edit: I'm using Fedora Workstation 42!

I really like the ability to just search "sleep", "shutdown", "restart", etc. Switching between windows and opening search using either the super key or a three finger swipe up is super handy, on Windows the button opens the start menu (where the search is horrible) and a three finger swipe up can open app switcher, where you have to hold your three fingers to go to another app.

Using GNOME extensions to see power usage, CPU usage, memory usage, etc. is very useful. Weird that the "extension list" addon isn't a thing that's on by default. Feel like being able to see all your extensions is a really important part of having extensions. Being able to see the clock at the top took a bit getting used to but makes so much more sense than having it tucked in a corner. I also like the integrated calendar, much better than Window's version where you are unable to see any of your events, not even as a dot!

Using dnf and flatpak to install programs is very smooth and I like being able to update all my programs at once with just "sudo dnf update && flatpak update"! Being able to see the dependencies and progress bars and download speeds is really helpful too. I don't need to search for programs anymore because of a thing called "fuzzy search". It's like magic!

GNOME's UI looks much cleaner than Windows, everything is actually cohesive. It's not a mix of flat and glass and clear and ancient. It's all adwaita. (that's what you call it, right?)

Something weird was not having the minimise and maximise buttons. I had to enable those myself, which is a bit odd. Now that it is enabled it works fine.

I also really like being able to easily customise themes (everforest) and icons (Papirus!). And if GNOME is considered "not very customisable" in the linux world, KDE, Cinnamon, etc. must be even more customisable! I'm happy with GNOME though, so I probably won't switch DE anytime soon. Maybe when I get a new computer I could try out KDE.

App compatibility was no problem. All the apps I used before (thunderbird, obsidian, joplin, vscodium, godot, etc.) all have linux versions, and the ones that don't (like SumatraPDF and AIMP) have linux alternatives. Okular and Gapless has been working great!

There were very few issues, but there were some nonetheless. OBS Studio footage was very choppy as hardware decoding wasn't working, and I had to dig deep into forums to install drivers for my intel igpu. Now it works fine, so that's good! I also had an issue with a VPN app, but they support an app called "Clash Verge". They only note the Windows and Mac versions on their site, but clash verge has a linux app too, and it works quite well!

I don't play many games, mostly Minecraft and some retro titles. mGBA works fine on linux, and Minecraft java edition supports linux. I've also tried a bunch of linux games like SuperTuxKart and Xonotic and, considering they were made around a decade ago or so (I think) they were really fun! My other games ran fine with Steam installed, Proton and Wine makes them run fine!

I'll be sticking with the penguin as it's fun, playful, and is much cuter than both the window and the apple. 😁

Everyone talks about how evil browser fingerprinting is, and it is, but I don't get why people are only blaming the companies doing it and not putting equal blame on browsers for letting it happen.

Go to Am I Unique and look at the kind of data browsers let JavaScript access unconditionally with no user prompting. Here's a selection of ridiculous ones that pretty much no website needs:

• Your operating system (Isn't the whole damn point of the internet that it's platform independent?)
• Your CPU architecture (JS runs on the most virtual of virtual environments why the hell does it need to know what processor you have?)
• Your JS interpreter's version and build ID
• List of plugins you have installed
• List of extensions you have installed
• Your accelerometer and gyroscope (so any website can figure out what you're doing by analyzing how you move your phone, i.e. running vs walking vs driving vs standing still)
• Your magnetic field sensor AKA the phone's compass (so websites can figure out which direction you're facing)
• Your proximity sensor
• Your keyboard layout
• How your mouse moves every moment it's in the webpage window, including how far you scroll, what bit of text you hovered on or selected, both left and right clicks, etc.
• Everything you type on your keyboard when the window is active. You don't need to be typing into a text box or anything, you can set a general event listener for keystrokes like you can for the mouse.

If you're wondering how sensors are used to fingerprint you, I think it has to do with manufacturing imperfections that skew their readings in unique ways for each device, but websites could just as easily straight up record those sensors without you knowing. It's not a lot of data all things considered so you likely wouldn't notice.

Also, canvas and webGL rendering differences are each more than enough to 100% identify your browser instance. Not a bit of effort put into making their results more consistent I guess.

All of these are accessible to any website by default. Actually, there's not even a way to turn most of these off. WHY?! All of these are niche features that only a tiny fraction of websites need. Browser companies know that fingerprinting is a problem and have done nothing about it. Not even Firefox.

Why is the web, where you're by far the most likely to execute malicious code, not built on zero trust policies? Let me allow the functionality I need on a per site basis.

Fuck everything about modern websites.

The concrete pumping equipment market presents investors with a critical dichotomy—stationary concrete pump offering relentless performance versus portable units delivering unmatched flexibility. This decision carries significant financial implications, with equipment choices directly influencing project win rates, operational efficiency, and ultimately, return on investment. Understanding the nuanced advantages of each system requires examining three pivotal dimensions: operational scope, financial architecture, and market adaptability.

Capital Efficiency and Depreciation Dynamics

Upfront Investment vs. Lifetime Value Proposition

Stationary concrete pumps command 25-40% higher initial capital outlay than their portable counterparts, yet their engineered longevity (typically 12-15 years versus 8-10 for portables) alters the depreciation calculus. High-pressure stationary models achieve 15,000+ operating hours before major overhaul compared to 8,000-10,000 hours for mobile units, translating to lower hourly capital costs despite higher purchase prices.

Portable concrete pumps reveal their financial advantage in utilization rates. Their ability to service multiple projects within a single day creates asset turnover ratios 2-3 times higher than stationary units. This mobility premium justifies their accelerated depreciation schedules, particularly for contractors operating in dense urban markets where equipment relocation occurs daily.

Operational Dominance in Specific Applications

Mega-Projects Demand Stationary Muscle

When concrete volumes exceed 500 cubic meters daily, stationary pumps demonstrate indisputable superiority. Their continuous pumping capability (achieving 200m³/h versus 120m³/h for portables) and industrial-grade hydraulics maintain pressure consistency across marathon pours. High-rise construction particularly benefits from stationary pump placement—strategically positioned base machines can service multiple tower sections without repositioning.

Portable units shine in geographically distributed work portfolios. Their rapid deployment capability (setup within 45 minutes versus 4+ hours for stationary systems) makes them ideal for infrastructure projects with multiple pour locations. The latest trailer-mounted models now incorporate self-leveling outriggers and remote-controlled boom articulation, enabling precise placement in constrained sites where stationary pumps cannot physically access.

Market Risk Mitigation Strategies

Adapting to Construction Sector Volatility

Stationary pump investments thrive in stable, vertical construction-heavy markets where consistent high-volume demand exists. Their economic viability depends on maintaining 70%+ utilization rates, making them vulnerable to market downturns. However, their specialization commands 15-20% pricing premiums for technical projects requiring extreme reach or pressure.

Portable pumps function as market volatility hedges, with their diversified application across residential, commercial, and civil sectors. Their resale markets remain remarkably liquid—late-model used [)mobile concrete pumps](aimixconcretesolution.com/conc… retain 60-70% residual value after three years compared to 40-50% for stationary units. This secondary market strength reduces financial risk during industry contractions.

The investment decision ultimately hinges on market positioning. Stationary pumps deliver superior returns in specialized, high-volume niches but demand operational scale to justify their fixed costs. Portable models offer lower-risk entry points with flexible upside, particularly for contractors requiring equipment versatility. Astute investors often build mixed fleets, allocating 70-80% to portable units for base revenue generation while reserving stationary assets for premium projects that maximize their technical advantages.