Please tell your friends about federated social media site that speaks several fediverse protocols thus serving as a hub uniting them, hubzilla.eskimo.com, also check out friendica.eskimo.com, federated
macroblogging social media site, mastodon.eskimo.com a federated microblogging site, and yacy.eskimo.com an uncensored federated search engine. All Free!
According to the findings of the Digital Fairness Fitness Check, consumers do not always feel fully in control of their online experience due to practices such as:
1. Dark patterns in online interfaces 2. Addictive design 3. Personalised targeting 4. Difficulties with managing digital subscriptions 5. Problematic commercial practices of social media influencers
Klimaapokalyptiker erzählen uns seit Jahren, dass das berühmte Great Barrier Reef in Australien bald dem Klimawandel zum Opfer fallen wird. Doch das Naturwunder will nicht mitspielen: Zum vierten Mal in Folge deutet alles auf ein Rekordjahr für das Korallenwachstum hin. report24.news/tropenwunder-sta…
Epstein is still alive. Well, maybe not anymore, but he was whisked out of that cell to the witness relocation program, then off to NH with a new face.
@wolf480pl I was just reading about Lorentz contraction as a solution to the Michelson–Morley null result, and I'm back to not understanding it.
Here's my logic, lets imagine the arms are 10 units long and the half-silvered mirror is at x,y of 0,0.
At rest: Light on the X axis bounces from 0,0 to 10,0, to 0,0, doing a total of 20 units of motion. Light on the Y axis bounces from 0,0 to 0,10 to 0,0, also doing 20 units of motion.
At speed (X travel of 2 units per light-bounce-time), light on the X axis bounces from 0,0 to 11,0 to 2,0, doing a total of 20 units of motion. Light on the Y axis bounces from 0,0 to 1,10 to 2,0 doing 20.1 units (if I'm not mistaken, the hypotenuse is 10.05 so the sum is 20.1).
You had me convinced earlier that because the X beam starts at 0,0 and ends at 2,0, it has to have taken extra time to move those 2 units, but considering the mirrors instantaneously moving from points 0->1->2, the numbers seem to indicate that the opposite is true.
But now the problem is that there's no amount of X contraction that can fix this, when the X travel is 20 and the Y travel is 20.1.
If light travels at 5 units per second normally, then at rest it takes 2 seconds out and 2 seconds back which is 4 seconds.
If the speed is 1 unit per second then light will only do 4 units per second on the outbound but does 6 units per second on the return. 10/4+10/6 is 4.16.
Okay I see the problem, it takes more than half of the time for the light to get to the mirror, so it's not 0,0 to 11,0 to 2,0, it's more like 0,0 to 11.3,0 to 2,0 (rough estimate).
Yeah and I don't do math, I've always been shit at it, it's just not how I think. So as soon as someone goes to an equation, they might as well have switched to Chinese. In that case I'll just assume the equation is right and challenge the assumptions.
BTW random thought: We have the universe expanding away from itself at an accelerating rate, so one possible explanation is that it's spinning and this is just centrifugal force.
But if it's spinning, doesn't that mean there's a preferred frame of reference? I mean, if you claim there's no preferred frame, then what's the difference between a spinning universe and a still universe? "Spinning relative to what?"
turns out in both Galilean relativity and in Special Relativity, spinning is not relative. Formally, spinning frames of reference are not inertial frames of reference. That's because you can do an experiment which will tell you if you're spinning or not (you'll see pseudo-forces like centrifugal force or Coriolis force)
so if the universe is spinning, then nine of the frames of reference we've been using are valid to.use for Special Relativity. Also, we should be able to find the centre by going against the centrifugal force.
The reason I brought it up is because intuitively it seems you could use it to find a definition of "stationary", but in fact that's not true because the known universe could still be drifting through deep space.
Intuitively, I suspect there is actually a definition of stationary, but because volume of an object, and all time keeping methods depend on particle orbits which follow C, it is impossible to find it.
