ICE agents mistakenly detain U.S. marshal in Arizona

The deputy marshal was detained because he "fit the general description of a subject being sought by ICE," according to the U.S. Marshals Service.
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ice-m…

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

benda

@bob yeah comrade they aint concerned with nazis and fash. they just don't like the color red.
"new axis"... tf is that? the only axis has always been empire and capital.
some fucking rachel maddow world history over here.

Krieg gegen Palästinenser: Horror ohne Ende in Gaza https://www.jungewelt.de/artikel/501800.krieg-gegen-palästinenser-horror-ohne-ende-in-gaza.html

weact.campact.de/petitions/cum…

Wusstest Du, dass ab Januar Banken Beweise für illegale CumCum-Geschäfte vernichten dürfen? 28,5 Milliarden Euro Steuergelder sind in Gefahr. Fordere den*die nächste Finanzminister*in auf, sofort zu handeln.
Jetzt unterzeichnen ✍️ und teilen!
#CumCum #CumEx

A Chinese state-owned company began construction of a solar power plant in Nicaragua on June 6, 2025.

The project will be the largest green solar power plant in Nicaragua.

The solar power plant, located in the municipality of Nindirí, Masaya, will have an installed capacity of 70 megawatts and include 112,700 high-tech photovoltaic panels.

The main function of the solar power plant will be to provide clean energy for sanitation and water services in Nicaragua.

fundacionandresbello.org/en/ne…

Well, guess I wasn't actually familiar with this album before, but I am fixing that now. Like, holy moly, it might be my favourite? Pretty sure you can hear the birth of Prince from "Frisky" alone. :ablobjam:

Sly and the Family Stone - Fresh (1973)

album.link/ca/i/216546627

Meta is under investigation for a privacy violation called "localhost tracking." This process allowed Meta to link users' real identities to their web browsing activity, even if they used VPNs, incognito mode, and deleted cookies.

The process involves the Facebook or Instagram app listening for incoming traffic on local network ports and exchanging information with Meta's tracking scripts in users' web browsers.

zeropartydata.es/p/localhost-t…

#privacy

Protest gegen Genozid in Gaza: »Der Druck aus der Bevölkerung nimmt langsam zu« https://www.jungewelt.de/artikel/501773.protest-gegen-genozid-in-gaza-der-druck-aus-der-bevölkerung-nimmt-langsam-zu.html

Today is the International Day of Solidarity with Long-Term Anarchist Prisoners and we're donating net proceeds from every sale. So treat yourself to a book and show some love for imprisoned freedom fighters! firestorm.coop/catalog/bestsel…

Crane Longevity: OEM vs. Third-Party Parts Debate


Scheduled servicing keeps your crane in the game. The parts you choose—OEM or third-party—shape its future. While OEM parts deliver reliability, third-party options can save costs if chosen carefully. Work with a supplier who knows your equipment and prio

Regular maintenance is the foundation of crane reliability, preventing costly downtime and safety risks. But when it's time to replace worn parts, the decision between OEM and third-party options sparks debate. It's about more than cost—it's about keeping your crane on the job.

Why Scheduled Servicing Is Non-Negotiable


Every crane, including Tadano models, follows a maintenance schedule based on usage or wear. Over time, components like filters, seals, and structural parts degrade. Skipping these intervals lets small issues escalate into project-stopping failures. The real question is which parts to use during servicing.

The Case for OEM Parts


OEM parts come from the crane's original manufacturer. They're built to precise specs, ensuring seamless integration and reliable performance. Tested to handle your crane's specific conditions, they reduce the chance of breakdowns and typically protect your warranty.

The downside is cost—OEM parts are often more expensive. Availability can also be an issue, especially for older models, leading to potential delays.

Third-Party Parts: A Mixed Bag


Third-party parts are attractive for their affordability and quicker delivery. Some aftermarket options are well-engineered, rivaling OEM quality at a lower price. But quality varies widely. Poorly made parts may fit incorrectly, wear out fast, or cause damage to other systems. They could also void your warranty.

For non-essential components like filters, a reputable third-party part might be fine. But for critical systems, caution is crucial.

Tadano Cranes Demand High Standards


Tadano cranes are known for their durability and precision, but only if maintained properly. High-pressure systems like hydraulics, electronics, or load-bearing components require parts that meet strict standards. Parts designed for these demands ensure safety and performance.

