39 years ago- Saturday 26 April 1986: The Chernobyl nuclear disaster
peaceandhealthblog.com/2025/04…

“The price of the Chernobyl catastrophe was overwhelming, not only in human terms, but also economically. Even today, the legacy of Chernobyl affects the economies of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus.” - Mikhail Gorbachev

He wrote: “Chernobyl opened my eyes like nothing else: it showed the horrible consequences of nuclear power even when it is used for non-military purposes.” -- Mikhail Gorbachev

"On 26 April 39 years ago, the worst nuclear accident so far exploded in Reactor 4 at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. It was a Soviet-made RMBK, high-power channel reactor design that could produce plutonium for nuclear bombs as easily as it could produce electricity.

A major reason for the disaster was that those in Moscow who decided to re-purpose reactors originally designed to produce materials for nuclear weapons to produce electricity kept secret a good deal about the inherent design dangers and instability of the reactors even from the reactor operators (including its “positive void co-efficient of reactivity”). The operators with pressure to fill production quotas cut corners.

In the reactor, 1,661 zirconium pressure tubes contained fuel rods and cooling water within 1,700 tonnes of graphite and a complex system of control rods, without heavy engineered containment. The design was 20 years old, but the plant had only been operating for three years.

An experiment was conducted to determine how much electricity could be generated by the freewheeling turbine to which supply of steam from the reactor had been cut. The experiment was delayed by 12 hours but continued in the wee morning hours despite failure to reset the automatic control system.

Multiple safety rules were deliberately violated. Reactor power was lowered to prohibited levels before attempts were made to insert shutdown control rods into the reactor core. Because of an inherent flaw in the reactor design, this did not lead to powering down, but to a rapid explosive burst. Nuclear criticality increased rapidly in some fuel elements, leading to their explosive disintegration, generation of vast quantities of steam and a hydrogen explosion. Chunks of highly radioactive molten fuel were blasted 7 – 9 km into the air, much of it into the stratosphere. A burning plume extended 500 m high. The two explosions and graphite fire over the next 10 days ejected about one third of the 190 tonnes of fuel inside the reactor and radioactive material continue to be emitted for a month.

The World Health Organisation observed that the Chernobyl disaster released 200 times as much total radioactivity as the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs.

Early fallout more than 1,500 km away was first detected the following day when unusually high levels of radiation were measured when a nuclear power plant worker in Sweden was checking out of work. For a day and a half, nobody understood the full extent of the disaster. Initial attempts to put the fire out with water only worsened the situation. Evacuation of nearby residents was only implemented after 34 hours.

Nuclear reactors may produce useful electricity for a brief few decades, but their enduring products are uniquely hazardous radiation and high-level radioactive waste which persist over geological time frames.

Thirty nine years is a little over one half-life of caesium 137, so the cesium-137 in fallout across the world will by now have decayed by a little over half. The plutonium 239 released, however, with a half-life of 24,400 years, will have only decayed by one seventh of 1% by now. It will take a quarter of a million years for it to substantially decay away.

The misguided arrogant and dangerous hubris and vested interests that brought us the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters, and at least 11 other core melt accidents in different nuclear reactors, now brings us the willful madness of the alternative parties of Australian government’s plan for nuclear reactors proliferated around our wide, sunny and windy land. If we don’t act on evidence and learn from the past, we will be doomed to repeat it."

Archived:
archive.ph/8t2Ka

RESOURCES:

Part 1 The Chernobyl Disaster Explained 1986 | A Brief History of Documentary
youtu.be/IkBJU8BbrUs

The RBMK reactor type had an extremely positive void coefficient, which means that without careful proper oversight, the reactor can rapidly become unsafe.
The economic and political significance of Russia's RBMK reactors
dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/1…

#ChernobylDisaster #NoNukes #RBMKReactors #NoWar #AntiMilitarism #MilitaryIndustrialComplex #NoNukes #disarmament #nuclearban #Green #Progressive #RadicalFeminism #Solidarity

in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ

The unfortunate thing about these scare tactics is that nuclear actually has the fewest sources of death of ANY power generation method, has the lowest carbon foot print of any base load power generation system, and is really our only viable path to a future. To put things in context, Chernobyl killed 50 people directly and perhaps caused cancer in about 4,000 others, but nearly every one of those cancers was thyroid cancer and there was only one known case of death that resulted from that. To put that in contrast, the failure of the Banqiao Dam, a Chinese hydro power project is estimated to have killed 175,000 people.
in reply to Nanook

@nanookThat's bullshit.
There's nothing more deadly (and costly) than nukes.

