friendica.eskimo.com

Phoronix: Several Linux Kernel Driver Maintainers Removed Due To Their Association To Russia

460 18 1
This is a shame, I always thought Linux was supposed to be an International collaboration, hate to see it caught up in this bullshit political agenda.
89 39 1

"propaganda"? Oh. You mean like Russia started a full blown unprovoked war with a peaceful nation? That "propaganda"?

Sucks others got caught in the crosshairs, but that's just what happens when your authoritarian government launches unprovoked wars and gets sanctioned.

31 21 1
Never ask a dronie how gullible they are, they'll tell you.
19 2 1
And never ask why the US has over 800 external military bases, while all other countries combined have less than 20.
2 1
I agree to this. I was literally just in the shower thinking how Linux, the space station, and the Olympics are the only times we as humans come together to collaborate
20 5
@secret300 The project to discover elements 119 and 120 which previously were a US/Russia collaboration also put on hold. All of humanity moves backwards when we fight, nothing is gained.
13 1
Banning CFCs went pretty well too
10 1
@JWBananas @secret300 Yea you know the funny thing about that, CFC's are heavy and tend to sink to the ground if not propelled into the stratosphere by rockets, say like the old Space Shuttle with it's solid chlorine oxidizer boosters, or the various military missiles which mostly have been converted to liquid hydrogen and oxygen engines. But nah we got to spend $3k to replace our A/C because it contains CFC's that never would have made it up into the atmosphere anyway because of you know, physics, little things like gravity, so the military can avoid blame.
3 4 1
If that was how it worked then we would have all suffocated long ago under all the argon that sank to the bottom of the troposphere. The atmosphere is turbulent and extremely good at mixing gases of varying densities, and CFCs last decades before being decomposed or removed from the air.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
8 1

You know that Russia wasn't able to compete in the Olympics or Paralympics this year, right? The individual athletes weren't banned however, but they had to compete under a neutral banner and weren't in the parade of nations.

Edit: I should have added, was disgusted because Israel were allowed to compete. Huge double standard there.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
7 1 1
@Norah - She/They @secret300 A shame people can't be more civilized. Really I don't think we've evolved all that much in spite of our technology.
1
If I recall correctly Russia is not allowed to participate because of their state doping program not because of their politics. So unless there was an Israel state doping program discovered that's not double standard.
2 1
That's a valid point to make, but it's actually both. Russian athletes would have been able to compete under the IOC flag if it was just the doping scandal, from what I understand.
2 1
No it was code started by Linus that got huge.
12
@theunknownmuncher The US has been involved in probably 300 regime changes throughout the world, has invaded many countries, including those that we were not affiliated with. Russia invades a neighboring country when we install a leader that is going to allow us to put missiles on their border. I really hate to see political hegemony get in the way of a good collaborative effort, we all suffer for it if we allow this.
53 21 1
@Midnight If Russia were the only one involved, and if weren't provoked by outside powers like say, oh, the United States, yea I could agree with you but my knowledge of history precludes my accepting that explanation.
24 50 1
Hello Internet commenters. Please remember that there's no rule that says you need to tell us all your gut reaction to this if you know absolutely nothing about the situation.
173 17 1
knowing nothing about the situation is indeed the problem. if only this process was more transparent...
45 3 1

Being Russian => banned from doing business with the rest of the world

That's pretty straight forward to me.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
11 42 1

and what do random developers have to do with a war between oligarchies? are we banning the dirty us imperialists next, because they do more damage than russia ever will?

or are we finding a negative thing about every nationality and ban international opensource collaboration entirely?

or, and hear me out on this one, the individual programmers making linux and 90% of the internet happen might not be fascists regardless of what shitty government reingns their lives?

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
16 9 1
Take it up with the concept of sanctions.
3 2 1

i do, (contemporary, us) sanctions are a way to punish entire countries for daring not to adopt neoliberalism.

i wonder how cuba would be doing right now if not for it.

8 3 1

You're sounding like a certain mustache man right now. Sure, boycott states and governments, but not the people. They could just be regular Russians who just want to code to escape the bullshit that their government is spewing on TV every day. Never blame people for their governments.

Would you be fine being blacklisted from kernel development just because of the crime of simply being your nationality?

9 5 1

I have seen pictures of Linus Torvads so I feel that I am uniquely qualified to explain whats going on. Let me break it down for you.

The Linux Kernel is meeting compliance requirements by removing Russian maintainers.

Thank you all and have a good night.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
11 25 1

The problem is they aren't even saying what those requirements are even after numerous inquiries about it.

Don't you think its wrong to ban someone only because of their nationality? I mean for real man. Every country in the world has done some fucked up shit but open source software is supposed to go beyond politics and ideologies.

They weren't doing anything malicious it was wrong to remove them.

29 3 1
International economic sanctions? He said that.
3 1
They were getting paid to develop the Linux kernel? No? Then what’s actually the requirement?
5 1

Allegiance is another thing. Russian citizens unfortunately are subject to Russian law and the influence of the agencies.

Maintainer is more than a contributer in that it is a position of trust, which is called into question when they and their computer systems are subject to a belligerent governments jurisdiction.

1 1
But then there would be no Internet! /s
1
Those nasty Russians might reveal or remove some of our back doors.
29 38 1
Yes, those are the only two possibilities going on here
29 8
exactly, can't forget about good old racism
22 4 1
@theunknownmuncher And I could give countless other examples of other countries. I don't agree with the war, but I also know if we hadn't installed Zelenskyy and if the United States had honored our promise to Russia not to extend NATO past East Germany, then it would not have happened. So I understand that it is hardly one sided on Russias part. If we didn't fund Ukraine, if we didn't offer them membership in NATO, none of this would have happened. And I'll add if the Ukraine and Russia did not have large oil reserves and some other precious minerals, the United States would be a lot less interested in them. But that's all in the past. Now, you and I can disagree with each other and we can disagree with what our governments do, but if we want to build a better world it has to happen through the cooperative efforts of citizens NOT governments because the latter just historically a lot less likely to happen. So I can't see this move as at all productive towards ending this particular war or world peace in general, I see it as quite the opposite.
13 32 1

there is simply no meaningful response to this

no matter whether you think russia is justified in invading ukraine or not, if russians get banned from the kernel bc russia invaded ukraine, yankees have to get the boot as well

22 3
@theunknownmuncher Your timeline doesn't go back far enough and I notice you completely ignored the bit about Eastern expansion of NATO and what the United States promised Russia.
11 26 1

NATO will continue expanding as more and more border countries don't want to deal with limp dick Putin. Russia will be broken up to small territories and anything that remains of the federation will be scrapped and sold for salvage to finance rebuilding what has been lost.

Ta-ta!

12 20 1
@beleza pura I'd agree, but on this same basis with all the conflicts in the world you'd have to expand this to about 99% of the globe.
8 7 1
@CaptDust @davel When you need to resort to insults like this it's a clear sign you've lost the argument.
7 11 1

YUP

so... maybe nobody should be banned and it sucks that this happened?

11 2 1
Greg sent out the patch but won't respond to mail list questions. Sad to see Linux leadership bend the knee
25 15 1

Dude seriously and I can't believe how many people don't seem to see how sad that is in this thread.

Even if you hate this country or that, not even responding about it and keeping the code and using it anyway and only removing the attribution to the maintainers they removed (although that will escalate to banning them altogether I imagine this seems like a step one kind of thing) is just salt on the wound .

Super sad shit honestly.

18 2 1
honestly, i'm not even sure i'd blame him. who knows what kind of pressure he's getting behind closed doors
1 1
Admittance of 'all eyes on code' being bullshit.
3 26 1
@beleza pura That would be my take. My take is that as individuals we are were international cooperation needs to begin, it isn't going to happen with our governments, at least it never has historically.
6 5 1
@theunknownmuncher I don't justify genocide, I acknowledge ALL conflicts involve at least two sides, and to punish only one of those sides is to take part in said genocide rather than oppose it.
5 12 1
Couldn't think of a more lemmy thread topic than one involving both Russian geopolitics and linux.
228 2 1
This one is scratching a ton of itch.
36 1
Couldn’t think of a more lemmy thread topic than one involving both Russian geopolitics and linux.


part of me is sad that there aren't many .worlders defending blocking those evil tankies. lol

16 31 1
Yes there are, I think you guys should block .ML and enjoy your botted shithole website. Better your feed be an obvious echo chamber full of hate.
5 7 1
you're preaching to the choir here; my fault for not including the sarcasm/snark tag.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
4 2 1
Lmao sarcasm is indistinguishable from the full on brigading from the "help tankies are brigading us" instances going on in here to me 😅
6 2 1
friendly fire is common on the lemmyverse and i think it's because of the reddit liberals; they've managed to get almost every single reddit refugee to self sort into a few instances to protect their delicate sensibilities so they're incredibly well organized and funded, or they're EXTREMELY dedicated individuals to the point of doing it full time for free.
4 1 1
There has to be a way to fit Star Trek in too...
13 1
I am quite disappointed at the lack of transparency regarding this.
71 3 1

@theunknownmuncher Suggest you research the German economy at the time, who was controlling it, the relationship between Ashkanazi's and Jews and Germany for starters. Without understanding those complexities there is no way to understand that whole situation. Look into the history of the Rothchilds as it relates to all of this. This video at least provides some background: bitchute.com/video/1gWU5DaITVh…

Note: I mis-wrote Russian when I meant to say German. That said my original statement that all conflicts involve two parties doesn't dismiss the occasional psychopath as being one of those parties.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
Shoreline, WA, USA
2 7 1

I'm sure removing these maintainers would be of great help to the Ukrainian war effort...

