Nanook

nanook@friendica.eskimo.com

Owner of Eskimo North

Network posts

P.O. Box 55816

Shoreline, Washington, USA

https://www.eskimo.com/~nanook

Welcome to Friendica.Eskimo.Com

Home of Censorship Free Hosting

E-mail, Web Hosting, Linux Shell Accounts terminal or full remote desktops.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Libtards in Washington Raise Gas tax $1/gallon

Wonderful fucking libtards in Washington raising gasoline tax $1/gallon, it was already the 2nd highest in the nation, now it should surpass even Californicatia. Fucking Assholes!

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

cranston likes this.

Moul reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

cranston likes this.

in reply to Nanook

Romeu Gamelas

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

We can't control Earth, we either adapt or die to whatever comes.
Like Chris, I'm tired of climate Nostradamus non-sense.

in reply to Romeu Gamelas

people tell me 'Aghh tides are rising panic!', well (ipcc map, since removed, 20 year prediction, sea levels will rise 16 feet, which means, where i am, i'm now 16 feet under water, that 20 year prediction ended about 3 years ago. and now of course it's Another 20 years (or is it now 10?) Again.
the global cooling was in the 70's, they tell me, Narr thats made up 'intrenet stuff lies' i say, no it wasn't cos i was there and we were all going to freeze to death.

in reply to chris

chris

in reply to chris 4 years ago

I live by the sea, the tides just come in and go out like they always have. (shock, suprise etc etc.)

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

all the crying wolf induces a fatal slumber.
we really should just get on liberating the emancipation technology and get spaceships for everybody.
crazy that over 3000 times free energy devices have been secreted by the patent office.

chris likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Vee McMillen reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Tickless Bleeding Edge Kernels for Debian Based Distros

Posted on January 19, 2021

I’ve compiled and placed online the latest mainstream Linux kernels 5.11rc4 and 5.10.9. The 5.11rc4 is only available in client form since it is still a release candidate it is not really suitable for server use yet. When the official release comes out I will place a server version.

The kernels can be obtained from: eskimo.com/kernel/linux-{versi…

There are three files for each kernel, download them all and install with: dpkg -i *.deb These will work on any debian based distribution such as Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, MxLinux, Zorin, Julinux, etc.

These are all compiled as fully tickless kernels. This is advantageous in situations where not wasting CPU cycles servicing clock interrupts where there is no work to be done is advantages, such as laptops where battery life is a concern or hosts with many virtual machines where each virtual machine wasting CPU totally can end up wasting more than real applications.

The “client” kernels are fully pre-emptive with a 1000Hz clock rate to minimize latency and are the best choice for multi-media, gaming, home desktops and workstations. The “server” kernel is non-pre-emptive with a 100Hz clock to maximize throughput at the expense of latency.

These kernels are all capable of running on bare metal or virtualized environments. They are all capable of hosting KVM/Qemu virtual machines provided you have the proper vt-t/vt-d instructions in your CPU.

like this

Unknown parent

Nanook

Unknown parent 4 years ago

@BR 549 ☎ they just waste less CPU than ordinary kernels, this is important on battery operated devices and on servers with many virtual hosts. And there is no real penalty for doing so.

Unknown parent

Nanook

Unknown parent 4 years ago

@BR 549 ☎ The point of the tickless kernels is that applications don't need the time and date UNLESS there is work to be done. Since no work means they're not going to read the clock so only wake up and update it during those times.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Vee McMillen reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Vee McMillen reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Vee McMillen reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Unknown parent

Nanook

Unknown parent 4 years ago

@Robin Well I do find it interesting that they put the fence around the Capital building with the razor wire on the inside and the links on the out. In other words it is oriented to keep people in and not out. And then you have all the military check points around DC, they are checking people leaving not coming.

Unknown parent

Nanook

Unknown parent 4 years ago

@Robin The constitution provides for this though perhaps not in as few steps.

Unknown parent

Nanook

Unknown parent 4 years ago

@Robin no it doesn't. If a national emergency is declared Marshall law can be instituted and the inauguration put off indefinitely. If the inauguration is allowed to go forward, it still can be overturned if fraud is proven, which I believe it will be.