Well, in order for that to work, you have to accept that space-time is a real thing. So we have x,y,z,t and t is a special dimension that we can't *ever* move backward in, and we normally always move forward at a specific rate, but there are all of these rules which exist to change that rate in order to workaround the bugs which emerge when we try to reconcile the business requirement of same rules in every frame, with the technological limitation of C (it really sounds like a simulation)...
OR, we go back to how everyone who is not a physicist thinks, we have x,y,z and processes occur at a certain rate, but all of those rates are relative to C. Then there is a preferred frame, one-way speed of light does depend on our speed in space, we can even have aether - why not... It's just that it's impossible to detect any of this because every other process's speed is based on C.
When is it symmetrical? In the case of GPS satellites, I'm pretty confident the satellites see the earth's clocks going fast while the earth sees the satellite clocks going slow, otherwise the clock skew would be paradoxical.
As I recall, symmetrical time dilation is a mirage based on doppler effect, and every "true" time dilation (which actually leaves clocks skewed) is asymmetrical.
Well, it's a net reduction of rules, it eliminates the entire mystery of What Is Time, and we kind of experience some form of aether already - the vacuum field - it's just that it doesn't have physical properties that match anything anyone had expected. Lastly, if light travels at a limited speed but there is no definition of stationary, then every inertial frame needs to be it's own little universe, but if stationary exists but we can't see it, then everything can be a lot more similar to the physics we're used to - i.e. Occam's Razor.
but we already have the experience of every inertial frame being its own universe - from Galileo. Every intertial frame being equivalent is more similar to the physics we're used to.
Besides, Occam's Razor is not path dependent, but "do the thing we're more used to" is.
> we already have the experience of every inertial frame being its own universe - from Galileo
Can you give me the part of the theory I can lookup for this?
> Every intertial frame being equivalent is more similar to the physics we're used to
Experimentally we of course see that it is, my little "it's not but you'll never know" model just resolves some of the rough edges when different inertial frames interact - and in a relatively Newtonian way.
Galileo's principle of relativity states that the laws of mechanics are invariant in every inertial frame of reference.
This is well illustrated by Galileo’s ship. What is meant here by "laws of
So, I *think* there might be a way that my model can be falsified.
If you try to invoke the twin paradox, but instead of putting one twin into orbit, you send him straight out and back, you should (per my model) end up building a very large Michelson interferometer and you will see no clock skew.
In the classical model you would see velocity based clock skew in accordance with how far out he went.
I don't understand that well, but an electron meeting an anti-electron and anihilating into a photon can be also thought of as an electron bouncing off a photon from the future and then starting to travel backwards in time
My reaction to that stuff is "prove it", I mean a dumb thought experiment is to build an anti-particle detector, which I imagine can be done, and build an anti-particle emitter, which again I imagine can be done with a particle accelerator... And then hook it up to a TTY terminal and try to chat with my future self...
That's a different question, but I'm just saying can we swap out (x,y,z,t) for (x,y,z) and recognize time is a convention based on processes of matter that take place are a repeatable speed vs. C
I'm just saying it's not fundamental. It's like temperature which is an effect of molecular vibration amplitude which depends on thermal energy density. Time is an effect of a particle orbit rates which depend on C
It's still useful for describing how an experiment will play out, but it's just not foundational.
so you have a different time-like dimension in the underlaying model, but that's not the observable time, because observable time is an emergent property dependent on local c?
> a different time-like dimension in the underlaying model
Yeah, you could say that, like a "processor tick" is when light moves whatever the minimum quantum distance is - and this is immeasurable because our measuring instruments all base on C.
matter anti matter particle pairs are the same particle where it starts going backwards in time but from our perspective 2 things collide and annihilate.
and yes that appears to happen with high energy particle accelerators like LHC at cern, steins;gate references cern a lot wrt time travel for a reason. it's spooky shit.
IMO nothing goes back, because back no longer exists. My model of the universe is like Conway's Game of Life, there just is no such thing as a saved game or anything you can go back to and send information to, and this stuff is all basically quackery.
