Semantic argument here... And I know its an argument that is already lost to the modern mind.

(And not to disagree with the OP, because elitists (globalists) are the true purveyors of division and strife)

But...

Racism is not bigotry.

eg; "blacks are generally better singers than whites" is a race-based observation.

Bigotry says blacks are indolent, frivolous, etc., (as Che claimed).

It is cultures that are inferior.

Hip-hop culture is debased and therefore inferior.

Aztec culture was based on appeasement of angry gods driving massive levels of human sacrifice. That is debased, and therefore, inferior.

I could go on...

Western culture based on individual autonomy is the best culture to ever exist. That is what globalists really strive to annihilate.

For that statement I can be called "racist", but race is only tangential to this - a mere coincidence of geography.

When you say "All Lives Matter" You're saying that police should be able to shoot black people any time they're afraid of them

No. That is exactly not what it means. It means the exact opposite.

laying around begging for reparations and refusing to get a job.

I lie around lazily, laugh at the stupid working people and I am white. So it's really a question of colours?

You simply don't want to understand that these social conditions, the level of education, the traditional distribution of roles is a historical process. A process that is connected with crime and suffering.
And that is crimes against the black population.
Ultimately, criminality can also be traced back to these historical processes.
The white elites at the top conduct their criminal business in a semi-legal way. Through extortion, coercion and the demand for obedience. The white lumpen proletariat has not yet reached class consciousness and also competes by criminal means, for the pittance that remains to them.
The blacks, who have only just escaped from slave labour, but still lack class consciousness, have no way up, neither accepted by the white working class nor by the lumpen proletariat, are granted the lot of the menial job.
Jobs from which they can now even gradually work their way up, but the negative experiences of the past, the impatience and the suffering endured, offer a much straighter path to criminality.

I do not want to serve this society, a society that is always dependent on the exploitation of people.
I reject wage labour as personal self-realisation. This does not mean that I reject communal work.

I am not calling you a racist, but someone who still has a potentially racist barrier in his head.
First of all, I have to say that there are differences between the term race (Rasse) in your language and mine.
Let us agree on the following fact when considering genetics: the differences between any two individuals of the same group are much greater than those found between average representatives of different groups.

So what you are talking about is more cultural, and culture is shaped by common experiences.
You mention rap, but you could also have mentioned blues or reggae.
Many musical styles ultimately go back to these influences.
The reason is that music has always been a way of expressing oneself, even for oppressed people.
For example, country music can clearly be traced back to Irish music, which in turn gained strong influence because Irish culture was oppressed by the English.

If I take all this to its logical conclusion, I could also describe the Americans as a rather cultureless bunch, made up of the rejects of those who no longer saw any chance in Europe or other parts of the world.
Various religious minorities as well as oppressed and marginalised people.
Unlike the blacks, however, these people opened up to this new world voluntarily and sometimes very euphorically. They were free and that is what they put above everything else.

The fact that they disturbed the freedom of other people, i.e. that of the indigenous people, did not bother them any more than slave labour.

They built up new culture and deliberately did not integrate the blacks and the indigenous people.

One particular culture became the guiding culture, and all other cultures were discriminated against.
In this way, no normal thinking person can expect that there can be a fair comparison of the people of these different cultures.
Nor can the language and grammar of one culture be placed above that of another.
Language and grammar is also ultimately an instrument of oppression.

For this reason, language and grammar have remained a symbol of oppression for me to this day.
If you don't see yourself as part of a society, then you also reject certain achievements of this society and make something of your own.
Please note that society and community are different things.
Every subculture, whether youth or social fringe groups, will intentionally develop its own language and culture.
There are really only two options: Adaptation or segregation.
The third option would be for real diversity to be accepted.
If there were no guiding religion, if there were no absolute science, if different spiritual ways of life were accepted just as much as absolutely rational or pseudo-rational behaviour.

But that is not the case and that is why there are these differences in what you call education, language, decency, etc. But these differences do not depend on the religion.
It is therefore primarily a question of the acceptance of the society to which one wishes to submit. Therefore education to make a career, etc.
But if I don't want to be part of this society or if I don't see any chance in this society, then it's not a big step to be hostile to this society. So with violence and crime.
I am not saying that this is the right way, but unfortunately it can be explained socio-psychologically.

But all this does not depend on a certain colour, but on cultural experiences.

Please also consider. You call yourself a Baptist. What distinguishes the Baptists from their origins is the fact that they did not want to accept a certain direction of religion.

someone who still has a potentially racist barrier in his head.

Call the pre-crime police.

"There were more Irish slaves in America, I am told, than blacks."

Believing such a thing is a clear indication that you'll enthusiastically embrace anything that lets you keep thinking that you're right. You follow that up with claims that indentured servitude means that the Irish were willing to work for a living, whereas being kidnapped and beat until you obey is a sign of laziness and criminal intent.

You are so thoroughly broken that all that is left for you is to harm others any way you can imagine.