Unknown parent

Nanook

Unknown parent 4 years ago

@Robin what makes it legally an attack on the United States is foreign countries involvement, and so far the government of Italy has admitted involvement, a military raid in Germany has proven involvement there, and Spain, UK, and China have all been implicated.

like this

in reply to Nanook

chris

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

also an affidavit sent in, stating who where when and how.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

rotto Pureblood likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

"Seven Days in May". Except I believe I am on their side for this one.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Vee McMillen reshared this.

in reply to Nanook

all in one seo (aioseo) 4.2.3.1 - Link to source

:debian: :gnu: :fed: :tux:

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

excellent, there's a joke about peacock to Peking in there somewhere.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

cranston likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/CZUb0VdLuyBE/

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Their "decisions to act" only involve furthering the political agenda, NWO, politicians, globalists, whatever you want to call them.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

in reply to Nanook

(((Dirk Weber)))

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Ok, so now that is state of things: There have been numerous allegations of vote fraud, none of these proved, no voting was cancelled by court. The vote is valid. Mr. Biden is presicent elect. Mr. Trump will be president till January 20th, 2021 12:00 ET.

After that date Mr. Biden will be president and I really hope that Mr. Trump then will be brought to court because. There are several court cases coming up against him, civil actions, criminal proceedings, on state level and on federal level.

Even if Mr. Trump manages to be pardoned by whomsoever, this only can be for the federal level. Thus I hope, chances are qute good for him to go to jail. That is where he belongs.

I know a lot of people who really would be delighted to see this.

in reply to (((Dirk Weber)))

chris

in reply to (((Dirk Weber))) 4 years ago

ok...

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

reshared this

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

What do they think this is, some kind of action hero video game? These people are brainwashed idiots!

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

rotto Pureblood reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Ha ha ha!

in reply to Nanook

(((Dirk Weber)))

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

That is cynical

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

reshared this

in reply to Nanook

rotto Pureblood

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

I'm hearing its up to 20K as well...

in reply to Nanook

chris

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Maybe, get em all in, biden the fake trump supporters then arrest the Lot.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Margaret Sanger would be so proud

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

cranston likes this.

cranston reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

The only thing that went wrong for the Democrats and RINOs is that a humongous group did not fall for the bait and start a riot. They had to hold their own pathetic riot, and shoot people, throw them off the stairs.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

https://lbry.tv/@Freedom:fa/MILITARY-INTELLIGENCE-HAS-EXPOSED-THE-OPERATION-TO-TAKE-OVER-THE-UNITED-STATES-G:f?r=AY3wS54gdcEdLnZHn4oWnBqyNvdx2P2N

like this

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

reshared this

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

oh i so wanna reshare that... but it still uses the psyop phrase "conspiracy theorist", even though it's dispelling the blatant deceptions. tis a mere fleck of blue in that red pill... maybe it's just a homeopathic dose. n_n ok, it's worthy. ;D

in reply to Nanook

Arnaud DANIEL

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Conspiracy theorists, foil tin hat, are some of the adjectives people dedicate to those whistle blowers posting different information to the one given to the public through the MSM daily.

Felipe Lopez likes this.

in reply to Nanook

chris

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

just a word

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

I understood it as sarcasm and they calling the “sheeple” the real conspiracy theorists, don’t you agree?

I'm just wary and concerned for those to whom this will not be apparent, and it'll affirm that phrase as valid, unquestioned. Even if they don't get that ["conspiracy theorists" is a psyop term that abuses them, dissuading due questioning authority], then maybe they'll at least get shaken out of their cognitive dissonance as they see past their prior unquestioned beliefs that government cares, media never misleads/lies, and that for profit pharma's healing them. and realising that, is why i re-shared, after weighing it up.

😀

chris likes this.

in reply to Nanook

Team Reality

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

but can we agree that something like flat earth theory or chemtrails ARE conspiracy theories?

in reply to Team Reality

Nanook

in reply to Team Reality 4 years ago

@Team Reality Well no because conspiracy involves someone conspiring, flat-earther's and chamtrailer's are merely psychotic.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

but can we agree that something like flat earth theory or chemtrails ARE conspiracy theories?

funny guy. 😛 no, the term conspiracy theory is still a psyop term designed and deployed to dissuade questioning/investigating authorities and crooks.

Is it still "a "conspiracy"" when there are publicly traded companies offering services for, and conferences promoting deployment of, various forms of the idea? let alone theory.

I remember seeing evergreen avionics way back... i forget when now... 2004? and I thought "What gall! The people will see this and rise up.". What a fool.

and flat earth's a good thought experiment to see how far you can keep coming up with new contrivances to explain how it could be flat despite appearances to the contrary, or to shift your reference plane (like playing flatland, and trying imagine the 4th dimension and up, to imagining the 10th dimension), or simply to challenge someone to experiment to give evidence to back up their claim it's round/spherical/globe, rather than just presuming and proclaiming (like many flat earthers do ~ lol, oh the irony so many miss). it's not all just fools to be dismissed to help you feel superior; to help prevent you entertaining other perspectives. ... like the term "conspiracy theorist" does.

in reply to Nanook

Team Reality

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Okay I got it, the wording is posisonous and misleading.