More seriously: We need to help Ukraine more. But this doesn't do that. It just hurts a bunch of people (both the maintainers, and the people using their code) for no benefit whatsoever.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
18 5 1

Nazi germany came into being a thing because post great war was massively hard on germans in large part to the treaty of versailles completely crippling germany's economy.

ofc there were other factors like the massive propaganda machine, Germany was effectively reduced to a slave state dealt a massive blow to the pride of the german populace which was fairly easy to turn young men militant alone, even disregarding the disastrous effects to the German economy.

4 1
@Samueru @davel Is there something about people from lemmy.ml that makes them only capable of insults as opposed to rational discussions?
8 13 1
@lily33 @theunknownmuncher The best way we can help Ukraine is by removing outside influences from both sides. What is being portrayed as a war in Ukraine is really a proxy war between Russia and the US that was egged on by the US. This is most unwise given that both nations are armed to the teeth with nukes. We really should be looking at ways to de-escalate not escalate this war.
9 18 1
The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace
The shooting war in Ukraine began with Yanukovych’s overthrow nine years ago, not in February 2022 as the U.S. government, NATO, and the G7 leaders would have us believe.



So many people forget that the Ukrainian Russian conflict never really ended, the idea that it was an unprovoked invasion is absurd, (and no, before someone decides to make a braindead comment, provoked does not mean justified.) There have been many leaked videos pre-invasion of violence towards both sides, and neither side made a proper effort to actually quell it, only surface level bullshit inorder to take the "moral ground:

20 5 1

@theunknownmuncher @Samueru Like Russia placing nukes in Cuba guaranteed we wouldn't invade it?

The thing about not being willing to learn from history is that you are then destined to repeat the same mistakes.

5 12 1
@drwankingstein @theunknownmuncher That being the case why did Rockefeller fund BOTH sides of the conflict? It's true it had bad effects on the economy but it wasn't the only thing that had bad effects on the economy, you need to go back about 800 years to get to the roots of that.
3 2 1
@Samueru The history goes back way before 2014 and your summation of the situation is inaccurate.
9 8 1
@davel @drwankingstein All of which have their biases and really a very limited subsample of viewpoints and history.
7 4 1
@Samueru I find it humorous that someone would downvote me for suggesting that history goes back more than a decade. Guess they are less than ten years old and think their parents appeared out of nowhere when they were born.
8 5 1

my understanding was that the kernel didn't publicly state any specific reason, but "complying to sanctions" semms like a safe bet to me

in any case, whatever the reason, this removal is unfortunate and uncalled for

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
7 1 1
@davel If the world were so simple then those with single digit IQ's and no real knowledge of historical fact would be able to understand it, unfortunately it is not.
7 7 1
You do realize that the US has invaded far more countries than Russia has, do burgerlanders have no self awareness at all?
26 4 1
The biggest help the west could've done for Ukraine was to fuck off when the Istanbul negotiations were happening two months into the war.
16 4 1
always hilarious to see nafoids show up here
12 3 1
The US currently occupies a larger percentage of Syria than Russia is of Ukraine, but do go on.
13 3 1
@davel Everyone has their own perspective but I think most people here are trying to greatly over simply a complex situation with and Noam Chomsky offers only yet another perspective and I disagree with him on the issue of world government or extinction. I don't think world government on a large scale, particularly the way it is now with no real citizenship representation, is particularly desirable.
3 3 1
@☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ @theunknownmuncher I am in the US and I realize this. There was a funny meme a while back about look how aggressive Russia is, they put their country all around our military bases. Unfortunately there is a lot of truth in that. What other country has military bases throughout the world?
15 3 1
Gotta have them "various compliance requirements", man, gotta have'em. Don't ask me what they are, but damnit, gotta have'em.
42 5 1
Aside from the fact that it's pretty insane to suggest to kick someone off a project for no reason other than their nationality (the article doesn't say any of these maintainers supported the invasion or had any ties with the government), even if these people actively supported the government, as far as kernel development is concerned... I don't really care? If their contributions are good then I want their patches to be merged. Tor was made by the US government, which I in no way condone, but I still use Tor.
21 6 1
De-escalation is easy: Russia can get the fuck out of Ukraine. All of it.
14 6 1
@remotelove Yea sure, let the US place missiles on their border. Not a rational option.
7 10 1
How to piss off the tankies 101
15 39 1
I don't agree with communists either but open source software is supposed to be about more than that
18 5 1
@BobGnarley @Possibly linux My take as well, but for the record, Putin is well aware of how Bolsheviks affected his nation and not eager to repeat it so not a big supporter of Communism himself.
8 1

It is a tricky topic that is hard to get right. For instance the CoreJS dev is Russian and he is maintaining a library that is depended on by a large number of counties.

In general I support any action to further distance Russia but I can understand how the Russian maintainers feel. After all they may or may not support Russia.

The likely cause of this was the fact that it looks bad on paper for Linux to have Russian involvement. After all that's where all the "hackers" live. Somehow I think this was probably in response to a threat behind closed doors.

I also would be concerned about counties trying to compromise foss but unfortunately that is just as likely to come from the US as it is from Russia.

8 12 1

@Possibly linux @BobGnarley One would hope there are enough checks and balances such a major opensource project as Linux to keep malware out of the kernel regardless of who contributes to it, but we do there have been some instances where that was not the case.

I see the evolution of the Internet as humanity growing a nervous system, and anything that gets in the way of that as negative.

8 1 1
I've never heard of malware making into the kernel. The closest I've head was that university "research project" that tried to insert backdoors.
2 1
What communists?
3 1 1

How to piss off people 101.

Do you fail to remember how the tech world collectively cringe at one guy who intentionally injected malware into his own npm library to delete all data from Russia and Belarus?

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
7 2 1
You are on the Russian instance my friend. I would strongly recommend finding a new home.
4 15 1

removed

Or that's what this would be on Lemmy.ml. They are all tankies and they get mad when you point out terrible things like facts.

4 14 1

Russia literally invaded everyone around them. Look at all the former USSR counties.

The US has been involved in a lot of places but that's not a justification for Russia attacking its neighborhood.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
6 17 1

I think the general idea is to create as much drain on Russia as possible. Limit there ability to import and export good while creating brain drain and terrible moral.

How many Russians have defected at this point? Spoiler is a decent amount.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
4 11 1
I'm definitely all for Ukraine winning, but this is bullshit, basically the red scare all over again (but for tech).
48 14 1
red scare all over again


It never stopped. Most people still think Russia's communist. Or any country that calls themselves as such.

