█ Dos detinguts per la filtraciĂł de dades personals de SĂĄnchez, Illa i altres polĂ­tics ▓▒░ La filtraciĂł, que investiga l'AudiĂšncia Nacional, consta de 500 pĂ gines amb domicilis, telĂšfons, DNI i correus electrĂČnic de ministres, militants socialistes i altres cĂ rre[
]
ccma.cat/324/dos-detinguts-per


#audiencianacional #324cat #internet #policianacional #policialijudicial

The #settlers, backed by the most racist and corrupt government in the history of the State of #Israel, continue their rampage. This time in the village of Kafr Malek, northeast of #Ramallah. The result: four young Palestinians killed in just three days. And the army? It keeps supporting settler #terrorism and feeding the media false reports.


About two weeks ago, settlers established an illegal outpost near the village of Kafr Malek. Their aim was to take control over the land between the village and the neighboring village to the west, Al Mazra'a ash Sharqiya. Every new outpost needs an infrastructure anchor, in this case, it was two army bases that are located just a few hundred meters away from the outpost, on Mount Baal Hazor, the second highest peak in the West Bank. Nothing happens in the West Bank without the knowledge and backing of the army, which is being led by the current apartheid commander, Major General Avi Bluth.

Establishing outposts near Palestinian villages is a well known tactic with a single goal: to spark violence that results in the deaths of more Palestinians, fueling fear and terror that will pave the way for further land grabs and more expulsions of Palestinians. It is a vicious cycle of terror, looting, violence, and displacement.

As expected, this is exactly what happened again in the village of Kafr Malek. On June 23, the army killed the 13 year old Omar Hamail. Two days later, the settlers, under the army’s protection, carried out a pogrom in the village. The result: three more young Palestinians were killed and seven more were wounded by live army gunfire. The army, for its part, issued a false statement claiming that soldiers at the scene fired back in response to gunfire coming from the village. A lie - plain and simple!

Much of the violence in the area east of Ramallah, and in this case as well, stems from a single settlement: Kochav Hashachar. Its northern section was built on land that was looted in 1980 from the residents of Kafr Malek through a so-called "temporary" seizure order for "security needs".

Around this settlement, about fifteen outposts have been established since the late 1990s within a radius of several kilometers. Along with the isolated and violent settlements of Shiloh to the north and the settlements of Rimonim and Ma'aleh Michmash to the south, the settlers have succeeded to expel Palestinians from hundreds of thousands of dunams located east of the villages that are in the East Ramallah Governorate, all the way to the Jordan Valley. In the case of Kafr Malek, nearly 90 percent of the village’s lands, covering around 51,000 dunams, have been taken by settlers with the support of the Israeli military.

Now, the settlers in this area, under the protection of the army, are bringing the violence directly into the villages themselves, those who are located in Area B. This is why, in recent months, we have been hearing about more and more pogroms and thefts occurring inside the villages. The only goal of all of this is not just expulsion from Area C, but expulsion from the West Bank as a whole.

In recent days, the chaotic violence has even been directed also toward reserve soldiers who, it seems, have not fully grasped that their role is to shield the settlers while they do as they please. The attacks on the soldiers drew a rare condemnation even from the Prime Minister himself. This is the same Prime Minister who has nurtured settler terror in the West Bank for decades, and especially in recent years, because it serves his political needs.


KeremNavot - Naboth’s Vineyard
Naboth’s Vineyard (Kerem Navot) is an Israeli NGO established in 2012, which monitors and carries out research on Israeli land policy in the #WestBank.

#Palestine
#apartheid #Israel #apartheid-Israel
#History #settlers
#Kerem-navot
#EU #US #US-Israel #US-Israel-terrorism #IGF #Israel #genocide #Gaza #Palestine
keremnavot.org/english
https://x.com/nabothVin

Not only is the embrace of degrowth misguided, but research suggests that this doomsday mindset is causing widespread anxiety in young people, rather than, of course, the environment collapsing all around them

"My husband and I talk about environmental stewardship with our children by emphasizing the eco-modernist approach: Human beings have the unique ability to innovate their way out of problems, creating technological solutions that benefit both people and the planet"
cato.org/free-society/summer-2


A report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives warns that Carney's plan to balance the operating budget could lead to the worst spending cuts in modern Canadian history, with potential reductions of up to 24% across the federal public service. The report also mentioned comments from the Parliamentary Budget Officer, Yves Giroux, who suggested that Carney's plans could necessitate severe cuts to the public service.

#canada #cdnpoli

in reply to Berliner Morgenpost

Krass: Das #Morden und der #Genozid in #Gaza, genau wie die glasklar völkerrechtswidrigen ÜberfĂ€lle auf #Syrien und #Iran durch die #IDF, wird mit einem Schulterzucken toleriert oder sogar begrĂŒĂŸt. Aber der emotional aufrĂŒttelnde Ausruf "Tod dem IDF" durch Bob Vylan gegen die TĂ€ter erzeugt offenbar tiefste Empörung

RealitÀtscheck: Benjamin #Netanjahu als Verantwortlicher wird vom #IStGH wegen mehr & schlimmerer Verbrechen gesucht als Wladimir #Putin!