I don't share that view. I don't think the phrase is pejorative. It's neutrally saying, there's a theory that there is a conspiracy.

I mean, jesus, who would have thought that GCHQ is tapping subsea cables to spy on the whole atlantean internet traffic? No conspiracy theory probably would have gone that far, but yet it's entirely true.

in reply to Team Reality

Nanook

in reply to Team Reality 4 years ago

@Team Reality Yea especially since they have equipment co-located at virtually every meet room.

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

I like it. It needs some intellectual effort to understand it, but I see that as a quality rather than a fault.

The main issue I see is that the term “conspiracy” doesn’t really fit with the things mentioned (government cares, media don’t lie, pharma wants to cure) – at least not at first sight, because where is the secrecy that belongs to a conspiracy?

Rather take the official story about 9/11 as an example (and it has indeed been called a conspiracy theory). Bin Laden and Al Qaida would be the conspirers, acting secretly to destroy the Western way of life. A person who believes in the government, the mainstream media and Big Pharma will also believe the official 9/11 story.

in reply to Nanook

Team Reality

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

so you think Al quaeda doesn't exist and Bin Laden is a retard and everything was done by Falcons so they can sell more weapons and invade Iraq again?

in reply to Team Reality

Nanook

in reply to Team Reality 4 years ago

@Team Reality I think Al Quaeda was a CIA created group, Bin Laden was a much better leader than any which has succeeded him.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

It’s neutrally saying, there’s a theory that there is a conspiracy.

Bold claim. An assertion thrown out fallaciously. I strain to conceive of a use of it that is not a fallacious misdirect.

Epistemologists must utterly baulk at seeing it so rife.

I mean, jesus, who would have thought that GCHQ is tapping subsea cables to spy on the whole atlantean internet traffic? No conspiracy theory probably would have gone that far, but yet it’s entirely true.

and how casually and normalised you deploy the term. And yet, people were pointing out this was going on for decades before Snowden. ... people who would have had the label "conspiracy theorist" thrown at them by the spook agencies to discredit them and such claims, to discourage others rightly investigating the authorities to hold them to account.

because where is the secrecy that belongs to a conspiracy?

Yep. So many seem so deep into the induction that even the very word "conspiracy" (without being suffixed with theory) is now a synonym for falsehood to them. As if no one would ever conspire. As if the idea is laughable and readily dismissed without investigation. Of course no one would ever conspire, especially not when there's massive gains for them to be had. And then all manner of atrocities get to proceed, unchallenged, even unhidden, in plain sight, for those who would even bother to look, and yet so few do look, because who wants to appear like a "conspiracy theorist"?... regardless of the fact that they were not coming up with any theories, and that the plans are not only laid bare, but promoted. If you so deploy that little due diligence and follow a little casual research, as aught be respected as the duty of everybody in a democracy, then there's a whole lot of horror to face up to in the revelations.

so you think Al quaeda doesn’t exist and Bin Laden is a retard and everything was done by Falcons so they can sell more weapons and invade Iraq again?

Quite the spurious leap and characterisation. A rhetorical style befitting of shilling for the man. Heh.

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th"

"A lone gunman."

lol.

Do tell, how does one fit a 757 in a pentagon shaped hole?

n_n

y'know?

(and in context: scrapsfromtheloft.com/2017/08/… / (Revelations, so relevant today, in so many ways, tragically prophetic in our ignorance and capitulation, right down to the "pretty soon we'll all be locked in our homes")).

"back and to the left, back and to the left, back and to the left... "

"...And that's why Kennedy's head~ blew~ off~~ What time's gladiators on? Are we missing it? whoo-wee, I'm so glad we're free."

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

It's like when someone identifies as a skeptic, they really affirm they're not. Quite similarly as when someone proclaims they have the most humility. ;)

in reply to Nanook

Team Reality

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

A yes or no would have done... You didn't answer my question.

I try to word it neutrally: Do you think not Al Quaeda and bin Laden did 9/11? If so, who do you think did it?

I just wanna understand, no hard feelings dude.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

A yes or no would not do to such a troll question.

I answered sufficient.

... and if you're asking again, it seems you didn't quite grok the meaning of:

Do tell, how does one fit a 757 in a pentagon shaped hole?

nor the rest, it would seem.

