It's been a year since Project 2025 hit national news. Back then, I cited Rick Perlstein, an expert on the history of the conservative movement, who said that the most important thing about the P2025 document wasn't its extreme plans, but rather, it's total incoherence:
pluralistic.net/2024/07/14/fra…
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
pluralistic.net/2025/07/18/win…
1/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
You see, Project 2025 isn't just *one* roadmap for turning America into a doomed, corporate/christofascist hellscape: it is *several* such roadmaps, with many policy prescriptions that directly and violently contradict each other.
For Perlstein, this was both revealing and important. Like all successful political campaigns, Trumpism is a coalition. Coalitions form when groups of people set aside their disagreements and join together.
2/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Virtually every important political change is downstream of a coalition.
The easiest kind of coalition to form is an oppositional one, where groups agree on what they *don't* want, without agreeing on what they *do* want. Think, for example, of the Andrea Dworkin wing of the feminist movement making common cause with Jerry Falwell to oppose pornography.
3/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Obviously, these people have a completely irreconcilable goals for what they *want*, but when it comes to porn, it's easy for them to agree on what they *don't* want.
That's fine when you're waging the campaign *against* something, but if you happen to win that campaign, you're in trouble. That's when the fight starts over who will get their way. That's the moment when winning coalitions become bitterly divided:
pluralistic.net/2025/01/06/how…
4/
Pluralistic: Winning coalitions aren’t always governing coalitions (06 Jan 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Now, some of these conflicts matter more than others. The least politically connected, least sophisticated (and most numerous) members of the conservative coalition have long been mollified by performative acts of cruel racism and gender discrimination.
5/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
These could be enacted without any real impact on the power-players in the coalition, since they were insulated from discriminatory lending and hiring, immune to police violence, and could skip to another state or country to get abortion care, hire sex workers, etc. No one is ever going to deny Peter Thiel a mortgage, no matter how many twinks he bangs. Ted Cruz's daughter will always be able to get an abortion, no matter what Texas or federal law states.
6/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Clarence Thomas doesn't have to worry about getting pulled over because he "fits the description." As Wilhoit's Law says:
> Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.
Project 2025 is an anthology, edited by the Heritage Foundation, collecting the post-victory aspirations of the most important members of the Trump coalition.
7/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
As anthologists, Heritage's job was to choose which submissions to include and which ones to reject. Perlstein's key insight is that wherever Heritage included two or more directly contradictory plans in Project 2025, we can infer the groups that submitted those plans are each too powerful and important to sideline - they are equally matched combatants, and it's impossible to predict which one will get their way and which ones will eat shit in the aftermath of a victory.
8/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
There were *so many* contradictions in Project 2025: immigration policy, military policy, trade policy, monetary policy, tax policy, and more. As Perlstein pointed out, Project 2025 was a 900-page roadmap to the future fracture lines in the Trump coalition. These were the places where the opposition could break off parts of Trump's base, in the same way that Steve Bannon has been doing to the progressive movement (also an easily fractured coalition).
9/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Since Trump won the presidency, House and Senate, he has done a remarkable job of keeping this brittle coalition together through a mix of flattery and bullying. But the fact remains that Trump's most important factions *hate* each other and are gunning for one another, and whenever Trump chooses one faction to win and another to lose, the losers are prone to turning on *him*:
pluralistic.net/2025/05/21/et-…
10/
Pluralistic: Strange Bedfellows and Long Knives (21 May 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Trump's lifelong strategy has been to race across a succession of rivers on the backs of alligators without losing a leg. He is the undisputed all-time historical champion of this bizarre sport, but no one can win that race forever, and your first loss is a career-ender.
I think a lot of people - including Trump allies - understand this, at least at a gut level. That's why the Epstein stuff is so huge now.
11/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
It's impossible to overstate the extent to which the Trump base is organized around conspiratorial beliefs about elite pedophile rings:
soundcloud.com/qanonanonymous/…
These beliefs are a stand-in for an overall rage against elite impunity, the two-tiered system of justice that lets the powerful get away with anything. The sexual abuse of children is such a viscerally offensive crime, so the idea that rich and powerful people are getting away with it carries a lethal charge.
12/
The Great Epstein Backstab (E332)
SoundCloudCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Conspiracy fantasies have their roots in traumatic reality. Without a long list of US military cover-ups, there'd be no room for UFO conspiracies. The credibility of antivax ("pharma companies want to kill you and regulators want to help them") is rooted FDA's failure to prevent the opioid crisis, and the million Americans who died as a result:
memex.craphound.com/2019/09/21…
13/
Republic of Lies: the rise of conspiratorial thinking and the actual conspiracies that fuel it – Cory Doctorow's MEMEX
memex.craphound.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Conspiratorialism is a cognitive failure that occurs when you blame systemic problems on individuals. That's why they call antisemitism "the socialism of fools" - it's what you get when you blame Jewish bankers, rather than the finance sector's class warfare, for your problems:
pluralistic.net/2024/03/25/bla…
14/
Pluralistic: Conspiratorialism and the epistemological crisis (25 Mar 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Conspiratorialists have the right feeling, but the wrong facts. If you hate elite impunity, you should be furious about the Supreme Court ruling that presidents have "absolute immunity" from prosecution for the crimes they commit in office. But bad actors can exploit the failures of the conspiratorial mindset to make people who are legitimately enraged by elite impunity to direct that rage at imaginary "cultural Marxists" at universities.