24 3 1
Sure but they are not a democracy.
5 7 1
Neither is Canada. It's full of occupying settlers, for example.
18 6 1
Nope, they're an oligarchy, pretty much like the US.
21 2 1
@Auli @0x0 Neither is the US,Australia,New Zealand,France,the UK, or pretty much anywhere else, maybe India, in any practical sense.
6 2 1
Its almost as if it is coming right out of the Russian media
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
5 13 1

How's that working you for y'all there?

oh and spoiler, welcome to the real world opendemocracy.net/en/odr/russi…

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
9 1 1
I love how libs are utterly incapable of engaging with reality thinking that if they just repeat this mantra enough times it'll happen.
4 2 1
Zelensky took office on the promise of normalizing relations with Donbas and Russia, and then proceeded to do the opposite. Also, wonder what happened in 2014 that might've provoked a response from Russia there.
13 2 1
Seems to me that you're the one justifying genocide of people of Donbas by the fascists that took power in a violent coup backed by the west. Even western media reported on the far right problem in Ukraine and the ethnic cleansing in Donbas before the war started.
8 2 1
@Possibly linux @theunknownmuncher I know it might hurt your brain but it is helpful to fully understand an issue to understand the other sides perspectives.
11 5 1
this is the genocide you must be referring to
18 2 1
By Russian instance you mean one where people engage with reality that's uncomfortable for the utterly brainwashed people like yourself?
11 6 1
I love how you dronies always project. The only ones who are mad are you lot. We just think you provide free entertainment like court jesters.
12 1 1
@☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ @theunknownmuncher Well we are two weeks away from an Presidential election here in the US, going to be interesting to see where that goes. If Kamaltoe, er, Kamala gets it then probably we won't even be able to discuss it anymore.
1 1 1
All NATO wanted to do was to use Ukraine as a tool to weaken Russia, and now NATO will discard Ukraine like a used condom. That's the fate of all the vassals of the empire.
17 2 1
@☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ @theunknownmuncher The controllers of said empire isn't the elected government. How we can reign that back in, I don't know.
3 1
My expectation is that Ukraine is going to be dumped after the election regardless of who wins. The whole gig has run its course at this point, and there's a new war with Iran being drummed up already.
5 2 1
How to say you're historically illiterate without saying so. Go read up on how USSR was formed clown.
18 4 1
That's the big question of our times.
3
@☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ Trumps past record suggests not. The real question is what the outcome will be. I do expect if he is elected, we will see negotiated outcomes.
1 1 1
  1. NATO Expansion: The argument that NATO’s eastward expansion “provoked” Russia is often linked to Gorbachev’s 1990 talks with Western leaders. However, this promise was tied to Germany’s unification, not a blanket prohibition on expansion. And importantly eastern european countries sought NATO membership because of their historical (and justified) fears of Russian imperialism (a dynamic Marxists should understand as nations seeking sovereignty free from external dominance.)
  2. Western Involvement in Ukraine: The U.S. supporting a regime change in Ukraine in 2014 is thought to be imperialism. But ignores the agency of Ukrainians, who led the Maidan protests because of already existing deep dissatisfaction with Yanukovych’s corrupt, oligarchic regime and his pivot to Russia. Supporting popular uprisings against oligarchs should align with Marxist values even if "the West" has its own interests
  3. The Role of Fascism in Ukraine: Yes, Ukraine has issues with far-right groups like so many countries but exaggerating their influence as a justification for invasion serves to divert attention from Russia’s own reactionary politics. Far-right elements in Ukraine do not define the country’s political landscape, nor do they justify imperial aggression from another state. Russia has its own history of fostering right-wing authoritarianism.
  4. Minsk Agreements: While the West" and Ukraine could be criticized for their handling of the Minsk agreements, Russia also violated these accords by continuing support for the separatists. Both sides share blame for the failure of Minsk, but it doesn’t make Russia’s invasion justified. Ukrainians didn’t provoke a full-scale invasion; they were defending their sovereignty.
  5. NATO as a “Defensive” Alliance: Criticism of NATO’s imperialistic behavior is fair its actions in places like Libya show it isn’t 100% defensive. But in this case, NATO's expansion was driven by countries seeking security from a historically imperialist power. Ukraine wasn’t “provoking” Russia by wanting self-determination; it was trying to secure its future.

You're trying to push this "Actuall, but Ukraine DID provoke" narrative by mixing in unverified, ideologically biased material with references that are legitimate, but isolated incidents. Like linking far-right activity to justify the war conveniently ignores Russia’s (I should probably say everyone's) own far-right issues. Marxists should reject imperialism in all its forms, including Russia’s actions in Ukraine.

18 11 1

Dude, WHAT. This is totally against what Linux and Open source in general stand for.

I don't support the thing that I'm sure was their reason for this but I definitely don't support banning someone from contributing to an open system solely off nationality.

So what eventually only the "good guys" can contribute to and use open source software? Who exactly decides who the "good guys" are in this scenario? USA? China?

The implications of what this can cause in the future for potentially all of the open source community is absolutely sad. We should welcome all our fellow human beings to contributing to open source.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
141 28 1

Reminds me of a comment the other day on a post about Ventoy. Whatever the situation there is, which definitely needs clarification still, the person was saying that you shouldn't trust it at all because the maintainer is Chinese, even though he has emigrated away. Because the CCP will be able to leverage his family still there to force him to create a backdoor.

That's just thinly veiled racism in my opinion.

64 9 1

That's plain racism honestly.

I knew a (asian) guy who was working for a government contractor serving the US military. The racism is very serious to say the least. He got framed when something went down and was almost tried with treason. (that carries the death penalty) The authorities hit him with questions about his loyalty to the US for 5 hours even though he grew up in the US and so did his parents.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
49 7 1

Where is that argument wrong, though?

Think about how completely unacceptable binary blobs are for most people in this community. And now comes a guy who for no reason whatsoever puts a binary blob of unclear origin into a project that can be used to inject code on a bootloader level. And that's somehow okay?

And the threat of the CCP is real. Look at the xz situation. The Chinese agencies are willing and capable to invest a lot of money to get access to systems, and they also have a track record of taking families essentially hostage (or just taking the target hostage directly, if they happen to visit).

Don't you understand that China is ruled by an evil party? The maintainer could be the nicest bloke in existence, with the best intentions and highest intellect - but if he can be pressured by a dictatorship, that's a problem. And that's not even a personal thing, I wouldn't blame him for giving in to the pressure - I would cave in too, probably.

You have to grow up and don't just throw around racism for everyone you don't like. That's not helpful and actually diminishes actual racism.

7 1 1
Just an fyi but blob already stands for binary large object
7 1 1
@BobGnarley @kixik Yep this is definitely not a step forward.
4 1 1

It's about sanctions, simple as that.

You guys love to walk yourself on how super friendly open source is and that utopia is juuust around the corner, if everyone would finally switch to Arch.

But the reality is, that it's straight up illegal for the Linux foundation to deal with Russians. Yes, that sucks for a lot of people, but that's exactly the point of sanctions. Every time some NSA adjacent entity contributes anything to Linux, you all get hysterical, but people living under an openly fascist regime, that is willing to kill literally millions of people, having write access to core infrastructure, that they are known to attack is perfectly fine? You really don't see the problem here?

You still act like open source exists on a plane removed from everything else. Linux is critical infrastructure, it runs all critical infrastructure. We have to act like it.

7 4 1

As far as I can read from that, they're still maintainers, just have had their credit removed from the contributors page, no?

Still a strange thing to do and I look forwards to an explanation.

24 1
Yeah, being from Russia is a lot different from being associated with the Russian government. If the maintainers are in the latter, then yeah fuck em, but if they live in Russia with no realistic way of getting out and they’re just trying to live a normal life removed from the bullshit and write code as an intellectual escape? And you take that away from them? Precisely how you radicalize people
77 6 1
...and we don't know whether they're the former or the latter, no? So maybe a little early to get outraged?
10 27 1
Considering the US foreign policy and the impact it has on the world, regardless of whether the white house is R or D, i propose to ban all american devs... preemptively, ya know?
40 5 1
@0x0 @Vincent Yea well that makes about as much sense as banning the Russians, maybe we can stop development of Linux altogether. I'm sure Gatis of Borg would approve.
5 1 1
I don't see what this has to do with my comment. I see no indication that all Russians are blanket-banned.
9 9 1
You are casually declaring all Russians should be assumed to be state agents until proven otherwise, and therefore the negative reaction to this obvious betrayal of principles, not even for convenience but for hatred, is unjustified.
5 2 1
I am literally saying the opposite: I am saying that it's not clear that this applies to all Russians, or just ones that are sanctioned.
3 1
Inexplicably based
17 2 1
Benefit of the Doubt…
13 1
Honestly I wish that was a principle that the internet embraced more. We're so trigger-happy to be outraged.
5 3 1
No the contributors should not be considered guilty until proven innocent just to give Linus et al the benefit of the doubt fuckface!
4 2 1
Oh geez, this the third reply by the same account... Again, I'm just saying that we don't know whether the contributors were assumed guilty, or if they have actual ties to sanctioned companies.
2 1 1

I'm pretty talkative on certain subjects when I see people mangling the discussion and engaging in bad faith.

This is just softpedaling it and telling people to suspect foul play just because they are Russian honestly. There are some significant sanctions going up against Israeli companies but nobody seems concerned with that.