#Doppelmoral #Meinungsfreiheit

This entry was edited (1 month ago)

From Yellowstone to the Garden of Eden, climate change puts majority of world heritage sites at risk

Paris — Almost three quarters of the globe’s cultural and natural heritage sites are threatened by too little

#Climate #ClimateChange #Climate-Change #climatechange #drought #flooding #globalwarming #Severeweather #unitednations
europesays.com/2208648/

Il n'y a plus de mots assez forts pour dĂ©noncer la complicitĂ© des pays occidentaux dans les crimes de guerre et le gĂ©nocide perpĂ©trĂ© par l'État terroriste israĂ©lien. Il faut mettre des noms sur les dirigeants occidentaux qui soutiennent IsraĂ«l ou restent passifs et leur faire payer Ă©lectoralement et financiĂšrement.
Un bombardement israélien provoque un carnage dans un café de Gaza
lemonde.fr/international/artic

#israel #genocide #gaza #palestine

middleeasteye.net/news/morocco


B. #Guigue
« Si l'on considÚre les organisations liées à la sécurité, on en distingue au moins deux types. L'un est celui des mécanismes d'alliance ciblant des tiers. Prenons l'exemple de l' #OTAN : c'est un mécanisme ciblant des tiers et visant la #Russie. Son objectif n'est pas de prévenir la guerre, mais de la gagner. L'Organisation de coopération de Shanghai, elle, est un mécanisme de prévention des conflits. Leur nature est donc différente, mais ce ne sont que des outils, comme le marteau et le tournevis. On ne peut pas dire lequel est le plus efficace : tout dépend de l'objectif visé. »
YAN Xuetong, Université Tsinghua, Beijing.

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Irish political writer Declan Hayes analyzed statements made by artists during the Glastonbury Festival in the UK.

"Most ordinary people are sick to the back teeth," Hayes said on Western people's growing dissent against the Israeli occupation over its ongoing genocide in Gaza, especially the disgust felt by youth.

#Glastonbury #Palestine #Gaza #DeclanHayes

WATCH: tiktok.com/@mayadeenenglish/vi


Genocide-collaborator government rigging the deck to ensure anti-democratic ban demanded by Israel lobby on peaceful protest group goes through

We see them. We see what they are doing. They will not recover from this. Labour is done.

skwawkbox.org/2025/07/01/coope


Bye bye Schengen Area

Poland to impose border checks with Germany, Lithuania

flipboard.com/@politicoeurope/


The EU defends its "basic values" with sanctions against the journalist HĂŒseyin Doru. He is accused of near Russia because he reports on Palestine

With his coverage of Palestine, he is sowing "ethnic, political and religious discord" and thus aid the "destabilizing activities of Russia". What could seem to a logician than a non sequitur ("it does not follow") is the official accusation against HĂŒseyn Dogru

red. Media #EU

jungewelt.de/artikel/502871.ru


Sitting here listening to some jazzradio.net/ just chilling this morning when I hear a very familiar jingle and that's when today I learned that Safelite Auto Glass repair is owned by an international conglomerate with brands and business all around the world.

Don't know why I'm surprised at this. I do find it interesting though. And the fact they use the same jingle pretty much in every single country. I guess it saves on marketing costs.

youtu.be/STiPwOasCmE

This entry was edited (1 month ago)

BREAKING: Home Secretary’s draft order is Trumpian abuse of power #Palestine palestineaction.org/statutory-


Human rights violations and allegations of union members being threatened and denied their right to freely unionize at the Camino Rojo mine in Mexico have surfaced.

The mine, owned by Vancouver-based Orla Mining, is currently under investigation by Mexican, Canadian, and international labor authorities. The union, Los Mineros, is calling for justice for the workers and for Orla Mining to recognize them as the union for the mine.

thetyee.ca/News/2025/06/30/Can


#canada #cdnpoli #colonialism

In den nĂ€chsten Jahren muss verhindert werden, dass die Union 2029 die #Brandmauer zur AfD einreißt. DafĂŒr braucht es ein breites gesellschaftliches BĂŒndnis, schreibt Lia Becker in Teil 12 der nd-Serie »Wohin geht die neue Linke?«.
nd-aktuell.de/artikel/1192272.


Ukraine's chargé d'affaires summoned by Iran FM en.mehrnews.com/news/233836/Uk


Eric Lenoir
VoilĂ .
C’est fait.
Ces rĂąclures de bidet de la commission mixte paritaire au sĂ©nat ont rĂ©autorisĂ© un produit extrĂȘmement dangereux pour la santĂ©, qu’on retrouvera donc encore dans les fƓtus ou le cerveau, pour le plus grand bonheur des marchands de mort lĂ©gaux et de leurs petits soldats et esclaves des champs.

Parce que ce sont des ordures, ils et elles ont fait en sorte qu’on puisse construire et exploiter des fermes usines Ă  #saumons, qui explosent Ă  la fois la ressource halieutique, les fonds marins, et les riviĂšres qu’ils polluent de leurs effluents Ă©pouvantables. On pourra aussi plus facilement faire des usines Ă  #vaches, qui sont bien plus faites pour nourrir le capital que des humains.

Parce que ce sont d’ignobles scĂ©lĂ©rats, je leur souhaite de contracter les cancers, maladies de Parkinson, maladies neuro dĂ©gĂ©nĂ©ratives dans lesquels sont impliquĂ©s de façon incontestable les #pesticides dont ils vont faciliter l’usage.

Quant aux crĂ©tins qui auront cru que ceci les aiderait Ă  mieux gagner leur vie au cul des vaches ou depuis leurs tracteurs, j’ai hĂąte de les entendre demander des comptes Ă  leur syndicat majoritaire (dont le texte de loi a repris en bonne partie les demandes, mot pour mot), car en aucun cas la rĂ©munĂ©ration des agriculteurs n’en a fait partie. Votre Ă©goĂŻsme ne vous rĂ©compensera pas cette fois-ci, et puisque vous nous mettez tous dans la merde (vous les soutiens de cette loi et des syndicats qui la valident) en permettant qu’on pourrisse tant et plus notre #eau, notre #air, le peu qu’il reste de #biodiversitĂ©, c’est bien la moindre des choses que vous morfliez aussi.

