in reply to Nanook

If we spend $50 trillion to become carbon neutral in the U.S. by 2050, you’re the Deputy Secretary of Energy, give me your estimate of how much that is going to reduce world temperatures.”


A legitimate question. Tying money to climate change is a con. Reducing pollution, like the giant oceanic garbage patches is one thing, and doable with the effort of money. The temperature of the earth is not.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.