39 years ago- Saturday 26 April 1986: The Chernobyl nuclear disaster
peaceandhealthblog.com/2025/04…
“The price of the Chernobyl catastrophe was overwhelming, not only in human terms, but also economically. Even today, the legacy of Chernobyl affects the economies of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus.” - Mikhail Gorbachev
He wrote: “Chernobyl opened my eyes like nothing else: it showed the horrible consequences of nuclear power even when it is used for non-military purposes.” -- Mikhail Gorbachev
"On 26 April 39 years ago, the worst nuclear accident so far exploded in Reactor 4 at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. It was a Soviet-made RMBK, high-power channel reactor design that could produce plutonium for nuclear bombs as easily as it could produce electricity.
A major reason for the disaster was that those in Moscow who decided to re-purpose reactors originally designed to produce materials for nuclear weapons to produce electricity kept secret a good deal about the inherent design dangers and instability of the reactors even from the reactor operators (including its “positive void co-efficient of reactivity”). The operators with pressure to fill production quotas cut corners.
In the reactor, 1,661 zirconium pressure tubes contained fuel rods and cooling water within 1,700 tonnes of graphite and a complex system of control rods, without heavy engineered containment. The design was 20 years old, but the plant had only been operating for three years.
An experiment was conducted to determine how much electricity could be generated by the freewheeling turbine to which supply of steam from the reactor had been cut. The experiment was delayed by 12 hours but continued in the wee morning hours despite failure to reset the automatic control system.
Multiple safety rules were deliberately violated. Reactor power was lowered to prohibited levels before attempts were made to insert shutdown control rods into the reactor core. Because of an inherent flaw in the reactor design, this did not lead to powering down, but to a rapid explosive burst. Nuclear criticality increased rapidly in some fuel elements, leading to their explosive disintegration, generation of vast quantities of steam and a hydrogen explosion. Chunks of highly radioactive molten fuel were blasted 7 – 9 km into the air, much of it into the stratosphere. A burning plume extended 500 m high. The two explosions and graphite fire over the next 10 days ejected about one third of the 190 tonnes of fuel inside the reactor and radioactive material continue to be emitted for a month.
The World Health Organisation observed that the Chernobyl disaster released 200 times as much total radioactivity as the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs.
Early fallout more than 1,500 km away was first detected the following day when unusually high levels of radiation were measured when a nuclear power plant worker in Sweden was checking out of work. For a day and a half, nobody understood the full extent of the disaster. Initial attempts to put the fire out with water only worsened the situation. Evacuation of nearby residents was only implemented after 34 hours.
Nuclear reactors may produce useful electricity for a brief few decades, but their enduring products are uniquely hazardous radiation and high-level radioactive waste which persist over geological time frames.
Thirty nine years is a little over one half-life of caesium 137, so the cesium-137 in fallout across the world will by now have decayed by a little over half. The plutonium 239 released, however, with a half-life of 24,400 years, will have only decayed by one seventh of 1% by now. It will take a quarter of a million years for it to substantially decay away.
The misguided arrogant and dangerous hubris and vested interests that brought us the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters, and at least 11 other core melt accidents in different nuclear reactors, now brings us the willful madness of the alternative parties of Australian government’s plan for nuclear reactors proliferated around our wide, sunny and windy land. If we don’t act on evidence and learn from the past, we will be doomed to repeat it."
Archived:
archive.ph/8t2Ka
RESOURCES:
Part 1 The Chernobyl Disaster Explained 1986 | A Brief History of Documentary
youtu.be/IkBJU8BbrUs
The RBMK reactor type had an extremely positive void coefficient, which means that without careful proper oversight, the reactor can rapidly become unsafe.