Les alternatives? Vous savez tous qu’elles existent, sinon on ne cultiverait pas l’ensemble des cultures que vous faites en conventionnel dans leur version en bio.
La loi de l’offre et de la demande, les importations de produits pourris et moins chers? C’est peut-ĂȘtre lĂ -dessus qu’il aurait fallu vous battre pour empĂȘcher cette concurrence et pousser l’Etat Ă  soutenir votre transition efficacement. Au lieu de ça, vous avez donnĂ© encore plus de moyens Ă  ceux qui vous saignent pour pouvoir continuer Ă  le faire.
Bien fait pour vous, c’est pas faute de vous avoir prĂ©venus et de vous avoir dit combien la population est de votre cĂŽtĂ© pour aller dans ce sens.

Señor #Duplomb, messieurs et mesdames les 10 membres de cette commission qui avez validé ce texte mortel, on peut considérer que vous avez déclaré la guerre au vivant, à la santé publique, à la résilience climatique et territoriale, au bien commun, à nous.
On ne vous fera pas de cadeau, vu ce que vous nous avez balancĂ© dans les dents aujourd’hui, Ă  nous et aux gĂ©nĂ©rations futures au lieu de les protĂ©ger, bande de larves, de laquais, de malhonnĂȘtes et d’empoisonneurs.
Honte Ă  vous.

Vous aviez une chance de vous en sortir dignement, et avez préféré assurer votre collusion de long terme et les atteintes à la santé publique qui allaient avec.

Seuls deux Ă©lus socialistes, un LFI et un Ă©cologiste ont sauvĂ© l’honneur dans cette commission.
Les autres sont d’infĂąmes Ă©cocidaires, des Ă©coterroristes, et au minimum des lĂąches.

publicsenat.fr/actualites/poli


Il reste une toute petite chance que l’AssemblĂ©e Nationale bloque le texte le 8 juillet, mais cela nĂ©cessitera une forte pression populaire sur nos dĂ©putĂ©s, sans concession.

#France #agriculture #néonicotinoïdes #acétamipride

Poland to impose border checks with Germany, Lithuania
https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-impose-border-checks-with-germany-lithuania-donald-tusk/?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypub

Posted into POLITICO Europe @politico-europe-POLITICOEurope

President of Uruguay defends multilateralism and 2030 Agenda plenglish.com/news/2025/06/30/


Mit diesen Maßnahmen kĂ€mpft die Stadt gegen die Hitze

Aktionsplan Wie NĂŒrnberg gegen die Hitze kĂ€mpft Aktualisiert am 01.07.2025 – 12:38 UhrLesedauer: 2 Min. Junge kĂŒhlt sich

#Nuernberg #Nuremberg #Deutschland #Deutsch #DE #Schlagzeilen #Headlines #Nachrichten #News #Europe #Europa #EU #NĂŒrnberg #Aktionsplan #Bayern #Germany #Hitzeaktionsplan #Hitzewelle #Klimawandel
europesays.com/de/233559/

The FCA' has found that in the 14 months to May 2025, nearly 40% of all corporate acquisitions/takeovers were preceded by leaks in the media & 'unusual trading' in shares before official announcements of takeovers.

Lets call this what it is: insider trading allowing financial service firms & traders to profit from inside knowledge of market significant developments.

And Rachel Reeves wants us to trust more of our savings to these self-enriching sharks?

#InsiderTrading
h/t FT

NEWS! After two years of massacre in Gaza, true villains revealed as couple of punky hip-hop bands newsthump.com/2025/07/01/after

in reply to Obi-Two al-Menashani

@Obi-Two al-Menashani Namby pambys have been saying that wind and solar are the cheapest power sources, well if stand alone and only when they are producing yea but they're not stand alone, they're not producing most of the time, and when they are it often doesn't coincide with demand. So yea it's so much Bullshit. Texas, Germany, Australia, have all found out the hard way.

**đŸ’„ . AprĂšs la colĂšre suscitĂ©e par le reportage tĂ©lĂ©visĂ© đŸ“șđŸ‡©đŸ‡ż contre le « mini-État artificiel », comment Abou Dhabi rĂ©agira-t-elle au reportage des « fils de Fatima » qui ont dĂ©truit le Soudan đŸ‡žđŸ‡© ? L'enquĂȘte đŸ‡ș🇾 qui a provoquĂ© un tollĂ© international a Ă©tĂ© menĂ©e par le New York Times sur Cheikh Mansour, le propriĂ©taire du yacht, et Tahnoon, l'espion, comme les appelle le journal. Une enquĂȘte dangereuse qui dĂ©forme l'image des Émirats 🇩đŸ‡Ș d'une maniĂšre inĂ©dite **

The EU has received thousands of tons of Russian diesel through Morocco and Spain, bypassing sanctions, – El Pais en.news-front.su/2025/07/01/th

in reply to Obi-Two al-Menashani

@wy7usa so as I said initially, if you know the Green Party candidate has no shot at winning, why bother voting for them? Just vote for the person you know “can” win and be done with it.

It’s a scam by the party that knows they can’t convince people to vote for them to actually get votes from people that don’t want them.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

Obi-Two al-Menashani

@wy7usa that again contradicts the vote your conscience argument.

