friendica (DFRN) - Link to source

Humanity


I am pondering our population and our human response to it.
I see pro-abortionists wanting to kill babies.
I see eugenicists wanting to inject us with poison.
I see military wanting to savagely bomb other human beings out of existence.
And I am thinking, perhaps the real problem with our population isn’t the exhaustion of resources or pollution, perhaps it is that when human life becomes so plentiful, it looses all it’s value.
This entry was edited (4 years ago)
in reply to Nanook

Very interesting. I was leaving Facebook, searching for platforms and found Diaspora, and it reminded me of the group of speakers I used to work with at our conferences. One was The Open Source Conference, and that was a collection of very interesting speakers and attendees. I miss them. I was the Operations Manager of our tech media company, in charge of putting on conferences. I am going to take some time to check out your site. Thanks!
in reply to Nanook

@Everyone:

1) I am not here (in life) to discuss about:

  • religion. Less even which one is true and which one is false.
  • anybody's beliefs:
  • negros', dwarfs', balds', gays', Red Socks fanatics', etc, cultural, moral nor mental condition.
  • Hitler intentions, Pearl Harbour's deservability, how many pairs three boots are, nor the lenght of Archangel Gabriel's dick.

2) I am here to refutate the whole shit that the original thrown on us, by interchanging opinions well back-upped in facts.

If there's any one that wants to go on that issue in those conditions, don't hesitate in calling me back. Else, I quit.

Thanks for your attention.

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source

LaRouchePAC Weekly â„–Â 48

A weekly roundup of news, culture, and organizing from LaRouchePAC.
International Investigative Commission on Truth in Elections

The Schiller Institute convened an “International Investigative Commission on Truth in Elections†which aired Saturday, November 28, 2020, featuring a panel of distinguished international jurists hearing reports from qualified Americans related to the ongoing electoral process in the United States. This is not a partisan issue. Some of the participants are, in their own political views, pro-Trump; some are anti-Trump. But what brings them together is a far greater issue: a concern over the universal importance of truth in elections, and the need to hold the United States to the same high standard as its own Constitution demands. Watch now >>>
Explosive Developments in the President’s Countercoup

Friday, November 27, saw explosive developments in the fight to reverse the fraud through which the news media, the Democrats, and their intelligence community collaborators are trying to seat their Avatar, Joe Biden, as President of the United States. On Friday, Senators and Representatives in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the keystone state, announced that they will move legislation on Monday, November 30, to decertify the election and reclaim the Constitutional authority given to the state legislatures to directly appoint the state’s electors to the Electoral College. This news comes just two days after stunning hearings held in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, during which hours of testimony revealed the manifold levels of fraud in the election. As the legislators told the audience at the beginning of those hearings, the hearings themselves were the product of tens of thousands of telephone calls coming from constituents who knew the election had been stolen or who had personally witnessed outright fraud. Senator Doug Mastriano, who is leading the effort, asked Pennsylvania citizens to help by calling on their state representatives to join the effort. Read more >>>
A Republic, Not a Democracy: Will State Legislatures Appoint Presidential Electors?

by Judy Hodgkiss

In the fight for this victory for Trump, we see among these legislators a quality of soul searching not seen among politicians for decades, perhaps a century or more. They are being confronted with fundamental questions concerning the genius and the morality embedded in the U.S. Constitution; they find themselves tasked with writing a chapter in a new edition of Profiles in Courage.

It is that production of a different kind of politician that reveals, in fact, the essence of the meaning of a republic. It is not just a negative definition, i.e., the negation of mob democracy. A successful republic depends on the rise, out of the cauldron of the political fray, a quality of leadership that is not just defined by the politician’s usual search for a majority of votes.

If the Biden voter of good will is able to appreciate that definition of republic, and resist clinging to the dirty dishpan of a tainted election, then he will help us to make the U.S. electoral system and its underlying republican structure, once again the marvel of the world. Learn more >>>
The President Is Fighting on Multiple Fronts; Do You Know About Them?

by Barbara Boyd

If there is anything we have learned in watching Donald Trump, it is that he does not think linearly—while his morally and mentally challenged opponents almost always do. Our observation is that the President is marking territory for the upcoming fights his Administration and his movement will undertake in the ongoing second American Revolution—the revolt of the population which won a major advance in November 2016. To grasp this, compare what the President is doing and what those who control the senile Joe Biden are telling you they will do. We refer to Biden here, and will do so persistently into the future for any pretensions that he will occupy the Office of the President of the United States, as "The Avatar", because he is not mentally capable of running anything and is instead being run openly by former President Barack Obama and Obama’s associates. Read more >>>
A Vignette Concerning Benjamin Franklin:
Parts II & III

by Robert Ingraham

Franklin's revolutionary life and struggles come alive in Ingraham's vignettes, connecting the fight Franklin was engaged in then, with the historic and revolutionary moment we find ourselves in today. Read 1774: Franklin in the Cockpit—Face to Face Against Empire & Leadership at a Time of Crisis

As always, thanks for following our work. If you've got any questions, or feedback, send it my way.Â

Alicia
LaRouchePAC Web-Team
Alicia@LPAC-Organizers.com

in reply to Nanook

Yes, poet1b, like all liberals (since you lump them altogether, I will too), you support things that sound great, but that is not what you are really supporting. The Democrats lie all the time, they will never lower your taxes. They are the global empire, they are just good at saying they are something else. They flock around at election times and tell you all the pretty lies, then they go away again to spend money. In the past 4+ years they have done nothing at all except obstruct and attack the President. I support America, and that means Trump for 4 more years.

