Yesterday was my first bad day on Mastodon, and what happened to me could happen to you, so let me explain what went down, and how I got blocked by a lot of people.
In March, I wrote a post critical of Musk (picture 1). I then asked another Mastodon user (Harriett) whom I have found friendly, if she would help me translate a Danish phrase to English, and linked to the Musk post where the phrase would be relevant.
But yesterday β 4 months later β that blew up in my face. Here is howβ¦
1/7
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
reshared this
Randahl Fink
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •You see, yesterday someone discovered that my old post requesting translation help had been mirrored onto Bluesky by the so-called bridge system. And that system had made the VERY unfortunate error of removing my link to the context about Elon Musk, and instead now linked to Harriett's profile page.
So it now looked as if I was not talking about Elon Musk, but talking about Harriett (see picture) β as if I was making fun of this Mastodon user behind her back on Bluesky.
2/7
reshared this
Fou and Ann1944 reshared this.
Randahl Fink
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •A person saw this unfortunate mishap on Bluesky and rightly found it suspicious looking, so that person then warned Harriett about it. She then got upset thinking I was making posts ridiculing her on Bluesky, blocked me, and then wrote about this to all of us here on Mastodon.
I have no hard feelings about that, because the technical glitch really made it seem like I was a bad person.
But then more people got upset, and a whole thread formed where people agreed I should be blocked.
3/7
Randahl Fink
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •And while all of this went down, I was not even here. Because yesterday I hosted a party and was preparing dinner and entertaining guests here in Denmark.
Then late in the evening when the guests went home, I sat down to check in on Mastodon, and all of hell had broken loose.
Because everyone was thinking the Bluesky post came from me, the famous profile Gottalaff now entered the discussion which amplified it to her 33,000 users, and even more people blocked me, called me out etc.
4/7
Randahl Fink
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •The only person who stopped to check if all of this was really true was @Gargron. And he wrote a very helpful post explaining that the bad post on Bluesky was created by the bridge system, which had linked to Harriett's profile and thereby changed the meaning of my original post.
But Gargron's post was very technical, and I am not sure everyone understood it, and I was still getting angry responses, and more people blocked me.
So I was very sad to discover all this late last night.
5/7
Fou reshared this.
Randahl Fink
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •But here is the lesson we can all learn from this: If you see something strange where someone suddenly seems to change their behaviour and do something malicious, it is important to ask questions before concluding what is going on.
In this case, a post which seemed like it was written by me was actually altered by an IT system that I have never given permission to do so β and it now seemed like I was spreading hatred.
In conclusion: I blame no one for this incident. I fully understandβ¦
6/7
reshared this
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
Randahl Fink
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •β¦ why someone saw the Bluesky post and wanted to warn Harriett. I fully understand how Harriett could feel shocked that it looked like I was talking about her on another platform. And I fully understand how Gottalaff would amplify that and try to stop me from harassing Harriett.
So please, do not send any negativity their way. Let us just all learn from this:
Never jump to conclusions about other people. If you see sudden strange behaviour from someone, ask questions before concluding.
7/7
Fou reshared this.
Alexandre Oliva
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •this, a thousand times this, and then some more π
sorry this happened to you; such things have happened to me and others as well, and it sucks
the problem is IMHO people who hold the mistaken idea that one can suppress hateful behavior by behaving hatefully in reaction to perceived hatefulness. even if it worked in real cases, the emotional error rate is so high that it ends up amplifying hate. so, everyone, before setting out to react explosively, count to 10 (or to a million π and investigate thoroughly, otherwise you may accidentally promote injustice and hatred.
LAUREN
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •After reading her posts, I do think she was most upset that it carried her account information over to BS, a very public corporate owned and run server. Not your fault but significant in the failure of not opting into the bridge, which she had done to preserve her privacy here, and because we don't just hand our info over to a corporation. It is the reason many people are on the Fediverse and not BS. It is a problem that the bridgy people need to address asap.
In the end technology failed everybody involved.
Dibs
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •S.T. Veje
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Martijn Vos
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •@Randahl Fink
I blame the creator of that bridge. You need to be extremely careful not to repost other people's content, while impersonating them and changing the context of the post.
Turning a mere mention of someone's name into a picture of their homepage is completely unreasonable. I don't know why anyone would implement something like that.
Suzanne Aldrich (she/her)
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Miha MarkiΔ
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Kumar McMillan
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Bret Carmichael πΊπ¦
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •apps.apple.com/us/app/croissanβ¦
βCroissant - Cross-Posting
App StoreMvRiederberg
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Sebastian Lauwers
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •They removed their picture from their profile because they didnβt want it on Bsky, but this is the second or third time youβre posting it, which means third time youβre posting that picture on Bsky as well I presume (because of the bridge).
Maybe stop doing that? Maybe stop posting their bio and handle and everything over and over again?
