It was an act of blatant cyberwarfare, no different from Russian hackers bricking Ukrainian power plants (except that Microsoft didn't have to hack Outlook, they *own* it).

The move put teeth into Trump's frequent reminders that America no longer has allies or trading partners - it only has rivals and adversaries. That has been the subtext - and overt message - of the Trump tariffs, ever since "liberation day" on April 2, 2025.

10/

When Americans talk about the Trump tariffs, they focus on what these will do to the cost of living in the USA. When other countries discuss the tariffs, they focus on what this will do to their export markets, and whether their leaders will capitulate to America's absurd demands.

11/

This makes sense: America is gripped by a brutal cost of living crisis, and contrary to Trump's assertions, this is not a Democratic hoax. We know this because (as *The Onion* points out), "Democrats would never run on a salient issue":

theonion.com/fact-checking-tru…

12/

Fact-Checking Trump On Affordability

President Trump continues to make misleading statements about affordability despite the Consumer Price Index indicating an increase in costs for many goods and services. The Onion assesses the veracity of the president’s claims.

^{The Onion Staff (The Onion)}

It also makes sense that Canadians and Britons would focus on this because Prime Ministers Carney and Starmer have caved on their plans to tax US Big Tech, ensuring that these companies will always have a cash-basis advantage over domestic rivals (Starmer also rolled over by promising to allow American pharma companies to gouge the NHS):

independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli…

13/

NHS drug prices set to rise as Starmer to cave on Trump demands

The threat of Trump tariffs means that the UK will need to pay US pharmaceutical companies more money

^{David Maddox (The Independent)}

But there's another, highly salient aspect to tariffs that is much neglected - one that is, ultimately, far more important than these short-run changes to other countries' plans to tax American tech giants. Namely: for decades, the US has used the *threat* of tariffs to force its trading partners into policies that keep their tech companies from competing with American tech giants.

14/

The most important of these Big Tech-defending policy demands is something called "anticircumvention law." This is a law that bans changing how a product works without the manufacturer's permission: for example, modifying your printer so it can use generic ink, or modifying your car so it can be fixed by an independent repair depot, or modifying your phone or games console so it can use a third-party app store.

15/

This ban on modification means that when a US tech giant uses its products to steal money and/or private information from the people in your country (that is, "enshittification"), no one is allowed to give your people the tools to escape these scams. Your domestic investors can't invest in your domestic technologists' startups, which cannot make the disenshittifying products that also cannot be exported globally, to anyone with an internet connection and a payment method.

16/

It's a double whammy: your people are plundered, and your businesses are strangled. The whole world has been made poorer, to the tune of trillions of dollars, by this scam. And the only reason everyone puts up with it is was that the US threatened them with tariffs if they didn't.

So now we have tariffs, and if someone threatens to burn your house down unless you follow orders, and then they burn it down anyway, you really don't have to keep following their orders.

17/

This would make everything in Canada cheaper and better, and turn America's trillions in Big Tech ripoffs into Canadian billions by selling these tools to everyone else in the world:

pluralistic.net/2025/11/28/dis…

There's lots of reasons to like this plan. Not only is it a double *reverse* whammy - making everything cheaper and making billions for a new, globally important domestic tech sector - but it's also *unambiguously within Canada's power to do*.

19/

After all, it's very hard to get American tech giants to do things they don't want to do. Canada tried to do this with Facebook, and failed miserably:

cbc.ca/radio/podcastnews/under…

The EU - a far more powerful entity than Canada - has been trying to get Apple to open up its App Store, and Apple has repeatedly told them to go fuck themselves:

pluralistic.net/2025/09/26/emp…

20/

Apple, being a truly innovative company, has come up with a whole lot of exciting *new* ways to tell the EU to fuck itself:

theregister.com/2025/12/16/app…

But anticircumvention law is something that every government has total, absolutely control over.

21/

Devs say Apple still flouting EU's DMA six months on

: Coalition for App Fairness warns App Store fees remain unlawful despite non-compliance ruling

^{Carly Page (The Register)}

Maybe Canada can't order Apple, Google and Facebook to pay their taxes, but it can *absolutely* decide to stop giving these American companies access to Canada's courts to shut down Canadian competitors so that US companies can go on stealing data and money from the Canadian people:

pluralistic.net/2025/11/01/red…

22/

Funnily enough, this case is so convincing that I've started to hear from Canadian Trump appeasers who insist that we must not repeal our anticircumvention laws because this would *work too well*. It would inflict *too much* pain on America's looting tech sector, and save Canadians *too much* money, and make *too much* money for Canadian tech businesses. If Canada becomes the world's first disenshittification nation (they say), we will make Trump too angry.

23/

Apparently, these people think that Canada should confine its tariff response to measures that *don't work*, because anything effective would provoke Trump.

When I try to draw these critics out about what the downside of "provoking Trump" is, they moot the possibility that Trump would roll tanks across the Rainbow Bridge and down Lundy's Lane. This seems a remote possibility to me - and ultimately, they agree.

24/

The international response to Trump invading Canada because we made it easier for people (including Americans) to buy cheap printer ink would be…intense.

Next, they mumble something about tariffs. When I point out the US is *already* imposing tariffs on Canada, they say "it could be worse," and point to various moments when Trump has hiked the tariffs on Canada, e.g. because he was angry to be reminded that Ronald Reagan would have hated his guts:

youtube.com/watch?v=dCKmMEFiLr…

25/

Watch ad and Reagan address at centre of Trump ending Canada trade talks

U.S. President Donald Trump announced he was ending trade talks with Canada over an Ontario government ad campaign related to tariffs that features remarks f...

