@mttaggart Jesus. BRB, hunting up a copy of iceweasel
Firefox now has Terms of Use! This'll go over like a lead balloon.
You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, including processing data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice, as well as acting on your behalf to help you navigate the internet. When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.
mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/…
Update: See below in the thread for their clarification.
Taggart
in reply to Taggart • • •Taggart
in reply to Taggart • • •This clause explicitly separates the information they claim license over from the data collected in the Privacy Notice. This clause is more expansive—"information uploaded through Firefox" is basically anything in a HTTP request or a websocket.
mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/fire…
Firefox Privacy Notice
MozillaTransitBiker
in reply to Taggart • • •Aaron Williamson
in reply to Taggart • • •davd
in reply to Taggart • • •DJ🌞
in reply to Taggart • • •Tamsyn Ulthara 🏳️⚧️⛧🎃🐈⬛
in reply to Taggart • • •Sikorski Arkadiusz
in reply to Taggart • • •Advanced Persistent Teapot
in reply to Taggart • • •Veronica Explains
in reply to Taggart • • •Primo
in reply to Taggart • • •Qper
in reply to Taggart • • •these machines will destroy US.
in reply to Taggart • • •aburka 🫣
in reply to Taggart • • •soc
in reply to Taggart • • •Martin Boller
in reply to Taggart • • •soc
in reply to Taggart • • •Thomas Lobig🐔🐔
in reply to Taggart • • •Kim
in reply to Taggart • • •Oliver Geer
in reply to Taggart • • •Francis 🏴☠️ Gulotta
in reply to Taggart • • •Nicole Parsons
in reply to Taggart • • •#TranslatedFromTheRepublican
newsweek.com/gops-war-abortion…
"Your rights don't exist" is Firefox's new Terms of Use.
politico.com/news/2024/04/09/i…
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
theregister.com/2025/02/25/chi…
newyorker.com/news/daily-comme…
hipaajournal.com/republicans-f…
politico.com/newsletters/playb…
nytimes.com/2017/03/29/opinion…
pbs.org/newshour/politics/lame…
freepress.net/blog/gop-lawmake…
therecord.media/data-privacy-l…
Tech authoritarianism relies on voyeuristic invasions of voter's privacy for profit & control.
cnn.com/2024/10/21/politics/el…
Xi know what you did last summer: China was all up in Republicans' email, says book
Jessica Lyons (The Register)Ryan Lounsbury
in reply to Taggart • • •Frank Bennett
in reply to Taggart • • •B-rad 🏳️🌈👨💻
in reply to Taggart • • •Liminal witch 🧙♀️ Sarah
in reply to Taggart • • •smeikx
in reply to Taggart • • •I guess it is time to throw some money at @servo.
#Mozilla #enshitification
Gurleen K
in reply to Taggart • • •thesofafox
in reply to Taggart • • •George Saich
in reply to Taggart • • •JF
in reply to Taggart • • •Jonas
in reply to Taggart • • •Darrin West
in reply to Taggart • • •lb
in reply to Taggart • • •Maronno Winchester
in reply to Taggart • • •Ditch Firefox, use #Librewolf or #Floorp
stealthradek
in reply to Taggart • • •So if I obtain a single use license image from Getty etc and upload that image to my website using Firefox; does that image becomes royalty free property of Firefox?
I'm sure the original rights holder will be pleased.
🍿
jstm ausm paralleluniversum
in reply to Taggart • • •Shadow, First of His Name
in reply to Taggart • • •Vash
in reply to Taggart • • •Morre
in reply to Taggart • • •Mike Taylor 🦕
in reply to Taggart • • •Thibaultmol 🌈 🔜@WHY2025
in reply to Taggart • • •I want to believe this is just being misintrepted somehow.... but I keep saying that each time Firefox does something.....
Anyways, not regretting switching from Firefox to @zenbrowser (also firefox based)
Iker
in reply to Taggart • • •Shark Attak
in reply to Taggart • • •Quarky
in reply to Taggart • • •7222e800 "memdmp"
in reply to Taggart • • •Morgan ⚧️
in reply to Taggart • • •Dan
in reply to Taggart • • •Thomas Brand
in reply to Taggart • • •Rev. Nogard_D
in reply to Taggart • • •Welp, off to something else. Gonna have to check out Vivaldi. Thanks for that @mttaggart, always appreciate a recommendation.