Each row has to fit the row before it and the row after it. But looking at the solved puzzle, you don't know from which side someone started laying the tiles.
Any thought about going back in time starts off with "is the data there?" if the past still exists, then either the universe takes a snapshot at every "processor tick" or something. But if you believe it's there, then anything like giving yourself the stock market numbers for tomorrow is just paradoxical horseshit and really not worthy of serious discussion. So what's left is some kind of "infinite universes" hypothesis and then if you "time travel" well how do you know you're going to the same universe as 1957 America and not like idk Supernova Wiped Out Everything universe?
The only possible histories are fixpoitns. The only solutions with time travel are the ones where the time traveller reinforces the state that led him to travel back in time.
If I have to humor the idea of "affect your past" time travel, I'll just say that even if someone did invent such a thing, it's certain that people would keep screwing with it until they had broken the past such that it is no longer invented. Then you get to decide if it just vanishes, or if the universe implodes into a paradox blackhole.
But generally speaking, I think the prospect of time travel makes Stanley Meyer sound like Richard Feynman.
@jeff Here's an example of how I imagine a useless time travel could work:
1. Create an electron-positron pair from two photons of known spin. Now you know the sum of the spins of the electron and the positron. Person A gets the electron, person B gets the positron.
2. Person A measures the spin of the electron. It's up, so buys the stock.
3. Months later, person B checks stock's price, turns out it went down, needs to tell person A not to buy.
@jeff 4. Person B tries to anihilate the positron in such a way, that it has a spin up, so that person A's electron has a spin fown. That requires the resulting two photons to have a particular spin. Unfortunately, after anihilation it turns out the resulting photons have a different spin, as if the positron's spin has always been down, and person A's electron's spin has always been up.
(note that I probably got the quantum details all wrong) 2/2
What's bizarre to me is that someone (CIA?) has somehow convinced the physics community that changing the past and then having the past and present re-compute again is a worthy topic of conversation between serious educated adults - but pulling energy out of the quantum vacuum is the domain of the schizophrenic.
Affecting the past, with the intention of reaping the benefits of that affect in the present - which would require the universe to instantaneously re-compute the new present based on the changed past. This is like modern day alchemy.
I think free energy is more of an alchemy than time travel.
Because just like transmuting one metal into another, it will probably eventually turn out that it's possible, and super not worth it.
And like transmuting one metal into another, people are searching for it to solve the scarcity they experience every day, and those people have multiple times misinterpreted their results or intentionally deceived the public.
Well you're right that it has a lot in common with alchemy, particularly that it makes people crazy - either in the sense of doing endless random experiments with no theoretical basis, or in the sense of trying to "force" something to be a scam even if the guy isn't asking for any money.
I've thought to myself that if I got something like this working, I'd probably just mine bitcoin and keep my mouth shut, not because I'm afraid of the CIA or something (fuckem), but because I don't want to deal with the weirdos.
That said, I think it's theoretically possible based on reactionless thrusters.
@jeff I think it's more theoretically possiblebthan reactionless thrusters.
Like, conservation of momentum is more dear to me than conservation of energy. It probably can be violated in some circumstances too, but I don't think the specific type of reactionoess thruster you've talked about is real.
Well you're welcome to think what you want, but apparently the Buhler asymmetric capacitor has been reproduced in a couple of labs at this point because it's so simple anyone can do it. And it's been tested in a faraday cage and the cage makes force, and it works in a vacuum ...
Stephen Hawking threw a party for time travelers, so it's definitely a pop sci topic. Every Neil Tyson type of documentary on relativity eventually gets to this "jee I wonder if it's possible" kind of discussion. But if you dare say there's energy everywhere and it can be harvested, that's considered to be the most despicable heresy that can possibly be said in physics. Which I mean, in poker we refer to this as a Tell...
