Welcome to Friendica.Eskimo.Com

Home of Censorship Free Hosting

 Eskimo North Linux Shells, E-mail, Virtual Machines, Web Hosting.

E-mail, Web Hosting, Linux Shell Accounts terminal or full remote desktops.

Sign Up For A Free Trial Here

Please tell your friends about federated social media site that speaks several fediverse protocols thus serving as a hub uniting them, hubzilla.eskimo.com, also check out friendica.eskimo.com, federated macroblogging social media site, mastodon.eskimo.com a federated microblogging site, and yacy.eskimo.com an uncensored federated search engine. All Free!
in reply to Polly Kraisus

mastodon - Link to source

Polly Kraisus

My claim to fame after 9 years on Masto: screenshotting a YouTube comment.
But it makes perfect sense given that it touches (1) hating on destructive tech industry projects, (2) planting trees and (3) birbs.
in reply to Polly Kraisus

friendica - Link to source

DFX4509B (Joshua Mason)

You think Big Tech's gonna care? They got the money to pay off the fines if they develop there anyways. Money is why Big Autos can skirt pollution laws and get off with a slap on the wrist while if small tuning shops try it, they're fined out of business (Christ, our legal system ain't fair in the slightest). What's stopping the same logic from being used by Big Tech?

Plus, Big Tech can just pay to get protections removed or weakened as others on this thread have said.

Shit, you know how speech opposing AI datacenters is protected by the First Amendment? Big Tech could pay to get those protections weakened or stripped too.

This entry was edited (Sunday, June 7, 2026, 5:58 AM)
in reply to Polly Kraisus

mastodon - Link to source

gnarf

There's a great german book on the topic: "Wie man illegal einen Wald pflanzt" (how to illegally grow a forest). In a lot of jurisdictions certain trees and greenery are protected, so you can take back disused properties by throwing "seed bombs" and waiting a few years.
in reply to Heath Borders

mastodon - Link to source

Polly Kraisus

@heathborders as if that would be the justification they'd wait for. I think you're leaning into a classic reversal of responsibility in environmental destruction: saying that the only reason a legal protection was scrapped was because of irresponsible activists.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.

⇧