in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/3

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/4

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/5

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/6

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/9

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/10

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/11

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/12

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/13

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/eof

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

If some measures become targets, then some targets were formerly measures.

Money (net worth) has become a target. Was/is money also a measure?

Is the “measure everything” mentality used inappropriately, like the proverbial hammer? Is this one of those bad side effects of the corrupted “rationalism” that has haunted the IYIs since the enlightenment—as John Ralston Saul argued, in Voltaire’s Bastards? (“IYI”: Intellectual Yet Idiot, Taleb’s term.)

Once someone learns how to use a tool, they always want to use it everywhere, even if it’s ill-suited. That’s a fundamental characteristic of the human psyche. It’s efficient, except when it’s not

It takes a kind of meta-cognition to recognize the pitfalls of this behaviour. A sort of self-awareness that is usually only acquired by failure and self-reflection. Not a thing common to bros, especially young cis-het tech bros, who believe that the world belongs to them.

in reply to Poligofsky 🇨🇦

@8r3n7 Money is definitively a measure. To qualify as money, a given instrument must serve as:

* A unit of account (a measure);

* A store of value;

* A medium of exchange.

More here:

locusmag.com/2022/09/cory-doct…