Whether it's actually possible is another question, but I think the Epsteins of the world WORRY that it's possible - and I think when they invite the Hawkings' of the world to their Rape Island, they're expressing the concern that modern society is predicated on energy scarcity and if someone upsets energy scarcity then it's the end of an era.
What if you can send a message to the past; to the geometric point of "time" at which we experienced the past, but it won't change anything in the present or the future, because there's no one there in the past to actually receive the message, because we all moved on from that point in the past already.
People imagine time travel as if you could go upstream against the flow of a river and expect to see exactly the same water and the same fish you saw when you were there last time, but no, that point now has different water and different fish, the water and fish you're used to are all gone now, far and still going downriver. Heck, if you go back in time and then go forward again to your "current" time, you'd also find nothing, because by now everyone have moved on from that geometric point forward too.
Perhaps if you go to the past you'd find a completely different world there, or different people and events inhabiting our "same" world, or you'd find the void of nothingness. But the only way you'd find the actual past people and events exactly as they happened is for all those people and events and things to be part of the geometry of space-time itself, and not flowing in it or on top of it. But if we are the geometry of space-time itself, then what "flow" makes us experience the movement forward in time? I imagine, to "scan" the geometry in the direction of time-forward /something/ has to be detached from that geometry and moving "over it". I can't tell the shape of a surface blindfolded unless I move my finger over it, if my finger was molded into part of that surface, then no discovery is possible at all. But we seem to "discover" the future as it becomes our present.
I'll let Wolf take this one. To me, time travel is just maddeningly quackish. I'll do free energy, reactionless thrust, and Lorenz aether, but time travel and alien UFOs are my limit.
random sleepy bordering-on-high passer-by without-context fantasy comment: what if we do see a weird centrifugal force, say, gravity, and due to some spinning of the universe in some higher dimension in which we get farther from the "center" by getting closer to higher concentrations of mass. The edges of the universe being walls of highest concentrations of mass, i.e. blackholes, and the center of the universe being somehow somewhere as far as you can get from any mass at all.
The problem with trying to reason gravity as a form of centrifugal force is that it attracts you to so many different things. With centrifugal force in general, you're pushed to "the edge", but with gravity, you're pushed (or pulled) to the earth, and the moon, and the sun, and other planets, and other stars, etc...
Quantized Inertia attempts to unify them by imagining a universal pushing force that pushes from all directions, and it can be blocked by matter, or it can be blocked by the Rindler horizon that emerges behind you when you accelerate.
Thank you for entertaining the random thought. Thinking out loud still, perhaps incoherently: if the rotation of our world is around an axis that is "outside" the world, say, we live in a two-dimensional world, hanging from a thread rotating around a pole somewhere above in the third dimension, then we'd see the centrifugal force applying in one direction in our 2D world, but, if the axis of rotation goes /through/ our world, then we'd see centrifugal force going in all directions away from one "center" point in our world.
Now I can't claim to know intuitively what "spinning" means in a 4th dimension, let alone spinning in a 13th one, looking at a projection of a hypercube spinning confuses me, but gives me more ideas.
What if it's not gravity, what if the "center" point we're all going away from is the point of the big bang, and the edges we're going towards in all directions are... I don't know? But perhaps this explains dark energy and somehow the accelerated expansion of the universe.
Another idea, perhaps, when considering time as one of the dimensions, the one direction we're all going away from is the "past", and towards the edges of the "future" (hence perhaps why the past is "one" and the future feels somehow like multitudes?) The beginning of the universe being the center, again is perhaps the big bang, and the "end" of the universe being the edges. Now if we assume the end of the universe being all the black holes that swallowed all matter, then the closer you are to becoming a black hole, the closer you are to the edge, hence, you are pulled towards all directions that are closer to being black holes. Whenever any matter is pulled towards any other matter, it is going in the direction of becoming black holes, hence "gravity".
