The people in Substack comments were wrong. If I copy text generated by an LLM, then I usually indicate it's something an LLM said. People in Substack comments are so stupid that they think if someone writes a post that is longer than 100 characters and that is not full of grammatical errors, then they must be an AI.

I noticed that McCairn had accidentally left in Markdown blod formatting in one of his Substack posts, which looked similar to one of Greg Harrison's AI-hallucinated documents (in the bottom image): sars2.net/clot2.html#Fibrillar….

Then McCairn replied: "You're looking at a summary, generated off the article, that some one who I trust to review the document said it needed, the LLM output was better and more concise than my attempt, which leans towards a more verbose style. Hence leaving the markdown in for transparency."

But his post didn't say anywhere that it was generated by AI. It would've been more transparent to just write that it was an AI summary instead of "leaving the Markdown in for transparency". McCairn later edited the post to remove the Markdown bold formatting, but he still didn't mention anywhere that it was an AI summary.

hahaha. Trusted source edits his LLM output. holy shit.

Mr. Worst-Case-Scenario McCoon is at it again with his amyloid apocalypse scenario... Just as suspected.

And McCairn was connected to Hirschman by Greg Harrison, whose team presented a laboratory analysis of the clots last year (even though I think their analysis was fake). Tom Haviland said that Harrison was the "lead scientist" of the team that was analyzing the clots, and that Greg asked Hirschman to send the clots to McCairn, and that Greg asked McCairn to look for prions in the clots: laurakasner.substack.com/p/a-h…. Greg tries to pass off AI-hallucinated nonsense like this as discoveries he made in secret Chinese and Soviet documents: x.com/Greg21143362/status/1888….

These are screenshots of his document titled "Chinese_Dialect_ORF_Maps_ALL-comparisons_9_1_25.doc", which says that the reason why the text in the images is garbled is because it's written in a secret bioweaponeer code, so that for example "Hetnody Ane Uadeeanchounsylnfrtn" is code for "Cytokine-Anchored Systemic Inflammation".

The same document also said that the calamari clots are made of amyloid fibrin produced by his mystery ORFs. For example it said: "ORF19 is heavily implicated in beta-sheet oligomer stacking, a hallmark of prion diseases and amyloid-like deposits."

The real ORF19 was the long reverse ORF in McKernan's Pfizer plasmid sequence. But Greg says that ORF19 is an ORF of the virus and not the vaccine, and that he discovered it in "research logs from 1999 to 2005".

Greg's co-conspirator Wayne Crouch wrote this about Greg's marine black ball theory: "just when i thought marine life would be spared what's the bet we disassemble these in the lab and we find o.r-f 8 o.r.f 11 o.r.f 19 o.r.f 29 signatures a biological asteroid is steadily approaching hmm": x.com/WayneC50256258/status/19….

Wayne Crouch is the "head reporter" at Australian National Review, which looks like an Aussie equivalent of Stew Peters Network. Last week Steve Kirsch flew to Australia to attend ANR's awards show, where he got the "Best Research on the COVID Fraud" award. Kirsch also promoted the Unholy Triad videos made by Wayne Crouch.

The people credited in An Unholy Triad include Matt Shelton and Gerry Brady, who were members of IIRT nanobot research team that was coordinated by the military intelligence agent Daniel Broudy. In 2022 Shelton toured alt media presenting microscope images which he claimed showed nanotechnology, graphene oxide, and microchip-like structures. Shelton said the images were taken by an anonymous team from New Zealand, but Suzanne Humphries now says they were her images.

The people credited in the videos also include Daniel Santiago, who is on the editorial board of IJVTPR along with the IIRT members Daniel Broudy and Shimon Yanowitz.

They also include Todd Callender, who claimed that calamari clots are 5G antennas, and John O'Looney, who said that vaccines contain graphene razor blades that resonate with 5G.

None of this surprises me at all. Just a bunch of liars, grifters, apparatchiks and bamboozled followers pushing assumption, lies, and bad science.

None of these stories are any more looney than the lab-leak Pandemic story itself and transfection as a "vaccine" for a coronavirus batshit crazytown.

The story of a lab able to create a molecule which then travels around the world causing a pandemic! Without the use of human experimentation--using humanized mice--they supposedly created something NOVEL and extra deadly! ORFs! Furry Cleavage Sites! HIV inserts! etc. etc.

The story you are telling is a parallel to the original story: A group of coordinated liars passing off assumption, lies and bad science as a doomsday scenario which must be solved by an intrepid mixed squad of amateurs and professionals on social media.

The Kevins and the Mouse army and the rest of the Twatter Medical Freedom celebs are just running the sequel to "Worse-Case-Scenario" lab-leak billions dead.

