A major problem with letting billionaires decide how your country is run is that they will back whichever psycho promises the lowest taxes and least regulation, no matter how completely batshit and unfit that person is:

hamiltonnolan.com/p/nations-ar…

--

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

pluralistic.net/2025/06/23/bil…

1/

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/2

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/3

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/4

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/6

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/7

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/8

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/10

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/11

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/12

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/14

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/16

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/17

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/18

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/eof

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/5

Sensitive content

in reply to Aaron

Cooperatives even work to prevent externalization of costs into the environment. What community would intentionally damage the environment they live within in order to gain a larger share, when it's money that already belongs to them? That's something that third-party shareholders *outside* the community do to that community while harvesting them for profits, because they are removed from the situation.
in reply to Aaron

@hosford42 Sure. I like co-ops. I've been serving on co-op boards since I was 17, and I'm keynoting the UK co-op conference in Manchester in July (I also keynoted the international year of the co-op UN launch in Delhi last year).

But also: capitalism exists. Doing nothing about improving the conduct of firms until they go co-op requires that we accept untold - perhaps existential - harms to billions and possible the end of humanity.

in reply to Cory Doctorow

"Some of y'all forget the reason we have food safety regulations is because companies used to do things like adding chalk to spoiled milk so it looked normal.
Regulations don't exist because governments enjoy them. They exist because pure unadulterated capitalism would kill us."

cr: @EpiEllie

We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both.

Louis D. Brandeis

Cory Doctorow reshared this.

in reply to paul

@amiserabilist
Here's a short story by Lord Dunsany, written in 1915, about the food of the day. It's pertinent.

THE FOOD OF DEATH

Death was sick. But they brought him bread that the modern bakers make, whitened with alum, and the tinned meats of Chicago, with a pinch of our modern substitute for salt. They carried him into the dining-room of a great hotel (in that close atmosphere Death breathed more freely), and there they gave him their cheap Indian tea. They brought him a bottle of wine that they called champagne. Death drank it up. They brought a newspaper and looked up the patent medicines; they gave him the foods that it recommended for invalids, and a little medicine as prescribed in the paper. They gave him some milk and borax, such as children drink in England.

Death arose ravening, strong, and strode again through the cities.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

WallOffTrump

@GhostOnTheHalfShell
I have been waiting for a Trump era espionage novel. Just read A Spy Alone by former MI6, Charles Beaumont. Nice ripping yarn but also the best yet analysis of the current coup of globalized oligarchs and propagandists against "the masses" and citizens of every nation. It ain't east vs west; it's 1% against 99%.