For less critical parts, a vetted third-party option could work, but only from a trusted source.

Partnering with a Parts Supplier


A reliable supplier is your ally in making smart choices. They understand your crane, can recommend when third-party parts are viable, and ensure fast delivery to minimize downtime. They'll also clarify the risks of each option.

Suppliers who push parts without context or can't verify compatibility are a liability. Choose a supplier who values your operation's success.

Closing Thoughts


Scheduled servicing keeps your crane in the game. The parts you choose—OEM or third-party—shape its future. While OEM Tadano crane parts deliver reliability, third-party options can save costs if chosen carefully. Work with a supplier who knows your equipment and prioritizes quality.

Ask the tough questions: Is this part reliable? What's the risk? A little care today prevents major headaches tomorrow.

Three years ago I wrote about how we may be slowly coming to understand that progress isn't inevitable and things may actually be trending downward on multiple fronts: alfiekohn.org/blogs/regress/.

Now comes strong evidence that this is particularly true regarding trends in attitudes about gender roles: nytimes.com/2025/06/04/opinion…. Some truly disturbing polling data here.

in reply to KittenBiscuits

Thank you for caring. If you need to or just feel it's best, there are all sorts of safe live animal traps out there, if you need it or any more coons relocated..

youtube.com/watch?v=xCZprBPFDV…

#Alerta Neo-nazi Ryan Sanchez was apparently on the ground in LA yesterday with a crew, infiltrating protests and taking people's pictures. He also had a knife with him. (See first link below)

Sanchez is a (former?) member of Patriot Front and a (definitely former) member of neo-nazi fight club Rise Above Movement (RAM), which was sort of the precursor to and model for today's "active clubs". (See second link below)

bsky.app/profile/jtischauser.b…

leftcoastrightwatch.org/articl…

#PatriotFront #RiseAboveMovement #RAM #RyanSanchez #LA

Cuban President expresses solidarity with Cristina Fernandez cubanews.acn.cu/world/26954-cu…

Wikipedia Pauses AI-Generated Summaries After Editor Backlash


“This would do immediate and irreversible harm to our readers and to our reputation as a decently trustworthy and serious source,” one Wikipedia editor said.

The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization which hosts and develops Wikipedia, has paused an experiment that showed users AI-generated summaries at the top of articles after an overwhelmingly negative reaction from the Wikipedia editors community.

“Just because Google has rolled out its AI summaries doesn't mean we need to one-up them, I sincerely beg you not to test this, on mobile or anywhere else,” one editor said in response to Wikimedia Foundation’s announcement that it will launch a two-week trial of the summaries on the mobile version of Wikipedia. “This would do immediate and irreversible harm to our readers and to our reputation as a decently trustworthy and serious source. Wikipedia has in some ways become a byword for sober boringness, which is excellent. Let's not insult our readers' intelligence and join the stampede to roll out flashy AI summaries. Which is what these are, although here the word ‘machine-generated’ is used instead.”

Two other editors simply commented, “Yuck.”

For years, Wikipedia has been one of the most valuable repositories of information in the world, and a laudable model for community-based, democratic internet platform governance. Its importance has only grown in the last couple of years during the generative AI boom as it’s one of the only internet platforms that has not been significantly degraded by the flood of AI-generated slop and misinformation. As opposed to Google, which since embracing generative AI has instructed its users to eat glue, Wikipedia’s community has kept its articles relatively high quality. As I recently reported last year, editors are actively working to filter out bad, AI-generated content from Wikipedia.

A page detailing the the AI-generated summaries project, called “Simple Article Summaries,” explains that it was proposed after a discussion at Wikimedia’s 2024 conference, Wikimania, where “Wikimedians discussed ways that AI/machine-generated remixing of the already created content can be used to make Wikipedia more accessible and easier to learn from.” Editors who participated in the discussion thought that these summaries could improve the learning experience on Wikipedia, where some article summaries can be quite dense and filled with technical jargon, but that AI features needed to be cleared labeled as such and that users needed an easy to way to flag issues with “machine-generated/remixed content once it was published or generated automatically.”

