Why it will appear the vaccines work


Two MAGIC reasons why it will appear that #covid #vaccines work.
1. The FDA just approved the use of HCQ for treating covid.
2. Studies have shown that Ivermectin (a chemical used to de-worm animals) is effective against covid-19.
Both are cheap (Doc Wallach said Ivermectin is cheaper than bubble gum) so, all of a sudden, anyone can be cured. And some are going to be dumb or uninformed enough to think it is the vaccine.

Hello everyone, nice to be on a social site that accepts positive comments about Trump!


I'm new to friendica, this is my first post! I've only ever used facebook. The problem with it, you shouldn't use it period if you believe anything or voted for Trump because the owner is anti religion and pro Biden. You are making him very wealthy by using his site. So wealthy because of the virtual monopoly facebook enjoys that it's terribly inappropriate to use facebook in the quest to restore free speech in America. To this end, I want to find enough social media owned and operated by pro religion people that all the religious people on facebook can leave facebook. The next trick is getting them all off. It needs to happen yesterday, I am guilty of having been on there so long myself. Of greatest concern, live streamed religious ceremonies need to get off of facebook period. No matter what you believe, I beg of you to reach out to all people of faith that are on facebook to help them leave. The sooner, the better. We should be able to cut facebook's subscribership by at least 50% and cut his revenues significantly too. I encourage Robert who runs eskimo.com and everyone I can reach who does or can run an appropriately pro religion social media site to get to know each other and support each other. Ideally, any large pro religion social media site is in a red state and there are sites all over the country to accommodate everyone who believes anything coming off of Facebook and Youtube.
in reply to Stefani Banerian (pluspora)

@Stefani Banerian Arkansas, Alabama & Louisiana support Texas before US Supreme Court, alleging ‘unconstitutional’ election in four states

8 Dec, 2020

Attorneys-general of Arkansas and Alabama have now joined Louisiana in backing the push by Texas to challenge the presidential election results in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin before the US Supreme Court.

“After reviewing the motion filed by Texas in the US Supreme Court, I have determined that I will support the motion in all legally appropriate manners. The integrity of our elections is a critical part of our nation and it must be upheld,†Arkansas AG Leslie Rutlege announced on Tuesday evening.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall issued a statement likewise supporting the effort of his Texas colleague Ken Paxton, saying that “unconstitutional actions and fraudulent votes in other states not only affect the citizens of those states, they affect the citizens of all states.â€

Every unlawful vote counted, or lawful vote uncounted, debases and dilutes citizens’ free exercise of the franchise.

The four battleground states declared Democrat Joe Biden the victorm based on large numbers of mail-in ballots counted after Election Day.

While Marshall stopped short of signing on to the Texas lawsuit, he said that he expects the Supreme Court to “quickly†decide whether to hear the case, and that the decision will “instruct†Alabama how to continue fighting to ensure election integrity.

Earlier in the evening, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said his state had “deep concerns†about how the elections were run in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

While Landry did not sign onto the Texas lawsuit either, he said it echoes the claims made in the previous amicus brief by several states, backing Pennsylvania Republicans who wanted the election results in the Keystone State voided due to irregularities.

Both Mainstream media and social networks hastened to declare Biden the winner of the election and label as “false†or “disputed†anything that challenged that, in particular President Donald Trump.

Unlike the cases brought by Trump’s own lawyers and allies, however, Texas is not alleging election fraud, but arguing that the four states engaged in “voting irregularities,†improper “amendments to States’ duly enacted election laws,†and even potential suppression of the Republican vote, “whether lawful or unlawful.â€

“These flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections,†said the motion filed by Texas AG Ken Paxton, which the Supreme Court has placed on the docket, but has yet to adjudicate.

Paxton argues that the four states’ declaring Biden the winner is “unlawful†and should be reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control all four state legislatures.

The Supreme Court has given the four states until Thursday afternoon to file responses to Paxton's suit.