Unions are not perfect. Indeed, it is possible to belong to a union that is bad for workers: either because it is weak, or corrupt, or captured (or some combination of the three).
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
pluralistic.net/2025/12/15/cla…
1/
Pluralistic: Break up bad companies; replace bad union bosses (15 Dec 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
Pluralistic: Break up bad companies; replace bad union bosses (15 Dec 2025)Cory Doctorow (Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow)


Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Take the "two-tier contract." As unions lost ground - thanks to changes in labor enforcement under a succession of both GOP and Dem administrations - labor bosses hit on a *suicidal* strategy for contract negotiations. Rather than bargaining for a single contract that covered all the union's dues-paying members, these bosses negotiated contracts that guaranteed benefits for *existing* members, but did not extend these benefits to *new* members:
pluralistic.net/2021/11/25/str…
2/
Pluralistic: 25 Nov 2021 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
Cory Doctorow (Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
A two-tier contract is one where *all* workers pay dues, but only the dwindling rump of older, more established workers get any protection or representation from their union. An ever-larger portion of the membership have to pay dues, but get *nothing* for them. You couldn't come up with a better way to destroy unions if you tried.
3/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Thankfully, union workers figured out that the answer to this problem was firing their leaders and replacing them with militant, principled leaders who cared about *workers*, not just a subsection of their members. Radicals in big unions - like the UAW - teamed up with comrades from university grad students' unions to master the arcane rules that had been weaponized by corrupt bosses to prevent free and fair union elections.
4/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Together, they forced the first legitimate union elections in generations, and then the newly elected leaders ran historic strikes that won huge gains for workers (and killed the two-tier contract):
theintercept.com/2023/04/07/de…
Corrupt unions aren't the only life-destroying institutions that radicals have set their sights on this decade. Concentrated corporate power is the most dangerous force in the world (indeed, it's large, powerful corporations that corrupted those unions).
5/
Deconstructed: The Teamsters and UAW Gear Up for Struggle
TI Podcasts (The Intercept)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Antitrust activists, environmental activists, consumer rights activists, privacy activists and labor activists have stepped up the global war on big business all through this decade. From new antitrust laws to antitrust lawsuits to strikes to boycotts to mass protests and direct action, this decade has marked a turning point in the global consciousness about the danger of corporate power and the need to fight it.
6/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But there's a big, important difference between bad corporations and bad unions: what we should do about them.
The answer to a powerful, corrupt corporation is to take action that strips it of its power: break the company up, whack it with fines, take away its corporate charter, strip its executives of their fortunes, even put them in prison.
7/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
That's because corporations are foundationally undemocratic institutions, governed by "one share, one vote" (and the billionaires who benefit from corporate power are building a society that's "one dollar, one vote").
They fundamentally exist to consolidate power *at the expense* of workers, suppliers and customers, to extract wealth by imposing costs on the rest of us, from pollution to political corruption.
8/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
When a corporation gets big enough to pose a risk to societal wellbeing, we need to smash that corporation, not reform it.
But the answer to a corrupt union is to fire the union bosses and replace them with better ones. The mission of a union is foundationally *pro-democratic*. A unionized workplace is a democratic workplace. As in any democracy, workplace democracies can be led by bad or incompetent people.
9/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But, as with any democracy, the way you fix this is by swapping out the bad leaders for good ones - not by abolishing democracy and replacing it with an atomized society in which it's every worker for themself, bargaining with a boss who will always win a one-on-one fight in the long run.
I raise this because a general strike is back on the table, likely for May Day 2028 (5/1/28):
labornotes.org/2025/12/maybe-g…
10/
Maybe a General Strike Isn’t So Impossible Now
Labor NotesCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Unions are an important check against fascism. That's why fascists always start by attacking organized labor: solidarity is the opposite of fascism.
To have unions that are fit for purpose in this existential battle for the future of the nation - and, quite possibly, the human race - we desperately need better leaders.
11/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Like the union bosses who gave us the two-tier contract, many of our union leaders see their mission as narrowly serving their existing members, and not other workers - not even workers who might someday become their members.