^{The Canadian Press (YouTube)}

But of course, the fact that Trump's tariffs yo-yo up and down depending on the progress of his white matter disease means that anyone trying to do forward planning for something they anticipate exporting to America should assume that there might be inifinity tariffs the day they load up their shipping container.

26/

But there's another way in which the threat of tariffs is ringing increasingly hollow: American consumption power is collapsing, because billionaires and looters have hoarded all the country's wealth, and no one can afford to buy things anymore.

America is in the grips of its third consecutive "K-shaped recovery":

prospect.org/2025/12/01/premiu…

A K-shaped recovery is when the richest people get richer, but everyone else gets worse off.

27/

Selling the Poor on Spending Like They’re Rich - The American Prospect

How plutonomy, premiumization, and social media squeeze the middle class.

^{Emma Janssen (The American Prospect)}

Working people in America have gotten steadily poorer since the 1970s, even as America's wealthiest have saw their net worth skyrocket.

The declining economic power of everyday Americans has multiple causes: stagnating wages, monopoly price-gouging, and the blistering increase in education, housing and medical debt.

28/

These all have the same underlying cause, of course: the capture of both political parties - and the courts and administrative agencies - by billionaires, who have neutered antitrust law, jacked up the price of health care and a college educaton, smashed unions, and cornered entire housing markets.

For decades, America's consumption power has been kept on life-support through consumer debt and second (or third, or fourth) mortgages.

29/

But America's monopoly credit card companies are every bit as capable of price-gouging as America's hospitals, colleges and landlords are, and Americans don't just carry more credit-card debt than their foreign counterparts, they also pay more to service that debt:

justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/ju…

The point is that every dollar that goes into servicing a debt is a dollar that can't be used to buy something useful.

30/

Justice Department Sues Visa for Monopolizing Debit Markets

The Justice Department filed a civil antitrust lawsuit today against Visa for monopolization and other unlawful conduct in debit network markets in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.

^{www.justice.gov}

A dollar spent on consumption has the potential to generate multiple, knock-on transactions, as the merchant spends your dollar on a coffee, and the coffee-shop owner spends it on a meal out, and the restaurateur spends it on a local printer who runs off a new set of menus.

31/

But a dollar that's shoveled into the debt markets is almost immediately transferred out of the real economy and into the speculative financial economy, landing in the pocket of a one-percenter who buys stocks or other assets with it.

The rich just don't buy enough *stuff*. There's a limit to how many Lambos, Picassos, and Sub-Zero fridges even the most guillotineable plute can useful own.

32/

Meanwhile, consumers keep having their consumption power siphoned off by debt-collectors and price-gougers, with Trump's help. The GOP just forced eight million student borrowers back into repayment:

prospect.org/2025/12/16/gop-fo…

They've killed a monopolization case against Pepsi and Walmart for colluding to rig grocery prices across the entire economy:

thebignewsletter.com/p/secret-…

They've sanctioned the use of price-fixing algorithms to raise rent:

thebignewsletter.com/p/an-odd-…

33/

Secret Documents Show Pepsi and Walmart Colluded to Raise Food Prices Across the Economy

The Trump FTC tried to hide a complaint showing Pepsi forced shoppers to pay higher prices everywhere but Walmart. But now it's unsealed. And the politics of affordability are explosive.

^{Matt Stoller (BIG by Matt Stoller)}

As Tim Wu points out in his new book, *The Age of Extraction*, one consequence of allowing monopoly pricing is that it reduces spending power across the entire economy:

penguinrandomhouse.com/books/6…

Take electricity: you would probably pay your power bill even if it tripled. Sure, you'd find ways to conserve electricity and eliminate many discretionary power uses, but anyone who can pay for electricity *will*, if the alternative is *no electricity*.

34/

The Age of Extraction by Tim Wu: 9780593321249 | PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books

A NEW YORKER BEST BOOK OF 2025 • Tech platforms manipulate attention, extract wealth, and deepen inequality. In this new book, Tim Wu (The Attention Merchants) explains how we can reclaim control...

^{PenguinRandomhouse.com}

Electricity - like health, shelter, food, and education - is so essential that you'd forego a vacation, a new car, Christmas gifts, dinners out, a new winter coat, or a vet's visit for your cat if that was the only way to keep the lights on.

Trump's unshakable class solidarity with rent extractors, debt collectors and price gougers has significantly accelerated the collapse of the consumption power of Americans (AKA "the affordability crisis").

35/

But it gets worse: Americans' consumption power isn't limited to the dollars they spend, it also includes the dollars that the government spends on their behalf, through programs like SNAP (food stamps) and Medicaid/Medicare. Those programs have been slashed to the bone and beyond by Trump, Musk, DOGE and the Republican majority in Congress and the Senate.

36/

The reason that other countries took the threat of US tariffs so seriously - seriously enough to hamstring their own tech sector and render their own people defenseless against US tech - is that the US has historically bought a lot of *stuff*. For any export economy, the US was a critical market, a must-have.

But that has been waning for a generation, as the Lambo-and-Sub-Zero set hoarded more and more of the wealth and the rest of us were able to afford less and less.

37/

In less than a year, Trump has slashed the consumption power of the an increasing share of the American public to levels approaching the era of WWII ration-books.

The remaining American economy is a collection of cheap gimmicks that are forever on the brink of falling apart. Most of the economy is propped up by building data-centers for AI that no one wants and that can't be powered thanks to Trump's attacks on renewables.

38/

The remainder consists of equal parts MLMs, Labubus, Lafufus, cryptocurrency speculation, and degenerate app-based gambling.

None of this is *good*. This is all *fucking terrible*. But I raise it here to point out that "Do as I say or Americans won't buy your stuff anymore" starts to ring hollow once most Americans can't afford to buy *anything* anymore.

America is running out levers to pull in order to get the rest of the world to do its bidding.

39/