‘It’s a Killing Field’: Israeli Soldiers Admit to Firing on Hungry Civilians in Gaza #Palestine palestinechronicle.com/its-a-k…
'It’s a Killing Field': Israeli Soldiers Admit to Firing on Hungry Civilians in Gaza - Palestine Chronicle
By Palestine Chronicle Staff A Haaretz exposé reveals that Israeli soldiers were ordered to shoot at Palestinians gathering for food, with commanders normalizing the killing of unarmed civilians. An investigation published by the Israeli [...]admin (Palestine Chronicle)
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •There are 6 cases remaining:
#FreeSpeech Coalition v. Paxton — #Texas law that requires #porn sites to verify age.
#FCC v. Consumers’ Research — consumer *protection* group devoted to fighting “#woke” corporations contends that E-Rate phone & internet subsidies for #LowIncome communities violates the #nondelegation doctrine
#SCOTUS #law
🧵
scotusblog.com/2025/06/remaini…
The cases that remain
Amy Howe (SCOTUSblog)Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Louisiana v. Callais — a 2022 map w/ 1 majority-Black district was ruled to violate the #VotingRightsAct. The new map, drawn w/ 2 majority-Black districts, was challenged by a group describing themselves as “non-African American” who contend it was unconstitutional racial #gerrymandering. The state says it drew the map not due to #race but to protect #Republican incumbents, such as #House Speaker #MikeJohnson & Rep Julia Letlow, who sits on the House #Appropriations Cmte.
#SCOTUS #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Kennedy v. Braidwood Management — does the #Constitution require members of the Preventive Services Task Force to be #appointed by the president & #confirmed by the #Senate? It concerns the legality of a portion of the #ACA that requires #health plans to provide #free #PreventiveCare such as #cancer screenings, #contraception & #immunizations.
Mahmoud v. Taylor — #Maryland public #schools & #LGBTQ+ subject matter
#Trump v. CASA — #BirthrightCitizenship
#SCOTUS #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Regarding #Trump v. CASA — The case BEGAN as a challenge to Trump’s ban on #BirthrightCitizenship, but #SCOTUS is instead weighing an emergency appeal by the administration on a different question:
Do federal district #courts have the #authority to issue nationwide injunctions?
#SCOTUS #law #judiciary
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •First opinion is in. It’s #Trump v Casa
#BirthrightCitizenship #judiciary #authority
supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pd…
The government's applications to partially stay the district court's nationwide injunctions in the birthright citizenship cases are GRANTED.
The court says that universal injunctions "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts."
#SCOTUS #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •From the opinion of the court: The principal dissent’s analysis of the #ExecutiveOrder is premature because the #BirthrightCitizenship issue is not before us. [excuses excuses]
Justice #Sotomayor dissents, in an opinion joined by #Kagan & #Jackson. Jackson also has a separate dissent.
#Trump #SCOTUS #judiciary #authority #immigration #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •From near the conclusion of Justice Barrett's opinion for the Court, on behalf of the 6 conservatives:
"#FederalCourts do not exercise general #oversight of the #ExecutiveBranch; they resolve cases & controversies consistent with the authority #Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its #power, too."
TOTAL BS!
#Trump #SCOTUS #judiciary #authority #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •There are also separate opinions.
First, #ClarenceThomas has a concurring opinion in which he stresses that #SCOTUS "today puts an end to the 'increasingly common' practice of federal courts issuing universal injunctions."
#Alito too has a concurring opinion in which he notes that the court does not resolve two issues that "potentially threaten the practical significance of today's decision: the availability of third-party standing & class certification."
#Trump #judiciary #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Alito says that the "Court does not address the weighty issue whether the state plaintiffs have third-party standing to assert the #Citizenship Clause claims of their individual residents."
#Barrett, in her opinion, specifically goes after Justice #Jackson: "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial judiciary.”
#Trump #SCOTUS #judiciary #authority #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Alito says next that the ruling "will have very little value if district courts award relief to broadly defined classes without following" the procedural protections for class certification.
District courts are going to have to start certifying classes now [#ClassAction].
#Trump #SCOTUS #judiciary #authority #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Kavanaugh's concurring opinion notes that district courts do not have the last word on preliminary #injunction requests -- courts of #appeals & #SCOTUS can also weigh in, & "that order of operations will not change." [which is why they should have the ability to apply nationwide & the power to rule an executive action is illegal. FFS]
#Trump #judiciary #authority #BirthrightCitizenship #immigration #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Sotomayor contends that the #Trump admin DID NOT ASK the court to completely block the lower court orders because it would have to show that the order is probably constitutional, which it can't do, she says. "The gamesmanship in this request is apparent & the Government makes no attempt to hide it. Yet, shamefully, this Court plays along."
This gets at the "merits" of the #BirthrightCitizenship issue (the focus was universal injunctions).