To get a sense of how bad it's gotten, consider these five facts:
I. Public support for unions is at its highest level since the Carter administration;
II. More workers want to join unions than at any time in living memory;
12/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
III. Unions have larger cash reserves than at any time in history;
IV. Under Biden, the National Labor Relations Board was more friendly to unions than at any time in generations; and
V. During the Biden years, the number of unionized workers in America *went down*, not up.
13/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
That's because union bosses - sitting on a mountain of cash, surrounded by workers *begging* to be organized - decided that their priority was their existing members, and declined to spend more than a pittance of their cash reserves on organizing efforts.
This is suicidal - as self-destructive as the two-tier contract was.
14/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
To pull off a general strike, we will need mass civil disobedience, a willingness to ignore the Taft-Hartley Act's ban on solidarity strikes. Trump's NLRB isn't just hostile to workers - he's illegally fired so many of its commissioners that they can't even perform most of their functions.
15/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But a militant labor movement could turn that to its advantage, because militants know that when Trump fires the refs, you don't have to stop the game - you can *throw out the rule book*:
pluralistic.net/2025/01/29/whi…
This is the historic opportunity and challenge before us - to occupy our unions, save our workplace democracies, and then save our national democracy itself.
16/
Pluralistic: All bets are off (29 Jan 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
Cory Doctorow (Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I'm and the end of my tour for my new book, the international bestseller *Enshittification*!
My last two events are CCC in #Hamburg, Dec 27-30:
events.ccc.de/congress/2025/in…
and the Tattered Cover in #Denver, Jan 22:
eventbrite.com/e/cory-doctorow…
I hope you can make it!
eof/
Cory Doctorow Live at Tattered Cover Colfax
EventbriteNicole Parsons
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Grooming a cohort of effective leaders happened in the 1930's.
Public education absorbed a generation of university graduates when higher education was defunded in the 1930's. Those teachers taught civil rights leaders, women's rights advocates and union members. Public libraries for the self educated
This time Koch Network got there first. Dismantling effective public education forestalled that path to growing good leaders.
They're also attacking libraries...
1/
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
Nicole Parsons
in reply to Nicole Parsons • • •Sensitive content
2/
michiganadvance.com/2024/09/26…
commondreams.org/news/2021/08/…
jacobin.com/2018/06/public-edu…
theguardian.com/us-news/2018/s…
... and all other avenues to self-education. The internet archive. Reliable news organizations. Book publishing. All sabotaged.
Koch is funding a $1 billion dollar campaign to bring AI to the masses for "economic mobility".
We all know that AI is intended to do the opposite; create a generation of the ill-educated semi-literate worker with precarious employment.
Billionaires v teachers: the Koch brothers' plan to starve public education
Steven Greenhouse (the Guardian)Nicole Parsons
in reply to Nicole Parsons • • •Sensitive content
3/
forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/202…
desmog.com/2025/12/11/the-koch…
We underestimate how badly billionaires want a 2-tier society of haves & have-nots
The alumni of the John Birch Society are spending billions to destroy pluralustic democracy
Bradley, Koch, Coors, Scaife Mellon, Seid, Uihlein; want tech feudalism, aristocracy, & a #MadKing, & the perpetual warfare & revolution that goes with unsustainable societies circling around a privileged elite, before flushing themselves down the drain
The Koch Network Is Pushing Trump to Accelerate AI, Documents Show
Geoff Dembicki (DeSmog)Anarchy How
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
We might also look to do something about our rather minimalistic democracy. A lot of the problem is how public choice-making is funded and structured. Be not surprised as a result.
@pluralistic
Nicole Parsons
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Another form of union busting is the practice of gender-based "inside unions" vs "outside unions".
Many public sector employers use this divide & conquer tactic.
Inside unions require higher education & experience levels, on average, for its members, mostly female, with a self-serving male supervisory elite that get the higher wages of exempt staff.
Outside unions are mostly blue collar white males who ensure that the 17 year old ..
1/
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
Nicole Parsons
in reply to Nicole Parsons • • •Sensitive content
2/
... high school dropout surveyor's assistant (he holds a pole all day) gets paid more than the 45 year old woman with 20 years experience & a master's degree in the inside union.
Both are burdened with discriminatory job classification systems stuck in the 1950's.
stephen m 🍞🌹🇵🇸
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •This is a another great piece and recommend others to see more of the strategy to take on bad union leaders through DSA's Rank and File Strategy rfs.dsausa.org/
and also a great book from labor notes Democracy is Power by the late Mike Parker labornotes.org/store/democracy…
The Rank-and-File Strategy
dslc (The Rank-and-File Strategy)Cory Doctorow reshared this.