A major problem with letting billionaires decide how your country is run is that they will back whichever psycho promises the lowest taxes and least regulation, no matter how completely batshit and unfit that person is:
hamiltonnolan.com/p/nations-ar…
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
pluralistic.net/2025/06/23/bil…
1/
Nations Are People
Do you deserve to die for your own bad government?Hamilton Nolan (How Things Work)
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Billionaires have farcical, almost unimaginable resources. These let them take over whole political parties, even "left" parties, with the result that all real electoral options disappear. Voting for the other party gets you a different set of aesthetics, but the same existential threats to the human race and the planet:
theguardian.com/world/2025/jun…
2/
Keir Starmer backs US strike on Iran but warns of wider escalation risk
Jessica Elgot (The Guardian)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
After generations of increasingly oligarch-friendly policies and billionaire entryism into the Democratic Party, America may well be cooked, a total write-off for generations to come. The path to saving the world and our species arguably lies through strengthening other countries to resist American psychos and protect the planet from the consequences of their brainwormed leadership.
3/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Writing for *Jacobin*, Alex Hemingway sets out a plan for imposing a wealth-tax on Canada's oligarchs, one that incorporates lessons from previous attempts at such a tax:
jacobin.com/2025/06/wealth-tax…
Even on the left, the idea of a wealth-tax is controversial - not because leftists are sympathetic to billionaires, but because they are skeptical that a wealth tax can be carried out. It's a practical, not an ideological objection:
pileusmmt.libsyn.com/196-the-p…
4/
Designing a Wealth Tax for Today’s Robber Barons
jacobin.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
After all, under capitalism, wealth always grows faster than the economy at large, meaning that over time, the rich will get steadily richer, and inequality will widen and widen:
memex.craphound.com/2014/06/24…
5/
Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century – Cory Doctorow's MEMEX
memex.craphound.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Ideally, we would counter the trend of wealth piling up into dynastic fortunes with continuous redistribution and predistribution: taxing capital gains at the same rate (or a higher rate) than income, so that income from labor isn't treated worse than income from ownership; steeply graded progressive taxes, with top rates in of 70-99%, high inheritance taxes, and so on.
6/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
7/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
So here we are, trapped in the new oligarchy. It's too late to rely on income taxes, not if we're going to euthanize enough rentiers to free out politics from their toxic influence and save the human race any of several foreseeable mass-extinction events. Making the ultra-rich poor again is going to require new tactics.
8/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
In Canada, the 1% owns 29% of the country's wealth. The 87 richest families in Canada control as much wealth as the bottom 12 million Canadians combined. This is better than the US (where the 1% own 35% of the country), but not by much:
policyalternatives.ca/wp-conte…
9/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Can we make a wealth tax work? Here's Hemingway's program for making it work in Canada:
* Make it apply to all wealth equally. No carve-outs for real-estate, which makes it very easy to shift wealth among asset-classes to duck the tax;
* Aim it at the super-rich alone. Avoid even the upper middle-class, who lack the liquid assets to pay the tax and could get wrecked if they have to liquidate their holdings at the same time as everyone else, which will depress asset prices;
10/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
* Use third-party assessments of asset values. Don't take billionaires' word for how much their assets are worth! Canada's got an advantage here, thanks to the Canada Revenue Agency's requirement for financial institutions to report their account holders' income, including capital gains. Canada's also recently created "beneficial owner" registries that record the true owners of assets;
11/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
* Use lifestyle audits: anyone caught engaging in tax-evasion will face severe penalties, as will the enablers at financial services firms that help them
One frequent objection to high taxes is that it encourages capital flight - rich people hopping to another territory to avoid taxation. That's a reasonable fear, given how pants-wettingly terrified the rich are of paying tax.
12/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Hemingway points out that a wealth tax is different from an income tax - income taxes are levied on the outcome of productive activities, while wealth taxes target accumulated wealth. High income taxes can starve a country of the capital it needs for a productive economy, but that's not the case with wealth taxes.
13/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Hemingway points to the OECD's Common Reporting Standard, through which more than 100 countries have agreed to share financial information, which will help Canada catch billionaires as they funnel their wealth offshore. Meanwhile, if the rich try to move *with* their money, we can hit them with an exit tax, like the 40% that Elizabeth Warren has proposed.
14/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
It's an article of faith that the rich will move offshore at the first hint of a wealth tax, but the research shows that rich people often have reasons to stay that trump their taxophobia. The economic effect of rich people Going Galt is pretty darned small:
warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economic…
15/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The modern prophet of oligarchy and its origins is the French economist Thomas Piketty. In a recent *Le Monde* column, Piketty examines the failure of a French wealth tax proposal that would have shaved a modest 2% off the fortunes of the 1,800 French people with more than €100 million:
lemonde.fr/blog/piketty/2025/0…
16/
Ultra-wealthy, the Senate beside the story
Le blog de Thomas PikettyCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The proposal passed the National Assembly, only to die in the Senate, an institution with a long history of pro-oligarchic activism (the Senate killed *every* French income tax passed by the Assembly from 1896-1914). The Assembly's wealth tax addressed the problem of tax exiles, levying the wealth tax for 5 years after an oligarch relocated.