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source


Let’s Stand Up for Home Hacking and Repair


eff.org/deeplinks/2020/11/lets…

Image/photo

#hash(0x326a788) #hash(0x326a860) #hash(0x326aa70) #hash(0x326ab60)

Let’s tell the Copyright Office that it’s not a crime to modify or repair your own devices.

Every three years, the Copyright Office holds a rulemaking process where it grants the public permission to bypass digital locks for lawful purposes. In 2018, the Office expanded existing protections for jailbreaking and modifying your own devices to include voice-activated home assistants like Amazon Echo and Google Home, but fell far short of the broad allowance for all computerized devices that we’d asked for. So we’re asking for a similar exemption, but we need your input to make the best case possible: if you use a device with onboard software and DRM keeps you from repairing that device or modifying the software to suit your purposes, see below for information about how to tell us your story.

DMCA 1201: The Law That Launched a Thousand Crappy Products


Why is it illegal to modify or repair your own devices in the first place? It’s a long story. Congress passed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in 1996. That’s the law that created the infamous “notice-and-takedown” process for allegations of copyright infringement on websites and social media platforms. The DMCA also included the less-known Section 1201, which created a new legal protection for DRM—in short, any technical mechanism that makes it harder for people to access or modify a copyrighted work. The DMCA makes it unlawful to bypass certain types of DRM unless you’re working within one of the exceptions granted by the Copyright Office.

Suddenly manufacturers had a powerful tool for restricting how their customers used their products: build your product with DRM, and you can argue that it’s illegal for others to modify or repair it.

The technology landscape was very different in 1996. At the time, when most people thought of DRM, they were thinking of things like copy protection on DVDs or other traditional media. Some of the most dangerous abuses of DRM today come in manufacturers’ use of it to limit how customers use their products—farmers being unable to repair their own tractors, or printer manufacturers trying to restrict users from buying third-party ink.

When the DMCA passed, manufacturers suddenly had a powerful tool for restricting how their customers used their products: build your product with DRM, and you can argue that it’s illegal for others to modify or repair it.

Section 1201 caught headlines recently when the RIAA attempted to use it to stop the distribution of youtube-dl, a tool that lets people download videos from YouTube and other user-uploaded video platforms. Fortunately, GitHub put the youtube-dl repository back up after EFF explained on behalf of youtube-dl’s developers that the tool doesn’t circumvent DRM.

mytubethumb play%3Ciframe%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2Fck7utXYcZng%3Fautoplay%3D1%26mute%3D1%22%20allow%3D%22accelerometer%3B%20autoplay%3B%20clipboard-write%3B%20encrypted-media%3B%20gyroscope%3B%20picture-in-picture%22%20allowfullscreen%3D%22%22%20width%3D%22560%22%20height%3D%22315%22%20frameborder%3D%220%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3EPrivacy info. This embed will serve content from youtube.com

Abuse of legal protections for DRM isn’t just a United States problem, either. Thanks to the way in which copyright law has been globalized through a series of trade agreements, much of the world has similar laws on the books to DMCA 1201. That creates a worst-of-both-worlds scenario for countries that don’t have the safety valve of fair use to protect people’s free expression rights or processes like the Copyright Office rulemaking to remove the legal doubt around bypassing DRM for lawful purposes. The rulemaking process is deeply flawed, but it’s better than nothing.

Let’s Tell the Copyright Office: Home Hacking Is Not a Crime


Which brings us back to this year’s Copyright Office rulemaking. We’re asking the Copyright Office to grant a broad exception for people to take advantage of in modifying and repairing all software-enabled devices for their own use.

If you have a story about how:

  • someone in the United States;
  • attempted or planned to modify, repair, or diagnose a product with a software component; and
  • encountered a technological protection measure (including DRM or digital rights management—any form of software security measure that restricts access to the underlying software code, such as encryption, password protection, or authentication requirements) that prevented completing the modification, repair, or diagnosis (or had to be circumvented to do so)

—we want to hear from you! Please email us at RightToMod-2021@lists.eff.org with the information listed below, and we’ll curate the stories we receive so we can present the most relevant ones alongside our arguments to the Copyright Office. The comments we submit to the Copyright Office will become a matter of public record, but we will not include your name if you do not wish to be identified by us. Submissions should include the following information:

  • The product you (or someone else) wanted to modify, repair, or diagnose, including brand and model name/number if available.
  • What you wanted to do and why.
  • How a TPM interfered with your project, including a description of the TPM.
    • What did the TPM restrict access to?
    • What did the TPM block you from doing? How?
    • If you know, what would be required to get around the TPM? Is there another way you could accomplish your goal without doing this?
  • Optional: Links to relevant articles, blog posts, etc.
  • Whether we may identify you in our public comments, and your name and town of residence if so. We will treat all submissions as anonymous unless you expressly give us this permission to identify you.


sss reshared this.