Sunday Energy Post coming soon, but in the mean time, a mini-post related to energy:

As nuclear fusion seems to finally be coming close to reality, it's becoming more and more apparent this whole thing is bit of a Booby Prize.

Fusion was originally touted as the key to Infinite Clean Energy, but all of it's supposed advantages have qualifications that make it really not that good at all.

1. "Fusion is done with abundant hydrogen" - No, it's done with deuterium and tritium, which are isotopes of hydrogen and are actually pretty rare. Deuterium isn't rare enough to be a real supply constraint, but tritium is. Ironically the best way to make tritium is in a (classical) fission reactor...

2. "Fusion doesn't make nuclear waste" - Hahaha, maybe not in the fundamental reaction itself, but what do you suppose happens when that neutron flies off and slams into part of the reactor? A lot of what's generally called "radioactive waste" is not actually spent fuel, but rather normal things that have been exposed to enough radiation that they are now considered radioactive.

3. "Fusion will be easier" - Noooooo. In a classical nuclear plant, you bring fuel close to other fuel and they spontaneously begin exchanging neutrons and doing fission. In a fusion reactor, you use electricity to make plasma and then you heat and confine it to temperatures and pressures that are unseen on earth outside of a nuclear bomb, and only THEN does fusion begin to occur.

So the conclusion is that while fusion is an interesting thing to be able to do, trying to extract energy from it is really kind of a pointless exercise. And table-top fusion has been possible since the 1960s when Philo Farnsworth (the farm boy who invented the CRT television tube) figured out how to do it in a (near) vacuum.

There are youtubers who build and run Farnsworth Fusors and are able to get meaningful amounts of neutron radiation off of them.

But I would argue that if half the effort that has gone into self-sustaining fusion had instead gone into molten salt reactors, we would have actually gotten the more-or-less infinite energy that we were promised.

in reply to Caleb James DeLisle
@Caleb James DeLisle Deuterium is about 1-in-2000 hydrogen atoms in the ocean and there are a shitload of hydrogen atoms in the ocean so not at all rare. Tritium can be bread by using lithium blankets, so again not really a major issue.
in reply to Jolly Rancher
@Jolly Rancher @Caleb James DeLisle Yes but you know what it decays into? He3, a helium isotope possibly usable for neutron free fusion and that we'd otherwise have to mine the moon for. And as for the danger of that short half-life, tritium emits only very low energy beta particles (electrons) that are stopped by paper or skin. Only a threat inside the body, and there it's excreted within ten days so not all that dangerous.
in reply to Caleb James DeLisle
@Caleb James DeLisle The issue is not immediate, we have enough known thorium reserves to last 10k years or so. But we have enough deuterium and lithium to last 500 million, but if I were to bet, the odds of us destroying ourselves in a war before thorium runs out are high.
That said, we fight over resources, with adequate energy reserves we can create a truly circular economy and most resource issues vanish.
in reply to Caleb James DeLisle
Geothermal is mid.
Unobtanium drill bits will make it still mid, but available in more places.
Carnot Limit caps efficiency in single figure percentages.
And then you have the frictional losses of pumping your working fluid many kilometers in both directions whilst hoping your pressure doesn't fluctuate and crystalize scale on everything.
sCO2 is less mid than H2O, but only safe where you can keep it dry. So, not on Earth lol
in reply to Caleb James DeLisle
@Caleb James DeLisle Trouble with H-Boron fusion is temperatures, it requires about a billion degrees, D+He3 fusion only requires about 200 million so is a more achievable aneutronic, but He3 is rare on Earth, present in Lunar regolith or achievable by breeding tritium in lithium in a neutronic environment and letting it decay. It's present as a waste product in Candu reactors.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.