1 2 1
No, I'm telling people not to suspect anything, because we don't know anything.
2 1 1
I think what we know paints a really bad picture and Torvalds should not get the benefit of the doubt while trying to silence his detractors by calling them Russian bots.
2 2 1
@Oblique Obscurantist @Vincent I think bottom line is that it's bad for the open source community and something a grown adult like Linus should know better than to do even if it means moving his foundation to another nation. You can't be as critical to the open source movement and then bow to political pressures like this. The last estimate of Linus's personal worth was placed at 50 million, so not like he can't afford to move.
1 1
Would you say that Linux contributors with ties to MIT and other US universities that get funding from the same organizations of the MIC and
intelligence racket are suspect? No? Yeah just Russians. Cold War propaganda chugging little twerp
8 3 1
No, I'm saying that if the banned people are only banned because they're associated with the Russian government (/employed by sanctioned companies), then I'm not going to get outraged over the kernel maintainers. I do not expect them to break the law just to die on this hill.
2 1
This is all hypothetical, they are calling everyone dismayed by this Russian bots, and it's clear this is happening in sync with US aggression against Chinese professors and tech workers in the west. Most of my comments here have been pretty independent of what you're saying anyways. The wider context which could even justify speculating about this where open source is beholden to western laws and corporate practices should be a wake up call to people.
2 2 1
This is all hypothetical


Yes, that is exactly my point: let's not get all worked up about something where we have almost zero facts. Although:

open source is beholden to western laws and corporate practices


is definitely the case for the Linux Foundation: it's beholden to US laws. And wake-up call or not, a foundation would always be incorporated somewhere, and beholden to the laws of that somewhere.

5 1 1
I think getting all worked up about it is probably the first step to getting more information out of them. ┻━┻︵ (°□°)/ ︵ ┻━┻
2 1
Yeah, being from Russia is a lot different from being associated with the Russian government.


Lies! You're a communist! Russian troll!

/s for the obtuse

31 5 1
You need that reddit.world or shitty.twerks URL to really sell the bit and make the tone indicator necessary IMHO
5 5 1
I think the events on the ground will be what dictates things ultimately. Russia is wining the war, and even western media is starting to grudgingly admit it. The west is basically tapped out in terms of material support, and Ukraine is running out of manpower to keep the war going. Eventually, it's either gonna be NATO boots on the ground or Russia dictating terms. And the former almost certainly means a nuclear holocaust.
3 2
@linuxisevil @madthumbs Sorry but Dave Plumber isn't at the top of my list of trusted sources. I don't expect someone whose got a vested interest to be neutral.
16 1 1

During the 1932 Holodomor Famine, the USSR sent aid to affected regions in an attempt to alleviate the famine. According to Mark Tauger in his article, The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933:

While the leadership did not stop exports, they did try to alleviate the famine. A 25 February 1933 Central Committee decree allotted seed loans of 320,000 tons to Ukraine and 240,000 tons to the northern Caucasus. Seed loans were also made to the Lower Volga and may have been made to other regions as well. Kul'chyts'kyy cites Ukrainian party archives showing that total aid to Ukraine by April 1933 actually exceeded 560,000 tons, including more than 80,000 tons of food


Some bring up massive grain exports during the famine to show that the Soviet Union exported food while Ukraine starved. This is fallacious for a number of reasons, but most importantly of all the amount of aid that was sent to Ukraine alone actually exceeded the amount that was exported at the time.

Aid to Ukraine alone was 60 percent greater than the amount exported during the same period. Total aid to famine regions was more than double exports for the first half of 1933.


According to Tauger, the reason why more aid was not provided was because of the low harvest

It appears to have been another consequence of the low 1932 harvest that more aid was not provided: After the low 1931, 1934, and 1936 harvests procured grain was transferred back to peasants at the expense of exports.


Tauger is not a communist, and ultimately this specific article takes the view that the low harvest was caused by collectivization (he factors in the natural causes of the famine in later articles, based on how he completely neglects to mention weather in this article at all its clear that his position shifted over the years). However, the Soviets really did try to alleviate the famine as best as they could. Maybe spend some time learning a bit of history instead of flaunting your ignorance in public.

jstor.org/stable/2500600

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
10 2
The almost the entire world is against Russia. And I don't see China coming to Russia's aid any time soon.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
11 17 1
@Possibly linux @davel Since 2022, China has amplified its purchase of cheaper Russian oil after the West hit Moscow with unprecedented sanctions.
19 1

Pretty much any that isn't Lemmy.ml, hexbear or lemmygrad. (And maybe beehaw.social as they have defederated from Lemmy.world)

Just look around and pick one.

8 8 1
@linuxisevil Microsoft tends to provide stock options to their employees, this gives them more incentive to work 80 hours / week and contribute to the companies financial growth, and if they've retained those stocks, then they retain an interest.
6 1 1

I totally think them invading Ukraine is fucked up too but I also think the Israel situation is messed up too and would you be against someone maintaining code just because they are from Israel?

That would be wrong. Linux is supposed to be about more than political alignments its supposed to be a collaborative effort its always been about that.

This is wrong and its super wrong they don't tell anyone what compliance they are following or who issued it to them which is also supposed to be against what open source is about.

18 3 1

My first thought is that this was to make Linux palatable to western regulations, like how companies can't use Kaspersky anymore. Stupid if I'm right because it's not like the fsb is going to sneak spyware into Linux.

Edit: Linus commented on this and I was right: lemmy.world/comment/13034386

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
29 6 1
They very well could. However, it also could come from some US intelligence agency as well.
29 1
Wasn't that XZ Utils backdoor recently with state ties or am I just remembering wrong
16 1
No one knows yet. Given the scale of the operation it's most likely a large organization.
5 1
Possibly, but that's a much smaller project being run by 1 guy. Linux has a lot more people and reviews involved.
1
reddit.com is the one for you
11 2 1
But Torvalds is from Soviet Finland [SF]
10 29 1
Spent too much time in .ml I see
12 11 1
Nonsense personal attack
18 2 1
@linuxisevil I don't really give a flying fuck if you buy it or not. If you want to use Windows be my guest, load up your spyware and controlware and have a good time.
6 1 1
That doesn't even matter. If he worked at Microsoft he probably has a Microsoft attitude. Also I've noticed that the older programmers share his sentiment.
3 1

Image/photo

it's a pity that politics is penetrating more and more into open source and FOSS.

recently support for Russian cloud providers was cut out of opentofu. github.com/opentofu/registry/p…

now this. this is, of course, natural the core and many components of modern distributions have not been free in terms of decision-making for a long time and are under the influence of large companies, which in turn are under the influence of the USA.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
79 28 1

It's a fact of life that politics permeates everything, nothing is in isolation of the political climate it exists within.

The state of the world today is a function of the politics that got us here, a big change in world politics can have dramatic and far reaching effects.

A healthy global FOSS culture requires collaborative politics to be the flavour of the day—which is unfortunately not the case in a lot of countries currently.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
53 2 1
A healthy global FOSS culture requires collaborative politics to be the flavour of the day


Bullshit. There's no reason people with political differences can't collaborate on the same project, unless those differences are really huge.

13 6 1
@0x0 @9point6 That's my take and the universal betterment of mankind that results will bring people closer together. You might even realize someone not sharing your viewpoint is just as human.
3 1 1

Politics is not just the relationship between two people, it's the relationship between a person and everyone/everything else in the world.

Reducto ad absurdum: would you suggest a world where every country is at war with everyone else would foster a better environment for global FOSS collaboration than one where the world was at complete peace?

I honestly thought the statement you quoted was entirely uncontroversial. "Healthy" and "global" being the key words, I'm not saying it's a requirement for FOSS to exist in general or anything.

34 1
Well for what its worth there are other counties outside of Russia
2 1
We had a time of peace everyone was dependent on each other. Now the world is fragmenting and we we’ll probably have war or at least high tension between the parties.
6 2 1
What was this alleged time of peace you speak of?
14 1 1
@Possibly linux @TheOubliette Four years ago was certainly more peaceful than today.
1
It depends on how you measure it. That was the start of covid so people were dying
1
@Possibly linux Whether you measure it by the sheer number of conflicts, their average size, or the number of people dying as a result.
1
I might frame it as less embroiled in open war and extermination.
1
@TheOubliette i don't think there is any way you can measure and/or frame it that my statement is not true.
1
To split hairs, saying "more peaceful" implies it was peaceful in the first place and even is now, just less so. I don't think it was peaceful at either point. Which why I am framing it as a status quo of violence that was lesser 4 years ago and greater now.
1
@TheOubliette I don't like to choose between evils, but when not given the choice I'll choose the lesser.
1
I don't know what you mean
1
To be honest, the only reason why any of that appeared to be true, or the west appeared to uphold free speech, just like free trade policies and laissez faire approach to international finance, that was all just because Wall St did not feel threatened, that was all just because the propaganda was received unthinkingly for the past 30 years or so. Especially between 2001 and the first part of the financial crash.
2 1
FOSS has always been political. And usually fairly reactionary.
44 3 1
Agree with the former, not the latter.
5 1 1

See: the FOSS higs that all flipped out when contributor agreements with codes of conduct like "don't be homophobic or racist" started popping up.