Osama Bin Laden's an interesting character, with an interesting history, an interesting tool/agent, that reveals much, if you spend some time investigating.

But further, (less ambiguously / less nebulously), if the "how to fit a 757 in a pentagon shaped hole" isnt enough, consider "pull it", building 7 (proclaimed fallen on the news when in sight over the shoulder of the reporter, text-book controlled demolition, and why (and how not)), the missing gold, the timing of execs being away, the "construction" work done in the preceding days, the fighter jets that had scrambled, told to head back... for just a few other easy pieces to broaden the picture beyond the misdirect binary did-he/didn't-he.

Lots to look into, to do your own research and thinking.

No need to rhetorically faux-interrogate others for what they think, let alone when they've already laid out sufficient spread for you. n_n

Happy websearching and contemplating. 😀

in reply to Nanook

ACIO exextri

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

connect25lovylmq.onion/i/8a71a…

DOWN FORGET TO USE TOR BROWSER FOR EXTENSION DOMAIN IN .ONIONS LIKE THIS ONE ABOVE

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

@Team Reality

so you think Al quaeda doesn’t exist

Not quite. In fact I don't believe the official story, but I must admit that I don't know what happened then.

Nevertheless, the official story is about a conspiracy, whether true or not. So one might call it a conspiracy theory.

On the other hand, if not being true is essential for conspiracy theories, it may be none -- if it is true.

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

And to answer your question more directly, I do think that Al Qaida exists/existed. And Bin Laden, I'd say, is no retard.
But this is not my point.

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

@Digit

Bold claim.

But this definition of "conspiracy theory" exists, namely that it is a theory that there is a certain conspiracy behind something, no matter whether it's true or not (or partly true, as tmo. are many if not most conspiracy theories).

I got it from a book by Matthias Bröckers, who treats conspiracy theories more like hypotheses than dismissing them outright. (Matthias Bröckers: Verschwörungen, Verschwörungstheorien und die Geheimnisse des 11.9.)

Yep. So many seem so deep into the induction that even the very word “conspiracy” (without being suffixed with theory) is now a synonym for falsehood to them. [...]

I'm with you there, Digit. Nevertheless one can reclaim and redefine terms. Take the insults hurled at you, and own them! So I would say that I'm a conspiracy theorist in my own understanding.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

@Blutpumpe

funny guy. 😛 no, the term conspiracy theory is still a psyop term designed and deployed to dissuade questioning/investigating authorities and crooks.

XD ;P 😁 #S

in reply to Digit

Nanook

in reply to Digit 4 years ago

@Digit @Blutpumpe Yes it was coined by the CIA.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

yup.

when bush jr said “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th”, i bet he made his cia daddy proud.

in reply to Digit

Nanook

in reply to Digit 4 years ago

@Digit Yea no kidding! I hope he ends up at gitmo.

in reply to Nanook

ACIO exextri

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

twitter.com/acio3301/status/13…

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

@Digit
Oh, if somebody calls me such a name, I'll just say yes, I am.

And moreover, still I have the right to tell Mr Bush jr. dubbleyou that what he advertises is a pure conspiracy theory. Bin Laden and the 40 Hijackers.

Not that I don't believe it was fundamentalists who did it, but who used them, and for what? Bin Laden, or a similar figure might have been acting as go-between, like he did in Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, as far as I know, originally was the name of the list of mudjahideen that Bin Laden recruited for fighting against the Soviet Union.

They build a world of great confusion to force on us the devil's illusion

(Bob Marley)

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

I dont for a femto second think bush jr really thinks that. it's an outright deception, put out there to misdirect others. so can't reliably call it a theory of his. and so, also... again:

funny guy. 😛 no, the term conspiracy theory is still a psyop term designed and deployed to dissuade questioning/investigating authorities and crooks.

;D lol. (even though, that is a better use of it, same as in the original post's image).

but then... we can pick and choose which definition of theory we go with... so maybe we can still legitimately use that psyop phrase, and keep discouraging anyone from questioning the nefarious dominator kleptocrat/oligarch plans.

#Orwell

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

keep discouraging anyone from questioning the nefarious dominator kleptocrat/oligarch plans.

Why would you want to do that?

As I said, I got the idea from Matthias Bröckers. His book about conspiracy theories that ttakes 9/11 as the main example is in German, though, otherwise I would have recommended it.

And if Bush doesn't think it's a lie he perfectly fits into the majority of so called "conspiracy theorists" who also believe what they are saying.