Of course the big issue with this "assumption" that black holes are the "end" is that it is wrong as far as we know. Firstly, because space is expanding, matter is less likely to become black holes over time, and secondly, because Hawking radiation indicates that black holes are not the end state for matter as they seem to evaporate over time (unless Hawking radiation comes from "somewhere else" and does not result in mass reduction of black holes, but that's not what we collectively think for now (as far as I know)).
> if the rotation of our world is around an axis that is "outside" the world
Well, you could possibly imagine creating a warped version of space where all matter exists around the edges of a cylinder or something and therefore gravity is centrifugal in nature.
But you would have a lot of explaining to do to convince anybody that this warped model of space is something they need to consider.
And I'm probably the last person on earth you would want to try to convince, because I'm so suspicious that I'm not even convinced TIME is a fundamental dimension we travel through - let alone the concept of "curved space-time" from Einstein's General Relativity.
> what if the "center" point we're all going away from is the point of the big bang
This is Lorentz Ether Theory, namely that speed-of-light is relative to a fixed frame, i.e. location of the big bang.
> Another idea, perhaps, when considering time as one of the dimensions, the one direction we're all going away from is the "past", and towards the edges of the "future"
This is generally accepted as the Space-Time of Einstein's GR, but I don't personally like it.
> unless Hawking radiation comes from "somewhere else" and does not result in mass reduction of black holes
I think that's a good line of questioning, because: 1. If black holes are getting lighter, why are they still here? 2. Large black holes radiate less, and therefore are not believed to get lighter, so why haven't they swallowed up the universe already? 3. The same radiation is seen at a Rindler horizon, so what's that swallowing up? This one is really annoying because Rindler horizons are contextual, you only see them when YOU are accelerating, someone next to you won't see them.
Oh, I just noticed that you suggested the universe's expansion as centrifugal force here too. Apologies, I came back to read the whole thread just now :>
Apparently that explanation doesn't hold because centrifugal force requires an axis and the universe doesn't have one. It's not surprising that this was the first thought of physicists when they saw universe expansion, but it seems it has been excluded.
"TikTok has updated its guidelines to include a ban on referring to Israeli forces as “terrorists,” just days after hiring a former Israeli soldier and self-described “proud Zionist” to fight antisemitism" Zionists create anti-semitism. They actually need anti-semitism to thrive. They need it to wave their victim card around and commit more atrocities and repress more speech.
Los Angeles (Quds News Network)- TikTok has updated its guidelines to include a ban on referring to Israeli forces as "terrorists," just days after hiring a former Israeli soldier and self-described "
The Pentagon will not save Americans from the wicked intentions of billionaire fascists. It will arm the National Guard to kill them.
Remember their love on April 15th. You pay for everything. Billionaires pay nothing. Who writes the rules for that which they do not pay for? Them. They get to murder for the 34-time felon.
This Constitution with no real checks and balances is a piece of shit.
Das Ziel des #Sozialismus als Staatsreligion besteht nicht darin, den öffentlichen Raum zu verwalten, sondern unangefochten zu werden, alle Alternativen auszuschalten und eine Diktatur zu errichten.
I'll always remind anyone that all a computer does is to display text and images. Windows XP needed 64~128MB of ram to do that. Even a recent GNU/linux distro can go as down as 34MB of ram with a DE if needed.
I'll always remind anyone that all a computer does is to display text and images. Windows XP needed 64~128MB of ram to do that. Even a recent GNU/linux distro can go as down as 34MB of ram with a DE if needed.
re: An Investigation of Bloatware Effects on Smart Devices
I'm no expert, but the article you give here seems quite unacademic. they define things incorrectly, they deduce incorrectly, there are many grammatical issues. it's not very professional.
> This makes an apparently useful application to degrade bloatware > Malware apps Purpose: Negative intentions > Malware is bloatware.
re: An Investigation of Bloatware Effects on Smart Devices
@kaia The graph in the quote post is at least correct and somewhat close to reality. But the reason why Android RAM size grows faster than on Apple devices isn't bloatware, but the way how Android manages applications in the background. They are still loaded in the background even if unused and they aren't swapped out due to flash durability reasons and aren't unloaded for responsibility reasons. You can partially blame Java for that.