It was quite a struggle and there is still a large old guard that simply refuses to move on it.

10 1
You're greatly overestimating how many people that is; additionally, it was largely people that aren't very committed to FOSS that got mad. The project maintainers and most users are fine with it. People who are committed to FOSS ideals are overwhelmingly progressive to leftist. That's why those codes of conduct were added in the first place, and were largely uncontroversial amongst most actual contributors of those projects.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
2 1
The projects that have those codes of conduct are the ones where any reactionary maintainers could be overruled. You have to look to the projects that have never had codes of conduct, the old guard and Incelie techbro spaces. Brave's CEO is a homophobe, for example. This has been known for years, he still makes homophobic comments. Brave does not have a code of conduct or community guidelines. And basically anyone that notices and tries to address an issue like racism or transphobia with a repo suddenly finds a mass of reactionaries coming out of the woodwork.
1 1

russia is untrustworthy country and taints even regular good people by them having to live there. What can they do if kgb or something calls and tells them to put in some code they want? Refuse and watch their loved ones die? Comply but risk telling the community they just did that?

edit. ok maybe that was a bit too harshly put. But dont you think at all that there is possibility that kremlin would exploit something like that?

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
8 28 1
Oh...
USA is untrustworthy country and taints even regular good people by them having to live there. What can they do if CIA/DEA/CIS/DHS/SS/FBI or something calls and tells them to put in some code they want? Refuse and watch their loved ones rot in prison/get deported/disappear/die? Comply but risk telling the community they just did that?
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
33 4 1
@reksas @fireshell There is no such thing as a trust worthy country because they're all run by politicians and there is no such thing as a trust worthy politician. There is an old saying, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
4 1
Finland is an untrustworthy country. America is an untrustworthy country. You want special ttreatment for citizens of the NATO bloc despite constantly running intel operations and huge invasions since WWII and especially the 90s, thag got worse after they successfully desposed the former USSR and turned it into the capitalist shithole of the Russian Federation - which tried damn hard to ally with NATO before we pushed them away. No, it's not "harshly put", you have antique, vicious neoconservative politics and racist bullshit to back it up.
11 6 1
Open-source is politics.
34 3 1

Does Russia invading Ukraine justify the US invading Iraq?

Though we are discussing individuals here, should we ban Americans in projects to maintain moral integrity?

BTW are you referring to historical (pre 1990) expansion as well? Because an American really shouldn't want to go there.

11 1

"Compliance requirements"? The kernel's american now?! WTF?

The commonality of all these maintainers being dropped? They appear to all be Russian or associated with Russia. Most of them with .ru email addresses.


Not short-sighted in the least...

Similarly, the driver code remains within the kernel -- including for Russian hardware such as around the Baikal CPUs from Russia's Baikal Electronics.


Not a hypocrite move at all...

Are israeli developers blocked as well? How about all american developers considering how the US foreign policy keeps fucking everyone up all over the place in the name of liberty and freedom... of oil?

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
101 31 1
The kernel's american now?! WTF?


Now we see the intended outcome of the "Inclusively" movement of the past few years.

I can't wait to see this "Inclusively" extended to China, India, Brazil and others.

We'll truly be the most Inclusive ever!!! What a great thing!!!!!!!!!!

12 41 1

The open source / FOSS movement in China is pretty rad. I use a sweet all platform text editor maintained by Chinese devs only.

People should be more wary of the control universities, NGOs, finance through those, law enforcement infiltration etc from US, Euros, Japan, South Korea, Aus has over open source projects due to technology being such a high national security priority.

Guess we're just going to be racist and run with the misdirection of criticism of US laws on to foreign enemies. Just go with the flow, I guess.

If they really want reverse brain drain it isn't my problem, it's their long term problem. CERN is also making a dumb mistake, all universities are in on this, it's imperial chauvinism.

22 4 1
Fantastic to hear! wonderful news. Racists and Xenophobes will try to stop global collaboration, but the real conflict that matters will always be the smart vs the lowiq. FOSS is about humanity first and not any particular sub-category. Everyone who gets in the way is trying to divide and stop FOSS from saving the planet.
10 5 1

I think at the moment FOSS movement has a core of libertarian idealism which historically cleaves to the west when anything is on the line. This is because of academic institutions being dependent on/greedy for financial and political backing, and the control of the time economy of workers by tech corps trying to turn open source into "mow my lawn for free, build character" or by the media platforms which popularizers/online tutors of open source tech and software and operating systems are dependent on

However it is also a worker's movement in some ways not just a device user's movement, and I think it will play an important part in the battle over Wall St's tech cash cow globally.

4 3 1
Racists and Xenophobes will try to stop global collaboration,


Yes! Go on...

real conflict that matters will always be the smart vs the lowiq.


Uff... That's some serious brainworms right there. How do you call your worldview? IQ Supremacy?

1 1
I wanna skirt by all the political stuff and ask what that text editor is?
5 1
Gaslight gatekeep girlboss
1
Well this is the last thread where I want to open up possibilities of text editor drama, but it is Siyuan
1 1

I wouldn't be surprised if they did something similar for China at some point. (If tensions worsen)

I don't see them doing anything outside of that

5 1 1
You do realize that the Linux foundation is an American based entity right? It isn't a shock that it is bound by US law.
13 6 1
They employ Torvalds, Torvalds owns Linux™. Who owns the code?
2 2 1
Gee i'm glad israeli maintainers are being blocked as well.
19 2 1
How we can reign that back in, I don’t know.


They're above the law, so... guillotines.

1
So it's ok if you're invading non-neighbors... got it,
10 2 1
Ehh they keep saying we are not involved we are not whatever. You can only say that so long. I mean the soldiers are coming from somewhere these are not people grown in vats.
2 1
So why did Russiactaje Crimera? Saying this wouldn’t have happened is BS. Russia I expected a quick and decisive victory.
3 1
We had international cooperation but the world is splintering now. Might be some security concerns but also think some of it is America protecting its companies from China companies.
1 2 1
Well considering the US said they would defend Ukraine from Russia when Ukraine got rid of there nukes. Yah kind of hand tied with Russia invading.
2 1 1
Of course, money
2 1
Your perfective only make sense if we assume that Putin is retarded(what he propably is) because Ukraine couldn't join NATO(Crimea) and now Finland is at NATO because that war, and Putin said that he don't care that Finland is in NATO, I can only came to the conclusion that he didn't care about NATO in Russia border, he just wanted to genocide ukranians, or die as the one who brought back Russia empire
1 2 1
You think the US provoked Russia to invade Ukraine? bruh
1
This is dumb. Corporate divestment, sure, of course, fuck their money and their power structures. But open-source developers are not generally gung-ho about the war effort... let alone propping up their local military-industrial complex.
33 1 1

This is the only plan the west has to win the war. Keep fucking over random Russians in the hopes Putin somehow becomes politically vulnerable over this, despite opposition getting weaker than ever throughoit the war and with the onset of sanctions. Now we are asking random Linux contributors, please come back when you've overthrown your government for us.

Russia is of course the only country that has ever invaded another country so it's only fair.

No matter how many vulnerabilities are introduced into software by western allied intelligence agencies, we should never be held accountable for dealing with them ourselves. After all Russians are uniquely responsible for their tyrannical government because of their Asiatic brainpans.

14 6 1

All those guns are for show, I guess.

Fuck off.

4 11 1
Fact is you know I am right, you just don't have any principles. You seem baffled some people uphold principles.
8 1 1
Putin is a despot trying to make his mark on history. No amount of appeasement from the global West would have stopped him from ordering the invasion.
6 6 1
Only problem being that Ukraine never had nukes. USSR had nukes that were stationed on the territory of Ukraine. When USSR dissolved, Russia became the successor state and inherited the nukes. This has never been in dispute.
1 1
Also, wonder what happened in 2014 that might've provoked a response from Russia there.


Ukraine using its right to free association, to sign an agreement with the EU strengthening relations? Specifically including a further formalising of cooperation around Chernobyl (Euratom is independently a signatory), an issue entirely caused by Russia in the first place, who didn't ever offer a similar level of cooperation? Is that what you're referring too?