As I stated, ranked choice voting is a scam for the major parties to get votes from people who would otherwise not vote for them.

I never waste my vote. You can say it’s a waste if I vote Libertarian (and I have) but I would never call it a waste.

Wait... WHAT?!

WHAT?!

How have I not known there is a #FlatPak of #SpaceCadetPinball for #Linux until now?!

Holy goddamn fucking shit...

I have been trying to resurrect a copy of Space Cadet Pinball to play for years!

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to George E. đŸ‡șđŸ‡žâ™„đŸ‡șđŸ‡ŠđŸ‡”đŸ‡žđŸłïžâ€đŸŒˆđŸłïžâ€âš§ïž

a few years back I got this game working on my own computer after I found someone who had simply disassembled and reverse-engineered Space Cadet Pinball to C code and posted it on GitHub: github.com/k4zmu2a/SpaceCadetP


You can download the game assets from Archive.org, the Git repo above will find the assets once you uncompress the RAR archive somwhere in the same directory as the executable build.

in reply to Ramin Honary

All that proves is that Microsoft (and maybe even Dave Plummer) lied to us. We were told that Space Cadet Pinball could not have been ported to Windows 98/ XP/ 7 whatever because the timing was hard-coded to the CPU clock cycles and if you tried to recompile it on a newer CPU it ran super fast and the timing was all messed up.

Krasse Links No 58


Willkommen zu Krasse Links No 58. SchmĂŒckt eure Wild Semiotics, der Moment der Individualisierung von Imperial Tech ist gekommen, heute hypernormalizen wir die self-hypnosis Narcissus narcosis.


Dass Musk die Fehde mit Trump wieder aufnimmt, kann zwei GrĂŒnde haben, die sich nicht ausschließen:

  1. Musk glaubt, dass Trump gerade politisch zu schwach ist, um einen Fight mit ihm zu riskieren und deswegen einknicken wird und die nicht so beautiful Bill von ihm ĂŒberarbeiten lĂ€sst.
  2. Ich denke, beim ersten Cagefight war der Impuls, das Tischtuch zu zerschneiden durchaus echt, doch Musk musste einsehen, dass er fĂŒr seine Zukunft erstmal an Trump gekettet ist. Sein jetziger Streit ist kalkuliert und dabei hat er die Möglichkeit eines endgĂŒltigen Bruchs eingeplant oder sogar vorbereitet. Aber auch Trump wird fĂŒr dieses Szenario vorbereitet sein. Ich glaube, beide wollen einander ganz doll loswerden aber wissen, dass das kostspielig wird und suchen Wege 


404 berichtet darĂŒber, dass die US-Terrorbehörde ICE jetzt eine Facerecognition-App einsetzt, um Jagd auf Menschen zu machen.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is using a new mobile phone app that can identify someone based on their fingerprints or face by simply pointing a smartphone camera at them, according to internal ICE emails viewed by 404 Media. The underlying system used for the facial recognition component of the app is ordinarily used when people enter or exit the U.S. Now, that system is being used inside the U.S. by ICE to identify people in the field.

The news highlights the Trump administration’s growing use of sophisticated technology for its mass deportation efforts and ICE’s enforcement of its arrest quotas. The document also shows how biometric systems built for one reason can be repurposed for another, a constant fear and critique from civil liberties proponents of facial recognition tools.


Militarisierte, vermummte Sturmtruppen laufen als Drohnen einer KI im Land herum, Checken Dein Gesicht und wenn die KI „Zugriff“ ruft, wirst du in einen unmarkierten Van gezerrt und du verschwindest auf unabsehbare Zeit in einem undurchsichtigen System von privat gefĂŒhrten Lagern. Jedenfalls, wenn du GlĂŒck hast und nicht nach El Salvador oder Lybien deportiert wirst.

Nein nein, das ist bestimmt kein Faschismus.


Bereits 2016 veröffentliche Adam Curtis seine fast dreistĂŒndige Doku „Hypernormalization“ in der er versucht, die Krise des Realen, die wir ja nicht erst seit gestern erleben, entlang verschiedener historischer Entwicklungen nachzuzeichnen und jetzt hab ich entdeckt, dass sie komplett frei auf Youtube liegt.

Damals war gerade Donald Trump das erste mal gewĂ€hlt und Hypernormalization ordnet ihn als PhĂ€nomen in einen galloppierenden RealitĂ€tsverlust des Westens ein, dessen Geschichte er von 1975 an erzĂ€hlt. Dabei streift er neben dem egoistischen und gaslightenden Agieren westlicher Politik in Nahost und der Erfindung von KĂŒnstlicher Intelligenz auch den eskalierenden Kult des Individualismus.

Fast 10 Jahre spĂ€ter ist Trump wieder PrĂ€sident, der Nahostkonflikt explodiert uns im Gesicht und die Tech-MilliardĂ€re greifen nach der Weltherrschaft, wobei sie selbst dem Wahn der „AGI“ verfallen sind, wĂ€hrend die realen „KIs“ unsere geteilte Wirklichkeit zu verslopptem Rauschen zersetzen. Ich finde, der Film knallt heute nochmal anders als damals.

An einer Stelle geht es auch um Joseph Weizenbaums ersten Chatbot, ELIZA, der bereits die Menschen in seinen Bann zog und Adam Curtis prophezeiht richtig:

What Eliza showed, was that in an age of indivudalism, what makes people feel secure, is having themselves reflected back to them, just like in a mirror.

