#systemd #wayland #xorg #x11libre #linux
technophobeconfessions.wordpre…

Digit reshared this.

in reply to β„π• π•“π•šπ•Ÿ

I am loth to say "they didn't want to fix it" - who are 'they"? Corporates don't care about X. Users of X can't because X is incredibly complex. X is in fact not unlike an init system. X reaches out to many hardware-related functions. I have never read the source code. I have heard that no programmer can fathom the full extent of X.
It was inevitable that, given that it has not been systematically maintained for a very long time, nobody could perform a reliable security audit of the code.
in reply to β„π• π•“π•šπ•Ÿ

let me help your search search.brave.com/search?q=tiny…

various forms over the years, and other things complicated searches taking the name for other things... so adding these terms should help you discover it and many other wonderful things around it. πŸ˜€

in reply to β„π• π•“π•šπ•Ÿ

sorry for not giving you just a link, but at this stage, it's kinda a case of pick your fork. puppy and tinycore maintain their own forks i think. and there'll be others out in the wild too.

then there are ways to ~kinda~ do a tinyx from xorg (or was, have not tried it myself) from when it got merged in (ages ago ~ idk if that's still a feature it can be compiled to, but still wont likely be as tiny). perhaps also available in xlibre.

⇧