mountain
in reply to Taggart • • •The part about gathering data “to prevent harmful, unauthorized or illegal activity”worries me even more…
mastodon.social/@sarahjamielew…
Sarah Jamie Lewis (@sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social)
Mastodonbenjamin melançon
in reply to Taggart • • •OK e-mailed legal-notices@mozilla.com
(Note it is a lot more than this one clause where they expand their claimed right to spy on you, and i encourage your e-mails to reflect this where i did not. See Sarah Jamie Lewis' thread, social.coop/@sarahjamielewis@m… )
Anyway what i wrote, before i read that:
Firefox does not have any right to information i enter into the URL address bar or forms on websites
My feedback and suggestion here, absolutely you can use for free.
social.coop
social.coopThe Turtle
in reply to Taggart • • •Hyde 📷 🖋
in reply to Taggart • • •brerb
in reply to Taggart • • •Metalglasses
in reply to Taggart • • •Chris Hayes
in reply to Taggart • • •Reminds me of Chrome's "Enhanced ad privacy" in the way this seems to be a form of privacy washing.
Source: ghacks.net/2023/07/01/all-chro…
All Chrome users will see popups in the coming weeks: here is why - gHacks Tech News
Martin Brinkmann (Ghacks Technology News)Wesley Bryie
in reply to Taggart • • •Lorry
in reply to Taggart • • •Pamela Barroway – Biz Editor
in reply to Taggart • • •the elder sea
in reply to Taggart • • •how is this possible? anything i write, upload, input...is basically everything i do in a browser. this includes passwords, media, etc.
fuck ALL the way off, mozilla. now to find some browser that has decent extensions and isnt a right assbag.
Futuristic Robert [KJ5ELX]
in reply to Taggart • • •Eli Wallach's favorite Bass
in reply to Taggart • • •Tuckers Nuts Resist! 🇺🇦
in reply to Taggart • • •Neal Gompa (ニール・ゴンパ)
in reply to Taggart • • •Justin
in reply to Taggart • • •True North Strong And Free
in reply to Taggart • • •"These Terms only apply to the Executable Code version of Firefox, not the Firefox source code."
From
mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/…
So if a Linux distro, like Debian, compiled the source code and put it on a server then the new terms do not apply to the compiled version?
If so then there is nothing to stop anyone from forking the code (eg Librewolf).
The new TOU sucks but there seems to be a workaround.
Firefox: About Your Rights
MozillaKevin Russell
in reply to Taggart • • •I actually read the tagline as this;
MOZILLA
Forget: About Your Rights
Sudrien
in reply to Taggart • • •nospaceman
in reply to Taggart • • •Here we go again. I've had enough with IE ages ago and moved to Chrome. Then to Firefox. Now I'm trying LibreWolf, a fork of Firefox hosted on Codeberg.
Jens Finkhäuser
in reply to Taggart • • •GDPR removal request sent, with the addition that this seems to violate the digital services act in a number of ways. Fun.
I mean, I'm not a lawyer... but @noybeu might want to look into this?
bananabob
in reply to Taggart • • •Raven Luni
in reply to Taggart • • •SynAck the Employed!
in reply to Taggart • • •tipjip
in reply to Taggart • • •My credentials on websites. Everything I upload to the cloud. My browsing and search histories.
WTF?
Dr Know
in reply to Taggart • • •LibreWolf Browser
librewolf.netoakward
in reply to Taggart • • •David's Alias
in reply to Taggart • • •You... do realize this is every single legal preamble ever right?
This exists in every service that involves processing information given to it, such as Bluesky and art websites. Without outlining it, and courts can darn sure be picky about your legalese, they legally wouldn't be able to use the information you give Firefox for basic function, which is exactly why this section exists and does not over-extend.
Gabriel
in reply to Taggart • • •Rachel Lawson
in reply to Taggart • • •Takiro 🎨
in reply to Taggart • • •Mani and the Nonos
in reply to Taggart • • •boiert
in reply to Taggart • • •NH4ClO4
in reply to Taggart • • •Sensitive content
The Vampire Fish Queen
in reply to Taggart • • •Socel: Social for the Animation Arts
socel.netColin Cogle
in reply to Taggart • • •Patrick $8
in reply to Taggart • • •corbeau
in reply to Taggart • • •treefit
in reply to Taggart • • •the clarification is in a blog post, that may not be legally binding. so in my eyes any clarification outside of the ToS is worthless.
If #Mozilla wants to offer AI services or collect and use their users data, this should be a separate opt-in ToS in my opinion, not the terms of the base application.
But TBH #Mozilla is doing too much dumb management decisions these days, so I'm considering to stop recommending it. (colorways, firing #rust and #servo teams, ads for temu and so on)
generationX
in reply to Taggart • • •HashRaydamon
in reply to Taggart • • •alexx
in reply to Taggart • • •Time for more Opera in my life.