Can someone explain this to me.
Webpage asks to confirm my id via either text, email or pssword. I enter my password, then have to confirm via a code sent to my email. Why fucking bother having a GD password if you're just going to use the email anyway?
Of course this is also a company that gives you the option to accept or reject cookies on every page, everytime to visit their site. Must be some elementary school running things


BillyBon3s
in reply to Smeetoo • • •I was denied an online purchase because I didn't play "gimmie all your data" ball.
Smeetoo
in reply to BillyBon3s • • •@billybon3s
The biggest scam is the Passkey.
Make sure that everything is sync with the cloud in case your device gets stolen, breaks, or gets lost.
Nanook
in reply to Smeetoo • •Smeetoo
in reply to Nanook • • •What the fuck do I have a password for if your going to send an email anyway, might as well just use email from the start.
↯ Klaatu - Some Brave Apollo ↯
in reply to Smeetoo • • •@nanook yeah but the email and/or sms msg to phone option is to give you a 6 digit code that expires in 10 minutes to confirm your login with.
Given that an email can easily be hijacked and an SMS slightly less easy, plus baddies need to know the association to your login, adding a 10 minute window of opportunity to it all helps reduce some of your attack exposure. Lame but there it is. PassKey looks like public key shit to be exploited later once it gets seriously baddie studied.
Nanook
in reply to ↯ Klaatu - Some Brave Apollo ↯ • •Sir Ryan Bemrose
in reply to Nanook • • •@nanook @klaatu And not everyone has a yubikey either, dude.
What I want to know is what was being "secured" with this circus of steps.
In my experience, it's usually it's a forum login or some "account" that a website like github or discord or twitter that requires YOU to be 100% cryptographically secure before you're allowed to download an image or open-source plugin or something, while they're having data breaches every five minutes because Silicon Valley doesn't play by their own rules.
I want high security on my bank account. I don't need 2FA yubikey SMS pain-in-the-ass credential fuckery on the vast majority of "accounts" that every damn website in existence wants a person to create just because they want to enable ad tracking.
Nanook
in reply to Sir Ryan Bemrose • •Sir Ryan Bemrose
in reply to Nanook • • •@nanook @klaatu Obviously, the independent or 3rd-party solutions aren't attractive to the big platform vendors like Apple or Microsoft, who push hard for 2FA as a transparent lock-in ploy.
Their marketing says "no passwords", but their implementation is that most of the bits of the password is stored in a device that they control, meaning you lose all of your access if you ever try to switch platforms.
Yubikey is the same thing, but at least you control the device.
Nanook
in reply to Smeetoo • •Sir Endeavour
in reply to Smeetoo • • •