştık. Fakat toplumsal mücadelelerin bir ölçüde geri çekildiği, iktidardaki ittifakların değiştiği ve “yerli milli”leştiği dönemde, solun kimi kesimleri CHP’nin peşine takılmayı ve Kemalizmin daha inceltilmiş bir versiyonunu savunmayı geçer akçe hâline getirme çabalarına yeniden girişti. Demokrasinin hiçbir kırıntısına izin vermeyen bir rejim kuran, hatta bunu zaman zaman kendisi de kabul eden Mustafa Kemal, bugün yaşadığımız otoriter rejime karşı direnişin sembolü olan, özlediğimiz bir lider gibi takdim ediliyor.

30 Ağustos’ta birçok sol parti “bağımsızlığı”, “zaferi” ve Mustafa Kemal’i kutlayan açıklamalarda bulundu. Bunu yapanlar arasında geleneksel olarak ulusalcı çizgide duranların yanı sıra, HDP çevresinde dolanan sol partiler de bulunuyor.

Bu partiler anti-AKP’ciliği, Kemalizme biraz “devrimci” veya “demokratik” lafları katılarak, ancak onun ana çizgisinden kopmadan yürütülmesi gereken bir eksen olarak tarif ediyorlar. Bunun sonucu olarak da seçimlerde CHP-İyi Parti etrafında oluşturulacak bir koalisyonu desteklemeye şimdiden adaylar.

Antikapitalist sol için ise bugün hem Kemalizmin solla herhangi bir ilişkisi olmadığına dair ideolojik ve politik tartışmaları yürütmek hem de onun merkezinde olduğu bir “Millet İttifakı”nı, yani AKP-MHP’nin Türk milliyetçisi blokuna karşı bir başka milliyetçi alternatifi desteklemenin işçi hareketine ve sola hiçbir faydası olmayacağını anlatmak büyük önem taşıyor.

Kemalizm, bugün HDP’yi ittifakına dışarıdan desteğe zorlamaya çalışan CHP’liler ne derse desin, Kürtlerin Türkler karşısında ikincilliğini savunuyor. Kemalizm bugün göçmenleri dışlamanın, başka halkları aşağılamanın temel öğesidir. Kemalizm halka tepeden bakan elitist bir ideolojidir. Devlet bürokratlarının, askerlerin, TÜSİAD’ın ve büyük sermayenin ideolojisidir. Buradan sola, sosyalistlere dost veya müttefik bir güç devşirilemez.

Bizim ihtiyacımız olan ırkçılığa karşı çıkanları, iklim krizini durdurmak için mücadele edenleri, İstanbul Sözleşmesi’nin kaldırılmasına direnen kadınları, LGBTİ+ları, Boğaziçi’nde direnen öğrencileri, yerel ekoloji mücadelelerini, greve giden veya hakkını arayan işçileri birleştirecek bir muhalefeti inşa etmek. Bunun göbeğine ise böylesi bir birleşik mücadele hattını savunan Antikapitalist Blok’u koymak.

Kemalizm değil bize lazım olan, bize lazım olan antikapitalist, enternasyonalist ve özgürlükçü bir muhalefetin yükselmesidir.

Ozan T.
marksist.org/kemalizm-solun-du…

dorseteye.com/leicestershire-a…

Klitschko vs. Zelensky: Kyiv Mayor Says He Is Not Tapping into Budget to Help Military en.topwar.ru/269162-klichko-pr…

Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biological Age by 3.1 Years

Link: trial.medpath.com/news/5c43f09…
Discussion: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4…