But this is indeed an interesting aspect: that someone deliberately sets complex lies into the world, so the truth is no longer easily to be seen. Some people will believe these lies and spread them. This could be the case not only concerning the official 9/11 story, but also other misleading explanations, ranging from #chemtrails to #reptilian shape shifters.

Maybe we could coin a new term: "conspiracy hypothesis", or even something without the word "conspiracy", as long as it is fit to describe the phenomenon.

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

I dont for a femto second think bush jr really thinks that. it’s an outright deception,

I didn’t see the full stop, and misread: “I dont for a femto second think bush jr really thinks that it’s an outright deception” -- but I see politicians as puppets rather than as real leaders, so it doesn't really make a difference.

in reply to Nanook

BR 549 ☎

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

dancing israelis.
and, sometimes you gotta kinda 'catapult the propaganda'.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

" AND THERE'S NOT SUCH THING AS PSYCHOPATHS" could be added to the sign.

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Well, it's obvious that in the Western world all of them are in hospital, where they're ttreated nicely and to their benefit.

in reply to was? blutpumpe und so weiter

Nanook

in reply to was? blutpumpe und so weiter 4 years ago

@Blutpumpe is hospital a slang term for government?

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

@Eileen
I was talking about the psychopaths @Digit mentioned above, and it was meant to be ironic.

in reply to was? blutpumpe und so weiter

Nanook

in reply to was? blutpumpe und so weiter 4 years ago

@Blutpumpe @Digit @Eileen Yes that is why I asked if hospitals were a slang term for government. There are a lot of psychopaths in government and they are treated nicely.

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

No problem @Eileen

@Digit & all

What I tried to explain above, but apparently not in clear enough words: I think, the psy-op goes further than what Digit is saying.

It is clear that not all which is called "conspiracy theory" is the truth. There's really some weird fantasy stuff out there.

To my opinion, the psy-op counts on the existence of all the nonsense and half-sense that is -- deliberately or unknowingly -- being spread through the media. so when something true appears, people will not recognise it, but point their finger and say: "another conspiracy theory!"

So the term, as iit is generally used, works like a smoke grenade which covers both truth and lies. The more lies and half-truths are being spread (and even debunked), the better it works.

And it's somehow hard explaining all of it, and not using the word "conspiracy theory".

in reply to Nanook

BR 549 ☎

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

sometimes a fact . . .
https://friendica.eskimo.com/display/2abe6cc003310139dc8f047d7b62795e

in reply to BR 549 ☎

Nanook

in reply to BR 549 ☎ 4 years ago

@BR 549 ☎ Yep, and Biden got us back into a war the first day in office. Obama had us in what, five wars?

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

It is clear that not all which is called “conspiracy theory” is the truth. There’s really some weird fantasy stuff out there.

funny guy. 😛 no, the term conspiracy theory is still a psyop term designed and deployed to dissuade questioning/investigating authorities and crooks.

lol

And it’s somehow hard explaining all of it, and not using the word “conspiracy theory”.

cant get there from here.

#orwell

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

@Digit

funny guy. 😛 no

You're repeating yourself, and don't read/understand or deliberately don't react on what I'm saying. I'll end the discussion here.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

You’re repeating yourself,

with reason. that, on some level, you're well aware. you keep using the psyop term as if to validate it.

it's entertaining and encouraging to see you wrestle your way free of it. 😀 i'm just holding the space.

and don’t read/understand

n_n nah.

or deliberately don’t react on what I’m saying.

or, am satirically responding to precisely what you're saying, because of the same invalid thing said, that you're not fully accepting as invalid yet, despite professing to.

I’ll end the discussion here.

always amusing and damning to see that. lol.
fresh slab of arrogance and ignorance, offered as if some virtue. XD

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

@Robert Dinse

is hospital a slang term for government?

An ironic term, rather... But on the other hand, "hospital" stands for "hospital". Not all patients in hospitals are sick. My whole sentence was meant to be ironic. Psychopaths have been in charge many times in history.

@Digit

satirically responding

Ok, I'll take anoher try. Maybe you don't do it deliberately.

To clear some possible misunderstanding first: I'm not denying that it's originally a psy-op term, hope you got that.

If I analyse what I wrote, I had two points I wanted to express:

1) Perhaps you're right, and the word causes confusion, so it would be better not to use it at all. It has caused some confusion between us, I would say. Though I have a positive memory of how #Bröckers' uses it in his book, where I got it from. And as hard as I look, I don't find any synonym that covers all the meanings of it.