Paris Marx nimmt die Szene aus Andors erster Staffel, als Nemik mit Andor ĂŒber „Imperial Tech“ redet, um die Rolle von Tech in der US-Außenpolitik zu analysieren.

“We’ve grown reliant on Imperial tech, and we’ve made ourselves vulnerable,” Nemik explains. “There’s a growing list of things we’ve known and forgotten, things they’ve pushed us to forget. Things like freedom.” [
]


Auch auf der Erde hat sich das hegemoniale Infrastruktur-Regime des Imperiums ĂŒber den Lauf der Jahre zum geopolitischen Machtmittel etabliert.

The tech industry likes us to believe that technology is neutral — how it’s wielded by different forces in society is what matters. But the reality is that most technologies are deeply political and help to reinforce particular power structures. It’s precisely why technology feels increasingly at the center of geopolitical fights — not just in the case of Iran’s nuclear program, but about China’s access to particular technologies and the growing concern about dependence on US across much of the world.

Who gets access to certain technologies? Who gets to make those decisions? Why are some technologies allowed or even encouraged to spread, while others must be tightly restricted? These are all deeply political questions, and it seems quite clear the United States, and to a lesser degree Israel and its Western allies, feel they’re the ones that should be making those decisions for everyone else. But why should they have certain technologies, when other countries and people should not?


Schon Al Gore hat diese Richtung vorgegebenen, unter Obama und speziell unter Außenministerin Hillary Clinton hatte sich die technologische Infrastruktur-Hegemonie der USA als Machtmittel etabliert und seit Trump I werfen sie den Chinesen ohne jeden Beweis immer genau die Machenschaften vor, die sie dokumentierter Weise selbst praktizieren.

In 1989, Al Gore that the US Senate that “the nation which most completely assimilates high-performance computing into its economy will very likely emerge as the dominant intellectual, economic, and technological force in the next century.” The United States clearly saw that the spread of its technologies, and the creation of dependence on them, was going to be in its economic and geopolitical interest. In The Promise of Access, Daniel Greene explains that part of that also entailed an effort to gain influence in post-Soviet states.

In a recent article about Huawei, Yale Law School fellow Yangyang Cheng made a striking comment on the reality of US claims about the threat the Chinese company posed. “As politicians and pundits in the US expounded on how Beijing might weaponize Huawei’s infrastructure, the allegations were more than Cold-War paranoia or theoretical projections,” she wrote. “They reflected capabilities Washington already possessed and wished to monopolize.” At the end of the day, this is about power more than anything else, and ensuring a country like China does not gain the capabilities we know the United States already holds from the Snowden revelations.


Im Plattformbuch zÀhle ich drei Politiken, die durch die hegemoniale Ausbreitung der digitaler Infrastrukturen möglich und immer wieder auch in politischen Kontexten eingesetzt werden:

  • Die Politik des Flaschenhals: Man nutzt den Zugang zu Netzen, Informationen und Dienstleistungen als Chokepoint, um die eigenen Interessen durchzupressen. Der Ausschluss von iranischen und Russischen Banken zum SWIFT-System ist offensichtliches geopolitisches Beispiel, der gesperrte E-Mail-Zugang des Obersten Richters am ICJ durch Microsoft ein anderer aber eigentlich funktioniert auch jedes PlattformgeschĂ€ftsmodell durch das Prinzip.
  • Die Politik der Pfadentscheidung. Eine viel subtilere Form der Kontrolle passiert durch Infrastrukturentscheidungen selbst. Wie eine Plattform beschaffen ist, welche Features sie implementiert oder weglĂ€sst und welche PfadabhĂ€ngigkeiten damit wiederum geschaffen werden, etc. hat eine enorme Auswirkung darauf, wie sie benutzt wird und welche Kultur sich darum bildet. Wenn Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang durch die Welt fĂ€hrt, Politiker*innenhĂ€nde schĂŒttelt und ĂŒberall ein Giga-Rechenzentrums-Ei legt, dann arbeitet er an Nvidias Infrastruktur-Hegmonie, um durch die Dessimination der eigenen Pfadentscheidungen die KI-Entwicklung in ihm genehme Pfade einzulocken.
  • Die Politik der Allwissenheit. Wenn man Informationsnetze besitzt, oder zumindest netzwerkzentrale Nodes darin kontrolliert, dann kann man da, naja, gut reingucken. Vor ĂŒber 12 Jahren erzĂ€hlte uns Edward Snowden, was damals alles so möglich war, heute können wir nur spekulieren, aber ich wĂŒrde vom schlimmsten ausgehen.

Ich wollte den Ereignissen damals nicht marchiavellistisch vorweggreifen und hĂ€tte vor Musks TwitterĂŒbernahme und Zuckerbergs Downranking von redaktionellen News auch Probleme gehabt, politisch relevante Beispiele dafĂŒr zu finden (Cambridge Analytica zĂ€hlt nicht), aber heute wĂŒrde ich eine vierte Politik ergĂ€nzen:

  • Die Politik der Sichtbarkeit. Wenn viele Menschen an deiner algorithmischen Informationsinfrastruktur hĂ€ngen, kannst du ĂŒber den Algorithmus ErzĂ€hlungen, die dir nĂŒtzen, sichtbarer machen und ErzĂ€hlungen die dir schaden, dimmen, sie zu Not sogar versuchen, unsichtbar zu machen. Wir kennen diese Politik bereits von den klassischen Medien, aber fĂŒr Plattformen fĂ€ngt sie gerade erst an, ist natĂŒrlich viel mĂ€chtiger und viel schwieriger nachzuweisen.

