Challenge: Prove that an Epstein client list exists.
Over the last 4 years that I have been collecting and cataloging news and memes I have saved almost 60K images.
I read every charging document on Ghislaine Maxwell, and I saved every piece of evidence related to the case that I could find.
I have never seen proof that an "Epstein client list" even exists let alone that it would be trustworthy if it did.
Is there anyone that can prove it exists? I seriously doubt it.
Robert R. reshared this.
Caleb James DeLisle
in reply to Robert R. • • •I don't know what you mean by "client list" but this was entered into evidence and then redacted:
justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-ge…
Attorney General Pamela Bondi Releases First Phase of Declassified Epstein Files
www.justice.govRobert R.
in reply to Caleb James DeLisle • • •@cjd
Contact book is not a client list.
It's a phone directory. That's what was sealed in the Maxwell case to protect innocent people.
Being in Epstein's phone directory is not a crime, but if that phone book were released, it would destroy the lives of every person in it.
Caleb James DeLisle
in reply to Robert R. • • •If you're asking about a document that says: "Here are the people who I sold illegal sex from minors, signed J. Epstein", well, that probably does not exist, for obvious reason.
The real point is in his presidential campaign, Trump promised to do SOMETHING with the Epstein case, and now that he's president, nothing new has happened and he wants everyone to forget about it. Nobody has been indicted, no document has been disclosed.
So I'll accept that by your definition there's no list, but I think it's incumbent on you to prove that you're not wearing the Fell For It Again Award...
Robert R.
in reply to Caleb James DeLisle • • •@cjd
You Trump haters were always going to find a reason.
karnage
in reply to Robert R. • • •Robert R.
in reply to karnage • • •@karnage
That's pretty much what people are acting like they expect. lol
DeWalt
in reply to karnage • • •If I had to guess, there is most likely evidence of Money Laundering and Financial Crimes.
Not alot Sexual in nature.
Robert R.
in reply to DeWalt • • •@DeWalt @karnage
That's my guess too.
Aristocratic_Cthulhu
in reply to DeWalt • • •@DeWalt
Yeah, there has to be a ton of financial crime evidence in there. It's a typcial white collar crime and the people he surrounded himself with were all very affluent white collar workers.
@karnage @ILoveAmericaNews
Robert R.
in reply to Aristocratic_Cthulhu • • •@Aristocratic_Cthulhu @DeWalt @karnage
We have no idea what evidence still exists. My guess is Epstein was pretty good at covering his tracks.
DeWalt
in reply to Robert R. • • •He was hired by some very wealthy people for that very expertise.
Former Comrade (from Little Whinging, Fuckershire) KeepTakingTheSoma
in reply to Robert R. • • •boriquagato.substack.com/p/ass…
assessing epstein
el gato malo (bad cattitude)Robert R.
in reply to Former Comrade (from Little Whinging, Fuckershire) KeepTakingTheSoma • • •@KeepTakingTheSoma @Aristocratic_Cthulhu @DeWalt @karnage
It's mighty naive to think any damning evidence lasted through the Biden regime.
DeWalt
in reply to Robert R. • • •When the AG released the binders she was under the assumption that's what was held that wasn't under Seal of the Court.
A Whistle Blower came forward and stated the SDNY FBI was sitting on mountains of evidence.
Now, if that evidence was being held in other locations outside the SOP of DOJ Evidence and Archiving, then it stands to reason the Chain of Custody had been broken by unknown actors.
Former Comrade (from Little Whinging, Fuckershire) KeepTakingTheSoma
in reply to Robert R. • • •I now think that it is not possible to obtain any political power unless you have skeletons that can be held over you. It certainly explains why so many of our politicians think, act and talk in lockstep.
Robert R.
in reply to Former Comrade (from Little Whinging, Fuckershire) KeepTakingTheSoma • • •@KeepTakingTheSoma
That is the nature of government.
@Aristocratic_Cthulhu @DeWalt @karnage
Sir Winston Smith [NH] 🏴☠️
in reply to Robert R. • • •Robert R.
in reply to Sir Winston Smith [NH] 🏴☠️ • • •@thoughtcriminal
I am not sure any of that exists.
People are just assuming that the Trump administration is sitting on evidence of crimes against children, and I haven't seen any proof of that. Personally, I think all substantial evidence is long gone.
Joel [Minnesota]
in reply to Robert R. • • •Robert R.
in reply to Joel [Minnesota] • • •@fkq1q2r2
I am not sure any of it exists. If it ever did exist, it is long gone.