17/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
For Piketty, this didn't go far enough: he wants a pro-rated tax based on the years an oligarch spent in France in their lifetime: if you were educated and cared for at French expense from birth and went on to become a billionaire, then a modest share of your wealth would forever be owed to the country that made it possible. Piketty says that a wealth tax could be paid in shares instead of cash, with the stock going into a trust for workers, who would get board seats as well.
18/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
He points out that decarbonization is going to require large sacrifices from all of us, but that these will be impossible to demand with a straight face so long as the super-rich are paying taxes that are trivial relative to their assets and income.
19/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I'm at the end of my 24-city book tour for my new novel *Picks and Shovels*!
Catch me in #LONDON with RILEY QUINN from #TRASHFUTURE on July 1:
howtoacademy.com/events/cory-d…
And in #MANCHESTER at Blackwell's Bookshop on July 2:
eventbrite.co.uk/e/an-evening-…
eof/
An Evening With Cory Doctorow
EventbriteQole
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Aaron
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Aaron
in reply to Aaron • • •Aaron
in reply to Aaron • • •Aaron
in reply to Aaron • • •Cory Doctorow
in reply to Aaron • • •@hosford42 Sure. I like co-ops. I've been serving on co-op boards since I was 17, and I'm keynoting the UK co-op conference in Manchester in July (I also keynoted the international year of the co-op UN launch in Delhi last year).
But also: capitalism exists. Doing nothing about improving the conduct of firms until they go co-op requires that we accept untold - perhaps existential - harms to billions and possible the end of humanity.
Aaron
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Cory Doctorow
in reply to Aaron • • •@hosford42 sure, sounds gpkhg0h0jood.
But also we need to discipline existing firms with regulation, competition, and strong labor.
Aaron
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Winter Trabex
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Cory Doctorow reshared this.
Claire, The Ultimate Worrier
in reply to Winter Trabex • • •Cory Doctorow reshared this.
GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I mean they only believe that democracy is a failure and it’s best to return to absolute monarchy of bat shit crazy people dedicated to global genocide and apocalypse.
Ripple donated $9.4 million to the San Francisco Police Department to purchase surveillance drones.
What could possibly go wrong?
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell • • •Never mind, the optics of the SF police department accepting money from an institution that has been given legal right to defraud retail investors, while maintaining the collective rights to legal action to institutional investors.
No Gaza drones over SF!
GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I am in a state of high dudgeon this morning, because the hat trick, the brain stem hack super rich psychopaths have managed is to convince people that the predatory consequences of superrich collaborating to seize the means of government and society is proof that democracy is a failure and the solution is double down tyranny.
They’ve managed to convince most people that the destruction of equality and liberty justifies tyranny.
..
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell • • •You have to admit that’s a pretty good hat trick. It is a supreme con.
They really have accomplished freedom of slavery, love is hate and war is peace.
WallOffTrump
in reply to GhostOnTheHalfShell • • •I have been waiting for a Trump era espionage novel. Just read A Spy Alone by former MI6, Charles Beaumont. Nice ripping yarn but also the best yet analysis of the current coup of globalized oligarchs and propagandists against "the masses" and citizens of every nation. It ain't east vs west; it's 1% against 99%.
GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •And now that I’m getting into your article and I want to someday I gotta get off my own lazy ass and do the video I’ve been meaning to on this very.
Wealth taxes due work I think Massachusetts and Washington state have imposed two forms of that and the terms of tax on income over $1 million and some taxes on capital gains.
The chief observation to be made if I could go find the article that discusses his topic is it doesn’t stop the growth of their net worth
Robin Barton
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Cory Doctorow reshared this.
SpaceLifeForm
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •normy foxyoreos
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
normy foxyoreos
in reply to normy foxyoreos • • •Sensitive content
"If you take this marshmallow, it will hurt everyone, *including you* for the rest of your life. You understand? But since you already have so many marshmallows, surely you can wait and -"
Billionares: (already eating the marshmallow) "Sorry, I wasn't listening. Give me another marshmallow or I'll burn down this entire fucking building and everyone inside of it."
paul
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •"Some of y'all forget the reason we have food safety regulations is because companies used to do things like adding chalk to spoiled milk so it looked normal.
Regulations don't exist because governments enjoy them. They exist because pure unadulterated capitalism would kill us."
cr: @EpiEllie
We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both.
Louis D. Brandeis
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
Quasit
in reply to paul • • •@amiserabilist
Here's a short story by Lord Dunsany, written in 1915, about the food of the day. It's pertinent.
THE FOOD OF DEATH
Death was sick. But they brought him bread that the modern bakers make, whitened with alum, and the tinned meats of Chicago, with a pinch of our modern substitute for salt. They carried him into the dining-room of a great hotel (in that close atmosphere Death breathed more freely), and there they gave him their cheap Indian tea. They brought him a bottle of wine that they called champagne. Death drank it up. They brought a newspaper and looked up the patent medicines; they gave him the foods that it recommended for invalids, and a little medicine as prescribed in the paper. They gave him some milk and borax, such as children drink in England.
Death arose ravening, strong, and strode again through the cities.
Dźwiedziu
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •That's some modest, thought out proposals.
…that die in a [French] senate.
In the meantime a clock is ticking.
As someone on the stupidest places on the Internet* has nicely put it (from memory): tax is an insurance; an insurance against a revolution.
* Quora this time
Cory Doctorow reshared this.