Languages are not fixed. Words may mean different things to different people, and can change their connotation and even meaning over time. It must be possible to strip the term from its negative connotation, as Bröckers did, though probably not in all situations.

2) The term, as I see it generally used, doesn't only cover true stories that governments, big business, and whoever want to suppress. No, it stands for all kinds of complex hypotheses, truths, phantasies, ranging from serious background information about deep politics to weird theories that assume that we are all ruled by reptilian shape shifting beings from outer space. And of course, most times it is used in a pejorative way.
I think this wide range of meaning is, even if only by chancce and not by plan, part of the psy-op, thus letting true statements about politics and econmy appear beside half-truths and impossible fantasies. This is what I tried to express in these two paragraphs I wrote above (here only putting the first and last words):

To my opinion, ... the better it works.

I'm still missing your intelligent answer on this. Perhaps I didn't formulate it in an easily understandable way. If so, please tell me.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

And as hard as I look, I don’t find any synonym that covers all the meanings of it.

funny guy. 😛 no, the term conspiracy theory is still a psyop term designed and deployed to dissuade questioning/investigating authorities and crooks. ... and replacing it with words to the same effect is no remedy. the divisive barb must be extracted from deeper in your mind than the surface layer of interchangeable words.

I think this wide range of meaning is, even if only by chancce and not by plan, part of the psy-op,

spares me pointing that out. 😀 gets many babies thrown out with bathwater, ~ and bathwater that was intentionally dirtied specifically to have the baby thrown out with it.

To my opinion, … the better it works.
I’m still missing your intelligent answer on this. Perhaps I didn’t formulate it in an easily understandable way. If so, please tell me.

*salutes* Yes Sir! Here's my answer on this. ;) i dont think you need seek validation from others/me in-general/on-this. ;) but ok, to elaboratively/additively confirm seeing similarly, yes, the more agent provocateurs, the worse the impact... perhaps... maybe up to a point, then incredulity starts seeping in from the cracks under the pressure. there be many strategies deployed... many reasons, many effects. seeking the cartoon simplicities is itself indicative of having succumbed to manipulative mind maps imposed. no one has the answer. yet the truth is out there. ;)

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

and i do apologise for the obtuse satirical tool i've fallen into using. (but am also still amused, so likely will carry on too, lol).

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

spares me pointing that out. [...] bathwater that was intentionally dirtied specifically to have the baby thrown out with it.

So at least you got my second point now.

i dont think you need seek validation from others/me in-general/on-this

I don't need validation from anyone. I just had some things I thought were fit to share in this thread. Had you said nothing, I would have been silent.
Calling someone a "funny guy", and repeating the same sentence over and over again as if the other one hadn't read and understood it the first time, while on the other hand ignoring valid things they have to say is bad behaviour, to say the least.

satirical tool

That's why I try to keep serious when the tone of the other person is serious. See above how I failed with my irony. And why do you apologise when at the same time you tell me you want to go on with it?

yet the truth is out there

The truth is everywhere. I find it easier to grasp in my neighbourhood. The truth is, for example, that we have different opinions on whether it's legitimate to use the term "conspiracy theory" or not, but, as it turned out, share the same view on the character of the psy-op it's part of.

I have my own thoughts about the world "out there". If it comes to politics I know that it's unlikely to get any proof for anything. In fact, the only things I can be sure of are the ones I experience myself. All else is more or less unsure, and, yes, one could use that psy-op term for it.

If we know the truth, theories become facts.

in reply to Nanook

ACIO exextri

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

I don’t need validation from anyone. I just had some things I thought were fit to share in this thread.

yeah, that coulda been a dick-headed thing to say on my part. i took a gamble.

Calling someone a “funny guy”, and repeating the same sentence over and over again as if the other one hadn’t read and understood it the first time, while on the other hand ignoring valid things they have to say is bad behaviour, to say the least.

yeah, but, you get why, right?

because you kept walking into the trap... saying the thing that had already been established as the psyop phrase, re-perpetrating. ... even when acknowledging it is... which was amusing and perfect setup for the recurrent joke. juicy irony and satire, if you like the comedies. 😁

satirical tool

you're a satirical tool. ;] [jk, thought maybe cruder humour might please some. lol] ;]

That’s why I try to keep serious when the tone of the other person is serious.

& deadpanners may indeed chase each other's tails around and around.

the most serious topics censored are often found spoken of in comedy. cui bono censor.

