Roman era mosaic panel with erotic theme that was stolen during World War II returns to Pompeii
https://apnews.com/article/italy-pompeii-artwork-find-stolen-wwii-germany-cefd48bbdef050d6f70b0b2065784c19?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypub
Posted into Entertainment @entertainment-AssociatedPress
fm2279
in reply to Michael Magras • • •I think the Dems are wise not to embrace the MGSC agenda wholesale.
To take just one example, revoking Constitutional Carry would end any chances of Dems winning outside of Portland and maybe a few pockets on the coast.
Michael Magras
in reply to fm2279 • • •fm2279
in reply to Michael Magras • • •"Gun reform legislation" is pretty vague.
If you're not talking about the given example, then it's hard for readers to have any idea at all what it is you want Daughtry (and Maine Dems) to do.
A lot of the bills that have come out of the offices of Southern Maine Dems have been pretty rightly panned by lots of folks, including the ACLU (e.g. the ill-conceived ten-round limit on semi-automatics).
Michael Magras
in reply to fm2279 • • •fm2279
in reply to Michael Magras • • •My understanding is that municipalities are empowered to regulate the discharge of firearms.
The municipality wherein I reside does so, as you say most do (that is consistent with my limited experience, too).
I'm sympathetic if you have neighbors who behave badly with firearms. But that sounds like a local issue, not necessarily a state one.
Michael Magras
in reply to fm2279 • • •fm2279
in reply to Michael Magras • • •Not saying bad neighbors doing bad things with guns in tight quarters isn't a problem.
Just feel like it's a local one.
I don't even know how you'd write a statewide statue that would help you without being far too broad.
Anthony
in reply to fm2279 • • •Michael Magras
in reply to Anthony • • •fm2279
in reply to Michael Magras • • •@abucci You haven't demonstrated there's a "statewide" problem.
You've described a local problem.
Anthony
in reply to fm2279 • • •@michaelmagras@mstdn.social
fm2279
in reply to Anthony • • •@abucci I think you're talking about how guns are dangerous as a very general concern, while I (and I thought we) were talking about a specific problem with discharge of firearms within a local jurisdiction that has the power to regulate it but doesn't.
Those aren't the same thing.
And I want to be friendly here because I've found our interactions to be pleasant in the past, but I'm not sure the way you've jumped in and out of the thread here is the gold standard for "rational".
fm2279
in reply to fm2279 • • •Anthony
in reply to fm2279 • • •Nobody has made this conflation.
I reacted to the statement that gun-related issues and laws in Maine are a local problem, which they very clearly are not. The specific one at hand, a person using a firearm in their yard, might be framed as a local/municipal problem if one were inclined to ignore the context in which it's occurring. But I am not so inclined. Furthermore, it's a perfectly reasonable and valid political act to petition your state to take action that your municipality will not, and force it to be a statewide issue that needs to be addressed (which it is, and has been, for some time). That's how politics works. I found your responses here--that it's "just a local problem"--to be needlessly dismissive of an important issue. I'd also like to keep things friendly, but I don't find dismissiveness like that to be very friendly.
@michaelmagras@mstdn.social