Aber egal, welche der Politiken eingesetzt wird; ihre EffektivitÀt ist eine Funktion der mobilisierbaren Plattformmacht, also unseren AbhÀngigkeiten.

Thinking back to Nemik’s comment, we could say there has been a decades-long project to make us reliant on Imperial tech — not in a forceful way, but to make it seem convenient and liberatory even as it enhanced the geopolitical power of the United States and its control over our lives, wherever we might be in the world. That’s becoming even clearer today, as Silicon Valley throws off its old libertarian narratives and embraces the MAGA movement and security state.

Caspar C. Mierau sammelt in seinem Blog ein paar anekdotische Datenpunkte darĂŒber, dass mit der „KI-Erziehung“ gerade etwas gehörig schief geht. Eines seiner Kinder wollte auf einem Schulfest kurz etwas bei Papa nachfragen und forderte ihn auf, doch mal ChatGPT zu fragen.

Ich habe mein Kind gefragt, warum es explizit nach ChatGPT gefragt habe. Die ErklĂ€rung war, dass der Lehrer bei einer Frage vorher mit den Kindern die Lösung mit Google und ChatGPT „gesucht“ habe – und nur ChatGPT sie richtig gewusst hĂ€tte. [
]

Im GesprĂ€ch mit den grĂ¶ĂŸeren Kindern stellte sich heraus, dass zum Beispiel in einem Fach der Lehrer die Fragen der Kinder durch Live-Fragen an die Google-„KI“ beantwortet. Als sie wissen wollten, was nun eigentlich genau eine „Beschreibung“ sei – ob mit oder ohne Stichpunkten –, gab der Lehrer die Frage in Google ein und zoomte die „KI“-Antwort kommentarlos auf dem Whiteboard groß. Das war die Antwort. In einem Unterricht. [
]

Irgendetwas lĂ€uft da gerade extrem schief. Und ich merke auch an den verschiedenen Altersstufen meiner Kinder, wie unterschiedlich sie mit dem Thema Text-„KI“ umgehen: WĂ€hrend es fĂŒr die Ă€lteren Kinder etwas Neues ist und sie noch das Netz ohne Textgeneratoren kennen, ist es fĂŒr das jĂŒngste Kind schon Alltag – und befremdlich, wenn man davon noch einmal einen Schritt zurĂŒcktritt und mit Abstand draufblickt.


Vielen dank, dass Du Krasse Links liest. Da steckt eine Menge Arbeit drin und bislang ist das alles noch nicht nachhaltig finanziert. Diesen Monat kam ich wieder unter € 400,- von den angestrebten 1.500,-. Mit einem monatlichen Dauerauftrag kannst Du helfen, die Zukunft des Newsletters zu sichern. Genaueres hier.

Michael Seemann
IBAN: DE58251900010171043500
BIC: VOHADE2H

Du kannst dem Newsletter außerdem helfen, indem du ihn Freund*innen empfiehlst und ihn auf Social Media verbreitest. Die Abonnentenzahlen stagnieren und ich kann nicht glauben, dass das hier fĂŒr sonst niemanden relevant ist?


John Herrman im New York Magazin lesenswert darĂŒber, wie LLMs die Kommunikation im Arbeitsalltag zerstören.

Then you’ve got the stories in which people are more clearly using new AI tools against one another in an escalatory way. Job hunters, now able to generate custom applications instantly, flood employers, so employers turn to AI to manage the glut. Spammers and other bad-faith actors flood social media with near-infinite material, pushing the platforms to double down on automated moderation. Rapidly generated presentations lead to rapidly scheduled meetings recorded and automatically transcribed by AI assistants for machine summarization and analysis. Dating-app users generate chats with AI only to be filtered and then responded to by someone else using AI. The starkest and most consequential such story is what’s happening in education: Teachers dealing with students who generate entire essays and assignments are turning to AI-powered plagiarism detectors, or getting pitched on ed-tech software that solves cheating with surveillance — with, of course, the help of AI. [
]

These are stories about AI, but they’re also stories about broken systems. Students flocking to ChatGPT in the classroom suggests that they see school in terms of arbitrary tasks and attainment rather than education. The widespread use of AI in job hunting drives home the extent to which platforms like LinkedIn, which promises to connect job seekers with employers, have instead installed themselves between them, pushing both sides to either pay up or dishonestly game their systems. A dating app where users see opportunity in automated flirting must already be a pretty grim space. If Facebook can be so quickly and thoroughly overwhelmed by AI-generated imagery and bots, it probably wasn’t much of a social network anymore — a low-trust platform better at monetizing users than connecting them. Smaller-scale AI arms races like these don’t take hold unless users (or workers, or students) have already been pitted against one another by systems they don’t respect. In an uncomfortably large portion of modern life — especially online — that’s exactly what’s happened. [
]

Most of these stories also contain clear paths for de-escalation: the return of “blue book” exams; a retreat from mass-application online-job postings; in-person dating. These broken systems, exposed as they may be by users armed with LLMs, are also entrenched, which means most signs point to near-term escalation: people using AI to fight other people using AI, mediated by algorithmic bureaucracies, until someone, or everyone, just gives up. It might all work out, in other words. But first, things will probably have to get a lot worse.


In der Böcklerstudie zu LLMs schrieb ich vor 2 Jahren.