See above how I failed with my irony.

well if it was all intentional, then well played, setting up the joke setups for the recurring jokes is laying the comedy on thick. (stewart lee and richard herring would be proud). though some of the questions, and the progression, suggests to me it was legit unwitting re-perpetration of psyop (or witting, but, benefit of the doubt's always(?) worth hanging on to, if only for some deadpan ~ bold and brave, in faith of wit and wisdom of the audience/spectator/reader, lest falling into poe's law). them insidious memetics hide insidiously and spread insidiously. in them psyops. whether recognised as intentionally created or not yet, or the not at all.

And why do you apologise when at the same time you tell me you want to go on with it?

to save you and anyone else from the psyop, to retain the curiosity and the duty to investigate what's going on in the world, to disuade a paradigm of shutting yourself down obediently, to not make trained automatons of you, but conscious astute aware beings retaining faculties of clear thought, not duped into becoming unwitting destroyers and poisoners of your siblings, to help you see those who would attempt to poison and destroy you and your siblings by having you poison and destroy each other while thinking you're saving them.

"villains who twirl their mustaches are easy to spot. Those who clothe themselves in good deeds are well camouflaged."

"nobody involved in anything nefarious thinks of themselves as nefarious".

not to deny you the right to use that term, but to allow you your own decision with all infinite potential retained, ... "a fully informed public" as some more familiar language ascribed to aspire to the same i'm trying to word carefully [trying avoid orwellianized language, in english, is not easy, especially since the further accelerations of perversions by the perverted for imbalanced misconceptions of gains]. tis a minefield. or mindfield. so thanks for playing out here, for living, engaging. good to have a good think. 😀

The truth is everywhere. I find it easier to grasp in my neighbourhood. The truth is, for example, that we have different opinions on whether it’s legitimate to use the term “conspiracy theory” or not, but, as it turned out, share the same view on the character of the psy-op it’s part of.
I have my own thoughts about the world “out there”. If it comes to politics I know that it’s unlikely to get any proof for anything. In fact, the only things I can be sure of are the ones I experience myself. All else is more or less unsure, and, yes, one could use that psy-op term for it.
If we know the truth, theories become facts.

that started well, but then after reading "the truth is", everything else just became noise. .... like the high pitch squeel some shops and places play to scare away young people who can still hear those frequencies, "the truth is" is a triple wammy of alarm bells there... big mountain of incredulity to get past, seeing that big mountain of certainty... "the" just the one, the singular "truth", the thing to seek, and to run away from those who have claimed to have found it, "is", sure certain. n_n

and wow yeah...

“conspiracy theory” or not, but, as it turned out, share the same view on the character of the psy-op it’s part of.

so, you're gonna keep using it... despite knowing to use it is to perpetrate the psyop on others... ?

or is this a part of the shared same view on the character of the psyop its part of that has not really sunk in for you yet, past the cognitive dissonance?

it's kinda like me with plastic packaging... i see myself putting more of it in the plastic bins, as if i know not to where, but i do know well enough at least, that it's going to the environment in which we're all in and depend upon. but i keep doing it. a way of not injuring myself on the stress of the horror facing me/us from all around. it's mal-adaptive. such things we need be aware of, if we are to find tractionable remedy. remedy, to all this re-perpetration, this bully's victim becomes bully, this dog-eat-dog race-to-the-bottom, chicken-and-egg-problem, victim co-perpetration regeneration. the more we face it, the more we can find the easy path of taking a comfort fast, to see what's out there, what horrors are in reach of mends, simply if one transcends.

(and since that ends on a lyrical rhyming quality, you know it's much more true... ... noh, the silly folly of our not-perfect logical grok of reality sensibilities and psychologies, manipulable bio-chemical physiological lenses. beneficial to have some several layers and angles of meta-awareness. see more traps, avoid more traps. & trigger traps to trap the trapper to untrap the forest.)

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

and since we keep yackin about truth... and i've started quoting things... here's another fave quote, relevant here...

"There's no shame in the truth."

(((which is also nice when you hear it garbled on repeat or as a morphing mantra, and it becomes "there's gno-shaman, the truth", or even "there snow shaman, the truth". hehe.)))

in reply to Nanook

was? blutpumpe und so weiter

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

yeah, but, you get why, right?

Probably to show how strong your opinion is that the term is part of the psy-op and nothing else and cannot be used differently. I do respect that, though I don't share your view.

Why you ignored what else I had to say, I don't know. Perhaps telling me about the word was too important for you, so the other stuff I had to say somehow vanished into the shades. But on the other hand I know I'm not easy at formulating my thoughts, so that might have played a part, too. That's why I tried to get an order into what I had said.

satirical tool / serious

I'm an artist and no politician... which might be my main fault.