3 1
Nah, what I'm referring to is the violent coup by the far right that was openly supported by the west. Also, Russia never asked Ukraine to choose between economic association with Russia and Europe. It was western demand that Ukraine had to break economic ties with Russia. Maybe should get your facts straight so you can do more quality trolling.
6 1 1
Money and violence, the twin forces that make the world go 'round.
1
I think the Russians that would want to backdoor stuff would just use a name like John.
41 1 1
When you think the entire world is just western countries. 🤡
7 1 1

Now what the actual fuck

Linus gives it a full green light and refers to negative reactions as Russian bot attacks

phoronix.com/news/Linus-Torval…

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
49 9 1
Actually insane lol. But you can’t expect much from anybody who willingly takes money from IBM.
16 19 1

He's Finnish by heart even though he lives in the US. I think it is probably a pretty big worry for him that Russia might invade Finland.

I doubt this is something that he would initiate but if there was any pressure from other parties (I'm sure there was) I don't think he is going to fight it.

15 11 1

I understand that.

But he also sits at the heart of the open-source community, and his actions might ripple through the entire sector. With this much influence, allowing your personal fears to chime in is unacceptable.

Once we start fragmenting open-source the way we fragment everything else, we lose the very spirit of it and open doors to so much potential power abuse.

Besides, I really don't see how restricting Russian maintainers would prevent Russian military aggression. If something important there is powered by Linux, it can be forked and modified to serve a specific need. Not to mention Finland is now part of NATO.

14 4 1

he's just an American nationalist at heart. his dad was a member of the Russian communist party and his biography seemed to make clear that rebelled from that.

socially he's not terrible but when the war drums come beating he's stepping in line for the stars and stripes

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
16 10 1
socially he’s not terrible but when the war drums come beating he’s stepping in line for the stars and stripes


Like pretty much every Finn would these days, really.

6 2 1
I know you are saying this is a bad thing but as an American I have no issues with it.
2 7 1
American national can take many forms. The kind the person is probably the kind based in American idealism (think superman, Captain America, "liberty and justice for all") and less the kind based in racism.
1 1
Russia might invade Finland.


Finland's part or NATO now. Putin may be a lot of things, stupid ain't one of them. Ironically, this kinda backfired on him but can't say it was unexpected considering most scandinavians love the american dream.

1
Hey, Torvalds! 🖕
19 16 1
he makes me want to switch to bsd
4 1
Same here! I've been eyeing OpenBSD for quite some time now.
1 1
is bsd safe from this? where is their foundation based?
1 1
university of california
1
This is such an odd thing to do... I really cannot see the benefits for the project doing this. Maybe those maintainers were payed for their work and sanctions prohibit paying them or something?
23 5 1
Or maybe some Russian State backed programmers have tried to slip in backdoors in various key systems, numerous times. Including one that almost went live on millions of machines.
31 24 1

Even Wikipedia, which is a shockingly bloodthirsty pro-NATO outlet, admits there is zero proof that a "Russian state actor" did this, there are just "western security experts" claiming it (as usual), and opinion is divided.

Did you even read this or do you just vaguely remember a Wired article? I have been able to see through these obvious ploys since I was a teenager reading about cold war propaganda (okay that was like 5 years ago but still SMDH)

Great sign for discussion that hacking is still being treated by Redditors as Russian, Chinese, and North Korean until proven otherwise. 🤕

19 19 1
@Oblique Obscurantist @chaogomu Seems to me, after the Stuxnet incident, any US claims of bad foreign actors are a bad case of the pot calling the kettle black.
11 3 1

The funny thing is Stuxnet is a good example of how sanctions can backfire. We used a supply chain attack and the Iranians hardened their systems. Can anyone really claim it was any different than another Mossad "humiliate them and hope something happens" operation that ultimately blew the cover off years of intelligence work?

The Lebanon pagers attack, Russian sanctions and CERN or Linux creating reverse brain drain will continue to backfire, on our ability to even twist these screws, also on our supply chains in countries which consider themselves a US target or even just a middleman.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
9 2
I wonder if there are any official US documents declaring an intent to hide cyberattacks under the flags of foreign nations? 🤭 Wouldn't that be droll?
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
6 2 1
But where do you have information that it was russian state? There are many state actors capable of doing this. Just saying
15 1 1
What I see is that someone is arguing the point that all Russians are criminals. If someone is sending bad code, they usually just get banned, this time it's preventive measures based on ethnicity.
1

While this is completely appalling, I cannot say I am shocked considering what Linus posts on some platforms and in some conversations. Really not surprising.

Don't take this justification seriously for a second. This is the check coming due for a community with leadership still beholden to western political hegemony, the intellectual appratus that decides who gets educated and what is published, etc etc. Getting a bit offtopic. View this in the same context as CERN kicking out Russians. Mask is coming off of science, democracy, freedom of speech and all that nonsense made up to spruce up the myth of civilization versus barbarity.

36 24 1
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
2 4 1
yup. these so called "open" projects are being kneecapped in the name of American empire and Linus is celebrating it.
9 8 1
LMFO I was on the reddit thread reading this post and coudn't believe my eyes reading the comments. We're living truly revelation times. Like you said this is a long due wakeup call for the rest of the "uncivilized" world.
13 6 1
@Gamma They had other provocations such as what was happening to the Russian speaking people in Donbass, but the United States definitely sealed the deal.
1
Ah, cool. You're one of those.
1 4 1
Yeah, I'm one of those people who are actually informed on the subject.
4 2 1
I was wondering what's up with the comments but then I realized the main feed sent me to .ml.
33 19 1
You should stay on reddit.world or sh.itjust.twerks telling your fellow Redditors about how we need to send billions of dollars to foreign wars that RAND corporation and Chatham House have admitted they never intended to win (they thought Russians would overthrow their own government if enough Ukrainian men and adolescents die on the battlefield long enough, pure strategic genius, Zapp Brannigan would be proud).
21 33 1
You act as if we killed your dog. There is nothing stopping you from moving on. You can jump to an instance that is more agreeable to you or you could create a big block list. However, lemmyml has earned a bad rep from the rest of the community.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
13 12 1
@Possibly linux @Oblique Obscurantist I was working on bringing up a lemmy instance here, but after seeing the typical lemmy users I think I shall abandon the project.
1 8 1
No, you are wrong!
1 3 1
Deleted I missed who this replied to lol
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
3 1
Still worth while to do so, the trick is you need to defederate problematic instances. Not hide them, fully defederate. That stops problematic instances and communties from affecting your userbase. There's many great Lemmy servers and communties out there. Just because a few of them aren't great doesn't mean you should dismiss all of them.
10 5
I encourage you guys fully defederating the Redditor based instances from the people who actually care about the integrity of open source projects. Get lost creeps! You haven't made a single argument in this thread other than "all Russians are spies" and "all dissenters are Russian spied". Useless idiots!
12 11 1

I haven't made any arguments in this thread, you are putting words in my mouth, and not really helping your credibility. All I said is that the person should defederate Lemmy instances and communities which go against the mission of their instance. Something that almost all instance operators would likely agree on.

Just for the record though, I don't believe people should be kicked out of a project based on their nationality, that seems incredibly xenophobic. I don't know where you got that idea that I said any of those things from.

5 1 1

You're encouraging someone who wants to block "problematic instances" in this case people voicing opposition to that xenophobia, to host lemmy (an open source project where most instances have large linux communities), and taking them seriously on their concern trolling in the first place. It does send a bit of an unusual message.

Anyways I stand by it, that person should fuck off back to reddit.

3 8 1
@Oblique Obscurantist @Draconic NEO I've seen more trolling from lemmy hosts than anything else here recently. I was going to add a lemmy site to my social media sites but this has convinced me that perhaps now is not the time. This time last year mastodon was a big problem but it has settled down, perhaps lemmy will in the future.
3 1

Misskey forks and Mastodon all have a file drive to manage things, thread watching, one-click access to LibreTranslate without browser extensions (good for libraries and school). Lemmy is really only good for the insane blood bowl of comments sections - and I literally have to use SearxNG lemmy comments plugin to sift through it because federation is so annoying. Though I am being harsh maybe. Eh honestly it's workable if you babysit every aspect of federation but it was never worth it to me. A.gup.pe is pretty much the best way to bridge Lemmy with Mastodon/Misskey/Friendica forks.

Let's be for real though, Mastodon's ecosystem is horrible. They all support mindless aggression against Russia and "Israel's right to exist" where Palestinians used to live side by side even with Zionists. The few people who stand up even for international law, which is based in US oriented institutions, are constantly lambasted, to the point even mild radical liberals like that German "immibis" guy are driven to their own instances.