Pepe Escobar- The Putin–Trump meeting dropped some important veils. It revealed that Washington views Russia as a peer power, and that Europe is little more than a useful American tool.
Eric Trump predicts $175K BTC this year and $1M long term, while FT and Bloomberg report on his American Bitcoin Asia push and planned Metaplanet trip.
La déclaration de l’état de famine dans la bande de Gaza fait les gros titres. Il ne faut pas oublier que cette insécurité alimentaire a été décidée et mise en oeuvre systématiquement par les autorités politiques et militaires israéliennes au service de leur politique de nettoyage ethnique.
La déclaration de l’état de famine dans la bande de Gaza fait les gros titres. Il ne faut pas oublier que cette insécurité alimentaire a été décidée et mise en œuvre systématiquement par les autorités politiques et militaires israéliennes au service …
We were somewhere around Lhasa on the edge of the mountains when enlightenment began to take hold. I remember saying something like "I feel a bit beginner mind; maybe you should drive...."
Attached: 1 image
The Hanes Frog and 6000 other trademark designs digitized by the Library of Congress. https://blogs.loc.gov/picturethis/2025/04/whimsy-and-commerce-magical-beings-in-the-u-s-patent-office-trademark-collection/
Monster Energy's corporate infrastructure exposed: employee training, customer stereotypes, Beast Bux rewards, and a file system API that's STILL wide open.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi spoke by phone with the foreign ministers of the European Troika and the European Union's foreign policy chief.
@SolyLaLuna αυτή την συζήτηση είχα 2 φορές πριν χρόνια, 1 στον Πολύγυρο και 1 στην Πάλαιρο
Χρόνια τώρα πέφτει ο τζίρος στην εστίαση μα αρνιόντουσαν να καταλάβουν τις αιτίες, που είναι οι συνεχείς αυξήσεις κόστους καταλυμάτων, ομπρελών και εστίασης.
Γκρίνιαζε ο ταβερνιάρης πως είναι τσιγκούνηδες οι τουρίστες
Ρε άνθρωπε, του λέω, με 100€ την βραδιά το κατάλυμα και τις τιμές σε ομπρέλες καφέδες, τόσα που θα ξοδέψει μια οικογένεια σε 15 μέρες, δεν περισσεύουν για σένα.
I will be curious to see the new one. I usually watch these movies while flying on my summer and winter travels... but nowadays, Yandex has them lickety-split quick too.
I love the Russia-U.S. riff as a movie watcher... Russia don't give a fuck about Hollywood copyrights... 🤣
Avec une petite mise au point sur les merdias. L'imMonde a fait une minable provocation en envoyant précisément l'auteur du pamphlet "La Meute". L'autre journaliste de l'imMonde a été accrédité sans problème, il fallait juste envoyer quelqu'un d'autre. Ils ont très sciemment voulu créer un clash, d'une part pour vendre du papier et d'autre part pour salir la FI. Qu'on ferme tous ces torchons.
BGSJI and KFA UK support statement of KPA General Staff titled "The situation of the ROK clouded with powder smoke will further bolster the full readiness of our army" juche007-anglo-peopleskoreafri…
August 20, 2025 The following information came from Nodutdol’s Instagram posts. On Aug. 15, the 80th anniversary of Korea’s liberation from Japan, thousands of people packed Seoul [South Korea] demonstrations against U.S.
