P.O. Box 55816
Shoreline, Washington, USA
-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----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-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
2025-07-06T23:54:02+00:00
- About:
- Owner of Eskimo North
- Uid
-
a0ad54dd-145f-4619-8f11-4b0986938499
- Nickname
-
nanook
- Full_name
-
Nanook
- Searchable
-
true
- First_name
-
Nanook
- Family_name
-
- Url
-
https://friendica.eskimo.com/
- Photo
-
- Photo_medium
-
- Photo_small
-
Umbra Catti
in reply to Nanook • • •the "vaccines" to lower the probability of one's getting the "syndrome"? But the statistics -- as presented -- tell us little about it.
To investigate the correlation of, say, being vaccinated and getting
the syndrome, one should consider the incidence of the vaccinated
in the whole population and then among those with the syndrome.
If the first incidence is greater, then the vaccine would seem
to decrease the probability of getting the syndrome; if the second
incidence is greater, then the vaccine would seem to increase
the probability of getting the syndrome. 80% is approximately
the incidence of the vaccinated in the whole UK population; so
for the deaths the statistics seem to show no clear correlation.
The significantly lower 60% for the hospitalisations may be
presented to mean that (1) the vaccinated are less readily
admitted to hospitals as COVID patients or (2) the unvaccinated
are less likely to die once they get the syndrome than
the vaccinated or something else yet. Anyway, an admission
is probably classified as COVID or something else according
to the result of one of the not very relevant tests rather than
according to the presence or absence of symptoms possibly
caused by many different corona and even non-corona viruses.
Nanook
in reply to Umbra Catti • •link.springer.com/content/pdf/…
Umbra Catti
in reply to Nanook • • •The Exposé page. The "vaccines" do not protect one
from the viruses. Nor have they been shown to make
one more susceptible to the viruses. The question
remains open if the vaccines help the viruses spread.
If this year's seasonal flu surge turns out greater
than the last year's, then the vaccines would be
a prime suspect. One is also tempted to attach
significance to the fact that the study has been
reported in the European Journal of Epidemiology.
Maybe the end of Act II is already in sight
( diasporing.ch/posts/8c13a700ec… ).
What Is the Reason for the Organized Massive Deception to Hide the ...
diaspora* social networkNanook
in reply to Umbra Catti • •