Meanwhile, back in Gaza:
“A Number of displaced Palestinians were killed and others were injured, including children, in the bombing of a tent in the Nusairat refugee camp, central Gaza.
شـ..ـهداء و مصـ..ـباون في استهداف خيمة في مخيم النصيرات وسط القطاع.“
via Eye On Palestine on Telegram
#Press #Israel #US #UK #Iran #War #Attack #Natanz #Isfahan #Fordow #Gaza #Nuseirat #Camp #IDF #Tent #Bombing
Eye On Palestine
A Number of displaced Palestinians were killed and others were injured, including children, in the bombing of a tent in the Nusairat refugee camp, central Gaza. شـ..ـهداء و مصـ..ـباون في استهداف خيمة في مخيم النصيرات وسط القطاع.Telegram
kepix
in reply to Aatube • • •if i could, noone would ever had to open a console or a terminal or cmd ever again. even the poweruser windows experience is a nightmare, i cant imagine how shit linux can be for someone with a disability. big respect to the writer.
minoscopede
in reply to kepix • • •Nalivai
in reply to kepix • • •squaresinger
in reply to Aatube • • •Not surprised that OOP knows better what users need than the users. That's pretty much the whole concept of "opinionated" GNOME.
GNOME isn't even accessible to non-disabled users.
AHemlocksLie
in reply to squaresinger • • •I don't think they're saying they know better. Seems more like they're tired of pouring hundreds of hours of free labor specifically into accessibility only to hear people bitch about how they're not doing enough when the people bitching probably don't even genuinely care beyond using it as a way to bash GNOME.
To which your response is to take the opportunity to talk shit about GNOME and disregard his meaning, which kinda illustrates his point.
Nalivai
in reply to AHemlocksLie • • •bastion
in reply to Nalivai • • •Nalivai
in reply to bastion • • •Aatube
in reply to Nalivai • • •Nalivai
in reply to Aatube • • •Aatube
in reply to Nalivai • • •Linux reshared this.
Nalivai
in reply to Aatube • • •I'm saying that GNOME sucks balls right now, and the nobody can't just say "but the developers are working really hard", or "a bunch of people actually use it" and make it all suddenly go away. I'm not going to repeat all the specific points on why exactly it sucks, it's not what the discussion is about, it's not what my comment is about, and it's not the what only available criticism is.
Aatube
in reply to Nalivai • • •That's not what anyone's saying either. AHemlocksLie said the article—instead of saying "we know better what the users want"—expresses frustration at caring and working a ton at (blind) accessibility only for people to say GNOME devs don't care about (blind) accessibility; nowhere did they say that makes GNOME accessibility good. In the context of us understanding what AHemlocksLie said, I think it's not aberating that we interpreted your reply the way we did.
squaresinger said what you think you said in their last reply. Look at the positive response to them.
Nalivai
in reply to Aatube • • •And my point is, you only get recognition if you succeed. You do get mangled star with "you tried" misspelled on it if you didn't, of course, but also you get harsh comments like mine.