What is missed by most in the current Epstein kerfuffle is this:
Epstein's importance is NOT his 'client list' (by now already 20 years old).
What makes him important is that has become a MEME.
A marker of truth.
The truth that children are abused.
That top members of society are blackmailed.
That there is 'cabal/Deep State' pulling those strings.
Also, a marker for accountability, against 2-tiered justice.
Once looked at from this pov, the analysis changes.
Rose reshared this.
relentless_eduardo
in reply to ArnGrimR Jarl 🎖 • • •"A marker of truth.
The truth that children are abused."
when you use the word, truth, make sure what you say is true.
children were not abused. they were very experienced teenage girls who were probably already in the business and were paid very well.
but I know it makes people feel good to pretend to be protectors of children, so we have to bend the truth
ArnGrimR Jarl 🎖
in reply to relentless_eduardo • • •@relentless_eduardo
And you miss the point of the meme:
It is not about Epstein, but about the general truth that there are organisations trafficking in children for the purpose of sexual exploitation.
Also, BY DEFINITION, a minor cannot consent to sex and such, and this is statutory rape.
Try to protect and white-wash that...
relentless_eduardo
in reply to ArnGrimR Jarl 🎖 • • •"Also, BY DEFINITION, a minor cannot consent to sex and such, and this is statutory rape."
that is not by definition, and you don't need to capitalize as if I wouldn't get it. It's by governmnent lie. The government simply lies and says children cannot LEGALLY CONSENT.
"but about the general truth that there are organisations trafficking in children for the purpose of sexual "
yes we know that this is going on but it cannot be unravelled and stopped by lying
ArnGrimR Jarl 🎖
in reply to relentless_eduardo • • •@relentless_eduardo
You are really going to defend your attack on statutory rape?
As if children can freely consent to sex with adults?
What are you trying to defend? Unfettered access to children for sex?
"But they liked it! They consented! They were professional and very experienced teenagers, probably already in the business!"
You're a creep.
ArnGrimR Jarl 🎖
in reply to relentless_eduardo • • •@relentless_eduardo
Really?
This sounds like white-washing to me.
Too many reports talk about grooming of young girls, put into situations where they should never have been (parent alert: how on earth did they allow their daughters to go on such trips?).
There is no bending of truth here.
relentless_eduardo
in reply to ArnGrimR Jarl 🎖 • • •"Too many reports talk about grooming of young girls, put into situations where they should never have been (parent alert: how on earth did they allow their daughters to go on such trips?)."
where are these "reports"?
from the same garbage bin that almost everything on the internet comes from?