Ubuntu is swapping its time sync tool for a Rust-based version - OMG! Ubuntu
Licence is MIT / Apache, of course.
EDIT: of course the relicensing is the problem here. Alas we're in an all-time low interest in Free and Open Source politics, ideologies, and organization so the Big Evil Corpos continue to do their thing, one cog per time.
Ubuntu is swapping its time sync tool for a Rust-based version - OMG! Ubuntu
Canonical wants ntpd-rs, a Rust rewrite of NTP (Network Time Protocol), to become Ubuntu's default time sync client. To help get there, Canonical hasJoey Sneddon (OMG! Ubuntu)
This entry was edited (yesterday, 1:24 PM)
like this


molten_boron
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •Helix 🧬
in reply to molten_boron • • •I also wondered why this is a big news. Usually those tools are tried and tested over years of development and only run once a day or boot or even less. Don't know if it has that much of an impact.
It's cool and all, kudos to the devs, but idk why it's posted here and an article is written about it.
huey_m
in reply to Helix 🧬 • • •I feel like there's a lot of concern about more and more free software moving over to the MIT license.
I honestly don't know the ins and outs, but it's probably relevant to people concerned about it.
jcr
in reply to huey_m • • •InFerNo
in reply to huey_m • • •huey_m
in reply to InFerNo • • •verdare
in reply to InFerNo • • •Nanook
in reply to InFerNo • •wewbull
in reply to Helix 🧬 • • •Tixo
in reply to wewbull • • •verdare
in reply to wewbull • • •wewbull
in reply to verdare • • •No, they're in Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
LTS! The stablest of the stable releases.
atzanteol
in reply to Helix 🧬 • • •You think this is "big" news? An Ubuntu focused blog reporting on what Ubuntu is doing is not exactly the big time.
sudoer777
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •Nanook
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • •SayCyberOnceMore
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •SavvyWolf
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •The latest version of NTP is 15 years old, and implementations are expected to be compliant. There is no risk of embrace/extend/extinguish from licensing here.
Open standards are better than copy-left licenses, IMO.
SocialistVibes01
in reply to SavvyWolf • • •vala
in reply to SavvyWolf • • •99.999% sure the idea here is exactly that. They want a GPL free system.
☂️-
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •signofzeta
in reply to SocialistVibes01 • • •systemd-timesyncd. It seems like something they’d like based on the prefix.