Holy shit. This legit gave me chills. Texas State Rep. Ann Johnson clapped back at GOP members amid Wednesday's redistricting vote. WHITE WOMEN, this is the model. We have more power than others. We are the last to be silenced. We have a responsibility to SPEAK so others are HEARD.
bbs enthusiasts might remember the name Telegard - a bbs server written based on wwiv's source code and hugely popular with the ibm pc/ms-dos crowd
telegard had a long and tumultuous history by its authors, and its own source was eventually leaked and was modded into many more popular (pirate-friendly) ms-dos boards like Renegade, Oblivion and Iniquity.
while i was doing research a few months ago on the history of those systems, i found out that telegard.net - the original home of tg - was taken over by a domain squatter in 2010, populated with ads for the past 15 years.
two months ago, i noticed that the squatter had not renewed the domain, and it went into the long grace/redemption/auction/expiry cycle. i checked on it every single morning, and to my absolute delight, it was released this morning for purchase. 💸
the domain will be used purely for historical preservation of telegard and its many descendants
Seven Seas Brings 19 New Licenses to Anime NYC 2025, Spanning Manga, Light Novels, Audiobooks, and Webtoons
Seven Seas Entertainment announced nineteen titles at Anime NYC 2025, covering fantasy adventures, rom-coms, music drama, BL and GL romances, danmei, a hardcover omnibus, and multiple audiobooks under its Siren imprint. Releases begin in September 2025 and continue through 2026 across print and digital, with several ...
Two types of people in this wicked world - those who have been servers and all the rest of us. Those who have, tip well ( USA ) and know how to be nice.
I have never worked out the appeal of a country club, anyway.
The labour activists of 'Stand Up for rapist', various useful idiots, and woke cult members were out in force today, showing us just who they are with their actions.
There are definitely high earning Linux users, but there are also a disproportionate number of linux users begging for money with #mutualaid. It's primarily a social signal for them to use Linux rather than a tool.
@Zettour your logic makes no sense. To use Linux you have to know tech well enough to even put it on your PC. Windows users are closer to Android users. They just use what the device comes with.
@Zettour >To use Linux you have to know tech well enough to even put it on your PC most distros have a gui installer so the only technical knowledge you need to install linux is how to hit F12 and select a boot option (not that hard)
you can use a distro in stock state because literally only autists dive into technical nuances of a system. If you just want netflix and hotchip you really dont even need to know what the command line is
ive found that most linucks users have no real technical knowledge because its just for getting their system to work or how to install x thing they saw on le reddit
on the other thand if you know anything about high level windows admin you can literally make bank because no company is going to convince a team of drone workers that linux is better for their usecase (its not)
Linux people tell me there's tons of sick jobs available and that the real world uses it The only Linux jobs here are in Dayton and require a clearance....because it's next to wright AFB 🤣
⚡️ Info Parc – Fermeture exceptionnelle ⚡️
Suite au fort épisode orageux d’hier, nous devons fermer le parc demain, jeudi 21 août, afin de réaliser une inspection complète de nos installations....
"On the verge of a breakthrough in his quest to wipe out world hunger, altruistic botanist Dr. Alec Holland (Ray Wise) is placed under the protection of special government agent Alice Cable (Adrienne Barbeau). Mad outlaw scientist Anton Arcane (Louis Jourdan) wants to steal Holland's research for his own nefarious ends, but an unforeseen accident during the heist turns Holland into the Swamp Thing, an enormous plant-like creature that fights back against Arcane's henchmen to save Cable."
Directed by Wes Craven. With Louis Jourdan, Adrienne Barbeau and Ray Wise.Swamp Thing Blu-ray (Amazon) https://amzn.to/3ooDfHwSwamp Thing Blu-ray (88 Films) ...
WEF Board of Directors clears Klaus Schwab of wrongdoing, puts BlackRock's Larry Fink and Roche's André Hoffman in charge of operations drjacobnordangard.substack.com…
They will now act to accelerate the Forum's "strategic efforts to increase the impact of global cooperation for a better future," which in practice means the implementation of a worldwide Technocracy
stux⚡
in reply to stux⚡ • • •Hopefully this will become reality within digital realities
Many of these points where the reason i started creating my own games
One of the first questions other gamedevs are asking is me is:
"How much did you make with your games?"
Well, pratically in the minius since i give most away for free but that was the point lol
I just wanted to give a big middle finger to gaming studios who are predatory, like the most nowadays
@EUCommission