#Trump #SCOTUS #judiciary #immigration #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Barrett writes that "prohibiting enforcement of the #ExecutiveOrder againast the child of an individual pregnant plaintiff will give that plaintiff complete relief. Her child will not be denied citizenship. Extending the injunction to cover all other similarly situated individuals would not render her relief any more complete."
[but it’ll stop the courts from having to hear thousands of cases on the same issue - it’s called upholding an existing #law]
#Trump #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Next case:
Kennedy v. Braidwood
The court holds today that the appointment of the task force members is consistent with the Constitution.
Specifically the court rules that task force members can be removed at will by the Secretary of #HHS, & their recommendations about preventive services are reviewaable by the secretary before they take effect.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pd…
#SCOTUS #law #Constitution #PreventiveCare #ACA #health
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Kavanaugh writes majority opinion. #ClarenceThomas dissents. He contends that the majority erroneously relied on a new theory that the government "invented" on appeal.
#SCOTUS #law #Constitution #PreventiveCare #ACA #health
🧵
reuters.com/legal/litigation/u…
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •The next opinion is #FCC v. Consumers' Research [anti-woke folk]
It is by Justice #Kagan, & the vote is 6-3 again. #Gorsuch dissents, joined by #ClarenceThomas & #Alito.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pd…
It holds that neither #Congress's delegation of #power to the FCC or the FCC's delegation of power to the private corporation violated a theory known as the #nondelegation doctrine.
#law #SCOTUS #ERate #phone #internet #subsidies #LowIncome
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Kagan writes: "Under our #nondelegation precedents, #Congress sufficiently guided & constrained the discretion that it lodged with the #FCC to implement the universal-service contribution scheme. And the FCC, in turn, has retained all decision-making authority within that sphere, relying on the ‘corporation’ only for nonbinding advice. Nothing in those arrangements, either separately or together, violates the Constitution."
#law #SCOTUS #ERate #phone #internet #subsidies #LowIncome
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Gorsuch writes that the majority's ruling "defies the #Constitution's command that #Congress 'may not transfer to another branch 'powers that are strictly & exclusively legislative.'"
#Gorsuch also contends that "even as the Court swallows a delegation beyond anything yet seen in the U.S. Reports, it also signals, unmistakably, that there are some abdications of congressional authority, including in the very statute before us, that the present majority isn't prepared to stomach."
#SCOTUS #law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Next opinion written by #Alito — bad sign — it’s Mahmoud v. Taylor, the #Maryland public #schools & #LGBTQ+ subject matter
Predictably it is a 6 – 3 vote
supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pd…
Alito holds that the parents in this case are likely to succeed in their challenge to the school board's policies foreclosing the opt-out option.
#law #SCOTUS
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Sotomayor dissent joined by #Kagan & #Jackson: “The reverberations of the Court’s error will be felt, I fear, for generations. Unable to condone that grave misjudgment, I dissent.”
#law #SCOTUS #PublicSchool #schools #education #LGBTQ+ #censorship #bigotry
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Alito writes:
"We have long recognized the rights of parents to direct 'the #religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children."
#law #SCOTUS #PublicSchool #schools #education #LGBTQ+ #censorship #bigotry
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Alito cont:
“Based on the record before us, the Board's introduction of the LGBTQ themed storybooks & the failure to provide notice & opt-out options for parents meets that test: it does interfere with the children's religious development & imposes a burden on #religious exercise.”
#law #SCOTUS #PublicSchool #schools #education #LGBTQ+ #censorship #bigotry
🧵
AP coverage: apnews.com/live/supreme-court-…
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Sotomayor:
The board had argued that the #curriculum & no-opt-out policy "serve its compelling interest in 'maintaining a school environment that is safe & conducive to learning for all students."
The court agrees with this "as a general matter," but it notes that the board allows opt-outs for other reasons, suggesting that opt-outs are not actually unworkable.
#law #SCOTUS #PublicSchool #schools #education #LGBTQ+ #censorship #bigotry #religion #NewApostolicReformation
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Next opinion is #FreeSpeech Coalition v. Paxton. It is by #ClarenceThomas - oh boy.
The vote is once again 6-3.
Kagan dissents, joined by Sotomayor & Jackson.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pd…
#Texas #porn #law #SCOTUS
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Strange, #SCOTUS says that they are not going to decide #Louisiana v. Callais, the #VotingRightsAct #gerrymandering case, but instead they are requesting further argument. "In due course," it will "issue an order scheduling argument & specifying any additional questions to be addressed in supplemental briefing."
#ClarenceThomas dissents from the decision to have reargument in Louisiana v. Callais.
#law
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Back to the #Texas #porn #law
#SCOTUS rejected arguments from the porn industry that the law violates the #FirstAmendment rights of adults to access explicit content online because it required users to share identifying information that could be sold, misused or hacked.
#privacy
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •During oral arguments in January Justices indicated the landscape of the porn industry had rapidly transformed since the court last issued a major decision dealing with explicit material, about 20 years ago. Today, porn sites & smartphones allow easy access to adult content.