Otte Homan - remember Geordie
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Christine Olson
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •saxnot
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •smart choice to blur it before the same confusion happens again.
it feels to me this is 0 % your fault and it just sucks to be a blusky user where apparently the contents are flaky.
Mina
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •What I don't understand:
Even in that (apparently misleading) form, it looked to me as you were simply honestly asking for translation advice.
It would have never occurred to me that the preview picture of her profile related to the sentence's content.
eanopolsky
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •You said "that system made the VERY unfortunate error of removing [your] link to the context about Elon Musk", but the screenshot shows the following in blue text: "mastodon.social/@randahl/114..."
Was that not a link, and was it not to your post about Elon Musk? Or is your complaint instead that the embedded preview emphasized the person you tagged rather than the post you replied to?
Kuba Suder β’ @mackuba.eu on π¦
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Kierkegaanks regretfully
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Eisregen
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •lord pthenq1
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •There isn't much you can do about it.
They are going to lynch you because it is what they do.
It is sad because you were trying to build a presence and a community. And they destroyed it for nothing.
The only thing that works, and it worked for me, is to not interact with other community owners and never talk about other accounts, except in text and without generating loops.
And whatever you say in this specific case will be mansplaining.
You are not going to win. The best approach is to move on and learn from your no-mistakes. They bite the same.
Gary Houston
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Lynch mobs are going to lynch. Facts will be checked later, or more likely covered up.
Luckily you weren't left hanging by the neck from said bridge, and live to post another day.
Trash Panda
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Alexander Goeres π―
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •@Randahl Fink hope this turns out ok and this harriet person doesn't feel too offended by a technical error in the end. this again shows that one should be very wary of these (very popular) appeals to everbody to block certain accounts. and, of course, reading helps. a lot!
luckily , at least in the fediverse, there are no automatic choosing mechanisms to promote such outbreak of ill devised moral orthodoxy by enhancing its reach.
Jack Yan (ηη΅ζ©)
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •xs4me2
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Those of evil intent will always be able to find information and use it against us. I have seen my share in formerly Twitter. I guess the only thing one can do is indeed being open on oneβs best intent and consistently share fact checked information and use meticulous reasoning and ethics in whatever one does. Be honest and genuine.
Steve Cuthbert
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Sorry to hear this, Randahl. So frustrating for you. Some time ago, I muted the account that blew this up. precisely because of their tendency to jump to conclusions and react like this, seemingly without thought or investigation. I'm not referring to Harriet here.
It will blow over, keep up the good work - you're very much appreciated here!!
cedricdes
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Mark Wyner Wonβt Comply
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •AkaSci π°οΈ
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •As you said, "If you see something strange where someone suddenly seems to change their behaviour and do something malicious, (or write something indelicate), it is important to ask questions before concluding what is going on."
Let's not assume malicious intent. Let's send a friendly query to the guilty party, especially one with a solid reputation, and give them a chance to explain. In most cases, we will resolve the matter peacefully and both sides will feel better and wiser.
π€
Martin Seeger
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Bridging two different social networks always comes with it's own set of problems.
We experienced this the first time in the early 90s during the UseNET days, when we tried to bridge groups e.g. from the Z-Netz (local BBS network in Germany).
@isotopp has a lot of stories about that bridge and it's impact.
Technical compatibility is a trivial issue compared to the one of culture and expectations.
Sorry to see that this has hit you so hard. Thank you for making this so transparent. I hope the rift can be mended.
Memento MoriππͺπΊπ©πͺ
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Petra van Cronenburg
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •OMG, when shit happens in social media, it gets too fast a deep shitstorm. I hope so much that some mediators who follow you and those affected can put in a word to perhaps re-engage all of you in dialogue.
I'm on Bluesky myself and bridge from Bluesky to Mastodon. But I don't bridge from Mastodon to Bluesky, I would like to warn of this bridge. It can't work exactly simply because of the different post lengths. And much depends on how it is programmed. The best is not to bridge at all
Graeme π΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώ
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Mastodon is the only one I use as it's full of mainly sane people! Otherwise I stick to well moderated forums...
The trouble with blocking people is you never get to find out... Really should be a last resort.
Lastly - keep up the good posts!
Gytis RepeΔka
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •This is why I block all bridges (to BlueSky or others) from the very beginning
Only interested in posting original, unaltered content here, and here only. No need extra risks added only for some additional publicity.
Caleb James DeLisle
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •> Yesterday was my first bad day on Mastodon
Sorry to hear.
> what happened to me could happen to you
No it can't, I shitpost enough to make sure that anyone who would block over a silly mistake already has.
> I got blocked by a lot of people
Welcome to the club, I guess... I actually don't know how many people block me, I don't care.
> Bluesky
I HOPE they're blocking me, that place is cancer.