This time it is Amyloid Apocalypse extinction event. Prions! Just like a virus only WORSE!! Indestructible killer of the Neanderthals contagious to everything!

So ridiculous.

The punishment for the Kevins is that they have to keep up this ruse FOREVER.

If McCairn said that the worst-case scenario was that a billion people would die from COVID, it's off by less than two orders of magnitude from the real number of people who have died from COVID so far.

And he didn't even say it was the middle scenario but the worst-case scenario. If he had said that the best-case scenario was that half a million people would die, then the middle point of his two estimates on a log scale would be about 22 million people, which is close to the real number of people who have died so far.

If JC and Housatonic say almost no-one has died from COVID, then their estimate is further off from reality on a log scale than McCairn's worst-case scenario.

What is "Covid" to you?

Dr. Couey's position is that RNA cannot pandemic. This position is shared by Sucharit Bhakdi. If RNA cannot pandemic, what is covid?

Are you aware that all data from the early PCRs is null and void due to the non-specific nature of the early PCRs? Have you looked into the those tests? You have enough scientific literacy to understand what I am talking about.

An ohmie crunched all the research and it hasn't been published yet, so I don't expect you to know this (by the way he has the data to prove this). The PCR tests from 2020-2023 are total junk, only 2 of the 239 PCR tested SPECIFICALLY FOR the spook protein:

That means all the CDC numbers from 2020-2023 are trash, and that does not even account for the financial incentives of "positive" tests for both the hospitals, and the labs who produce the "results".

I think Bhakdi and Burkhardt were Füllmich-type plants in alt media. It would take too long to explain why.

I'm already done arguing with the no-virus and no-virus-lite people. I wasn't able to penetrate the thick skulls of Christine Massey or Eric Coppolino or USMortality or Jessica Hockett or Martin Neil, so I probably won't be able to get through to the Ohmies either.

If PCR tests are fake, then why do spikes in PCR positivity coincide with spikes in excess deaths? Did they ramp down the cycle threshold during months when they needed to create the impression of a fake COVID wave, and then ramped it back up again two months later?

If the spike in deaths in August to September 2021 was caused by opioids like Housatonic claims, then why did it coincide with a spike in PCR positivity rate?

Here you can see how the black line for all-cause mortality lags about two weeks behind the green line for PCR positivity:

I suspect that most of the media figures are plants. That doesn't mean everything they say is wrong, but if we are going to abandon all credentialism, I won't object.

It is up to you to prove there was a pandemic, and I just showed how the data from PCR tests circa 2020-2023 is disqualified for being non-specific.

I didn't say PCR is fake. I said the tests are not specific. Did you see the point I made about the 239 EUA authorized PCR tests? Only 2 had the specificity to discern "spike" protein.

I am going to lose patience with this conversation if you are going to erect strawmen.

How do you get a meaningful signal from non-specific tests?
That is not science. You cannot work backwards and say, "look spikes--these bogus tests explain it"

The Spike in deaths relate to the media announcements of NEW VARIENTS. This fear drove people to seek medical care, which was directly responsible for the deaths. I refer again to the list.

If the spike in deaths was caused by a media announcement of the Delta variant, then were people only afraid of Delta in Louisiana but not Connecticut?

Southern states also had a spike in deaths that occurred at home during the Delta wave:

Spike in deaths were NOT CAUSED by media anouncement. That is the second strawman. Spike in deaths are temporally proximal. If deaths are mostly old people, overdoses and iatrogenic death--as we are claiming at gigaohm , then media announcements correlates with surges in testing, and surges in hospital visits, and thus surges in iatrogenic death.

The reason for the variation in deaths is the difference in protocols / health care providers for each region.

Your own data of regional differences is proof against the theory of viral spread.

I am still open to some kind of poisoning or "seeding" but it seems unnecessary to the operation.

Is your theory that a lab leak produced a pandemic?

If COVID waves occur at the same time in all states, no-virus people say it's proof against viral spread because the virus couldn't have arrived everywhere at the same time. And if COVID waves don't occur at the same time in all states, no-virus people say it's proof against viral spread because the virus didn't spread everywhere at once.

Southern states had big spikes in deaths in August to September 2021 but northern states didn't. Are you saying it's because southern states adopted special protocols around August that they abandoned in October? People in southern and northern states followed similar media.

The spike in deaths that occured at home cannot be explained by hospital protocols.

Robert David Steele claims that he was the first person who started to say that the pandemic was fake: sars2.net/novirus.html#Robert_…. He also said that the virus was a hoax according to Taygetean ETs who were channeled by Polish people on YouTube: phibetaiota.net/2020/10/cosmic…. But he died of COVID in Florida during the Delta wave: phibetaiota.net/2021/08/robert….

I am not answering anymore of your questions until you answer mine.

