I don't doubt the content. I just want to point out that this is a La Rouche publication. I think you could run into an open knife with such links. Do you know La Rouche?

@Diggers
If you don't listen to the enemy's radio station, then you don't have a perspective on facts that may be hidden in your home country. However, it should not be forgotten that the enemy broadcaster is also trying to form your opinion.

It's not about what you read.
I really only meant well. Because that makes you unnecessarily vulnerable.
I was also shocked that Kim Iversen gave La Roughe a stage from time to time.
And I'll ask you again. Do you know La Rouche?
So I'm not just talking about hearsay. I know their methods, because I've often encountered them in some of their spin-offs. Sect is really the closest thing to it.

What is the difference between a sect and a cult?

That's a good question.
Don't expect me to give you a definition right now.
I'll tell you how I differentiate between the two.
A sect is not a voluntary gathering of all sect members. There is at least peer pressure, but sometimes also deliberate psychological terror.
A cult, on the other hand, is something people join voluntarily.
That's what I mean about La Rouche.
It's often married couples who take on the leading role.
They set themselves apart from all other groups. They are very engaging. In left-wing circles, there are many circles that all have something sect-like about them, but even the MLPD would not be described as sectarian in the same way as La Rouche.
La Rouche members are very demanding; they quickly sell you a newspaper or something similar. This is in stark contrast to other left-wing groups.
La Rouche may have been anchored in the left-wing milieu at some point, but they are very technocratic, cybernetics, fusion reactors, etc. It's all very strange and, in some cases, unique to this group.