In one experiment where summaries were enabled for users who have the Wikipedia browser extension installed, the generated summary showed up at the top of the article, which users had to click to expand and read. That summary was also flagged with a yellow “unverified” label.
An example of what the AI-generated summary looked like.
Wikimedia announced that it was going to run the generated summaries experiment on June 2, and was immediately met with dozens of replies from editors who said “very bad idea,” “strongest possible oppose,” Absolutely not,” etc.

“Yes, human editors can introduce reliability and NPOV [neutral point-of-view] issues. But as a collective mass, it evens out into a beautiful corpus,” one editor said. “With Simple Article Summaries, you propose giving one singular editor with known reliability and NPOV issues a platform at the very top of any given article, whilst giving zero editorial control to others. It reinforces the idea that Wikipedia cannot be relied on, destroying a decade of policy work. It reinforces the belief that unsourced, charged content can be added, because this platforms it. I don't think I would feel comfortable contributing to an encyclopedia like this. No other community has mastered collaboration to such a wondrous extent, and this would throw that away.”

A day later, Wikimedia announced that it would pause the launch of the experiment, but indicated that it’s still interested in AI-generated summaries.

“The Wikimedia Foundation has been exploring ways to make Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects more accessible to readers globally,” a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson told me in an email. “This two-week, opt-in experiment was focused on making complex Wikipedia articles more accessible to people with different reading levels. For the purposes of this experiment, the summaries were generated by an open-weight Aya model by Cohere. It was meant to gauge interest in a feature like this, and to help us think about the right kind of community moderation systems to ensure humans remain central to deciding what information is shown on Wikipedia.”

“It is common to receive a variety of feedback from volunteers, and we incorporate it in our decisions, and sometimes change course,” the Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson added. “We welcome such thoughtful feedback — this is what continues to make Wikipedia a truly collaborative platform of human knowledge.”

“Reading through the comments, it’s clear we could have done a better job introducing this idea and opening up the conversation here on VPT back in March,” a Wikimedia Foundation project manager said. VPT, or “village pump technical,” is where The Wikimedia Foundation and the community discuss technical aspects of the platform. “As internet usage changes over time, we are trying to discover new ways to help new generations learn from Wikipedia to sustain our movement into the future. In consequence, we need to figure out how we can experiment in safe ways that are appropriate for readers and the Wikimedia community. Looking back, we realize the next step with this message should have been to provide more of that context for you all and to make the space for folks to engage further.”

The project manager also said that “Bringing generative AI into the Wikipedia reading experience is a serious set of decisions, with important implications, and we intend to treat it as such, and that “We do not have any plans for bringing a summary feature to the wikis without editor involvement. An editor moderation workflow is required under any circumstances, both for this idea, as well as any future idea around AI summarized or adapted content.”

A few weeks back I read on Mastodon that the US Dept of Health and Human Services was getting rid of COVID tests. This is bad for all the reasons, but some enterprising government employee did a program where you could fill out a form and get anywhere from 300-3000 COVID tests (unexpired) sent to your home. I figured why not try? Last week I got seven boxes of COVID tests delivered to my porch. I posted to a local mailing list and I am getting them pointed towards my community. Thanks Mastodon!

This is a great example of how historical path-dependence has borked Canada. This savvy innovation is only workable with district heating, a collectivist infrastructure from the past. Now, that history of collectivism is allowing flexibility in unanticipated circumstances (climate change) which we cannot match, constrained as we are by our past choices.

World’s biggest sand battery to heat Finnish town without fossil fuels
thenextweb.com/news/worlds-big…

San Francisco based XRobotics pizza making robots, lease for $1,300 a month and can make 100 pizzas per hour.


Interesting that they are going the subscription route and not selling these outright. It works because the comparison with the cost of a human looks so favorable. I'd expect to see this with humanoid robots too as they take over more and more human jobs.

XRobotics’ countertop robots are cooking up 25,000 pizzas a month

Verkhovna Rada MP Bezugla: The real target of the Russian Armed Forces' offensive in Sumy Oblast is Kyiv en.topwar.ru/266152-nardep-vru…

A very interesting analysis of Monday's anti-ICE protest in #Austin. I especially am interested that protesters used micromobility scooters as a makeshift barricade.

(I do wish Crimethinc would give credit for the photos they borrow from other sources)

CrimethInc. : Melt #ICE, Be Water : Report-back from a Hot Summer Demonstration in Austin, #Texas
crimethinc.com/2025/06/11/melt…

#activism #politics #USpol #news