15/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
As Naomi Klein writes in *Doppelganger*, the right lives in a "mirror world" where child abuse is confined to largely imaginary children in nonexistent pizza parlor basements, while actual kids in Florida concentration camps, or border detention cages, or meat-packing plant night shifts, or living in hunger and without a home, are ignored:
pluralistic.net/2023/09/05/not…
16/
Pluralistic: Naomi Klein’s “Doppelganger” (05 September 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
It's not hard to understand why Trump wants to suppress the Epstein files. He had a long friendship with Epstein, and spoke glowingly of Epstein's taste in "beautiful women...on the younger side." Trump sent Epstein lewd drawings and imaginary dialogues about Epstein's "wonderful secret":
archive.is/20250718003039/wsj.…
17/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Not only that, it's likely that many of Trump's most important supporters were directly complicit in Epstein's crimes (participating in the rape of young women and girls) and indirectly complicit (covering up these crimes and helping to launder Epstein's money).
Can Trump convince the conspiratorial wing of his coalition that Epstein is a "nothingburger" and a fabrication of Biden, Obama, the Clintons, Emmanuel Goldstein and Snowball?
18/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
It's not impossible. As *The American Prospect*'s Ryan Cooper points out, conspiratorialists possess an incredible ability to "believe just about anything, even if it literally kills them—witness, for instance, the unvaccinated Texas GOP official who was posting anti-vaccine memes on Facebook right up until he died of COVID":
prospect.org/politics/2025-07-…
19/
Epstein Signals the End of Donald Trump’s Crackerjack Crisis Management Style
Ryan Cooper (The American Prospect)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
As ever, *The Onion* captures the spirit of the moment with a single, brilliant headline, "Elderly Woman Keeps Mind Active Justifying Trump’s Actions":
theonion.com/elderly-woman-kee…
But so far, the signs are not looking good for Trump. Writing for *Wired*, Jake Lahut speaks to many high-ranking Trump advisors, past and present, anonymous and named, who are concerned about the mounting fury from Trump's conspiratorial base:
wired.com/story/trump-epstein-…
20/
Elderly Woman Keeps Mind Active Justifying Trump’s Actions
The Onion Staff (The Onion)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
As Lahut writes, Trump is flubbing this badly, but there may be *no way* for him to resolve the Epstein affair to the satisfaction of his base. They were already primed to be suspicious of whatever story they were presented with, and this latest incident all but guarantees that they will not accept whatever material Trump is eventually arm-twisted into releasing.
21/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
And that's not even the biggest disappointment Trump's conspiratorialists will confront. Trump has no intention of changing the system to make life better for this Christmas-voting turkeys. Arresting 11 million immigrants and any number of US citizens who fit the description will not help these people with their very real, material problem.
22/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Nor will banning abortion, giving tax breaks to the ultra-rich, or defunding the police at the CFPB who were in charge of shutting down rip-off artists at payday lenders, big banks, cryptocurrency exchanges, etc. So these people can only ever get angrier.
But the conspiratorial base isn't the only Trumpland faction that is being forced to eat shit after Trump's victory.
23/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
In another *Wired* story, David Gilbert presents a snapshot of the pieces of the Trump coalition that have broken off, or are hanging by a thread:
wired.com/story/jeffrey-epstei…
There's Tucker Carlson, who thinks (correctly) that Trump is a warmongering lunatic for bombing Iran:
theguardian.com/us-news/2025/j…
24/
Tucker Carlson confronts Ted Cruz on Iran as Maga rift erupts into public view
Joseph Gedeon (The Guardian)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
There's Laura Loomer, who thinks (correctly) that it's unforgivably corrupt for Trump to accept a luxury plane from Qatar:
politico.com/news/2025/05/12/t…
There's Ben Shapiro, who thinks (correctly) that Trump's tariffs are economic suicide:
mediamatters.org/tariffs-trade…
There's Joe Rogan, who thinks (correctly) that Trump's immigration raids are unforgivably cruel:
youtube.com/watch?v=WfmrEa0L08…
25/
Joe Rogan Experience #2344 - Amjad Masad
YouTubeCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
And there's Elon Musk, who is (correctly) furious that Trump wiped his ass with his promise of a balanced budget so he could hand trillions to the richest people in the history of the human race:
wired.com/story/elon-musk-thir…
Each of these people is an avatar for a bloc in the Trump coalition, and they reflect the fury of the people who stand behind them.
26/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
This is as Rich Perlstein prophesied a year ago: these groups hate each other and the only way for some of them to get what they want is for others to be totally betrayed.
Trump has been racing over those alligator-backs for so long now, it can sometimes feel like he'll never miss a step. But he's one snap away from losing a leg, and after that, it'll be a bloodbath.
27/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Support me this summer in the Clarion Write-A-Thon and help raise money for the Clarion Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers' Workshop! This summer, I'm writing "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book for Farrar, Straus and Giroux that explains how to be an effective AI critic:
clarionwriteathon.com/members/…
eof/
Clarion Write-a-Thon | Cory Doctorow
clarionwriteathon.comCanevecchio
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Anne Ominous
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
dont threaten me with a good time!!
ugh i cant bear this much longer, feeling like something. has to give somewhere, and yet ... nothing.
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
MidniteMikeWrites
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I genuinely tried my hand at identifying factions early on but I think some shifting has occurred.
I also seem to have undercounted the degree to which Heritage itself was a coalition and how much power Trump would have in forcing the Tarrifs. zirk.us/@MidniteMikeWrites/113…
MidniteMikeWrites (@MidniteMikeWrites@zirk.us)
zirkusCory Doctorow reshared this.