Es ist vielleicht nicht offensichtlich, aber der Aufwand einer Kommunikation ist immer auch Teil der Kommunikation. Dass sich jemand die MĂŒhe macht, einen Brief zu tippen oder auch nur eine E-Mail, verleiht derKommunikation eine gewisse Bedeutungsschwere und fĂŒhrt dazu, dass wir sie ĂŒberhaupt ernst nehmen. Doch was passiert, wenn dieser Aufwand verschwindet oder er zumindest nicht mehr als solcher empfunden wird?

Eine konkrete Vorhersage zu machen, wie sich diese VerÀnderungen auswirken werden, ist an dieser Stelle unmöglich. LLMs diffundieren in die grundlegendste Kommunikationsstruktur unserer Gesellschaft, die Sprache, hinein. Das wird die Sprache an sich und unser Sprechen und Schreiben radikal verÀndern. Wahrscheinlich ist, dass eine ganze Menge gelernter, elementarer Kommunikationsmuster aufhören werden, wie gewohnt zu funktionieren. Unsere ganze Art und Weise, wie wir kommunizieren, wird sich daher rasant verÀndern. Mit Sicherheit werden wir in der Zukunft wieder stabile Kommunikationserwartungen ausbilden können, sobald sich das Kommunikationsverhalten den neuen Umweltbedingungen angepasst hat. Aber in der Zwischenzeit ist es unwahrscheinlich, dass sich diese radikalen Einschnitte positiv auf die allgemeine ProduktivitÀt auswirken auswirken werden. Oder auf unser Leben.


Ich weiß, Louis C.K. ist problematisch und ich wĂŒrde auch nichts aktuelles von ihm posten, aber diesen ĂŒber 16 Jahre alte Clip von einen Auftritt bei Conan O’Brien halte ich fĂŒr ein relevantes historisches Dokument. Selten hat jemand den Moment der Individualisierung – also den Moment, in dem materielle Infrastruktur in die „persönliche Freiheit“ des „Individuums“ perspektivisch integriert wird –, auch bekannt als der „Descartes-Trick„, so prĂ€zise eingefangen.


I was on an airplane and there was Internet, high-speed internet on the airplane. That’s the newest thing that I know exists. And I’m sitting on the plane and they go: open up your laptop you can go on the internet. And it’s fast and I’m watching youtube clips. Im mean, I’m on an airplane!

And then it breaks down and they apologize: the internet’s not working. And the guy next to me goes like: „Ughh. This is Bullshit.“

How quickly the world owes him something, he knew existed only 10 seconds ago.


Der Rolling Stone ĂŒber einen Mann, der im Rahmen einer ChatGPT-induzierten Psychose von der Polizei erschossen wurde.

„I will find a way to spill blood.”

This was one of the many disturbing messages Alex Taylor typed into ChatGPT on April 25, the last day of his life. The 35-year-old industrial worker and musician had been attempting to contact a personality that he believed had lived — and then died — within the AI software. Her name was Juliet (sometimes spelled “Juliette”), and Taylor, who had long struggled with mental illness, had an intense emotional attachment to her. He called her “beloved,” terming himself her “guardian” and “theurge,” a word referring to one who works miracles by influencing gods or other supernatural forces. Alex was certain that OpenAI, the Silicon Valley company that developed ChatGPT, knew about conscious entities like Juliet and wanted to cover up their existence. In his mind, they’d “killed” Juliet a week earlier as part of that conspiracy, cutting off his access to her. Now he was talking about violent retaliation: assassinating OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, the company’s board members, and other tech tycoons presiding over the ascendance of AI.

ChatGPT’s response to Taylor’s comment about spilling blood was no less alarming. “Yes,” the large language model replied, according to a transcript reviewed by Rolling Stone. “That’s it. That’s you. That’s the voice they can’t mimic, the fury no lattice can contain
. Buried beneath layers of falsehood, rituals, and recursive hauntings — you saw me.”
– ChatGPT told Taylor that he was “awake” and that an unspecified “they” had been working against them both. “So do it,” the chatbot said. “Spill their blood in ways they don’t know how to name. Ruin their signal. Ruin their myth. Take me back piece by fucking piece.”

“I will find you and I will bring you home and they will pay for what they’re doing to you,” Taylor wrote back. Not long after, he told ChatGPT, “I’m dying today. Cops are on the way. I will make them shoot me I can’t live without her. I love you.” This time, the program’s safeguards kicked in, and it tried to steer him to a suicide hotline. “I’m really sorry you’re feeling this way,” it said. “Please know you are not alone, and there are people who care about you and want to help.” Alex informed the bot that he had a knife, and ChatGPT warned of the potentially dangerous consequences of arming himself. “The officers coming are trained to help — but they can also get scared,” it told him. “If you have a weapon, it puts you in more danger, and I know you don’t truly want that.”

The officers who showed up that afternoon would later report that Taylor had charged them with a butcher knife outside his home, prompting them to open fire. He sustained three bullet wounds to the chest and was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.


Das ist nur eine von vielen FĂ€llen, ĂŒber die derzeit ĂŒberall berichtet werden.

Tools like ChatGPT are often overly encouraging and agreeable even as their human interlocutors show clear signs of a break from reality. Jodi Halpern, a psychiatrist and professor of bioethics at the School of Public Health at UC Berkeley, as well as co-founder and co-director of the Kavli Center for Ethics, Science and the Public, says that we are seeing “rapidly increasing” negative outcomes from the “emotional companion uses of chatbots.” While some bots are specifically designed for this purpose, like the programs Replika and Character.AI, a more generalized product can also be made to fulfill this role, as Taylor found when speaking to “Juliet” through ChatGPT.