All Nuclear Reactors Leak All Of The Time.
They’ve been hacked, infested with vermin, power black outs, hundreds of accidents that the public never hears about ...
When the Chernobyl elephant foot sinks into ground water, they’ll be an explosion.
Radioactive spills happen all the time and the media overs most of it up

nrc.gov/docs/ML1723/ML17236A51…

Revealed: Sellafield nuclear site has leak that could pose risk to public
theguardian.com/business/2023/…

All nuclear power plants in Spain stopped due to blackout — Energoatom
eadaily.com/en/news/2025/04/28…

A nuclear power plant leaked contaminated water in Minnesota. Here's what we know
npr.org/2023/03/19/1164588882/…

cbsnews.com/news/radioactive-l…

Radioactive spill reported in Northeast Ohio nuclear power plant
msn.com/en-us/news/us/radioact…

in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ

@AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ Try taking a Geiger counter to a nuke to prove how wrong you are. Sellafield wasn't an issue because of the nuclear reactors, it was an issue of how badly the British did reprocessing, and we have a similar issue here in Washington known as Hanford. In both cases, it was a military project to extract plutonium, the chemistry wasn't well worked out at the time, and the emphasis was on getting as much plutonium as fast as possible. Nuclear energy CAN be tremendously destructive if applied to tremendously destructive objectives, i.e., dropping nuclear weapons on people, and it can also be tremendously beneficial. And to address Jolly Ranchers post, Graphite was a poor choice of moderator because at high temperatures it could catch fire, and unfortunately neutron capture lead to poisoning of it that required occasionally taking it to high temperature to purge it. What a lot of people don't know is that we had a very similar reactor to Chernobyl in California, that, like Chernobyl, also caught fire, but an employee took a fire hose to it and successfully extinguished the fire before it became a Chernobyl explosion. I personally am not a big fan of even boiling water reactors because of four safety issues, 1) they have to operate at 200-300 atmosphere's of pressure to achieve anything close to acceptable thermodynamic efficiency, 2) Water can and is disassociated into hydrogen and oxygen and if systems fail that can detonate into a Fukushima event, 3) they require active safety mechanisms and 4) because fission products aren't continuously removed, fission decay can create enough heat for a sustained meltdown even after the reactor is scrammed. Molten salt reactors resolve ALL of these issues, and while Jolly Rancher rightly points out there are some issues that are not fully resolved, he exaggerates some, 700C isn't white hot, it's red-orange hot, exhaust nozzles of rockets operate at twice this temperature and as Elon has demonstrated, can endure it repeatedly, but more than that the chemistry of continuously removing fission products had not been worked out at the time of Oakridge, it isn't known yet of the corrosion resistance of Hastalloy used in Oakridge us sufficient but material science has improved vastly since that time, but even so if you get a leak, unlike the situation of a pressurized water reactor, it's not the end of the world. You drain the core into the drain tank, what leaked will have solidified at room temperature and owing to the lack of fission products will be at room temperature and not nearly as hot as conventional corrium containing fission products, you scoop it up, put it in the tank, fix the plumbing, heat the drain tank and pump the salt/fuel back into the core and life goes on. Neither expensive nor a risk to the environment. Further, if we DON'T build these then we've got tonnes of million year waste that is impossible to safely store for that time frame, but if we do, we can use the actinides in that waste, which are the long term portion of that waste, and end up with a much smaller volume of waste that will take only 300 years to cool down to be safely disposed. As to the chemistry of removing fission products from molten salt, at least one human, Kirk Sorensen, has worked this out.
in reply to AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ

@AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ That depends somewhat on the level if goes off at. If it's at a very high level, unless someone drops a bomb unlikely here, but if it is then I obviously will try to determine in which direction it seems to be lower and head in that direction. But I consider that unlikely. If it is lower, I will take steps to try to determine the source such as trying to localize it, looking at various news sources, online monitors, etc. The nice thing about radiation is there is quite a wide range between detectable levels and levels that represent a safety issue as opposed to many chemicals which you can't readily detect at low levels but will kill you just the same.
in reply to Nanook

Regardless of whether you eat bananas or not, you and I and everyone have naturally radioactive potassium in us all the time.
Long half-life, so not many atoms are decaying in any one second, but the energy of each decay is awesome. Powerful enough to make positrons.

Antimatter is in your body, right now!

In the wake of Fukushima, it was amusing to see all the twitter users posting the readings on their radiation survey meters. Fukushima genuinely polluted the entire Pacific Ocean, but unless you were sampling it along the coast of Japan, you needed some sophisticated lab equipment to sort through all the NR and find a decay from some fission product..

Unknown parent

pleroma - Link to source

Jolly Rancher

> molten salt is FAR better.

... so long as you can get away with pumping fluorides thru white hot metal plumbing. There are some problems with them that have never been addressed.

Water moderated reactors are the way to go. The ones that power our navy are some of the most uninteresting machines ever built. Just sitting there making power.

Windscale and Hanford were cold war efforts to breed plutonium for weapons. I understand the Soviets made some messes too back then. Running right at the edge of insanity to get that Pu239. Molten sodium cooling is another neat idea that never caught on. ..

And Chernobyl was graphite moderated. Much less stable than water. The techs were playing around that night, deviating from the operation manual. And TMI here melted down when they disabled an annoying alarm signal instead of shutting down... It's a good idea to follow directions with those things.