"We’re in an entirely different world,” #ClarenceThomas said. “Playboy was about squiggly lines on cable TV.” [he definitely knows]
#privacy #Texas #porn #law #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •The #Texas #law requires age verification for any site where more than one-third of the content is sexual material “harmful to minors.” Users must submit digital #identification, a government-issued ID or other forms of proof that they are 18 or older. The law bars the sites from retaining identifying #information, but it does allow them to transfer the #data for
verification purposes.
#privacy #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •In response to statutes in #Texas & elsewhere, #Pornhub cut off service to states requiring #AgeVerification.
The #porn industry plaintiffs, who formed an association called the #FreeSpeech Coalition, sued to block the TX #law before it went into effect in 2023. Derek L. Shaffer, an attorney for the coalition, argued the lower court ruling allowing the law could “open the door to an emerging wave of #regulations that imperil #FreeSpeech online.”
#privacy #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#privacy #Texas #law #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •“Kids can get online porn through gaming systems, tablets, phones, computers,” Justice Amy Coney #Barrett said. “Let me just say that content-filtering for all those different devices, I can say from personal experience, is difficult to keep up with.”
#privacy #Texas #porn #law #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Another section of the #law, which was blocked by a lower court, requires sites to post “sexual material health warnings” that make widely disputed claims that pornography is “potentially biologically addictive” & “proven to harm brain development.”
Sites that violate the law face fines of up to $10,000 a day.
#privacy #Texas #porn #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •The very short summary of the ruling in
#FreeSpeech Coalition v. Paxton: "The power to require age verification is within a State's authority to prevent children from accessing sexually explicit content."
So #SCOTUS is basically simplifying down to a #StatesRights issue.
#privacy #Texas #porn #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •The court says that the #Texas #law "simply requires proof of age to access content that is obscene to minors" & therefore "does not directly regulate the protected speech of adults."
The court doesn’t seem to have considered the violation of #privacy implications .
#porn #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •Thanks for nothing #SCOTUS
#Trump says he will ‘promptly file’ to push policies after blocked by courts after #SupremeCourt decision
Speaking from the White House, Trump said he would try to advance restrictions on #BirthrightCitizenship & other policies that had been blocked by district courts.
#law #ActivistCourt
🧵
apnews.com/live/supreme-court-…
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Moronica #PamBondi says Americans are finally going getting what they voted for.
“These lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone in the world instead of the parties before the court,” she said.
#SCOTUS #judiciary #Constitution #SeparationOfPowers
🧵
Nonilex
in reply to Nonilex • • •#Trump: "Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, and some of the cases we're talking about would be ending birthright citizenship, which now comes to the fore. That was meant for the babies of slaves."
#FuckSCOTUS #law #SCOTUS #BirthrightCitizenship #NationwideInjunctions #immigration #Constitution #Judiciary #SeparationOfPowers #AbuseOfPower
Michael Gemar
in reply to Nonilex • • •Does the Constitution actually *say* that?
And, just note that the Constitution *does* say the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to maintain a “well-regulated militia”…you know, if we’re going by intent…
Luis Fierro
in reply to Nonilex • • •Peter Brown
in reply to Nonilex • • •And his grandfather was an immigrant from Germany.
Peter Brown
in reply to Nonilex • • •HarriettMB
in reply to Nonilex • • •FeloniousPunk
in reply to Nonilex • • •loucovey
in reply to Nonilex • • •RinostarGames
in reply to Nonilex • • •Tekniquelly correct
in reply to Nonilex • • •Peter Brown
in reply to Nonilex • • •loucovey
in reply to Nonilex • • •RinostarGames
in reply to Nonilex • • •Chris
in reply to Nonilex • • •Something, something about separation of church and state.
(More barfing)
Someone please hold my hair.
Pam C
in reply to Nonilex • • •Amoshias
in reply to Nonilex • • •SouprMatt
in reply to Nonilex • • •One other note: this will EXPLODE the number of class action lawsuits. Because it will REQUIRE them in order to get injunctions against unconstitutional laws or illegal government actions.
Other than lawyers, who in the world wants MORE class action lawsuits?
SouprMatt
in reply to Nonilex • • •Lyle Solla-Yates
in reply to Nonilex • • •HarriettMB
in reply to Nonilex • • •Sean Fenian
in reply to Nonilex • • •"The plaintiffs in [Braidwood], who have religious objections to the requirement that insurers provide coverage for a drug that prevents HIV, contend that [...]"
If you have religious objections to insurers covering a drug that prevents a debilitating, mostly-fatal infectious disease that you can get from receiving an emergency blood transfusion, then your religious beliefs are founded on hate and cruelty.
HarriettMB
in reply to Nonilex • • •Mycotropic
in reply to Nonilex • • •Levka
in reply to Nonilex • • •