The 911 "controlled demolition" BS is so tiresome...
I took the time to sum up the obvious to debunk this BS: NO EXPLOSIVES means NO EXPLOSIVES!
Absolutely none were required to bring down the WTC, once those jumbo jets hit them!
I have no idea how people think they would have held up. There's a mysterious belief in the infinite resistance of stuff that was excellent 1960s engineering, but not more.
As for WTC 7, it had been burning for hours, with no sprinklers or anything. Then was shaken up by the horrendous shock of the WTC 1 & 2 collapsing, which damaged several buildings in the area so badly that they had to destroy them, in the aftermath. First, the penthouse fell into the inside of the building, showing that the internal structure had collapsed. Then the entire structure fell in on itself. Again, with ZERO evidence of explosives. So yes, logic dictates that it collapsed on its own.
Not that hard to believe.
Once you've eliminated the IMPOSSIBLE, you have to accept what remains, no matter how improbable.
People just WANT to blame it on the US government, even when the accusation is absurd: it didn't make any sense that the government would coordinate with terrorists to let them fly planes into the WTC after rigging the buildings with some magical, undetectable explosives that worked in reverse, i.e. top to bottom, starting exactly where the planes had hit, then exploding floor after floor with those magical explosives to ... do do what? Lower the resistance of each floor, which was already at virtually zero?
So how d the "controlled demolition" nutters think those explosives were installed? At what time? How did they avoid security?
Would have required hundreds of workers. No whistleblowers? A perfect government operation with no screw-ups and no records?
How did they hide the bombs and the cables?
What magic did they use?
The conspiracy idiots keep talking about thermite, which is NOT an explosive! Could NEVER have had the observed effect.
For what reason would they launch the controlled demolition? The airplanes were already entirely enough terrorism. The building collapse was totally not necessary.
It is infinitely much easier to just admit that the building collapsed under its own weight...
The ONLY objection I've seen is "I don't believe that's possible".
But we saw it happen!
There are so many things that seem totally impossible, but are real.
Get a gigantic pile of metal weighing 400 tons off the ground just by pushing a bit of air... that's absolutely impossible! Yet we got used to it.
But gigantic buildings collapsing after a catastrophic attack .. that's where they draw the line for their absolute disbelief and they need some MAGIC FAIRY DUST to destroy the building rather than ... it's own mass 🙄