Do you believe that a lab-leak is responsible for the pandemic?

Do you believe the transfection is a vaccine that protects from Covid?

I think it was a deliberate release and not a lab leak, and mRNA vaccines have saved millions of lives.

Are you now saying that the spike in deaths in August to September 2021 was caused by hospital protocols and not by opioids? Housatonic said that Jessica Rose and Pierre Kory should be jailed because they said the spike was not caused by opioids. He should now start to say that Zardoz should be jailed.

Do you believe the deliberate release happened in wuhan and then spread around the world? Or that it was a wisespread release with many release points? Your position is a quasi-species swarm was recapitulated from a single dangerous sequence?

How does a Transfection confer immunity To a coronavirus when traditional vaccines for colds were thought impossible and flu vaccines are not effective (see: Cochrane). By what mechanism does a Transfection by way of intramusuclar injection confer mucosal immunity, especially considering Coronavirus does not create viremia (See: Fauci 2022)?

Are you aware that 65% of respiratory infections have NO KNOWN pathogen (see: CDC EPIC 2015)? This means that they don’t understand the cause of the majority of respiratory infections. Are you aware that there was a Covid contagion study where scientists were UNABLE to infect the study group?

Neither Dr. Couey nor Mark have claimed that ONLY opioids or ONLY hospital protocols lead to the spikes in death, but point to both AND the expected rise in all cause mortality due to the large population of fragile Baby Boomers dying en mass.

Like I said, I am open to a multi-point poisoning event, but it seems unnecessary when, like in New York, there is just no proof that 20k people died At the start of the pandemic.

Boomers don't explain why millennials had a temporary spike in deaths in August to September 2021.

Jessica Rose said: "There's this surge of deaths in millennials, which are 25-to-44-year-olds - these are young people - 84% surplus in deaths in the fall of 2021. Which is completely unexplained. Nobody knows why. It's - according to what I've found - it's not due to drug overdoses and suicides and all of these other ways - [cut off]." [rumble.com/v58q2bx-jessica-ros…, time 0:12]

Then Housatonic said that Jessica Rose should be jailed: x.com/HousatonicLive/status/18…. To hell with the first amendment. It doesn't protect Canadians anyway, who should be jailed by America because America is the best.

If you are not ready to conclude that the spike in deaths was primarily due to drug overdoses, then you should also be sent to Kulacz's Gulag along with Rose and all the other subversives.

Jessica Rose, like Pierre Kory, denies opioid epidemic is leading cause of excess death in youth

^Rumble

Did you even watch the clip??

In that clip, Mark shows, using the NYT, that Drug overdose / Fentanyl deaths were already a huge and growing problem BEFORE the pandemic. If the supply of fentanyl on the street suddenly spiked, then so would the deaths.

Why assume Covid is killing a specific younger cohort?? That makes no sense? fentanyl is a much more reasonable explanation by any measure.

Where is Jessica and Pierre’s PROOF? She says she “looked into it”. What data is she basing her reasoning on?

It sounds like “trust me, bro.”

if they say it isn’t Fentanyl and they have no proof of this claim, then WHY are they making it?

Cover-up is a reasonable answer.

You would rather believe Pierre and Jessica and some unscientific mystery boogeyman virus that kills young people? Rather than depressed and scared kids and a flood of Fentany?

That is just dumb.

In each of your points, a gain-of-function virus developed in vitro with zero human testing is a LESS likely cause. I will go through them one by one in the hopes that I can cure you of your selection & confirmation biases.

1) Drug deaths are USUALLY stable and don't shoot up USUALLY. But what was UNUSUAL about 2020-2023? Oh yeah, A massive Media / Social 5th generation warfare and media driven fear reaction, hysteria. Why wouldnt there be a spike in overdoses considering the fear and the loss of jobs, business closings, etc? -- No need for a Virus to explain a spike in overdoses.

2) Spike of deaths happened in elderly people too! Yes! Elderly were treated terribly and scared. Much more vulnerable to Iatrogenic manslaughter. In some places, there seemed to be an active push to eliminate elderly, vulnerable populations. (See: Scottish Covid Inquiry). The financial incentive is well known and often talked about. No reason for me to think Scotland is unique in having dire plans for the elderly and infirm. ---- No need for a virus to explain a spike in deaths of elderly.

3) Hospitals were incentivized to mark COVID for excess death, especially those patients who were killed from protocols / malpractice which I have listed for you. How were those COVID patients tested? The non-specific PCR. ---No need for a real virus to exist to explain this when financial incentives work so much better.

4-6) Spike in death = Spike in positivity rate. YES! not because there is a virus, but because the more testing, the more the "positives"--the more cases of "Covid--which means more "healthcare" and more iatrogenic death. More positive tests means more FEAR and more ISOLATION. Everytime a new wave of fear, a new wave of death.