FediMap shows why. Until server hosting is less concentrated in NATO countries you can expect more heavy handed neoconservative moderation. At least there are cool Brazilians.

Literally just use a Misskey fork, Funkwhale, and Peertube.

6
@Oblique Obscurantist Yea I don't think where the servers are hosted is the issue, if it were I'd be seeing this same traffic on my other social media sites and from other than lemmy servers here. Well there are about there other non-lemmy sites that are problematic but in a different way, lot of racist comments from a handful.
1 1

Lemmy needs way better management of uploads than a randomly created URL floating in the void. If you accidentally paste a picture of your face or dick it is just stuck there and you have to beg an admin to help. You don't even have to hit post.

Oh yeah I skipped over the Nazi microblog instances because they are pretty isolated and infighty. It's the full throated imperialists who ban anyone who talks about the genocide like anyone is responsible for it but the Palestinians.

They do actually often use EU laws to back up their censorship. They of course would never consider other hosting options. They are proud of the EU for some reason.

But whatever if that's what people decide "Mastodon" is going to be like there is a lot more to be done with ActivityPub services other than link it to your chosen flavor of microblogging, and it certainly doesn't need to have the sheen of Eugene Rotchko on it haha

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
1
Good, Lemmy is not very well-made software. I won't belabor it, but you are dodging a bullet. It's methadone for reddit. You can see the junkies fiending in this very thread.
1 11
@Oblique Obscurantist I see useful things happen on Reddit, can't say I've seen a parallel in Lemmy so far. And I'm not sure I can get it to run in the configuration I want to, which is to say having it NOT on the same machine as the web server proxy or database.
2 1
Take it to the dev/host chat buddy I can't help you
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
3 4
There is nothing stopping you from moving on


This guy was just telling me he couldn't stand to see opinions that don't mindlessly support sabotaging the Linux community. Now he says I should just move on? Weird.

8 12 1
The latest report that I saw was Russian attrition was nearing a collapsing rate in which the expected experience and levels of fatigue of renenforcments were to mean the expected casualty rates would climb exponentially on their side.
1 1 1

That's interesting because I remember reading that in 2022. Meanwhile Zelensky is publicly threatening to deploy "3 secret weapons" which he apparently discussed behind closed doors with western leaders who are responding negatively to this pronouncement (indicating an unwillingness to escalate)

Let's be for real, Russia could tac nuke a non NATO Eastern European country in response to whatever dual use weapons zelensky is talking about with a nuclear payload, and their chief worry would probably be the global backlash, not the threat of strategic nukes

Put down the washing machine memes and listen to the quieter admissions of Ukrainian soldiers. That's how I saw them throwing civilian bodies into a pit, gloating, before editing 30 min later to claim they took it off a Russian phone (despite visible armbands). Morale is breaking down, conscription is failing versus the Russian mercenary and volunteer partial mobilization. There is no political change coming in Moscow.

1 3 1
@Oblique Obscurantist @fruitycoder I don't think political change is even desirable, contrasted with Dmitry Medvedev and especially with Boris Yeltsin and Mikhail Gorbachev before him and pretty much the farther back you go the worse it gets, Konstantin Chernenko, Yuri Andropov, I mean farther back you go the worse they get. I think Putin really has been the most willing to work with us if we had only returned the same in kind, as any Russian leader in history. As for political change, though I do not think it will come as a result the political will of the people, sure he has his detractors but think most people are not unhappy with him, where it's likely to come is simply the fact that he is 72 years old, we don't know the state of his health or how long it will hold up.
2 1

It's a horrifying prospect unless you just want to maintain access to natural resource and monopoly rents via international corps, offered up by whatever Navalny type they would want to take power.

Medvedev... yeah no way but it would be funny.

1 1
@Oblique Obscurantist Prior to nuclear weapons perhaps but that kind of takes the humor out of it.
1 1
@fruitycoder @Oblique Obscurantist Yes MSNBC has been claiming this for oh the last two years.
1 1

Comments do drastically differ between .ml and .world. On .ml, you'll see more sympathy towards Russia and China.

But the issue on hand is way bigger than that. It's importance is not in Russia getting sanctioned somewhere else - it's in the destruction of openness and trust in the open-source community, which has far more reaching consequences. What has been done is pretty unprecedented - and dangerous.

And I'm surprised other Linux communities are silent on the matter.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
27 7 1
Half the problem with .ml is the even blend of sensible takes and wackadoodle nonsense. That's the systemic reason everyone who's not pro-wackadoodle catches themselves going "what the f-- oh, it's a .ml community, yeesh."
1 1 1
The other half of what's wrong with .ml is the blatant censorship all over the goddamn site.
2 3 1
The userbase's downvote-happy inability to take criticism barely matters.
1 1 1
@mindbleach @Allero From what I'm seeing from Lemmy, I would estimate the wackadoodle's to be much higher than 50%.
1 1

I can't stress how much the western supremacists are off the rails on this one: agreeing with the standard sanctions policy commonly used by the US, of punishing entire civilian populations based on the actions of their government, regardless of how you feel about that government and its actions.

Code is code, the nationality of the person shouldn't be used to exclude them. ppl know how most of us here feel about Israel but I would never even think of excluding an Israeli contributor to any of the projects I work on.

6 2 1
Are they excluding contributions or maintainer status?
1
I was wondering why some of the comments were being maliciously dense and then I realised the commentators were smug aspiring redditors
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
8 9 1
@YaBoyMax Sorry I've watched enough of his speeches that I can't come away with the same. I know there are a lot of deep state types trying to paint him as such so that we can get on with their ww III depopulation agenda.
2 3 1
It's funny that the mere suggestion someone learn history gets downvotes. Oh I don't want to do that. It takes so much effort. Much easier just to hate because MSNBC tells me to.
1
NVIDIA banned Russia. What a stupid trick. Why block? As if anyone would be left without a driver.
2 4 1

Linus Torvalds Confirms Decision to Remove Maintainers from Russia

You couldn't come up with a more powerful spit in the direction of FOSS. And from Linus, who is now kind of showing f*ck to the entire community. Here you have freedom, openness and all that. Today they just wiped their ass with it, and by one of the founders.

This is the moment when the split politics, dirty ones from all sides, have penetrated into the very heart of OpenSource - into the Linux kernel.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
51 28 1

Software still has to follow legal rules, like when some distros removed stuff to be ITAR /EAR compliant for shipping across borders

Nothing is stopping Russia from taking the Open Source
kernel and developing it themselves

7 4 1
@BCsven @fireshell Or Linus from moving the organization back to Finland, or Iceland, or Switzerland, or some other more neutral territory.
15 1
I'm not sure if you're kidding, so I'll just note that Finland and Iceland are NATO member states, and Finland is notoriously against Russian aggressions due to history.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
5 5 1
I think the commentor meant in regard to US restrictions that may get imposed on a project, since they have odd ITAR/EAR controls. Moving sonewhere with less export restrictions could alter choices of development.
5 1
@vga I can only tell you that if my personal net worth was 50 million, I'd be looking for a new national home yesterday.
1 1

Kernel cannot follow or not follow any legal rules. Linux Foundation can.

And if regulations become a serious issue and go against the spirit of open-source, it is time to move the Foundation somewhere else.

7 3 1
@Allero @BCsven That was the point I was making when I suggest back to Finland or perhaps Iceland or Switzerland.
5 1
Agreed with you!
1 1
the foundation should have moved long ago but I think Linus' personal adoration of the US is going to get in the way of that.
9 3 1

i don't know what exactly was in question in the kernel, that the lawyers had to worry about, but From EAR rules...
"note that open source software can still be subject to export control measures if it includes technologies or functionalities that are regulated. In such cases, specific controls may be applied to prevent the unauthorized export of these technologies or functionalities."

IF something was deemed controlled, it makes sense to pull it so kernel can ship anywhere, and whomever received it can do their own tweaks

2 1
@BCsven @Allero Given the modular nature of the kernel, the module can always be made available separately those today's Internet really makes such restrictions, as they apply to software, moot.
2 1
Exactly. Not much different than a distro that can't legally ship non-free drivers for initial instal due to licensing, but you load them in yourself on first boot
1 1
@BCsven As I stated though moot, the laws have really outlived their usefulness. There are simply too many unsecured systems on the Internet to make it impossible for a bad foreign actor to gain access to any software that is not intended for export. When I worked for the local telco, many of their switches had dial-in modems that connected to the recent change channels, the channels that allow you to alter how lines were assigned, telephone calls were routed, etc, without so much as a login or password. If you knew the commands you could do pretty much anything you wanted to. I caused a major meltdown that got me an unwanted interview with directors merely for suggesting that they put a password on the root account of a pbx interface Unix system used to serve a 40,000 line customer. So yea security is mostly a joke and as a result these laws serve no useful purpose.
1
Oh I get the futility of it. But if you are in the USA you are bound by it. Same reason encryption devs had to cross to Canada to do development because USA would not allow encryption code shared across boundaries.
Or how I once sent a software bug report in for an Engineering product; because company is USA based they assigned it an ITAR /EAR status. It was a 4" cube I modelled, and now some dev has to treat it as sensitive EAR data. LOL
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
1
That is interesting, my comment got removed.
2 1
Uhh ~~sir~~ Linus, this is a ~~Wendy's~~ Linux kernel.


