»These attacks amount to a pattern of what legal experts say are evidently war crimes and crimes against humanity, being committed in broad daylight with impunity, as part of a project to displace and potentially destroy the ability of Palestinians in Gaza to survive as a group – a key aspect of the legal definition of genocide.«

»The lack of a concrete response from Israel’s allies and the international community to each attack, each atrocity, has only helped to enable those that have followed. And as Israeli forces learned they could act with impunity, the violence has also become more brazen.«

»The Genocide Convention also requires states to act to prevent and punish the crime of genocide. Without waiting for the ICJ, states – particularly Israel’s Western allies – could act on their own, using their substantial leverage to pressure Israel to stop committing atrocities
[...]
There are many avenues for potential action, according to the legal experts The New Humanitarian consulted, but most countries – especially those with the most power – have chosen either passivity or complicity.«

@burnitdown
There are only a few cases judged under the genocide convention. The genocide convention was a compromise and states don't want to find genocide because the could mean consequences. Therefore they are doing everything to dilute it further.