Decentralization Scoring System
๐งฎ Decentralization Scoring System (v1.0)
This scoring system evaluates how decentralized and self-hostable a platform is, based on four core metrics.
๐ Scoring Metrics (Total: 100 Points)
Top Provider User Share (30 points): Measures how many users are on the largest instance. Full points if <10%; 0 if >80%.
Top Provider Content Share (30 points): Measures how much content is hosted by the largest instance. Full points if <10%; 0 if >80%.
Ease of Self-Hosting: Server (20 points): Technical ease of running your own backend. Full points for Docker/simple setup with good docs.
Ease of Self-Hosting: User Interface (20 points): Availability and usability of clients. Full points for accessible, FOSS, multi-platform clients.
๐ Example Breakdown (Estimates)
๐ง Email (2025)
- Top Provider User Share: Apple โ 53.67% โ Score: 4.5/30
- Top Provider Content Share: Apple likely handles >50% of mail โ Score: 4.5/30
- Self-Hosting: Server: Easy (Leverage email hosting services) โ Score: 18/20
- Self-Hosting: Client: Easy (Thunderbird, K-9, etc.) โ Score: 18/20
Total: 45/100
๐น Lemmy (2025)
- Top Provider User Share: lemmy.world โ 37.17% โ Score: 12/30
- Top Provider Content Share: lemmy.world likely hosts ~37% content โ Score: 12/30
- Self-Hosting: Server: Easy (Docker, low resource) โ Score: 18/20
- Self-Hosting: Client: Good FOSS apps, web UI โ Score: 18/20
Total: 60/100
๐ Mastodon (2025)
- Top Provider User Share: mastodon.social โ 42.7% โ Score: 11/30
- Top Provider Content Share: mastodon.social โ 45โ50% content โ Score: 10/30
- Self-Hosting: Server: Docker setup, moderate difficulty โ Score: 15/20
- Self-Hosting: Client: Strong ecosystem (Tusky, web, etc.) โ Score: 19/20
Total: 55/100
๐ต Bluesky (2025)
- Top Provider User Share: bsky.social โ ~90%+ (very centralized) โ Score: 0/30
- Top Provider Content Share: Nearly all content on bsky.social โ Score: 0/30
- Self-Hosting: Server: PDS hosting possible but very niche โ Score: 4/20
- Self-Hosting: Client: Mostly official client; some 3rd party โ Score: 10/20
Total: 14/100
๐ฅ Reddit (2025)
- Top Provider User Share: Reddit โ 48.4% โ Score: 0/30
- Top Provider Content Share: Reddit hosts a significant portion of user-generated content โ Score: 0/30
- Self-Hosting: Server: Not self-hostable (proprietary platform) โ Score: 0/20
- Self-Hosting: Client: Some unofficial clients available โ Score: 3/20
Total: 3/100
How Scores are Calculated
๐งโ๐คโ๐ง How User/Content Share Scores Work
This measures how many users are on the largest provider (or instance).
- 100% (one provider): If one provider has all the users, it gets 0 points.
- No provider > 10%: If no provider has more than 10%, it gets full 30 points.
- Between 10% and 80%: Anything in between is scored on a linear scale.
- > 80%: If a provider has more than 80%, it gets 0 points.
๐ Formula:
Score = 30 ร (1 - (TopProviderShare - 10%) / 70%)
โฆbut only if TopProviderShare is between 10% and 80%.
If below 10%, full 30. If above 80%, zero.
๐ Example:
If one provider has 40% of all users:
โ Score = 30 ร (1 - (40 - 10) / 70) = 30 ร (1 - 0.43) = 17.1 points
๐ฅ๏ธ How Ease of Self-Hosting Scores Work
These scores measure how easy it is for individuals or communities to run their own servers or use clients.
This looks at how technically easy it is to run your own backend (e.g., email server, Mastodon server) or User Interface (e.g., web-interface or mobile-app)
- Very Easy: One-command Docker, low resources, great documentation โ 18โ20 points
- Moderate: Docker or manual setup, some config, active community support โ 13โ17 points
- Hard: Complex setup, needs regular updates or custom config (e.g. DNS, spam) โ 6โ12 points
- Very Hard or Proprietary: Little to no self-hosting support, undocumented โ 0โ5 points
PS.
This is Version 1.0 so there are likely flaws and mistakes in it, feel free to help create the best version we can I've put it on github.com/NoBadDays/decentralโฆ
decentralization-score/decentralization_score_2025.04.md at main ยท NoBadDays/decentralization-score
A scoring system to measure how decentralised a service is. - NoBadDays/decentralization-scoreGitHub
like this
don't like this
clabru
in reply to AnonomousWolf • • •like this
noodle (he/him), f314, Coelacanth, Carighan Maconar, n2burns, usr, Adsooi, Fizz, Rogue1633, rearview, geekwithsoul and redshift like this.
AnonomousWolf
in reply to clabru • • •Agreed, we need to find a way to take as much if not all subjectivity out of the calculation.
And get reliable data.
This is just a starting point, it can be improved a lot.
like this
Fizz, Rogue1633 and fxomt like this.
don't like this
Carighan Maconar, 0xED, noodle (he/him), geekwithsoul and redshift don't like this.
anothermember
in reply to AnonomousWolf • • •like this
Beryl, Carighan Maconar, cmeio, n2burns, Otter, usr, sabreW4K3, henfredemars, Jumuta, Deconceptualist, HobbitFoot, AbouBenAdhem, Hjalmar, nimpnin, Fizz, ๐ฆ๐บ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, unautrenom, AnExerciseInFalling, kate, nibbler, randomblock1, geekwithsoul, redshift, Novaling and ThorrJo like this.
AnonomousWolf
in reply to anothermember • • •Based on my brief searches yes, but I haven't looked into the example data in great detail.
If you have a good data point for me I can update the examples.
like this
๐ฆ๐บ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, anothermember and fxomt like this.
don't like this
0xED, noodle (he/him), geekwithsoul and redshift don't like this.
anothermember
in reply to AnonomousWolf • • •like this
Beryl, Coelacanth, AnonomousWolf, cmeio, petroskoi, n2burns, Otter, Da Bald Eagul, curbstickle, G020B, Adsooi, HobbitFoot, AbouBenAdhem, Chewy, ๐ฆ๐บ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, randomblock1, geekwithsoul, fxomt and Hansae like this.
AbouBenAdhem
in reply to AnonomousWolf • • •like this
Fizz, sleepingoddish, AnonomousWolf, Die4Ever, BrianTheeBiscuiteer, myplacedk, kate, nibbler, geekwithsoul and hitwright like this.