I'm here to have fun, and I'm thankful if unfun people will just block me, rather than bringing bad vibes into my normally very cool notifications tab...
Preston MacDougall
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Massimiliano Siddi
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •webhat
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Speed demon πͺπΊ π³π΄πΊπ¦
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •im.alstadheim.no/@hakona/11330β¦ pinned for a while. Don't know if it helps.
Speed demon πͺπΊ π³π΄πΊπ¦ (@hakona@im.alstadheim.no)
AlstadheimMatze Schmidt
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •New York Dolls - Personality Crisis
YouTubeCiara
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •What an awful mess. I'm sorry it happened to Harriet, her shock and distress is understandable. It seems to be a technical flaw that Bluesky turned a tag into a preview to her Mastodon page, as if it were a website.
I've sympathised sincerely with Harriet and hope she can feel comfortable and safe again soon. I took the liberty of mentioning that you are upset for her and about it. I hope all this works out okay soon and I really really hope that technical fault gets fixed.
Trantion
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •This reminds me of a Tom Scott talk about outrage growing and spreading like wildfire about what someone had supposedly done or said, without them being able to give their side. In the context, most of the people were quite reasonably upset, although some were deliberately pushing the mob too.
I thought it was called The Speed of Outrage, but I've just watched that and it has a lot less to do with The Speed of Outrage than that story. Maybe someone else remembers it?
#TomScott
Heinzenstein
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •This (shortened) sentence should be the #1 rule for using the internet, especially so-called social media:
"If you see something, it is important to ask questions before concluding what is going on."
#TeamFacts
chris overcash
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •AlisonW βΏπ³οΈβπβΎοΈ
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •0x0
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •I'll refrain from commenting on mob mentality.
My advice to you is:
- keep multiple accounts, in multiple instances, separated by interests/languages, don't mix them
- chill, it's just social media
Been blocked (account canceled) on a couple of occasions 'cos of that mentality.
Snark Week Global
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •β‘ΚΚπ΅π±
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •cherrybombspice
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Itβs really unfortunate that happened to you Randahl. All kinds of things randomly happen that can make things go so badly. I hope in time people will come to understand this was a misunderstanding and matters will get better.
I will say stuff like this that makes me scared to post anything online. Even comments or dms. Miscommunications and mishaps between humans can be so nerve wrecking. Wishing you a good day πΌ
tyzbit
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •the only culpable party in this is the Bluesky bridge and a very illustrative reason why it is a dead-end solution that should not have been built in the first place. it's central design hinges on impersonation against users' wishes. it's not on you if some 3rd party lies about what you said.
if we substitute in an analog, is it your fault at all if a newspaper copies a quote from your LinkedIn profile but then changes it so substantially that it says something different and totally uncharacteristic? no, they're spreading misinformation.
Kuba Suder β’ @mackuba.eu on π¦
in reply to tyzbit • • •JoΓ£o Costa ππ΅πΉπͺπΊπ¬π§πΊπ¦
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •nickapos
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •π ±π »ππ ΄π ±οΈ
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •What are people still doing on Twitter and bluesky?
Your experience wasn't a bad experience with Mastodon, it was a bad experience with the social media we are all running from.
peterfisherbooks.com=freescify
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •ran mak
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •George Dinwiddie
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •I hope your relationship with Harriet has recovered, or will.
FWIW, this whole thing has been instructive and helpful to me. When Bluesky first opened up to whomever wanted to sign up, I followed the bridge so some friends there could see what I tooted. I didn't think about the fact that it might republish the info of others, too. Merely replying to a reply tags the other person.
1/2
WesDym
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Sβ m Vβ rmβ
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •@_elena Had a similar experience with, of all people, Gargron. Smaller scale, but also frustrating.
He didn't get that I was kidding. I mean, who is an asshole about cats??!
si_irini
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •Hi @randahl
I discovered this yesterday too
I totally understood Harriet, but I also had a strange feeling
I'm really glad that it was all a misunderstanding, but it also makes me angry
π§΅
Cerstin Mahlow
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •I followed this story a bit from afar. Sorry to see how it all blew up, Randahl. The technical explanation is very on point, this bridging thing is just not unpredictable by design
At least: I can still read your posts on Mastodon as no algorithm takes anything into account to filter it. Please keep on posting!
Ygor
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •There is an episode of Strawberry Shortcake about that, called A Circle of Friends. People who have been friends for years suddenly turn on each other over a small misunderstanding because they weren't paying attention to some small detail. It happens.
youtu.be/m7fEEF38bQk
#StrawberryShortcake
Berry Bitty Adventures π A Circle of Friends π Strawberry Shortcake π Kids Movies
YouTubeOnly Ohm
in reply to Randahl Fink • • •AP => AT: if a post ends with a URL, and it gets truncated, link embed to that URL instead of the original post?
s-brekke (GitHub)