.

Why force your political beliefs on something that has nothing to do with?

10 8 1
Not sure if being against Russian aggression can be called a "political belief" as nearly all Finns pretty much agree on it.
13 6 1
@vga @ChiefSinner That it was "aggression" in and of itself is a political belief.
1 2 1
@MrAlternateTape @fireshell <sarcasm>But Stuxnet proves nobody in the United States would do that.</sarcasm>
5 1
by this logic it turns out that the code quality control system is built in such a way that if someone has malicious intent and wants to add malicious code, but is not affiliated with dubious structures, then he will easily succeed? Hey, what about enough eyeballs and shallow bugs?
16 1 1

If we follow through with it, I would absolutely never ever trust anyone from the US, for example. US is very much known for cyber espionage and shady operations, and could absolutely backdoor Linux.

This is all power play, and it comes from a very certain direction amidst this political struggle.

You want your open source code not to have backdoors? Review it meticulously. This is really the only way, and the one an entire open-source community relies on - pretty successfully, by the way.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
28 4 1
Actually I'm interested how it looks legally ( it somebody cares about it at all ). Whether the Russian contributors could ask to revert their changes as they most likely never signed the contract to transfer their code copyrights. For sure it will have a big impact on foss because if you have at least one American and Russian contributors, you may get in the biggest shitshow. Additionally if I was considering now to become a contributors, I'd be wondering if it's worthy at all to work for free and then to be banned no thanks for whole free work years
8 6 1
IANAL, but I think the general answer is no. When someone contribute code to an open source project, although they aren't giving up their copyright, they do grant the recipient (and the rest of the world, for that matter) a license to use their code. In case of Linux, this is the GNU Public License. Unless GPL has a section about license revocation that I am not aware of, you won't be able to take your code back.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
12 1
So I think good luck for foss movement. Hopefully, forking that project won't be illegal because otherwise foss will die
5 9 1
If only there was some sort of review process for code to get into the kernel...
9 2 1
Yeah better discriminate based on nationality /s. But why stop at that? Poor people are too easily bribed can't have them. I hear the CIA recruits from top US universities, can't trust those college grads either. Anyone belonging to some homophobic church or religious group? Better not what if they're closeted gay and get blackmailed? Anyone in a monogamous relationship should be excluded for the same reason, if you think about it. *tips forehead*
17 7 1

Linus is an absolute cunt for not only following this gleefully but then attributing pushback to "russian trolls" and "state propaganda" fuck you man.

These people weren't the MIT pricks who inserted vulnerabilities into the kernel, they were contributors who did hard work and helped advance FREE software. Linus is now turning his back on the GPL and manning it clear that Linux can be controlled by the US state on a whim.

50 28 1
Yep, anyone who is celebrating this is shortsighted and letting their own nationalistic ideas and jingoism cloud their judgement.
9 1
It's literally just speculation. Even if it were true, what the fuck does that have to do with the nationality of a few Linux contributors? Have you people cracked?
4 3 1
There's definitely a lot of opposition to Russia's actions in the world but your comment sounds especially funny today when leaders of most of the world(including the UN Secretary General and even a certain NATO country President) are currently in Kazan, Russia on a global cooperation summit.
3 1

Also from seemingly reasonable commenters there are many arguments around security coming up. I don't get how one can jump to that idea? This obviously has nothing to do with security, it's about sanction compliance. And yes, likely a pretty pointless sanction compliance in this instance, as the sanctioned entities don't have a direct benefit from having an employee name mentioned in the kernel. However that's not how sanctions work, both just because, and also intuitively it makes sense: Sanctions wouldn't be enforcable at scale if every single case would have to be judged on merit - it's hard enough to enforce them as is.

And btw I so hope most of the comments on here are Russian trolls, but I fear many are people that fully drunk the Russian trolls' cool-aid and are now fully brainwashed...

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
13 8 1

That's so cute that you think that anyone who doesn't eat out of the hand of Google News is brainwashed by Putin. You're such a critical thinker. Thank you for weighing in.

Actually the difference between me and people like you is I actually read what Washington and Kiev are saying about the war and have memory longer than a goldfish! Plus, I avoid search engines that have gone under heavy censorship since February 2022 by groups like Alliance to Secure Democracy. I have far more cogent criticism of the Russian government and their media, their central bank, and MOD than anyone like you, or most of the supporters of the SMO. Mainly that they let the west get away with a Nazi coup in Ukraine in 2014 and sat on their hands.

Of course support for the Ukrainians has nothing to do with western propaganda LOL, you have no choice whether America and its sub-imperial partners in Europe, Australia, Japan, and South Korea send supplies and funding to the Ukrainians. It doesn't make any difference whether you buy the propaganda or not. These same thinks tanks that call for a war in Ukraine are now discovering that western industrial capacity cannot be restored and falls far short of doing anything other than delaying Ukraine losing.

The economic shock of the coronavirus pandemic has now rolled into the mass realignment caused by sanctioning Russia. Sanctions place a burden on all countries which are expected to abide by them. Outside of western countries which constitute 14% of the world population, people are ambivalent about the Anti Terrorist Operation Against Donbas Separatists entering year TEN, they only care about the western financial system being turned into a weapon against them.

In fact, even American vassals like Europe and Japan are becoming more cagey about war. It certainly is not inspiring the hardcore faction of the Taiwanese about war with China.

7 5 1
Which law under which jurisdiction?
4 1
Please report those comments so we can remove them too plz.
2 1
By keep it vague and saying their hands are tied they also get to dodge any kind of scutiny on what decisions they actually made before doing this.
1 1
As a Finnish person I wholeheartedly agree with Linus.
7 10 1
For me as an old fart this all sounds like such a stupid thing... who cares if someone who volunteer to work for an software project is a Russian, German, Iranian or - God forbid - an Frenchman. My personal - and of course completely insignificant - opinion is that politics should stay out.
20 3 1
@Tinidril How about self defense, same thing we would have called the invasion of Cuba if the Russians hadn't backed down.
1 1
@Tinidril It's realistic is what it is. It's not trying to paint Putin as some evil Hitler clone. It's what happens when you don't have a vested interest in the military industrial complex and aren't a shill for someone who does.
1

@Tinidril If it were not for our input I kind of doubt that would be the case.

You know we are at a precipice, we have the technology now to really make this world a nice place, or we can fight over what are mostly obsolete resources and turn it into a hellscape. I would prefer the former but obviously you and a lot of others prefer the latter.

1
@Tinidril I would be against that too but that is not the reason they invaded the Ukraine. I know someone who was born in Kiev, then lived in Moscow Russia, then moved to the United States, so he identifies with both sides of the conflict and just wants to see it end, but that's not happen as long as we continue to turn it into a proxy war with Russia.
1
@Tinidril He was backed into a corner and so he fought, he gave plenty of indications of what would happen, we ignored them, he followed through with exactly what he said he would do. If we'd followed through with what we said we would do and not advanced NATO past East Germany, then all Raytheon and company wouldn't be racking in the dollars killing people now.
1 1
I don't trust them considering their enthusiasm over it and the comments about Finnish history. Go read "Finnisu Civil War: History, Memory, Legacy" by Tepora and try to laugh at the comments about history. Impossible.
1

You are too blinded by propaganda to use reason. It's deeply pathetic.

Didn't read the book did you dum dum?

1

The US is the most belligerent nation on earth, shall we ban american contributors? How about israeli?

Should their code be removed from the kernel?

The real question i haven't seen answered is Who owns the kernel code. Torvalds owns the Linux™ but that's to prevent others from buying it, but i was under the impression the source code is owned by all those who contribute to it and not whoever happens to be employing Torvalds at the time. Or is it a matter of where git.kernel.org/ happens to be hosted?

I'd suggest Codeberg but that's in Germany, so maybe another forgejo instance hosted maybe in Switzerland.

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
1
@Tinidril @0x0 I'm sorry but I think our shoeing in of Zelenskyy did count as an invasion.
1 1