friendica.eskimo.com
@HuFool I'm not opposed to change, I am opposed to bad change. I would welcome MORE energy supplies lifting those in poverty out of poverty, I would welcome SANE clean energy sources such as molten salt thorium or actinide breeder reactors, fusion reactors, and geothermal, that are reliable and don't do more destruction to the environment than what they replace.
I don't welcome killing existing energy sources when there are no viable replacements ready plunging millions or billions in to poverty and early death.
I would welcome plants that take this thorium generated electricity and seawater, turn it into liquid hydrocarbon fuels, all of the carbon of which comes from carbolic acid in the oceans which are dissolved CO2 from the atmosphere, to replace hydrocarbons drilled from the depths of the Earth, and most of these alternatives exist.
If "climate change" were the real motivator, we would use them, but it isn't. The real motivator behind this bullshit is creating artificial scarcity to drive up prices, make the producers more profitable and concentrate even more wealth and power into the elite one percent.
Whoever speaks of a better world is a Nazi because he wants to forcefully impose his idea of a better world on all dissenters with inhuman violence.
#Philosoph Karl Popper:
… the attempt to make heaven on earth invariably produces hell. It leads to intolerance. It leads to religious wars, and to the saving of souls through the inquisition. And it is, I believe, based on a complete misunderstanding of our moral duties. It is our duty to help those who need help; but it cannot be our duty to make others happy, since this does not depend on us, and since it would only too often mean intruding on the privacy of those towards whom we have such amiable intentions.
libquotes.com/karl-popper/quot…
#KarlPopper
The attempt to make heaven on earth invariably produces hell. It leads to intolerance. It leads to religious wars, and to the saving of souls through the inquisition. And it is, I believe, based on a complete misunderstanding of...Lib Quotes
@guenter@despora.de
You cited Popper Out Of Context.
t is a book about society: He was talking about about society not about of ecology!
the-rathouse.com/OpenSocietyOn…
I agree with Popper on his argument, and deeply disagree on any fictious argoument by anyone who wants simply do nothing about ecology. Is it you?
Not at all. Is the contrary.
If you take care about something nobody hurts, if you just mess something and don't care about your shit someone dives in it.
Is it satisfactory to you that loking elsewhere you just don't see that?
@HuFool
If I support efuels or the solution of the French company MDI "Airpod" because I realise that this technology is better suited to protect the environment than e-cars and have to realize that the #NAZI ban these better solutions to serve their oligarchs, then who is the one who watches everything getting worse?
Now if your “freedom” is destroying the ability of billions to live a normal life?
The climate
The climate hysteria with its CO2 church suppresses the freedom of millions of people! It is zealots like Greta Thunberg who, against all scientific reason, rob and destroy the livelihood of millions.
This isn’t “freedom”, this is pillaging, or imperialism, or oppression; not “freedom”.