Being serious when the other one is is a sign of mutual respect, which we need in these times. Humour is often not understood (my experience).

irony

Not all was meant to be ironic. I was referring to the "hospital" part only. So you can spare your praises for another occasion.

trained automatons

I cannot hold back the fact that it was you who to me seemed somehow like a "trained automaton", repeating that one sentence like a mantra again and again.

Being cautious with one's language. Well I try to be. If one aims to use a term like "conspiracy theory" and not to fall into the psy-op trap, one will have to define it well to strip the negative connotations. I think, Bröckers has done so in his book. Peter Dale Scott, I believe, is another person who used it, though I'm not sure. He definitely uses the term "conspiracy" in the title of one of his books (The War Conspiracy).

noise

I'm probably not a good writer concerning politics, though I see myself as quite a critical reader. I'm more of a poet. I wanted to express that I'm not so much into what's happening far away, things I have no proof for.

To stay with the topic: We can see the outcome of those politics in everyday life. I'm asking myself if it is really necessary to deal with the other stuff, or if it is not enough to know that we know nothing.

"The Truth" not with capital letters. If I know what I say is true, it will stop being a theory, but simply become a fact (a conspiracy fact, if you want), even if only for me, the one who has the proof.

so, you’re gonna keep using it… despite knowing to use it is to perpetrate the psyop on others… ?

See above. I don't think it will in all cases "perpetrate the psyop on others", but it depends on how you use it. This is the point where our opinions are not the same. Language is flexible. Take the terms of the enemy and use them successfully to positive ends. We won't get them out of the world anyway. Throw them back at the ones who coined them, and you'll have won the battle, saying: "Yes it is us who are spreading conspiracy theories, but also you! Now whose theories make more sense?"

The truth is an offence, but not a sin.

Bob Marley (Yes I'm a fan)

in reply to Nanook

BR 549 ☎

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

stories. we tell stories.
yewtu.be/watch?v=1XKFQVJlmZY
some are just distractions. fake ones are made up to distract from the true ones.

in reply to Nanook

Digit

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

ack. lost my reply here to a browser crash.

cnbfarw. n_n

in reply to Nanook

BR 549 ☎

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

that movie was made in 1973. today, they wouldn't print anything without getting permission from the Nomenklatura. Redford's character would disappear, never to be found.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

reshared this

in reply to Nanook

(((Dirk Weber)))

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Weird. I think that CNN is rather US centred, much more than for example Al Jazeera. But still they rather informative and definitevely not spreading 100% fake news or conspiracy theories.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

That's funny

in reply to Vee McMillen

Nanook

in reply to Vee McMillen 4 years ago

@Vee McMillen I thought so. And that's pretty much my impression of Justin Beiber anyway.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

in reply to Nanook

chris

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

can't believe a word the media says.

Nanook likes this.

in reply to Nanook

chris

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

nicking ya phono, will give back later. 'onest

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

in reply to Nanook

❶⓿ ⛔ 紳助

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

A lap dance Is so much better when the stripper Is cryin'

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

westernjournal.com/elon-musk-n…

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

rotto Pureblood reshared this.

in reply to Nanook

❶⓿ ⛔ 紳助

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Well maybe I for one don't worry about the well drying up. People worry about it being depleted more than keeping it filled. Economic freedom can exist with currency. If you chose not to get on board, this is what you expected right?

in reply to Nanook

❶⓿ ⛔ 紳助

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

Listen I love good dystopian stories too. I also realise the value of currency in our world's history. Wasn't always about the greenback.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

cranston reshared this.

in reply to Nanook

Vee McMillen

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

How did the Democrats gain so much control that evidence is nothing?

in reply to Vee McMillen

Nanook

in reply to Vee McMillen 4 years ago

@Vee McMillen I think the bigger question is how did external powers gain so much control over the Democrats that evidence is nothing?

chris likes this.

in reply to Nanook

chris

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

They been playing this 'game' for a Long time

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

like this

Moul reshared this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Vee McMillen likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

cranston likes this.

Nanook

4 years ago

(Shoreline, WA, USA)

Nanook
4 years ago — (Shoreline, WA, USA)

cranston likes this.

Echo of You reshared this.

in reply to Nanook

chris

in reply to Nanook 4 years ago

for me def gab over parler, apart from anything else parler wants your phone number each time. (real pain if nothing else) so does the site trumps moved to, if you in the uk you can't make an account (clouthub)