The economic and political significance of Russia's RBMK reactors
dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/1…
#ChernobylDisaster #NoNukes #RBMKReactors #NoWar #AntiMilitarism #MilitaryIndustrialComplex #NoNukes #disarmament #nuclearban #Green #Progressive #RadicalFeminism #Solidarity
The Chernobyl nuclear disaster 39 years on
“Thorough studies conducted in the Soviet Union have proved completely nuclear power plants do not affect the health of the population.”Lev Feoktistov, deputy director of the Kurchatov …IPPNW peace and health blog
vic
in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ • • •> the horrible consequences of nuclear power
Well, the horrible consequences of getting it wrong. Nuclear power itself is a wonderful thing, far cleaner and more reliable than any other form, provided it's run competently.
AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ
in reply to vic • • •Nanook
in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ • •AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ
in reply to Nanook • • •@nanookThat's bullshit.
There's nothing more deadly (and costly) than nukes.
All Nuclear Reactors Leak All Of The Time.
They’ve been hacked, infested with vermin, power black outs, hundreds of accidents that the public never hears about ...
When the Chernobyl elephant foot sinks into ground water, they’ll be an explosion.
Radioactive spills happen all the time and the media overs most of it up
nrc.gov/docs/ML1723/ML17236A51…
Revealed: Sellafield nuclear site has leak that could pose risk to public
theguardian.com/business/2023/…
All nuclear power plants in Spain stopped due to blackout — Energoatom
eadaily.com/en/news/2025/04/28…
A nuclear power plant leaked contaminated water in Minnesota. Here's what we know
npr.org/2023/03/19/1164588882/…
cbsnews.com/news/radioactive-l…
Radioactive spill reported in Northeast Ohio nuclear power plant
msn.com/en-us/news/us/radioact…
Revealed: Sellafield nuclear site has leak that could pose risk to public
Anna Isaac (The Guardian)Nanook
in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ • •AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ
in reply to Nanook • • •Do thy pay you by engagement?
Nanook
in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ • •Jolly Rancher
in reply to Nanook • • •Those molten salt designs always lose me at "a sparge of fluorine" ...
Fluorine lowers the melting point of those salt mixtures, but it reacts with every other element in existence (except maybe helium and neon). You do not want the melting point of that Inconel or Hasteloy to be lowered.
Jolly Rancher
in reply to Jolly Rancher • • •Nanook
in reply to Jolly Rancher • •AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ
in reply to Nanook • • •Nanook
in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ • •AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ
in reply to Nanook • • •Nanook
in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ • — (Shoreline, WA, USA) •Jolly Rancher
in reply to Nanook • • •Regardless of whether you eat bananas or not, you and I and everyone have naturally radioactive potassium in us all the time.
Long half-life, so not many atoms are decaying in any one second, but the energy of each decay is awesome. Powerful enough to make positrons.
Antimatter is in your body, right now!
In the wake of Fukushima, it was amusing to see all the twitter users posting the readings on their radiation survey meters. Fukushima genuinely polluted the entire Pacific Ocean, but unless you were sampling it along the coast of Japan, you needed some sophisticated lab equipment to sort through all the NR and find a decay from some fission product..
Nanook
in reply to Jolly Rancher • •Nanook
in reply to Jolly Rancher • •Jolly Rancher
Unknown parent • • •> molten salt is FAR better.
... so long as you can get away with pumping fluorides thru white hot metal plumbing. There are some problems with them that have never been addressed.
Water moderated reactors are the way to go. The ones that power our navy are some of the most uninteresting machines ever built. Just sitting there making power.
Windscale and Hanford were cold war efforts to breed plutonium for weapons. I understand the Soviets made some messes too back then. Running right at the edge of insanity to get that Pu239. Molten sodium cooling is another neat idea that never caught on. ..
And Chernobyl was graphite moderated. Much less stable than water. The techs were playing around that night, deviating from the operation manual. And TMI here melted down when they disabled an annoying alarm signal instead of shutting down... It's a good idea to follow directions with those things.
Jolly Rancher
Unknown parent • • •vic
in reply to Jolly Rancher • • •Jolly Rancher
Unknown parent • • •> complexity of a pressure vessel
Not all that complex. You just need to swap it out every 30 or 40 years, before it gets too brittle.