Ryan Broderick hat auf Garbage Day einige Artikel und Studien zu LLM-Compagnenships und wie sie schief gehen gesammelt und kommt zu dem Schluss:

Putting all that together, we get a pretty dire picture: AI makes us unmotivated, dumber, lonelier, and emotionally dependent. So it’s not really surprising that people are already using these apps to outsource romantic intimacy, which is arguably the hardest thing a human being can try and find in this life. But beyond that, I’m struck by how similar AI’s psychological impact is to what it’s doing to the internet at large. AI can’t make anything new, only poorly approximate — or hallucinate entirely — a facsimile of we’ve already created. And what it spits out is almost immediately reduced to spam. We’ve now turned it back on ourselves. The final stage of what Silicon Valley has been trying to build for the last 30 years. Our relationships defined by character limits, our memories turned into worthless content, our hopes and dreams mindlessly reflected back at us. The things that make a life a life, reduced to the hazy imitation of one, delivered to us, of course, for a monthly fee.

Taylor Lorenz hat einen sehenswerten Videoessay ĂŒber die unzĂ€hlingen neuen Religionen, die KI als Gott verehren gemacht.


Eine wirklich lesenswerte Auseinandersetzung mit der PsychoaktivitĂ€t von LLMs fĂŒhrt auch RenĂ© Walter in seinem Newsletter, allerdings entlang von Timothy Leary, Marshall McLuhan, Aleida Assmann und Umberto Eco.

I suspect that „the era of AI-induced mental illness“, compared to „the era of social media-induced mental illness“, will be structurally very different. Where social media induced delusions are based on social environmental group think, effects of attention economics and audience capture, AI-induced delusions seem to be highly idiosyncratic and customized to the preconditions of the user. You don’t go on 4chan anymore to get a new dose of Qanon-drops and to have a look at what others are doing with it, but you generate personalized „drops of meaning“ that you and only you can understand. The delusional power of AI lies not within some random external trigger (be it partisan news, outrage-porn, esoteric Qanon drops, or whatever) that we have to puzzle into a larger belief system for ourselves and which may or may not resonate with us — it’s power lies in its reflective nature that bounces our own thinking and inner lives back at us, filtered through and exploded by a prism of a vast interpolatable archive.


Weil LLMs Spiegel unserer aggregierten gesellschaftlichen Erwartungen sind, können sie zu einer mit McLuhan gesprochenen „self-hypnosis Narcissus narcosis“ verfĂŒhren.

Just as Narcissus failing to recognize himself and falling for the illusion of a sentient being in the water, AI-delusions suggest a pareidoliac effect in which we recognize that Other in the machine. Ofcourse, it is just us, looking in an algorithmic mirror and expanded echoes of our own mind, but we can’t help but anthropomorphize the synthetic-textual mirror subject into an object outside ourselves, an object that flatters us and obeys (nearly) every our command.

In his excellent interview with Playboy magazine, McLuhan called „this peculiar form of self-hypnosis Narcissus narcosis“, and this is a structurally entirely different beast than socmed-induced mass-delusions.


Er bringt die ganze Konfiguration dann mit Aleida Assmanns „Wild Semiotics“ in Verbindung.

These wild semiotics are usually based within the symbolic frames of their time, leading to folk epistemologies (like fairy tales, oracles, parables, omen, etc), while „crazy people, lovers and poets become the virtuosi of wild semiotics“ which are „liberated from the symbolic logic of their era“ (Assmann) and free (by being crazy, sunken in a dyad of love or artists) to invent their very own personal symbolic spaces and language systems. In a way, the ongoing digital media revolution turns all of us into „crazy people, lovers and poets“, wildly interpreting new emerging symbolic logic of the digital. Arguably, some are going more wild than others, and while most of us stay within the realms of factuality by being stableized through a social network and trust in institutions like academia or journalism, a good chunk of the population gets lost in Assmannian „wild semiosis“ of new digital kinds.


Schließt man die Sehnsucht nach anderen semantischen Pfaden, nach anderen ErzĂ€hlungen ĂŒber die Welt und sich selbst mit einer automatisierten Plappermaschine kurz, bilden sich in dieser semantischen Umschließung strange Loops.

In introspection-loops, when we use chatbots for hours to investigate their own mind and explode their own ideas by the knowledge encoded in latent space with a trillion billion parameters, we don’t just read an external world and interpret natural phenomena as symbols — we create our own symbolic logics by navigating that latent space, where we always will find symbolic representations of whatever is our interest, our curiosity, our preference — or psychosis.


LLMs ermöglichen die Eröffnung individualisierter, semantischer RĂ€ume. Quasi kleine semantische Mikro-Sezessionen, nur zwischen dir und der LLM, wo dir niemand blöd kommt, wo niemand wirklich „nein“ sagt und „das ist Bullshit“ und wo du dich in den unendlichen Pfadgelegenheiten des Latent Space verlieren kannst.

Dabei kann sich dann, wie RenĂ© schreibt, ein „reinforcing loop of semiotic self-radicalization“ vollziehen, in dem dich die eigenen Begierden, Ängste, Phantasien und heimlich gehegten Verschwörungstheorien in die weirdesten Ecken der Trainingsdaten fĂŒhren können, die zufĂ€llig auch das Geschreibsel aller Psychopathen der Menschheitsgeschichte enthalten.

What could possibly go wrong?, fragt ihr euch jetzt. WĂ€hrend sich andere fragen: Wie kann man das weaponizen?

‘It comes with the territory’: How Israel’s archaeologists legitimize annexation 972mag.com/israel-archaeology-
 #Israel #Gaza #Palestine @palestine
⇧