7) You assume a virus caused the uptick in death of younger people. But I have a more reasonable explanation. Deaths of Despair. Younger people in America are much poorer as a cohort than Boomer elderly generations. Young people are much more vulnerable to having their businesses, and careers destroyed by government response to pandemic than fixed income Boomers. Deaths of despair are going to hit young people much harder. Remember that 2020-2023 was the largest wealth tranfer of wealth in history. That money came from small businesses and went to corporations.

8-9) This ridiculous "proof" of a virus' existence" is only PROOF that unvaccinated people were TREATED terribly during this time by their communities, by the government, the media, the medical system (denied care for example). This poor treatment lead to a spike of deaths in this persecuted group!!! They were fired from their jobs and cast out of families and social groups for refusing to go along with the corporate / intelligence controlled media. Imagine the deaths of despair in this population! The sickening levels of stress!

Every one of your "proofs "of a virus is better explained by greed, lies, stupidy and lysenkoism.

1. You said there was something unusual about 2020-2023. But what was so unusual in particular about August to September 2021 that deaths in ages 25-44 increased by over 50% in some southern states? The deaths had gone back to normal by November 2021.

2. If the spike in deaths in elderly people was not because of opioids, then why should the spike in young people have to be because of opioids? The spike occurred at the same time in young and old people, and in states where old people were missing the spike, young people were also missing the spike.

3. If the spike in deaths is explained by COVID hospital protocols, then you don't need opioids to explain the spike.

7. Why would young people have been particularly desperate in August to September 2021, but not in July or November 2021?

If you think any cause other than opioids may have contributed to the spike in deaths, then you are a traitor to America, and you will be sent to Kulacz's Gulag where you can regret your thought crimes together with Rose and Kory.

1. Yes. Injections. There is going to be a variation "quality control" for such a massive rollout of injections. Easy to imagine spikes due to "bad batches" or whatever. I maintain the logical position that a great deal of early injections were placebos or "duds"-- the manufacturing / coldstorage infrastructure did not exist for the rollout. Perhaps the spikes were legitimate, functional mRNA transfections and the expected fallout from such an injection.

Furthermore, IM injection is a dangerous practice, which results in injuries and death. When done at scale, mishaps are bound to happen...There is evidence (as pointed out by @jjcouey and @Housatonic ) that this dangerous truth has been ignored.

2. Spike in elderly is easy to explain without a VIRUS. IATROGENICIDE. For example, The declaration of viral pandemic and the connected policy to withhold antibiotics for respritory infections means more death by pneumonia. The insistence on measuring O2 levels means more deaths by 02 and Vents.

Seems to me young people could be dying of opiods AND other deaths of despair (suicide, alchohol, Drunk driving, etc)....

AND at the same time elderly are being hit by iatrogenicide.

This explains the spike in BOTH populations without there being a never berfore seen novel VIRUS which travelled the world.

3. why was there variation in data? There are loads of simple explanations like the kind I have given here that DON'T involve the following mythology:

Due to humanized mouse models, without human trails, a Novel, lab-created molecule traveled around the world with uncharacteristic (for RNA) fidelity.

In August to September of 2021, young people didn't have a spike in deaths classified as drug deaths or as deaths from external causes. Almost all of the excess deaths were deaths where the underlying cause was listed as COVID.

If you claim the spike in COVID deaths is because deaths from external causes were misclassified as COVID deaths, then there would not only need to be much higher than normal number of deaths from external causes in August to September 2021, but there would also need to be a much higher than normal percent of deaths from external causes being misclassified as COVID deaths.

sounds very plausible That both excess death AND misreporting occurred simultaneously. Much more plausible than an RNA pandemic, for which there is no scientific or historical precedent, despite the mythology as presented by Hollywood.

”Covid” as determined by non-specific PCRs reported by institutions with a financial incentive To report death as “Covid”. This sounds not only possible, but is logical and reasonabl.

No need for a virus.

In the United States in the current millennium, there have been two times when deaths in ages 25-44 have increased by over 20% over a period of two months.

The first time in February to April 2020 was because of a combination of drug deaths, deaths from external causes, and COVID. But the second time between July and September 2021 was because of COVID (but drug deaths and deaths from external causes remained stable, and the spike didn't occur in states that didn't also have a spike in PCR positivity rate).

The total extra deaths during the spike in August to September 2021 weren't even very high compared to the overall excess deaths in 2020-2023, because there was a sustained increase in deaths that started in 2020 and that was largely driven by drug deaths, and by deaths indirectly caused by drugs.

So I don't know why you guys have to die on the hill that the spike in August to September 2021 has to also be because of drugs, or why Housatonic is willing to imprison people who say it's not drugs.